Research examining the quality of local planning often treats planning problems as isolated incidents occurring in public decision making. Comprehensive plans and policy statements are evolving instruments, undergoing continual revisions. This article examines the degree to which the quality of local plans changes over an eight-year period with respect to natural hazards mitigation. Jurisdictions in Florida and Washington were sampled in 1991 and in 1999 to determine the extent to which their plans’ hazard mitigation components changed and to identify factors driving communities to adopt stronger policies. Results indicate the plans of local jurisdictions improved and that legal reform, repetitive damage to property, and citizen participation can facilitate an adaptive learning process. This article discusses policy implications and provides recommendations for improving learning capabilities to prepare plans that prevent natural hazards.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baer, William C. 1997. General plan evaluation criteria: An approach to making better plans. Journal of the American Planning Association63 (3): 329-344.
2.
Berke, Philip, Jan Crawford, Jennifer Dixon, and Neil Erickson. 1998. Do co-operative environmental management mandates produce good plans? The New Zealand experience. Working paper. Chapel Hill, NC: Department of City and Regional Planning.
3.
Berke, Philip, and Steven French. 1994. The influence of state planning mandates on local plan quality. Journal of Planning Education and Research13 (4): 237-250.
4.
Berke, Philip, Dale Roenigk, Edward Kaiser, and Raymond Burby. 1996. Enhancing plan quality: Evaluating the role of state planning mandates for natural hazard mitigation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management39: 79-96.
5.
Birkland, T. A. 1998. After disaster: Agenda setting, public policy, and focusing events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
6.
Brody, Samuel. 2001. Public participation in the city of Fort Lauderdale comprehensive plan: A constituency model of planning making. Chapel Hill, NC: Center for Urban and Regional Studies.
7.
Brody, Samuel. 2003. Examining the impacts of stakeholder participation in watershed approaches to planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research22 (4): 107-119.
8.
Brody, Samuel, David Godschalk, and Ray Burby. 2003. Mandating citizen participation in plan-making: Six strategic choices. Journal of the American Planning Association69 (3): 245-265.
9.
Burby, Raymond J. 2003. Making plans that matter: Citizen involvement and government action. Journal of the American Planning Association69 (1): 33-49.
10.
Burby, Raymond J., and Linda Dalton. 1994. Plans can matter! The role of land use plans and state planning mandates in limiting the development of hazardous areas. Public Administrative Review54 (3): 229-237.
11.
Burby, Raymond J., and Peter May. 1998. Intergovernmental environmental planning: Addressing the commitment conundrum. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management41 (1): 95-110.
12.
Burby, Raymond J., and Peter May, with Philip Berke, Linda Dalton, Stephen French, and Edward Kaiser. 1997. Making governments plan: State experiments in managing land use. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
13.
Chapin, S., and E. Kaiser. 1979. Urban land use planning. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
14.
Godschalk, David R., Timothy Beatley, Philip Berke, David Brower, and Edward Kaiser. 1999. Natural hazard mitigation. Washington, DC: Island Press.
15.
Godschalk, David R., Edward Kaiser, and Philip Berke. 1998.Integrating hazard mitigation and local land-use planning. In Cooperating with nature, edited by Raymond Burby. Washington, DC: John Henry Press.
16.
Habermas, Jurgen. 1984. The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society. Translated by T. McCarty. Boston: Beacon.
17.
Hall, Peter A. 1993. Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics25 (April): 275-295.
18.
Helco, Hugh. 1978. Modern social politics in Britain and Sweden. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19.
Hoch, Charles. 1998. Evaluating plan pragmatically. Paper presented at the 40th Annual Conference, Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, Pasadena, CA, November 5.
20.
Holling, C. S., ed. 1978. Adaptive environmental assessment and management. New York: John Wiley.
21.
Holling, C. S., ed. 1995. What barriers? What bridges? In Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions, edited by Lance Gunderson, C. S. Holling, and Stephen S. Light, 3-34. New York: Columbia University Press.
22.
Holling, C. S., ed. 1996. Surprise for science, resilience for ecosystems, and incentives for people. Ecological Applications6 (3): 733-735.
23.
Innes, Judith Eleanor. 1990. Knowledge and public policy: The search for meaningful indicators. 2nd ed. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing.
24.
Innes, Judith, J. Gruber, M. Nueman, and R. Thompson. 1994. Coordinating growth and environmental management through consensus building. CPS Brief6 (4): 1-8.
25.
Kaiser, Edward J., David R. Godschalk, and F. Stuart Chapin. 1995. Urban land use planning. 4th ed. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
26.
Lee, Kai N. 1993. Compass and gyroscope: Integrating science and politics for the environment. Washington, DC: Island Press.
27.
Lee, R. G. 1992. Ecologically effective social organization as a requirement for sustaining watershed ecosystems. In Watershed management: Balancing sustainability and environmental change, edited by R. J. Naiman. New York: Springer-Verlag.
28.
Lessard, Gene. 1998. An adaptive approach to planning and decision-making. Landscape and Urban Planning40: 81-87.
29.
Lindell, M. K., and C. Prater. 2000. Household adoption of seismic hazard adjustments: A comparison of residents in two states. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters18 (2): 317-338.
30.
Lowry, K., P. Adler, and N. Milner. 1997. Participating the public: Group process, politics, and planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research16: 177-187.
31.
May, Peter J. 1992a. Policy learning and failure. Journal of PublicPolicy12 (4): 331-354.
32.
May, Peter J. 1992b. Reconsidering policy design: Policies and publics. Journal of Public Policy11 (pt. 2): 187-206.
33.
May, Peter J. 1998. Fostering policy learning: A challenge for public administrators. Seattle: University ofWashington, Department of Political Science.
34.
Sacks, Paul. 1980. State structure and the asymmetrical society.Comparative Politics12 (3): 349-376.
35.
Schön, Donald A. 1983. The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
36.
Talen, Emily. 1996. Do plans get implemented? A review of evaluation in planning. Journal of Planning Literature10 (3): 248-259.
37.
Turner, Ralph, Joeanne Nigg, and Denise Paz. 1986. Waiting for disaster: Earthquake watch in California. Berkeley: University of California Press.
38.
Ventriss, Curtis, and Jeff Luke. 1988. Organizational learning and public policy: Towards a substantive perspective. American Review of Public Administration18 (4): 327-357.
39.
Weir, Margaret, and Theda Skocpol. 1985. State structures and the possibilities for “Keynesian” responses to the Great Depression in Sweden, Britain and the United States. In Bringing the state back in, edited by Peter Evans et al., 107-168. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Westley, Frances. 1995. Governing design: The management of social systems and ecosystems management. In Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions, edited by Lance Gunderson, C. S. Holling, and Stephen S. Light, 391-427. New York: Columbia University Press.
