Gray, B. 1989. Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
Gray, B. 1997. Framing and reframing of intractable environmental disputes. In Research on negotiation in organizations, vol. 6, edited by R. Lewicki, R. Bies, and B. Sheppard. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
3.
Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica47: 263-289.
4.
Kaufman, S., and J. Smith. 1999. Framing and reframing in land use change conflicts. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research16 (2): 164-180.
5.
Lewicki, R., D. Sanders, and J. Minton. 1999. Negotiation. Burr Ridge, IL: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
6.
Minsky, M. 1975. A framework for representing knowledge. In The psychology of computer vision, edited by P. H. Winston, 177-211. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7.
Neale, M. A., and M. H. Bazerman. 1985. The effects of framing and negotiator overconfidence on bargaining behaviors and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal28: 34-49.
8.
Pinkley, R. L. 1990. Dimensions of conflict frame: Disputant interpretations of conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology75: 117-126.
9.
Shmueli, D., and M. Ben-Gal. 2002. Framing environmental disputes, pilot final report, vol. 1: Frames as a tool for analysis and evaluation of environmental conflicts. Paper prepared for the Israeli Ministry of Environment, January.
10.
Shmueli, D., and M. Ben-Gal. Forthcoming. The potential of framing in managing and resolving environmental conflict. In Advancing sustainability at the sub-national level, edited by E. Feitelson, G. de Roo, and D. Miller. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
11.
Tannen, D. 1979. What’s in a frame? Surface evidence of underlying expectations. In New dimensions in discourse processes, edited by R. Freedle, 137-181. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
12.
Taylor, D. E. 2000. The rise of the environmental justice paradigm: Injustice framing and the social construction of environmental discourses. American Behavioral Scientist43 (4): 508-580.
13.
Vaughan, E., and M. Seifert. 1992. Variability in the framing of risk issues. Journal of Social Issues48 (4): 119-135.
14.
Watzlawick, P., J. Weakland, and R. Fisch. 1974. Change, principles of problem formation and problem resolution. New York: Norton.
