This article examines Australian indigenous participation in environmental planning to challenge some of the claims made by advocates of more participatory modes of planning. Calls for the enhanced participation of civil society in planning are associated with an international trend toward the decentralization and devolution of many areas of natural resource policy and state responsibility. Democratic decentralization has been widely advocated as being more efficient and equitable than state control. These claims are examined with reference to three stories involving environmental planning and Australian indigenous peoples. The stories suggest that rather than a “new political economy of planning” whereby the spaces for democracy are enlarged by the activities of civil society, the participation of civil society and decentralization can result in political processes whereby public deliberation is suborned by interest group politics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abers, Rebecca. 2000. Inventing local democracy: Grassroots politics in Brazil. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner .
2.
Agrawal, Arun. 2000. Small is beautiful, but is larger better? Forest management institutions in the Kumaon Himalaya, India. In People and forests: Communities, institutions, and governance, edited by Clark C. Gibson, Margaret A. McKean, and Elinor Ostrom, 57-86. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
3.
Agrawal, Arun, and Clark C. Gibson. 1999. Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation . World Development27 (4): 629-649 .
4.
Agrawal, Arun, and Jesse Ribot. 1999. Accountability in decentralization: A framework with South Asian and West African cases . The Journal of Developing Areas33: 473-502 .
5.
Amy, Douglass. 1987. The politics of environmental mediation. New York: Columbia University Press .
6.
Arnstein, Sherry R. 1969. Ladder of citizen participation . Journal of American Institute of Planners35: 216-224 .
7.
Beatley, Timothy, David J. Brower, and William. H. Lucy. 1994. Representation in comprehensive planning: An analysis of the Austinplan process . Journal of the American Planning Association60 (2): 185-196 .
8.
Benhabib, Seyla. 1996. Introduction: The democratic moment and the problem of difference. In Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political, edited by Seyla Benhabib, 3-19. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
9.
Berger, Peter L., and Richard John Neuhaus. 2000. To empower people: From state to civil society. In The essential civil society reader: The classic essays, edited by Don E. Eberly, 143-182. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield .
10.
Brennan, Frank. 1992. Land rights Queensland style: The struggle for Aboriginal self-management. Brisbane, Australia: University of Queensland Press .
11.
Brick, Philip, Donald Snow, and Sarah van de Wetering, eds. 2001. Across the great divide: Explorations in collaborative conservation and the American West. Washington, DC: Island .
12.
Commonwealth of Australia. 1995. Regional forest agreements: The commonwealth position. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia .
13.
Cortner, Hanna J., and Margaret A. Moote. 1999. The politics of ecosystem management. Washington, DC: Island .
14.
Curtis, Allan, and Michael Lockwood. 2000. Landcare and catchment management in Australia: Lessons for state-sponsored community participation . Society and Natural Resources13 (1): 61-73 .
15.
Dargavel, John. 1998. Politics, policy and process in the forests . Australian Journal of Environmental Management5: 25-30 .
Doyle, Timothy, and Aynsley Kellow. 1995. Environmental politics and policy making in Australia. Melbourne: Macmillan Education Australia .
18.
Dyck, Noel, 1992. Aboriginal peoples and nation states: An introduction to the analytical issues. In Indigenous peoples and the nation-state: Fourth world politics in Canada, Australia, and Norway, edited by Noel Dyck, 2-36. St. Johns, Canada: Institute of Social and Economic Research, Memorial University of Newfoundland .
19.
Eberly, Don E. 2000. The meaning, origins, and applications of civil society. In The essential civil society reader: The classic essays, edited by Don E. Eberley, 3-30. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield .
20.
Economou, N. 1992. Resource security legislation and national environmental policy: New objectives, old dynamics . Current Affairs Bulletin March: 72-76 .
21.
Ehrenberg, John. 1999. Civil society: A critical history of an idea. New York: New York University Press .
22.
Fainstein, Susan S. 2000. New directions in planning theory . Urban Affairs Review35 (4): 451-478 .
23.
Faludi, Andreas. 1973. A reader in planning theory. Oxford, UK: Pergamon .
24.
Fischer, Frank. 2000. Citizens, experts, and the environment: The politics of local knowledge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press .
25.
Forester, John. 1989. Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press .
26.
Fox, Jonothon. 1994. The difficult transition from clientelism to citizenship: Lessons from Mexico . World Politics46: 151-184 .
27.
Freemuth, J. 1996. The emergence of ecosystem management: Reinterpreting the gospel? Society and Natural Resources9 (4): 411-418 .
28.
Friedmann, John. 1973. Retracking America: A theory of transactive planning. New York: Doubleday Anchor .
29.
Friedmann, John. 1992. Empowerment: The politics of alternative development. Cambridge, UK: Blackwell .
30.
Friedmann, John. 1993. Toward a non-Euclidian mode of planning . Journal of the American Planning Association59 (4): 482-485 .
31.
Friedmann, John. 1998. The new political economy of planning: The rise of civil society. In Cities for citizens: Planning and the rise of civil society in a global age, edited by Mike Douglass and John Friedmann, 19-35. Chichester, UK: John Wiley .
32.
Galligan, B., and Lynch, G. 1992. Integrating conservation and development: Australia's Resource Assessment Commission and the testing case of Coronation Hill . Environmental and Planning Law Journal9: 181-192 .
33.
Gibson, Clark C., Margaret A. McKean, and Elinor Ostrom. 2000. Explaining deforestation: The role of local institutions. In People and forests: Communities, institutions, and governance, edited by Clark C. Gibson, Margaret A. McKean, and Elinor Ostrom, 1-26. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
34.
Hall, Peter. 1992. Urban and regional planning. 3d ed. London: Routledge .
35.
Hamel, Pierre, Henri Lustiger-Thaler, and Lousi Maheu, 1999. Is there a role for social movements? In Sociology for the twenty-first century: Continuities and cutting edges, edited by Janet L. Abu-Lughod, 165-182. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
36.
Healey, Patsy. 1992. Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory . Town Planning Review63 (2): 143-162 .
Holsten, James. 1998. Spaces of insurgent citizenship. In Making the invisible visible: A multicultural planning history, edited by Leonie Sandercock, 37-56. Berkeley: University of California Press .
Howitt, Richard, John Connell, and Phillip Hirsch. 1996. Resources, nations and indigenous peoples. In Resources, nations and indigenous peoples: Case studies from Australasia, Melanesia and Southeast Asia, edited by Richard Howitt, John Connell, and Phillip Hirsch, 1-31. Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press .
41.
Hutchcroft, P. D. 2001. Centralization and decentralization in administration and politics: Assessing territorial dimensions of power and authority . Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration14 (1): 23-53 .
42.
Hyman, E. L., and B. Stiftel. 1988. Combining facts and values in environmental impact assessment: Theories and techniques. Boulder, CO: Westview .
43.
Jackson, Sue. 1997. A disturbing story: The fiction of rationality in land use planning in Aboriginal Australia . Australian Planner34 (4): 221-226 .
44.
Kingsbury, B. 1998. “Indigenous peoples” in international law: A constructivist approach to the Asian controversy . American Journal of International Law92 (3): 414-457 .
45.
Kirkpatrick, J. 1998. Nature conservation and the regional forest agreement process . Australian Journal of Environmental Management5: 31-37 .
46.
Kuhnle, Stein, and Per Selle. 1992. Government and voluntary organizations: A relational perspective. In Government and voluntary organizations: A relational perspective, edited by Stein Kuhnle and Per Selle, 21. Aldershot, UK: Avebury .
47.
Lane, Marcus B. 1998. Reviewing the regional forest agreement experience: The “wicked problem” of common property forests . Presented at Regional Forest Agreements and the Public Interest: A National Symposium, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, 16 July. Retrieved from http://sres.anu.edu.au/associated/rfasymposium/speakers/lane.html.
48.
Lane, Marcus B. 1999a. Indigenous land management: Towards a new approach. Report commissioned by the Indigenous Land Corporation. Canberra, Australia: Indigenous Land Corporation .
49.
Lane, Marcus B. 1999b. Indigenous peoples and resource planning in northern Australia: Re-shaping or reproducing existing practice? Plurimondi2: 181-192 .
50.
Lane, Marcus B. 1999c. Regional forest agreements: Resolving resource conflicts or managing resource politics? Australian Geographical Studies37 (2): 142-153 .
51.
Lane, Marcus B. 2000. Indigenous land management—Towards a new approach: Evaluation of indigenous participation in and access to land management programs in Australia. Report commissioned by the Indigenous Land Corporation as Part of the National Indigenous Land Management Project. Adelaide, Australia: Indigenous Land Corporation .
52.
Lane, Marcus B. 2002. Buying back and caring for country: Institutional arrangements and possibilities for indigenous lands management in Australia . Society and Natural Resources15: 827-846 .
53.
Lane, Marcus B., and S. Cowell. 2002. Land and resource planning and indigenous interests: Reproducing or transforming the social relations of resource use. In The power of planning: Spaces of control and transformation, edited by O. Yiftachel, J. Little, D. Hedgecock, and I. Alexander, 155-170. London: Kluwer Academic .
54.
Leach, Melissa, Robin Mearns, and Ian Scoones. 1999. Environmental entitlements: Dynamics and institutions in community-based natural resource management . World Development27 (2): 225-247 .
55.
Libby, Ronald T. 1989. Hawkes law: The politics of mining and Aboriginal land rights in Australia. Nedlands: University of Western Australia Press .
56.
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1995. Malaise and resiliency in America . Journal of Democracy6 (3): 4-18 .
57.
McConnell, Grant. 1966. Private power & American democracy. New York: Knopf .
Nursey-Bray, M. 1999. Community histories and participation in environmental management. In Australian environmental history: Essays and cases, edited by S. Dovers, 165-191. Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press .
60.
Perry, Richard J. 1996. A long view. In From time immemorial: Indigenous peoples and state systems, edited by R. Perry, 3-24. Austin: University of Texas Press .
61.
Pharr, Susan J., and Robert D. Putnam, eds. 2000. Disaffected democracies: What's troubling the trilateral countries? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
62.
Pritchard, Lowell, Jr., and Steven E. Sanderson. 2002. The dynamics of political discourse in seeking sustainability. In Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems, edited by L. H. Gunderson and C. S. Holling, 147-172. Washington, DC: Island .
63.
Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
64.
Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster .
65.
Queensland Government. 1997: Regional forest agreements in Queensland—An information kit. Indooroopilly, Australia: Queensland Government .
66.
Queensland Government. 1999. Queensland government NHT bid 1999. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland Government .
67.
Rangan, Haripriya. 1999. Bitter-sweet liaisons in a contentious democracy: Radical planning through state agency in postcolonial India . Plurimondi2: 47-66 .
68.
Rangan, Haripriya, and Marcus B. Lane. 2001. Indigenous peoples and forest management: Comparative analysis of institutional approaches in Australia and India . Society and Natural Resources14 (2): 145-160 .
69.
Reynolds, Henry. 1998. This whispering in our hearts. St. Leonards, Australia: Allen & Unwin .
70.
Ribot, Jesse C. 1999. Decentralisation, participation and accountability in Sahelian forestry: Legal instruments of political-administrative control . Africa69 (1): 23-64 .
71.
Richardson, Benjamin J., Donna Craig, and Ben Boer. 1995: Regional agreements for indigenous lands and cultures in Canada: A discussion paper. Darwin: North Australia Research Unit .
72.
Ross, H., E. Young, and L. Liddle. 1994. Mabo: An inspiration for Australian land management . Australian Journal of Environmental Management1 (1): 24-41 .
73.
Sandel, Michael J. 2000. Democracy's discontent: The procedural republic. In The essential civil society reader: The classic essays, edited by Don E. Eberley, 269-304. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield .
74.
Sandercock, Leonie. 1998. Towards cosmopolis: Planning for multicultural cities. Chichester, UK: John Wiley .
75.
Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press .
76.
Snow, Donald. 2001. Coming home: An introduction to collaborative conservation. In Across the great divide: Explorations in collaborative conservation and the American West, edited by Philip Brick, Donald Snow, and Sarah van de Wetering, 1-12. Washington, DC: Island .
77.
Stephenson, M. A., and Suri Ratnapala, eds. 1993. Mabo: A judicial revolution: The Aboriginal land rights decision and its impact on Australian law. Brisbane, Australia: University of Queensland Press .
78.
Taylor, John 1998. Indigenous participation in conservation and land management programs. Consultancy report for the Biological Diversity Advisory Council. Canberra: Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Australian National University .
79.
Tendler, Judith. 1997. Good government in the tropics. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press .
80.
Toyne, Phillip 1994. The reluctant nation: Environment, law and politics in Australia. Sydney, Australia: ABC Books .
81.
Weber, Edward P. 1998. Pluralism by the rules: Conflict and cooperation in environmental regulation. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press .
82.
Wondolleck, Julia M., and Steven L. Yaffee. 2000. Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island .
83.
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
