This article argues that the search for a theory of good city form should be given a more prominent place in planning theory alongside theories of planning as a process. The professional practice of city and regional planning requires well-validated, durable criteria for successful outcomes. Fortunately, many recent developments in philosophy, science, political theory, and the arts challenge the postmodern relativism that has deflected attention away from normative theory toward procedural issues. The authors argue that planners should take advantage of these new ideas and launch a renewed quest for the elements of good city form.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
122 (May): 58-61.
2.
Alexander, Christopher . 1979. The timeless way of building. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
Alexander, C. , S. Ishikawa, M. Silverstein, M. Jacobson, I. Fiksdahl-King, and S. Angel. 1977. A pattern language. New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
Alexander, C. , H. Neis, A. Anninou, and I. King. 1987. A new theory of urban design. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
Arendt, Hannah . 1958. The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
Argyros, Alexander . 1991. A blessed rage for order: Deconstruction, evolution, and chaos. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
7.
Barnett, Jonathan . 1995. The fractured metropolis: Improving the new city, restoring the old city, reshaping the region. New York: HarperCollins.
8.
Beatley, Timothy , and Kristy Manning. 1997. The ecology of place: Planning for environment, ecology, and community. Washington, DC: Island Press.
9.
Beauregard, Robert A.1995. Edge critics. Journal of Planning Education and Research14: 163-166.
10.
Beiner, Ronald . 1992. What’s the matter with liberalism?Berkeley: University of California Press.
11.
Beiner, Ronald . 1997. Philosophy in a time of lost spirit: Essays on contemporary theory. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
12.
Benfield, F. Kaid , Matthew D. Raimi, and Donald D. T. Chen. 1999. Once there were greenfields: How urban sprawl is undermining America’s environment, economy, and social fabric. Washington, DC: Natural Resources Defense Council and Surface Transportation Policy Project.
13.
Bess, Philip . 2000. Inland architecture: Subterranean essays on moral order and formal order in Chicago. Oxford, OH: Interalia/Design Books.
14.
Bhaskar, Roy.1994. Plato etc.: The problems of philosophy and their resolution. London: Verso.
15.
Blake, Peter . 1977. Form follows fiasco: Why modern architecture hasn’t worked. Boston: Little, Brown.
16.
Brolin, Brent C.1976. The failure of modern architecture. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
17.
Brooks, Michael P.1988. Four critical junctures in the history of the urban planning profession. Journal of the American Planning Association54: 241-248.
18.
Chase, John , Margaret Crawford, and John Kaliski. 1999. Everyday urbanism. New York: Monacelli Press.
19.
Clay, Grady . 1994. Real places: An unconventional guide to America’s generic landscape. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Congress for the New Urbanism . 2000. Charter of the New Urbanism. New York: McGraw-Hill.
21.
Conte, Christopher R.2000. The boys of sprawl. Governing, May, pp. 28-33.
22.
Cox, Wendell . 1999. The president’s new sprawl initiative: A program in search of a problem (Heritage Foundation Backgrounder, Executive Summary no. 1263). Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation.
23.
Crawford, Margaret . 1999. Introduction. In Everyday urbanism, edited by John Chase, Margaret Crawford, and John Kaliski, 8-15. New York: Monacelli Press.
Dagenhart, Richard , and David Sawicki. 1994. If (urban) design is everything, maybe it’s nothing. Journal of Planning Education and Research13: 146-148.
26.
DeGrove, John M.1991. Balanced growth: A planning guide for local government. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
27.
Duany, Andres , Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk, and Jeff Speck. 2000. Suburban nation: The rise of sprawl and the decline of the American dream. New York: North Point Press.
28.
Dyck, Robert G.1994. Discipline vs. profession: A comment on the meaning of design. Journal of Planning Education ad Research13: 143-146.
29.
Etzioni, Amitai . 1993. The spirit of community: Rights, responsibilities, and the communitarian agenda. New York: Crown.
30.
Etzioni, Amitai . 1996. The golden rule: Community and morality in a democratic society. New York: Basic Books.
31.
Ewing, Reid . 1997. Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable?Journal of the American Planning Association63: 107-126.
32.
Fainstein, Susan S.2000. New directions in planning theory. Urban Affairs Review35: 451-478.
33.
Falconer Al-Hindi, Karen , and Caedmon Staddon. 1997. The hidden histories and geographies of neotraditional town planning: The case of Seaside, Florida. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space15: 349-372.
34.
Frampton, Kenneth . 1979. The status of man and the status of his objects: A reading of The human condition.In Hannah Arendt: The recovery of the public world, edited by Melvyn A. Hill, 101-130. New York: St. Martin’s.
35.
Frey, Hildebrand . 1999. Designing the city: Towards a more sustainable urban form. New York: Routledge.
36.
Frohnen, Bruce . 1996. The new communitarians and the crisis of liberalism. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
37.
George, R. Varkki . 1997. A procedural explanation for contemporary urban design. Journal of Urban Design2 (2): 143-161.
38.
Gleick, James . 1987. Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Penguin.
39.
Gordon, Peter , and Harry W. Richardson. 1997. Are compact cities a desirable planning goal?Journal of the American Planning Association63: 95-106.
40.
Greenberg, Mike . 1995. The poetics of cities. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.
41.
Greene, Sherwin . 1992. Cityshape: Communicating and evaluating community design. Journal of the American Planning Association58: 177-200.
42.
Harries, Karsten . 1997. The ethical function of architecture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43.
Harvey, David . 1997. The New Urbanism and the communitarian trap. Harvard Design Magazine, Winter/Spring, pp. 68-69.
44.
Hays, K. Michael . 1998. Architecture theory since 1968. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45.
Hill, David R.1985. Lewis Mumford’s ideas on the city. Journal of the American Planning Association51: 407-421.
46.
Hill, David R.1988. Jane Jacobs’ ideas on big, diverse cities: A review and commentary. Journal of the American Planning Association54: 302-314.
47.
Holston, James . 1989. The modernist city: An anthropological critique of Brasilia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48.
Jacobs, Jane . 1961. The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.
49.
Kelbaugh, Douglas . 1997. Common place: Toward neighborhood and regional design. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
50.
Kelbaugh, Douglas . 2000. Three paradigms: New Urbanism, everyday urbanism, post urbanism— An excerpt from The essential common place. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society20 (4): 285-289.
51.
Kostof, Spiro . 1991. The city shaped: Urban patterns and meanings through history. Boston: Little, Brown.
52.
Kostof, Spiro . 1992. The city assembled: The element of urban form through history. Boston: Little, Brown.
53.
Kreditor, Alan . 1990. The neglect of urban design in the American academic succession. Journal of Planning Education ad Research9: 155-163.
54.
Krier, Leon . 1984. Organic vs. mechanical composition. In Leon Krier: Houses, palaces, cities, edited by D. Porphyrios, 110-111. London: Architectural Design.
55.
Krier, Leon . 1992. The reconstruction of the European city: 1978-1984. In Leon Krier: Architecture and urban design: 1967-1992, edited by R. Economakis, 16-21. London: Academy Editions.
56.
Krier, Leon . 1998. Architecture: Choice or fate?Windsor, Berks, UK: Andreas Papadakis.
57.
Kunstler, James Howard . 1996. Home from nowhere. New York: Simon & Schuster.
58.
Lang, Jon.1994. Urban design: The American experience. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
59.
Lasch, Christopher . 1991. The true and only heaven: Progress and its critics. New York: Norton.
60.
Lasch, Christopher . 1995. The revolt of the elites and the betrayal of democracy. New York: Norton.
61.
Levy, John M.1992. What has happened to planning?Journal of the American Planning Association58: 81-84.
62.
Lofland, Lyn H.1998. The public realm: Exploring the city’s quintessential social territory. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
63.
Luccarelli, Mark . 1995. Lewis Mumford and the ecological region: The politics of planning. New York: Guilford.
64.
Lucy, William H.1994. If planning includes too much, maybe it should include more. Journal of the American Planning Association60: 305-318.
65.
Lynch, Kevin . 1980. City design. Urban Design International1 (2): 48.
66.
Lynch, Kevin . 1981. Good city form. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
67.
MacIntyre, Alasdair . 1984. After virtue. 2d ed.Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
68.
Mandelbaum, Seymour J. , Luigi Mazza, and Robert Burchell, eds. 1996. Explorations in planning theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University.
69.
McCann, Eugene J.1995. Neotraditional developments: The anatomy of a new urban form. Urban Geography16: 210-233.
70.
McMylor, Peter . 1994. Alasdair MacIntyre: Critic of modernity. London: Routledge.
71.
Montgomery, John . 1998. Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design3 (1): 93-116.
72.
Moudon, Anne Vernez . 2000. Proof of goodness: A substantive basis for new urbanism?Places13 (2): 38-43.
73.
Mulhall, Stephen , and Adam Swift. 1992. Liberals and communitarians. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
74.
Nasar, Jack L.1998. The evaluative image of the city. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
75.
Nelessen, Anton C.1994. Visions for a new American dream. Chicago: American Planning Association.
76.
Neuman, Michael . 1998. Planning, governing, and the image of the city. Journal of Planning Education and Research18: 61-71.
77.
Newman, Peter , and Jeffrey Kenworthy. 1999. Sustainability and cities: Overcoming automobile dependence. Washington, DC: Island Press.
78.
Norris, Christopher . 1996. Reclaiming truth: Contributions to a critique of cultural relativism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
79.
Norris, Christopher . 1997. Against relativism: Philosophy of science, deconstruction and critical theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
80.
1000 Friends of Minnesota. 2000. Smart growth principles for Minnesota. Retrieved from http://www.1000fom.org/.
81.
Parsons, Kermit C.1994. Collaborative genius: The Regional Planning Association of America. Journal of the American Planning Association60: 462-482.
82.
Pincoffs, Edmund L.1986. Quandaries and virtues: Against reductivism in ethics. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
83.
Platt, Rutherford H. , Rowan A. Rowntree, and Pamela C. Muick, eds. 1994. The ecological city: Preserving and restoring urban biodiversity. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
84.
Poulton, M. C.1991. The case for a positive theory of planning. Part 1: What is wrong with planning theory?Environment and Planning B18: 225-232.
85.
Rapp, Carl . 1998. Fleeing the universal: The critique of post-rational criticism. Albany: State University of New York Press.
86.
Rentschler, Ingo , Barbara Herzberger, and David Epstein. 1988. Beauty and the brain: Biological aspects of aesthetics. Basel, Germany: Burkhauser.
87.
Salingaros, Nikos A.1998. Theory of the urban web. Journal of Urban Design3 (1): 53-71.
88.
Salingaros, Nikos A. , and Bruce J. West. 1999. A universal rule for the distribution of sizes. Environment and Planning B26: 909-923.
89.
Sandel, Michael J.1996. Democracy’s discontent: America in search of a public philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
90.
(Reprint, New York: Dover Publications, 1955)
91.
Smith, Peter F.1977. The syntax of cities. London: Hutchinson.
92.
Solomon, Daniel . 1992. ReBuilding. New York: Princeton University Press.
93.
Soltan, Margaret . 1996. Deconstruction and architecture. In Reconstructing architecture: Critical discourses and social practices, edited by Thomas A. Dutton and Lian Hurst Mann, 234-258. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
94.
Staley, Samuel R.1999. The sprawling of America: In defense of the dynamic city (Policy Study no. 251). Los Angeles: Reason Public Policy Institute. Available from www.rppr.org/ps251.html.
95.
Sternberg, Ernest . 2000. An integrative theory of urban design. Journal of the American Planning Association66: 265-278.
96.
Sussman, Carl , ed. 1976. Planning the fourth migration: The neglected vision of the Regional Planning Association of America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
97.
Thompson-Fawcett, Michelle . 1998. Leon Krier and the organic revival within urban policy and practice. Plannig Perspectives13: 167-194.
98.
Turner, Frederick . 1991a. Beauty: The value of values. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
99.
Turner, Frederick . 1991b. Rebirth of value: Meditations on beauty, ecology, religion, and education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
100.
Turner, Frederick . 1995. The culture of hope: A new birth of the classical spirit. New York: Free Press.
101.
Turner, Frederick . 2000. Stealing “beauty.”American Arts Quarterly. 17 (1): 30-34, 43.
102.
Waldrop, H. Mitchell . 1992. Complexity: The emerging science of order and chaos. New York: Simon & Schuster/Touchstone.
103.
Walter, Eugene Victor . 1988. Placeways: A theory of the human environment. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
104.
Watkin, David . 1977. Morality and architecture. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
105.
Wojtowicz, Robert . 1998. Lewis Mumford and American modernism: Eutopian theories for architecture and urban planning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
