Annual changes in the amount and location of residential fringe development in metropolitan Phoenix are tracked from 1990 to 1998 using local records of housing completions. New development covered a wide geographic area in 1990 but became more geographically concentrated with time. Metropolitan Phoenix is organized into five belts: (1) an outer rural zone, (2) an area of pioneer settlement where the construction of single-family housing began in 1990, (3) a peak zone of intensive development, (4) a zone of infill, and (5) a built-up area where little new construction occurs. Multiple-family housing construction occurs primarily in the infill zone. Between 1995 and 1998, new home construction moved outward at the pace of almost one-half mile per year to an average distance of 18.94 miles from the metropolitan center. Planners can use information about the size, shape, type, and timing of urban fringe development to anticipate infrastructure and service needs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arizona Real Estate Center. 1999. Annual construction reports. Tempe: Arizona State University, College of Business, L. William Seidman Research Institute.
2.
Beesley, K. B., and L. H. Russwurn, eds. 1981. The rural-urban fringe: Canadian perspectives. Geographical monographs. Waterloo, Canada: York University, Department of Geography.
3.
Blumenfeld, H.1954. The tidal wave of metropolitan expansion. Journal of the American Institute of Planners10:3-14.
4.
Boyce, R. R.1966. The edge of the metropolis: The wave theory analog approach. Vancouver: University of British Columbia, Department of Geography.
5.
Brown, H. J., R. S. Phillips, and N. A. Roberts. 1981. Land markets at the urban fringe: New insights for policy makers. Journal of the American Planning Association47 (2): 131-144.
6.
Bryant, C. R.1995. The role of local actors in transforming the urban fringe. Journal of Rural Studies11 (3): 255-267.
7.
Bryant, C. R., L. H. Russwurm, and A. G. McLellan. 1982. The city’s countryside: Land and its management in the rural-urban fringe. London: Longman.
8.
Clawson, M.1971. Suburban land conversion in the United States. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press for Resources for the Future.
9.
Conzen, M. P. 1968. Fringe location land uses: Relict patterns in Madison, Wisconsin. Paper presented at the nineteenth annual meeting of the West Lakes Division of the Association of American Geographers, 18 October, Madison, WI.
10.
Conzen, M.R.G.1960. Alnwick, Northumberland: A study in town-plan analysis. London: Institute of British Geographers.
11.
Daniels, T.1999. When city and country collide: Managing growth in the metropolitan fringe. Washington, DC: Island Press.
12.
Evans, S., and R. Mabbitt. 1997. Redefining the urban fringe. Town and Country Planning66 (2): 56-57.
13.
Firey, W.1946. Ecological considerations in planning for urban fringes. American Sociological Review11:411-423.
14.
Gammage, G.1999. Phoenix in perspective: Reflections on developing the desert. Tempe: Arizona State University, College of Architecture and Environmental Design, the Herberger Center for Design Excellence.
15.
Gober, P.1998. The demographics of urban growth. In Growth in Arizona: The machine in the garden, edited by J. S. Hall, N. J. Cayer, and N. Welch, 30-36. Tempe: Arizona State University, Morrison Institute for Public Policy.
16.
Gober, P., E. K. Burns, K. Knowles-Yanez, and J. James. 1998. Rural to urban land conversion in metropolitan Phoenix. In Growth in Arizona: The machine in the garden, edited by J. S. Hall, N. J. Cayer, and N. Welch, 40-45. Tempe: Arizona State University, Morrison Institute for Public Policy.
17.
Gore, T., and D. Nicholson. 1991. Models of the land-development process: A critical review. Environment and Planning A:23:705-730.
18.
Hart, J. F.1991. The perimetropolitan bow wave. Geographical Review81 (1): 35-51.
19.
Healey, P., S. Davoudi, M. O’Toole, S. Tabsanoglu, and D. Usher, eds. 1992. Rebuilding the city: Property-led urban regeneration. London: Spon.
20.
Healey, P., P. McNamara, P. Elson, and A. Doak. 1988. Land use planning and the mediation of urban change: The British planning system in practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Hepner, G. F. (1983). An analysis of residential developer location factors in a fast growth urban region. Urban Geography4 (4): 355-363.
22.
Kaiser, E. J., and S. F. Weiss. 1970. Public policy and the residential development process. Journal of the American Planning Association36 (1): 30-37.
23.
Luckingham, B.1989. Phoenix: The history of a southwestern metropolis. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
24.
McMillen, D. P.1989. An empirical model of urban fringe land use. Land Economics65 (2): 138-145.
25.
Pacione, M.1990. Private profit and public interest in the residential development process: A case study of conflict in the urban fringe. Journal of Rural Studies6 (1): 103-116.
26.
Pond, B., and M. Yeates. 1993. Rural/urban land conversion I: Estimating the direct and indirect impacts. Urban Geography14 (4): 323-347.
27.
Pond, B., and M. Yeates. 1994a. Rural/urban land conversion II: Identifying land in transition to urban use. Urban Geography15 (1): 25-44.
28.
Pond, B., and M. Yeates. 1994b. Rural/urban land conversion III: A technical note on leading indicators of urban land development. Urban Geography15 (2): 207-222.
29.
Sargent, C., ed. 1988. Metro Arizona. Scottsdale, AZ: Biffington Books.
30.
Thorson, J. A.1994. Zoning policy changes and the urban fringe land market. Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association22 (3): 527-538.
31.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1920. Census of agriculture, reports for states with statistics for counties and a summary for the United States and the North, South, and West. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
32.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 2000. County population estimates for July 1, 1999 and population change for April 1, 1990 to July 1, 1999 [online]. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Population Estimates Program, Population Division. Available from http://eire.census.gov/popest/archives/county/co-99-2/99C2_00.txt.
33.
Vance, J. E., Jr.1977. This scene of man: The role and structure of the city in the geography of Western civilization. New York: Harper’s College Press.
34.
Whitehand, J.W.R.1967. Fringe belts: A neglected aspect of urban geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers41:223-233.
35.
Whitehand, J.W.R.1987. The changing face of cities: A study of development cycles and urban form. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
