This article provides an answer to what has been called the biggest problem in theorizing and understanding planning: the ambivalence about power found among planning researchers, theorists, and students. The author narrates how he came to work with issues of power and gives an example of how the methodology he developed for power studies—phronetic planning research—may be employed in practice. Phronetic planning research follows the tradition of power studies running from Machiavelli and Nietzsche to Michel Foucault and Pierre Bourdieu. It focuses on four value-rational questions: (1) Where are we going with planning? (2) Who gains and who loses, and by which mechanisms of power? (3) Is this development desirable? (4) What should be done? These questions are exemplified for a specific instance of Scandinavian urban planning. The author finds that the questions, and their answers, make a difference to planning in practice. They make planning research matter.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abler, Ronald, John Adams, and Peter Gould. 1971. Spatial organization: The geographer’s view of the world. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
Bailey, Mary Timney. 1992. Do physicists use case studies? Thoughts on public administration research. Public Administration Review52 (1): 47-54.
3.
Bruzelius, Nils, Bent Flyvbjerg, and Werner Rothengatter. 1998. Big decisions, Big risks: Improving accountability in mega projects. International Review of Administrative Sciences64 (3): 423-440.
4.
Campbell, Donald T.1986. Science’s social system of validity-enhancing collective belief change and the problems of the social sciences. In Metatheory in social science: Pluralisms and subjectivities, edited by Donald W. Fiske and Richard A. Shweder, 108-135. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
Crush, Jonathan. 1994. Scripting the compound: Power and space in the South African mining industry. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space12 (3): 301-324.
6.
Fischler, Raphaël. 1998. Toward a genealogy of planning: Zoning and the welfare state. Planning Perspectives13 (4): 389-410.
7.
Flyvbjerg, Bent. 1991. 90’ernes trafikplanlægning for miljø, sundhed og bæredygtighed (Traffic planning in the 90s for environment, health, and sustainability). Miljø og Teknologi: Nordisk Tidsskrift for Miljøteknik, -forvaltning og -politik6 (1): 28-32.
8.
Flyvbjerg, Bent. 1992. Aristotle, Foucault and progressive phronesis: Outline of an applied ethics for sustainable development. Planning Theory7-8: 65-83.
9.
Flyvbjerg, Bent. 1993. Når demokratiet svigter rammes miljøet (When democracy fails, the environment is hurt). In Planera för en bärkraftig utveckling: 21 nordiska forskare ger sin syn, edited by Benny Kullinger and Ulla-Britt Strömberg, 187-197. Stockholm: Byggforskningsrådet.
10.
Flyvbjerg, Bent. 1996. The dark side of planning: Rationality and Realrationalität.In Explorations in planning theory, edited by Seymour J. Mandelbaum, Luigi Mazza, and Robert W. Burchell, 383-394. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research Press.
11.
Flyvbjerg, Bent. 1998a. Empowering civil society: Habermas, Foucault, and the question of conflict. In Cities for citizens: Planning and the rise of civil society in a global age, edited by Mike Douglass and John Friedmann, 185-211. New York: John Wiley.
12.
Flyvbjerg, Bent. 1998b. Rationality and power: Democracy in practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2001. Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Flyvbjerg, Bent, Nils Bruzelius, and Werner Rothengatter. Forthcoming. Megaprojects and risk: An anatomy of ambition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Flyvbjerg, Bent, and Tim Richardson. 1998. In search of the dark side of planning theory. Paper presented at the Third Oxford Conference on Planning Theory, 2-4 April 1998, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
16.
Forester, John. 1989. Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17.
Forester, John. 1999. The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lindblom, Charles. 1990. Inquiry and change: The troubled attempt to understand and shape society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
24.
Lindblom, Charles, and David K. Cohen. 1979. Usable knowledge: Social science and social problem solving. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25.
Miller, James. 1993. The passion of Michel Foucault. New York: Simon & Schuster.
26.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1968a. The anti-Christ. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
27.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1968b. The will to power. New York: Vintage.
28.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1969. On the genealogy of morals. New York: Vintage.
29.
Peattie, Lisa. 2001. Theorizing planning: Some comments on Bent Flyvbjerg’s Rationality and Power. International Planning Studies6 (3): 257-263.
30.
Petersen, Morten Rugtved. 1993. Byfornyelse: Bypolitik og beslutninger. Master’s thesis, Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
31.
Putnam, Robert D., with Robert Leonardi and Raffaella Y. Nanetti. 1993. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
Richardson, Tim, and Ole B. Jensen. 2000. Discourses of mobility and polycentric development: A contested view of European spatial planning. European Planning Studies8 (4): 503-520.
33.
Rorty, Richard. 1985. Habermas and Lyotard on postmodernity. In Habermas and modernity, edited by Richard J. Bernstein, 161-175. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.
Skamris, Mette K., and Bent Flyvbjerg. 1997. Inaccuracy of traffic forecasts and cost estimates on large transport projects. Transport Policy4 (3): 141-146.
35.
Technical Department City Center Group, Aalborg Municipality. 1974. Minutes of meeting. 1 November, Aalborg, Denmark.
36.
Yiftachel, Oren, and Margo Huxley. 2000. Debating dominance and relevance: Notes on the “communicative turn” in planning theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24 (3): 907-913.
