There are clear benefits to the urban free-way mode of transportation, including increased mobility and accessibility. Historically, however, they have often brought adverse impacts to the communities that they traverse. There are signs that the 1990s generation of urban freeways has been more environmentally sensitive to neighborhoods. This study tests success in urban transportation planning by evaluating the impacts of the Squaw Peak Parkway in Phoenix, Arizona. Strategies within four thematic areas characterizing urban freeway planning are examined to explain success. The household survey in adjacent neighborhoods suggests that most freeway impacts were successfully mitigated. The article concludes that important lessons were learned from the earlier decades of freeway building. At the same time, broader issues surrounding more sustainable forms of transportation were not explored, and the authors speculate that success was obtained at the project level but question the freeway’s success at the larger urban policy level.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arizona Department of Transportation . 1988. Progress report: Fiscal 1986-87. Phoenix, AZ: Author.
2.
Arizona Highway Department . 1972. Draft environmental statement for Interstate and Defense Highway 10. Phoenix, AZ: Federal Highway Administration.
3.
Bank of America . 1995. Beyond sprawl: New patterns of growth to fit the new California. San Francisco: Author.
4.
Beatley, Timothy , and Kristy Manning. 1997. The ecology of place: Planning for environment, economy, and community. Washington, DC: Island Press.
5.
Berman, Marshall . 1982. All that is solid melts into air: The experience of modernity. New York: Simon & Schuster.
6.
Blair, J. M. , K. D. Pijawka, and F. Steiner. 1998. Public art in mitigation planning: The experience of the Squaw Peak Parkway in Phoenix. Journal of the American Planning Association64 (2): 221-234.
7.
Burkhardt, Jon E.1971. Impact of highways on urban neighborhoods: A model of social change. Highway Research Record365: 85-94.
8.
Caro, Robert A.1975. Power broker. New York: Vintage.
9.
Christensen, K.1976. Social impacts of land development: An initial approach for estimating impacts on neighborhood usages and perceptions. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
10.
City of Phoenix . 1990. The Squaw Peak Parkway specific plan. Phoenix, AZ: Author.
11.
Crewe, Katherine. 1997. Landscape architects and citizen participation: A study of the Boston southwest corridor (1976-1986). Ph.D. diss., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
12.
Crewe, Katherine. 1999. Conversation with author, May.
13.
DeCorla-Souza, Patrick . 1997. Using benefit-cost analysis to evaluate the distribution of highway project benefits. Publication HEP 20. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
14.
DeWitt, John . 1994. Civic environmentalism: Alternatives to regulation in states and communities. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
15.
DiMento, J. E. , Sherry Ryan, and Drusilla van Hengel.1997. Local government land use policy responses to the century freeway/transitway. Journal of Planning Education and Research17 (2): 16-26.
16.
European Conference of Ministers of Transport . 1995. Urban travel and sustainable development. Paris: OECD.
17.
Federal Highway Administration . 1996. Community impact assessment. Publication FHWA-PD-96-036. Washington, DC: Author.
18.
Fitzimmons, S. J. , L. Stuart, and P. C. Wolff. 1977. Social assessment manual. Boulder, CO: Westview.
19.
Flynn, C. , J. Flynn, J. Chalmers, D. Pijawka, and K. Branch. 1983. An integrated methodology for large scale development projects. In Social impact assessment methods, edited by K. Finsterbusch, L. G. Llewellyn, and C. P. Wolf. London: Sage.
20.
Garreau, J.1991. Edge City: Life on the new frontier. New York: Doubleday.
21.
Garret, Mark , and Martin Wachs. 1996. Transportation planning on trial. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Giuliano, Genevieve . 1995. Land use impacts of transportation investments: Highway and transit. In The geography of urban transportation, edited by Susan Hanson. London: Guilford.
23.
Glynn, Thomas . 1977. Psychological sense of community: Measurement and application. Human Relations34 (7): 789-818.
24.
Goodman, Robert . 1971. After the planners. New York: Simon & Schuster.
25.
Halprin, Lawrence . 1966. Freeways. New York: Reinhold.
26.
Hanson, Susan . 1995. Getting there: Urban transportation in context. In The geography of urban transportation, edited by Susan Hanson. London: Guilford.
27.
Hodge, David . 1986. Social impacts of urban transportation decisions: Equity issues. In The geography of urban transportation, edited by Susan Hanson. London: Guilford.
28.
Judd, Dennis R. , and Todd Swanstrom. 1994. City politics: Private power and public policy. New York: HarperCollins.
29.
Krueckergerg, D. A. , and A. L. Silver. 1974. Urban planning analysis: Methods and models. New York: John Wiley.
30.
Lockwood, Charles . 1999. Going green. Planning (May): 16-18.
31.
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority . 1972. Southwest Boston transportation planning review: Draft EIS-FHWA-MASS-EIS-72/29/D. Boston: Author.
32.
Mills, F.1981. Effects of beltways on the location of residences and selected workplaces. Transportation Research Record812: 26-33.
33.
Mohring, Herbert . 1994. Introduction. In The economics of transport, edited by Herbert Mohring. Alderhot, UK: E. Elgar.
34.
Mohring, Herbert , and Mitchell Harwitz. 1962. Highway benefits: An analytical framework. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
35.
Morrison Institute for Public Policy . 1998. What matters in greater Phoenix. Tempe: Morrison Institute for Public Policy, Arizona State University.
36.
Muller, Peter . 1995. Transportation and urban form: Stages in the spatial evolution of the American metropolis. In The geography of urban transportation, edited by Susan Hanson. London: Guilford.
37.
Nasar, J. L. , and D. A. Julian. 1995. The psychological sense of community for the neighborhood. Journal of the American Planning Association61 (2): 178-184.
38.
Nelson, J. P.1982. Highway noise and property values. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy16 (2): 117-138.
39.
Niven, K. W. 1992. Freeway mitigation: A case study of the Squaw Peak Parkway mitigation effort. Master of environmental planning thesis, Arizona State University, Tempe.
40.
Real Estate Research Corporation . 1974. The costs of sprawl. Washington, DC: Council on Environmental Quality.
41.
Stutz, F. P.1986. Environmental impacts. In The geography of urban transportation, edited by Susan Hanson. London: Guilford.
42.
Tomasik, Jack . 1987. Socioeconomic and land value impact of urban freeways in Arizona. Phoenix: Arizona Department of Transportation.
43.
Vallet, M.1987. The effects of non-acoustic factors on annoyance due to traffic noise. Developments in Toxicology and Environmental Science15: 371-382.
44.
Wagner, Paul Kevin . 1996. Environmental activism and world civic politics. Albany: State University of New York Press.
45.
Weiner, Edward . 1999. Urban transportation planning in the United States: An historical overview. Westport, CT: Praeger.
