University-community partnerships can be a realistic means of increasing resources for addressing community problems. However, expectations of partnerships are often so grand, and available resources so limited, that those who create partnerships may substitute fantasy about how partnerships will magically create abundant problem-solving resources for realistic analysis, organizing, planning, and funding. This article examines contrasts between the rhetoric and realities of the university, the community, and partnership with case material from the University of Maryland’s Urban Community Service Program partnership with a Southeast Baltimore education organization. The case highlights the importance of starting partnerships with definiteness about outcomes and resources but maintaining adaptability in process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arizona Department of Juvenile Corrections-Arizona State University Partnership . 1997. Final report, fiscal years 1993-1997. Prepared for the Urban Community Service Program, U.S. Department of Education, Office of Post-secondary Education, Division of Higher Education Incentive Programs. Tempe, AZ: Author.
2.
Baum, Howell S.1987. The invisible bureaucracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
Baum, Howell S.1997. The organization of hope: Communities planning themselves. Albany: State University of New York Press.
4.
Baum, Howell S.1999. Community organizations recruiting community participation: Predicaments in planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research18 (3): 187-199.
5.
Benson, Lee, and Ira Harkavy, eds. 1994. Universities and Community Schools4 (1-2).
6.
Bion, W. R. 1961. Experiences in groups. New York: Basic Books.
7.
Checkoway, Barry . 1998. Professionally related public service as applied scholarship: Guidelines for the evaluation of planning faculty. Journal of Planning Education and Research17 (4): 358-360.
8.
Cnaan, Ram A.1991. Neighborhood-representing organizations: How democratic are they?Social Service Review65 (4): 614-634.
9.
Cohen, James . 1995. Initiating participatory planning in the Palmer Park community of Prince George’s County, Maryland. Paper presented at the 37th Annual Conference of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, Detroit, MI.
10.
Cohen, James . 1997. The rhetorics of eclectic empowerment planning in Palmer Park, MD. Paper presented at the 39th Annual Conference of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, Fort Lauderdale, FL.
11.
Colman, Arthur D. , and W. Harold Bexton, eds. 1975. Group relations reader. Sausalito, CA: GREX.
12.
Colman, A. D. , and Marvin H. Geller, eds. 1985. Group relations reader 2. Washington, DC: A. K. Rice Institute.
13.
Department of Education . 1994. Urban Community Service Program: Notice inviting applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY) 1994. Federal Register59 (64): 15810.
14.
Department of Housing and Urban Development . 1997. Fiscal year 1997 notice of funding availability for Community Outreach Partnership Centers (COPC). Federal Register62 (54): 13506-13512.
15.
Dewar, Margaret E. , and Claudia B. Isaac. 1998. Learning from difference: The potentially transforming experience of community/university collaboration. Journal of Planning Education and Research17 (4): 334-347.
16.
Diamond, Michael A.1993. The unconscious life of organizations. Westport, CT: Quorum.
17.
Feld, Marcia Marker . 1998. Introduction. Journal of Planning Education and Research17 (4): 285-290.
18.
Gould, Laurence J. , Robert Ebers, and Ross Clinchy. n.d. The systems psychodynamics of a joint venture: Anxiety, social defenses and the management of mutual dependence. Unpublished manuscript.
19.
Harkavy, Ira . 1998. School-community-university partnerships: Effectively integrating community building and education reform. Paper presented to Conference on Connecting Community Building and Education Reform: Effective School, Community, University Partnerships, a Joint Forum of the U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 8 January, Washington, DC.
20.
Harkavy, Ira , and John L. Pickett. 1991. The role of mediating structures in university and community revitalization: The University of Pennsylvania and West Philadelphia as a case study. Journal of Research and Development in Education25 (1): 10-25.
21.
Hirschhorn, Larry . 1988. The workplace within. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22.
Hirschhorn, Larry . 1991. Managing in the new team environment. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Kets de Vries, Manfred F. R. , and Associates. 1991. Organizations on the couch. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25.
Kets de Vries, Manfred F. R. , and Danny Miller. 1984. The neurotic organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26.
LeGates, Richard , and Gib Robinson. 1998. Institutionalizing university/community partnerships. Journal of Planning Education and Research17 (4): 312-322.
27.
Mayfield, Loomis , Maureen Hellwig, and Brian Banks. 1998. The Chicago response to urban problems: Building university/community collaborations. Chicago: Great Cities Institute, College of Urban Planning and Public Affairs, University of Illinois at Chicago.
28.
McCall, Robert B. , Beth L. Green, Christina J. Groark, Mark S. Strauss, and Anne E. Farber. n.d. The University of Pittsburgh Office of Child Development’s Policy and Evaluation Project: An interdisciplinary, university-community, applied developmental science partnership. Unpublished manuscript.
29.
McCall, Robert B. , Beth L. Green, Mark S. Strauss, and Christina J. Groark. n.d. Issues in community-based research and program evaluation. Unpublished manuscript.
30.
McCall, Robert B. , Christina J. Groark, Mark S. Strauss, and C. N. Johnson. 1998. Challenges of university-community outreach to traditional universities: The University of Pittsburgh Office of Child Development experience. In University-community collaborations for the twenty-first century, edited by Richard M. Lerner and Lou Anna K. Simon. New York: Garland.
31.
Nyden, Philip , Anne Figert, Mark Shibley, and Darryl Burrows, eds. 1997. Building community: Social science in action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
32.
Putnam, Robert D.1993. Making democracy work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
Putnam, Robert D.1995. Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political Science ad Politics28: 664-683.
34.
Putnam, Robert D.2000. Bowling alone. New York: Simon and Schuster.
35.
Reardon, Kenneth M.1994. Community development in low-income minority neighborhoods: A case for empowerment planning. Champaign, IL: East St. Louis Action Research Project.
36.
Reardon, Kenneth M.1995. Creating a community/university partnership that works: The case of the East St. Louis Action Research Project. Metropolitan Universities: An International Forum6 (2): 47-59.
37.
Reardon, Kenneth M. 1996. Combating racism through planning education: Lessons from the East St. Louis Action Research Project. Paper presented at the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning—Association of European Schools of Planning Joint International Congress, Toronto, Canada.
38.
Reardon, Kenneth M.1998. Enhancing the development capacity of East St. Louis’ community organizations. Journal of Planning Education and Research17 (4): 323-333.
39.
Rubin, Victor . 1998. The role of universities in community-building initiatives. Journal of Planning Education and Research17 (4): 302-311.
40.
Sarason, Seymour B.1972. The creation of settings and the future societies. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
41.
Sarason, Seymour B. , Charles Carroll, Kenneth Maton, Saul Cohen, and Elizabeth Lorentz. 1977. Human services and resource networks. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
42.
Sarason, Seymour B. , and Elizabeth Lorentz. 1979. The challenge of the resource exchange network. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
43.
Sarason, Seymour B. , and Elizabeth Lorentz. 1998. Crossing boundaries: Collaboration, coordination, and the redefinition of resources. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
44.
Schwartz, Howard S.1990. Narcissistic process and corporate decay. New York: New York University Press.
45.
Southeast Planning Council . 1993. Southeast community plan. Baltimore: Author.
46.
Stein, Howard F.1994. Listening deeply. Boulder, CO: Westview.
47.
U.S. Department of Education, Urban Community Service Program . 1997. FY 1997 project abstracts. Washington, DC: Author.
48.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development . 1997. SuperNOFA 1. Washington, DC: Author.
49.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development , Office of University Partnerships, Office of Policy Development and Research, Community Outreach Partnership Centers Program. 1995. University-community partnerships: Current practices. Vol. 1. Rockville: HUDUser.
50.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development , Office of University Partnerships, Office of Policy Development and Research, Community Outreach Partnership Centers Program. 1996. University-community partnerships: Current practices. Vol. 2. Rockville: HUDUser.
51.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development , Office of University Partnerships, Office of Policy Development and Research, Community Outreach Partnership Centers Program. 1999. University-community partnerships: Current practices. Vol. 3. Rockville: HUDUser
52.
Wiewel, Wim , and Michael Lieber. 1998. Goal achievement versus relationship building: The challenges of university-community partnership. Journal of Planning Education and Research17 (4): 291-301.
53.
Willson, Richard . 1998. University/community collaborations: An opportunity to enrich planning theory and pedagogy. ACSP Update110: 6-7.
