Geographic information systems (GIS) assume an increasingly large role in North American land use planning. Although GIS is often promoted as an answer to both democratic and sustainability issues in planning, this paper calls these premises into question and suggests a less ambitious role for GIS technology in the planning process in the new millennium. The contributions of critical theory to conceptions of decision making and action in planning, as well as a case comparison study of government GIS systems and those of community groups in British Columbia's Gulf Islands are considered. Both strains of argument lead to the conclusion that more than new technology, fresh commitments to communicate and to share planning power and responsibility are needed for more democratic, interactive land use planning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Armstrong, M.P.1994. Requirements for the development of GIS-based group decision support systems. Journal ofAmerican Society for Informnation Science45(9):669-677.
2.
Basta, D.1990. Information and technology for multiple-use decision making. In Coastal Ocean Space Utilization, eds. S.D. Halsey and R.E. Abel, 309-313. New York: Elsevier Science Publishing Co.
3.
Berry, J.K.1993. Is conflict resolution an oxymoron?GIS World (May): 24-25.
4.
Berry, J. K.1995. Spatial Reasoning for Effective GIS. Fort Collins, Colo.: GIS World Books.
5.
British Columbia Land Use Coordination Office (B.C. LUCO). 1997. Coastal Resources and Oil Spill Response Countermeasures Atlas for the Southern Strait of Georgia. Victoria, Canada.
6.
British Columbia Land Use Coordination Office. 1998. http://www.gis.luco.gov.bc.ca.
7.
Budic, Z.D.1994. Effectiveness of geographic information systems in local planning. Journal of the American Planning Association60:244-263.
8.
Campbell, H.1996. A social interactionist perspective on computer implementation. Journal of the American Planning Association62:99-107.
9.
Campbell, H.1991. Organizational issues in managing geographic information. In Handling Geographical Information: Methodology and PotentialApplications, eds. 1. Masser and M. Blakemore, 259-282. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
10.
Canadian Wildlife Service. 1997. Sensitive Ecosystem Inventory. Digital data product. Qualicum Beach, B.C.
11.
Chorley, R.1991. Foreword. In Handling Geographical Information: Methodology and Potential Applications, ed. I. Masser and M. Blakemore, xi. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
12.
Conservation Technology Support Program. 1998. Guidelines and request for proposals. http://www.desktop.org/ctsp.
13.
Craighead, L.1997-1998. Designing a sustainable “lifescape”: An interview with conservation biologist Lance Craighead. Orion Afield (Winter): 25-27.
14.
Densham, P.J., M.P. Armstrong, and K.K. Kemp. 1995. Collaborative Spatial Decision-Making: Scientific Report for the Initiative 17 Specialist Meeting. NCGIA Technical Report 95-14. Santa Barbara, Calif.: NCGIA.
15.
Durazo, L.1995. Applicationis of GIS for integration planning in the Tijuana River watershed. In Coastal Zone '95: Proceedings of the Ninth Conference, ed. B.L. Edge, 502-503. New York: American Society Civil Engineers.
16.
Forester, J.1993Critical Theory, Puhlic Policy, and Planning Practice: Toward a Critical Pragmnatism. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press.
17.
Forman, R.T.T.1995. Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Harris, L.K., R.H. Gimblett, and W.W. Shaw. 1995. Multiple use management: Using a GIS model to understand conflicts between recreationists and sensitive wildlife. Society and Natural Resources8:559-572.
19.
Harris, T.M., D. Weiner, T.A. Warner, and R. Levin. 1995. Pursuing social goals through participatory geographic information systems: Redressing South Africa's historical political ecology. In Ground Truth: T he Social Implications of Geographit Information Systems, ed. J. Picklcs, 196-222. New York: Guilford Press.
20.
Innes, J.E.1990. Knowledge and Public Policy: The 5 earth for Meaningf/il hidicators. 2nd edition. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.
21.
Innes, J.E., and A. Simpson. 1993. Implementing GIS for planning. Journal ofthe American PlanningAssociation59:230-236.
Klosterman, D.1997. Planning support systems: A new perspective on computer-aided planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research17(1):45-54.
25.
Lake, R.W.1993. Planning and applied geography: Positivism, ethics, and geographic information systems. Progress itn Human Geography17(3):404-413.
26.
Lasqueti Island Steering Committee. 1989. Towards sustainable forestry on private land in the islands trust area. Forest Planning Canada5(6):34-35.
27.
Lindblom, C.E.1968. The Policy-Making Process. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall Inc.
28.
Lyman, F.1997-1998. Geo-Force: A Brooklyn neighborhood maps its future. Orion Afield (Winter): 8-13.
29.
Mascall, M., D. McEchern, T. Noble, and I. Douglas. No date. Quadra Island mapping project. Unpublished information sheet.
30.
Moore, G, K. Millard, and G. Gaylor. 1991. The betrayal of a community involvement process: Galiano learns the meaning of forest industry commitment. Forest Planning Canada7(3):5-9.
31.
Pickles, J.1995Representations in an electronic age: Geography, GIS, and democracy. In Ground Truth: The Social Implications of Geographic Information Systems. ed. J. Pickles, 1-30. New York: Guilford Press.
32.
Taylor, P., and R.J. Johnston. 1995. GIS and geography. In Ground Truth: The Social Implications of Geographic Information Systems. ed. J. Pickles, 51-67. New York: Guilford Press.
33.
Tribe, L.1972. Policy science: Analysis or ideology?Philosophy and Public Affairs 2:66-610.
34.
Veregin, H.1995. Computer innovation and adoption in geography: A critique of conventional techniological models. In Grouind Truth: The Social Implications of Geographic Information Systems. ed. J. Pickles, 88-112. New York: Guilford Press.
35.
Warnecke, L., J. Beattie, C. Kollin, and W. Lyday. 1998. Geographic Information Technology in Cities and Counties: A Nationwide Assessment. Washington, D.C.: American Forests.
36.
Yapa, L.S.1991. Is GIS appropriate technology?InternationalJournal of Geographical I,nformation Systens5 (1):41-58.
