Growth management attempts to improve the ordering of development to improve outcomes. To taxpayers, growth management promises more efficient delivery of public facilities and services. To developers, growth management promises more certainty. To citizen activists, growth management promises resolution of development problems in advance, instead of on an ad hoc basis. These promises are heroic. Nonetheless, even if only partly successful, communities engaged in growth management should out-perform other communities in overall economic output. This paper evaluates the economic performance of 182 metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) with 1990 populations between 100,000 and 500,000 over the period 1972 to 1992 with respect to presence or absence of growth management efforts such as urban growth boundaries, urban service limits, and state or regional oversight of local planning. We find a positive association between the presence of growth management and economic performance; communities engaged in growth management realized marginal improvements in economic performance relative to other communities, ceteris parnbus.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, Christopher, Sara Ishikawa, and Murray Silverstein. 1977. A Pattern Language. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
American Farmland Trust. 1992. Does Farmland Protection Pay?Washington, D.C.: American Farmland Trust.
3.
American Farmland Trust. 1997. Farming and the Edge. Washington, D.C.: American Farmland Trust.
4.
Brower, David J., David R. Godschalk, and Douglas R. Porter. 1989. Understanding Growth Management: Critical Issues and a Research Agenda. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Land Institute.
5.
Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce. 1994. County and City Data Book. Washington, D.C.
6.
Calthorpe, Peter. 1993. The Next American Metropolis. Princeton, N.J.: The Princeton University Press.
7.
Clawson, Marion. 1962. Urban sprawl and land speculation. Land Economics38(1): 99-111.
8.
Deakin, Elizabeth. 1989. Growth controls and growth management: A summary and review of empirical research. In Understanding Growth Management: Critical Issues and a Research Agenda, eds. David Brower, David R. Godschalk, and Douglas R. Porter. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Land Institute.
9.
DeGrove, John M.1992. Planning and Growth Management in the States. Cambridge, Mass.: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
10.
DeGrove, John M.1984. Land Growth and Politics. Chicago, Ill.: American Planning Association Planners Press.
11.
DeGrove, John M., and Patricia M. Metzger. 1993. Growth management and the integrated role of state, regional and local governments. In Growth Management: The Planning Challenge of the 1990s, ed. Jay M. Stein. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.
12.
Ewing, Reid. 1997. Reply to Gordon and Richardson. Journal of the American Planning Association63(1): 107-126.
13.
Fisher, Ronald C.1996. State and Local Public Finance. 2nd edition. Boston, Mass.: Irwin.
14.
Frank, James E.1989. The Costs of Alternative Development Patterns: A Review of the Literature. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Land Institute.
15.
Gordon, Peter, and Harry W. Richardson. 1997. Commentary. Journal of the American Planning Association63(1): 95-106.
16.
Hagman, Donald, and Julian Conrad Juergensmeyer. 1986. Urban Planning and Land Development Control. 2nd edition. St. Paul, Minn.: West.
17.
Harvey, Robert O., and W.A.V. Clark. 1965. The nature and economics of urban sprawl. Land Economics61(1): 1-9.
18.
Hershberg, Theodore. 1996. Regional cooperation: Strategies and incentives for global competitiveness and urban reform. National Civic Review85(2): 25-30.
19.
Howe, Deborah A.1993. Growth management in Oregon. In Growth Management: The Planning Challenge of the 1990s, ed. Jay M. Stein. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
20.
Judd, Dennis R., and Todd Swanstrom. 1994. City Politics: Private Power and Public Policy. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.
21.
Juergensmeyer, Julian Conrad, and Thomas Roberts. 1998. Urban Planning and Land Development Control. 3rd edition. St. Paul, Minn.: West.
22.
Knaap, Gerrit, and Arthur C. Nelson, 1992. The Regulated Landscape: Lessons on State Land Use Planning from Oregon. Cambridge, Mass.: Lincoln Institute of L and Policy.
23.
Lessinger, Jack. 1962. The case for scatteration. Journal of the American Planning Association28(3): 159-169.
24.
Logan, John R., and Harvey L. Molotch. 1987. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Plate. Berkeley, Calif.: The University of California Press.
25.
Lynch, Kevin. 1981. Good City Form. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
26.
Nelson, Arthur C.1987. The effect of a regional sewer service on land values, growth patterns, and regional fiscal structure within a metropolitan area. Urban Resources4(2): 15-18, 58-59.
27.
Nelson, Arthur C.. and Gerrit J. Knaap. 1987. A theoretical and empirical argument for regional sewer planning. Journal of the American Planning Association53(4): 479-486.
28.
Nelson, Arthur C.1990. Growth strategies: The new planning game in Georgia. Carolina Planning16(1): 1-6.
29.
Nelson, Arthur C.1992. Preserving prime farmland in the face of urbanization: Lessons from Oregon. Journal of the American Planning Association58(4): 467-488.
30.
Nelson, Arthur C.1997. Letter to the editor. Journal of the American Planning Association63(3):
31.
Nelson, Arthur C., James B. Duncan, Clancy J. Mullen, and Kirk R. Bishop. 1995. Growth Management Principles and Practices. Chicago, Ill.: Planners Press.
32.
Nelson, Arthur C., and Kathryn P. Foster. 1999. Metropolitan governance structure and income growth. Journal of Urban Affairs21(3): 309-324.
33.
Nicholas, James C.1989. The costs of growth: a public vs. Private sector conflict or a public/private responsibility. In Understanding Growth management: Critical Issues and a Research Agenda, eds. David Brower, David R. Godschalk, and Douglas R. Porter. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Land Institute.
Peiser, Richard B.1989. Density and urban sprawl. Land Economics65(3): 193-204.
36.
Porter, Douglas R.1996. Profiles in Growth Management. An Assessment of Current Programs and Guidelines for Effective Management. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Land Institute.
37.
Porter, Douglas R.1997. Managing Growth in America's Communities. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
38.
Repetto, Robert, Dale Rothman, Paul Faeth and Duncan Austin. 1997. Has environmental protection really reduced productivity growth?Challenge (january-February): 46-57.
39.
Richardson, Harry W., and Peter Gordon. 1993. Market planning: Oxymoron or common sense?Journal of the American Planning Association59(3): 347-352.
40.
Rusk, David. 1993. Cities Without Suburbs. Washington, D.C.: The Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
41.
Rickaby, P.A.1987. Six regional settlement compared. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design14: 193-223.
42.
Swanstrom, Todd. 1985. The Crisis of Growth Politics: Cleveland, Kucinich, and the Challenge of Urban Populism. Philadelphia, Pa.: Temple University Press.
43.
Urban Land Institute. 1975. Management and Control of Growth. Four volumes. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Land Institute.
44.
Whyte, William. 1956. Suburban Sprawl. New York: Times Press.
