The fuItLu-e is a long-recognized focus of thie uirban planning profession, but it has been nieglected of late particuLlarly in the academiiic COmmLullity. This article reviews concepts, theories, and tools useful for strengthening a ftttLire focus in planning. Core analytical coIncepts InCItide distinctions among projections forecasts and plans, and continiuities of past, present, anid future. Ethical issues center oni the tension betweeni an activist shaping of the future and the maniptLilation of forecasts to support desired plans. Emphasizing representation of the future as an essential means for gaining agreement, the article surveys the practices of visioning, scenario-building, and persuasive storytelling. The conclusion outlines .r reinvigorated appi-oach to plaiinrng the futtire that draws tLipon theories presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alonso, William. 1971. Beyond the interdisciplinary approach to planning. Journal of the American Institute ofPlanners37: 169-173.
2.
American Planning Association. 1996. Growing Smart Legislative Guidebook: Model Statutesfor Planning and the Management of Change. Chicago, Ill.: Planners Press.
3.
Ascher, William. 1978. Forecasting: An Appraisalfor Policy-Makers and Planners. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins Press.
4.
Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning (ACSP), Strategic Marketing Committee. 1997. Anchor points for pl4nning's identification. Foural of Planning Education and Research16(3): 223-224.
5.
Baer, William. 1995. When old buildings ripen for historic preservation: A predictive approach to planning. Journal ofthe American PlanningAssociationn6(1): 66-84.
6.
Baum, Howell. 1999. Forgetting to plan. Journal ofPlanning Education and Research19(1):2-14.
7.
Berry, Brian. J.L.1991. Lorng Wave Rhythms in Economic Development and Political Behavior. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins Press.
8.
Branch, Melville C.1998. Comprehensive Planningfor the 21st Century: General Tiheory and Iprinciples. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
9.
Brooks, Michael. 1988. Four critical junctures in the history of the urban planning profession: An exercise in hindsight. Journal of the American PlbnningAssociation54(2): 241-248.
10.
Cole, Sam. 1998. Bringing futures into planning: a futurist's perspective. Paper presented at the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planninlg Conference, Pasadena, Calif.
11.
Corn, Joseph J., and Brian Horrigan. 1996. Yesterday s Tomorrows: Past Visionsofthe American Future. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins Press.
12.
Davis, Mike. 1992. Beyond Blade Runner: Urban Control, the Ecology ofFear. Westfield, N.J.: Open Magazine Pamphlet Series.
13.
Gordon, Peter, and Harry W. Richardson. 1989. Gasoline consumption and cities: A reply. Journal oftheAmerican PlanningAssociation55(3): 342-346.
Helling, Amy. 1998. Collaborative visioning: Proceed with caution! Results from evaluating Atlanta's Vision 2020 project. Journal ofthe American PlanningAssociation64(3): 335-349.
16.
Hirschhorn, Larry. 1980. Scenario writing: A developmental approach. Journal ofthe American Planning Association46(2): 172-183.
17.
Institute of Portland Metropolitan Studies. 1995. A Pathway to Sustainabilicy. Portland, Ore.
18.
Innes, Judith E. 1996. Planning through consensus building: A new view of the comprehensive planning ideal. Journal oftheAmerican PlanningAssociation62(4): 460-472.
19.
Isserman, Andrew. 1984. Projection, forecast, and plan: On the future of population forecasting. Journal oftheAmerican PlanningAssociation50(2): 208-221.
20.
Isserman, Andrew. 1985. Dare to plan: An essay on the role of the future in planning practice and education. Town Planning Review56(4): 483-491.
21.
Isserman, Andrew. 1998. Using old methods in new ways to bring the future into planning. Paper presented at the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning Conference, Pasadena, Calif.
22.
Katz, Peter. 1994. The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Community. San Francisco, Calif.: McGraw Hill.
23.
Landis, John D.1996. Imagining Land Use Futures: Applying the California Urban Futures Model. Journal ofthe American PlanningAssociation61(4): 438-457.
24.
Mandelbaum, Seymour J.1984. Temporal Conventions in Planning Discourse. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design I1: 5-13.
25.
Mandelbaum, Seymour J.1985. Historians and Planners. Journal ofthe American PlanningAssociation, 51(3): 185-188.
26.
Markusen, Ann. 1998. The future of planning: Gains for the craft, threats to the philosophy. In 50 Years of City and Regional Planning at UC Berkeley, eds. S. Lowney and J.D. Landis, 293-301. Berkeley, Calif.: NSQ Press.
27.
May, Graham H.1996. The Future is Ours: Foreseeing, Managing and Creating the Future. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
Pred, Allan. 1990. Making Histories and Constructing Human Geographies. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
30.
Rein, Martin, and Donald Schon. 1977. Problem-setting in policy research. In Using Social Researchfor Public Policy, ed. C. Weiss, 4-5. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books.
31.
Rogers, Everett. 1983. Dijfusion ofInnovations. New York: Free Press.
32.
Sagoff, Mark. 1998. The allocation and distribution of resources. In Debating the Earth: the Environmental Politics Reader, eds. John Dryzek and David Schlosberg, 131-146. London: Oxford University Press.
33.
Schwartz, Peter. 1996. The Art ofthe Long View: Planningfor the Future in an Uncertain World. New York: Doubleday.
34.
Skaburskis, Andrejs. 1995. Resisting the allure of large projection models. Journal ofPlanning Education and Research14 (3): 191-202.
35.
ThrogTnortoro, James A.1992. Planning as persuasive storytelling about the future. Journal ofPlanning Education and Research12(1): 17-31.
36.
Urban Land Institute/Congress for the New Urbanism. 1998. Critiquing the new urbanism: A look at the design, marketing and financial realities. Proceedings of a joint session, Denver, Colo. Audiotape.
37.
Wachs, Martin. 1982. Ethical dilemmas in forecasting for public policy. Public Administration Review42: 562-567.
38.
Warren, Robert, Stacy Warren, Samuel Nunn, and Collin Warren. 1998. The future of the future in planning: Appropriating cyberpunk visions of the city. Journal ofPlanning Education and Research18(1): 49-60.
39.
Wells Fargo Bank. 1996. Preserving the American Dream: The Truth About Suburban Communities and Housing Choice. San Francisco, Calif.: Wells Fargo Bank.
40.
Wildavsky, Aaron. 1973. If planning is everything, maybe it's nothing. Policy Sciences4:127-153.
41.
Yaro, Robert D., and Tony Hiss. 1996. A Region at Risk: The Third Regional Planfor the New York-New Jersey-Connecticut Metropolitan Area. Covelo, Calif.: Island Press.
