Exurban development is especially prevalent in rural areas of the Mountain West, where rapid population growth has led to the conversion of vast amounts of rural land and natural open space. This article argues that traditional approaches to land use planning hasten the pace of exurbanization in rural areas of the region. Building on this premise, the article presents a conceptual process-based model that links land use planning with exurbanization and uses the model in an empirical study of exurban development in Cochise County, Arizona. The analysis confirms expectations, with conventional planning approaches unintentionally fostering exurbanization and fueling the conversion of natural lands. Several principles are identified that should inform new approaches to land use planning in rural areas.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arizona Department of Economic Security . 1950-90. Intercensal population estimates of Arizona counties. Arizona Department of Economic Security.
2.
Arizona Department of Economic Security . 1980-90. Population estimates of Arizona places by counties. Arizona Department of Economic Security.
3.
Arizona Department of Economic Security . 1991-96. Population estimates for Arizona’s counties and incorporated places. Arizona Department of Economic Security.
4.
Bahl, Roy . 1968. A land speculation model: The role of the property tax as a constraint to urban sprawl. Journal of Regional Science8: 199-208.
5.
Bahl, Roy , and Robert Firestine. 1972. Urban-suburban migration patterns and metropolitan fiscal structures. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Occasional Paper No. 8.
6.
Burby, Raymond , and Peter May. 1997. Making governments plan. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
7.
Cochise County Assessor’s Office . Annual Abstract 1984-97 tax years. Cochise County Assessor’s Office.
8.
Cochise County Planning Department. 1998. Personal communication, January.
9.
Daniels, Thomas . 1999. When city and country collide: Managing growth in the metropolitan fringe. Washington, DC: Island.
10.
Daniels, Thomas , John Keller, and Mark Lapping. 1995. The small town planning handbook. Chicago: Planners.
11.
Davis, Judy , Arthur Nelson, and Kenneth Deuker. 1994. The new ’burbs: The exurbs and their implications for planning policy. Journal of the American Planning Association60: 45-59.
12.
DeGrove John , and Patricia Metzger. 1991. Balanced growth: A planning guide for local government. Washington, DC: International City Management Association.
13.
Diamond, Henry , and Patrick Noonan. 1996. Land use in America. Washington, DC: Island.
14.
Doherty, J. C.1984. Growth management in countrified cities: Vol. 1. Change and response. Alexandria, VA: Vert Milon.
15.
Economic Research Service . 1995. Rural Conditions and Trends, 6 (1).
16.
Esparza, Adrian , and John Carruthers. 1998. Nonmetropolitan growth and planning revisited. Paper presented at the 37th Annual Conference of the Western Regional Science Association, Monterey, CA.
17.
Friedmann, John . 1996. The core curriculum in planning revisited. Journal of Planning Education and Research15: 89-104.
18.
Fuguitt, Glenn . 1995. Population change in nonmetropolitan America. In The changing American countryside, edited by Emory Castle, 77-100. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
19.
Fuguitt, Glenn , and Calvin Beale. 1996. Recent trends in nonmetropolitan migration: Toward a new turnaround?Growth and Change27: 156-174.
20.
Gale, Dennis . 1992. Eight state-sponsored growth management programs: A comparative analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association58: 425-439.
21.
Galston, William , and Karen Baehler. 1995. Rural development in the United States: Connecting theory and practice. Washington, DC: Island.
22.
Healy, Robert , and James Short. 1981. The market for rural land: Trends, issues, policies. Washington, DC: The Conservation Foundation.
23.
Johnson, Kenneth , and Calvin Beale. 1994. The recent revival of widespread population growth in nonmetropolitan areas of the United States. Rural Sociology59: 655-667.
24.
Kelly, Eric . 1993. Managing community growth: Policies, techniques, and impacts. Westport, CT: Praeger.
25.
Ladd, Helen . 1998. Local government tax and land use policies in the United States. Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar (in association with Lincoln Institute of Land Policy).
26.
Lamb, Richard . 1983. The extent and form of exurban sprawl. Growth and Change14: 40-47.
27.
Lapping, Mark , Thomas Daniels, and John Keller. 1989. Rural planning and development in the United States. New York: Guilford.
28.
Lee, Douglass . 1981. Land use planning as a response to market failure. In The land use policy debate in the United States, edited by Judith DeNeufville, 149-164. New York: Plenum.
29.
Logan, John , Rachel Bridges-Whaley, and Kyle Crowder. 1997. The character and consequences of growth regimes: An assessment of 20 years of research. Urban Affairs Review32: 603-630.
30.
Logan John , and Harvey Molotch. 1987. Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley: University of California Press.
31.
Mantell, Michael , Stephen Harper, and Luther Propst. 1990. Creating successful communities: A guidebook to growth management strategies. Washington, DC: Island.
32.
Molotch, Harvey . 1976. The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology82: 309-333.
33.
Morris, Adele . 1998. Property tax treatment of farmland: Does tax relief delay land development? In Local government tax and land use policies in the United States, edited by Helen Ladd, 144-167. Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar (in association with Lincoln Institute of Land Policy).
34.
Nelson, Arthur . 1992. Characterizing exurbia. Journal of Planning Literature6: 350-368.
35.
Nelson, Arthur . 1995. The planning of exurban America: Lessons from Frank Lloyd Wright’s broadacre city. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research12: 338-356.
36.
Nelson, Arthur , and Kenneth Dueker. 1990. The exurbanization of America and its planning policy implications. Journal of Planning Education and Research9: 91-100.
37.
Nelson, Arthur , James Duncan, Clancy Mullen, and Kirk Bishop. 1995.Growthmanagement: Principlesandpractices. Chicago:Planners.
38.
Pfeffer, Max , and Mark Lapping. 1994. Farmland preservation, development rights and the theory of the growth machine: The view of planners. Journal of Rural Studies10: 233-248.
39.
Pitkin County Department of Community Management . 1993. Aspen area community plan. Aspen, CO: Pitkin County Department of Community Management.
40.
Pitkin County Department of Community Management . 1994. Pitkin County land use code. Aspen, CO: Pitkin County Department of Community Management.
41.
Popper, Frank . 1984. Rural land use policies and rural poverty. Journal of the American Planning Association51: 326-334.
Razin, Eran . 1998. Policies to control urban sprawl: Planning regulations or changes in the “rules of the game”?Urban Studies35: 321-340.
44.
Santa Fe County Planning Department . 1980. Santa Fe County general plan. Santa Fe, NM: Santa Fe County Planning Department.
45.
Santa Fe County Planning Department . 1994. Santa Fe County open space inventory report. Santa Fe, NM: Santa Fe County Planning Department.
46.
Santa Fe County Planning Department . 1995. Santa Fe County visual resources inventory and analysis. Santa Fe, NM: Santa Fe County Planning Department.
47.
Santa Fe County Planning Department . 1996. Santa Fe County land development code. Santa Fe, NM: Santa Fe County Planning Department.
48.
Santa Fe County Planning Department . 1997. A treasured resource: Santa Fe County open spaces plan recommendations. Santa Fe, NM: Santa Fe County Planning Department.
49.
Santa Fe County Planning Department. 1998. Personal communication, October.
50.
Shumway, Matthew , and James Davis. 1996. Nonmetropolitan population change in the mountain west: 1970-1995. Rural Sociology61: 513-529.
51.
Sierra Vista Department of Development Services . 1985. VISTA 2000: The city of Sierra Vista general development plan. Sierra Vista, AZ: Sierra Vista Department of Development Services.
52.
Sierra Vista Department of Development Services . 1986. City of Sierra Vista development code. Sierra Vista, AZ: Sierra Vista Department of Development Services.
53.
Sierra Vista Department of Development Services . 1995. VISTA 2010: The City of Sierra Vista general development plan. Sierra Vista, AZ: Sierra Vista Department of Development Services.
54.
Sierra Vista Department of Development Services . 1997a. Guide to zoning maps: Sierra Vista, Arizona. Sierra Vista, AZ: Sierra Vista Department of Development Services.
55.
Sierra Vista Department of Development Services . 1997b. Silhouettes: A statistical profile of Sierra Vista. Sierra Vista, AZ: Sierra Vista Department of Development Services.
56.
Sierra Vista Department of Development Services 1998. Personal communication, January, February, March.
57.
Sierra Vista Economic Development Foundation . 1997. A demographic profile of Sierra Vista and the Cochise County region. Sierra Vista, AZ: Sierra Vista Economic Development Foundation.
58.
Starrs, Paul . 1995. Conflict and change on the landscapes of the arid American West. In The changing American countryside, edited by Emory Castle, 271-285. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
59.
U.S. Bureau of the Census . Selected years. Current construction reports: Housing units authorized by building permits. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
60.
Vogel, Ronald , and Bert Swanson. 1989. The growth machine versus the antigrowth coalition: The battle for our communities. Urban Affairs Quarterly25: 63-85.
61.
Worden, Marshal , and David de Kok. 1996. Population growth, economic expansion, and Arizona land use. In Arizona’s growth and development: A world of difficult choices, edited by David de Kok, Marshal Worden, and Bruce Wright, 21-63. Phoenix: Arizona Town Hall.
62.
Yaro, Robert1991. Balancing growth and conservation. In Balanced growth: A planning guide for local government, edited by John DeGrove and Patricia Metzger, 29-35. Washington, DC: International City Management Association.
