From Fire to Frying Pan: The Impact of Major-Power War Involvement on Major-Power Dispute Involvement,1816-1975

Abstract

This paper sought to plug a gap in the literature on war, by exploring its impact on subsequent dispute involvements. The present effort was confined to an examination of the major powers, and only their major power-major power experiences were studied. This may limit the generalizeability of the results. Nevertheless, there is some tendency for major powers to decrease their dispute involvement, even though the drop may not be large, particularly over the first ten years after the war involvement. In most cases, the trend is for the major power to become involved in one less dispute over the next ten years than in the previous decade. Although it is disheartening to observe that major powers do not learn more from their war behavior (i.e., experience a quicker and more dramatic drop), and that World War II was followed by an increase in dispute involvement by the superpowers, we can also interpret these results as showing that most major power governments are not imprisoned by their past wars. That is, these results indicate that the government of a major power generally views each possible dispute involvement as a separate situation. Coupling the results of this paper with earlier results showing a lack of periodicity and cycles in major power war involvements, we may take the optimistic view that in any situation that a government contemplates dispute involvement, it may be possible to dissuade it from crossing this conflict threshold, since it is not necessary to overcome the effect of past war experiences. The research findings are somewhat dull, but they do offer hope for conflict containment.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Derman, Cyrus, Leon J. Gleser , and Ingram Olkin (1973). A Guide to Probability Theory and Applications. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Gilpin, Robert . (1981). War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gochman, Charles S. , and Zeov Maoz . (forthcoming). “Serious Interstate Disputes, 1816-1976: Empirical Patterns and Theoretical Insights.” Journal of Conflict Resolution.

Howard, Michael (1976). War in European History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Moyal, J.E. (1949). “The Distribution of Wars in Time.” >Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series A) 112, pp. 446–49.

Richardson, Lewis F. (1960). Statistics of Deadly Quarrels. Pittsburgh: Boxwood Press.

Singer, J. David , and Thomas Cusack . (1981). “Periodicity, Inexorability, and Steersmanship in International War.” In From National Development to Global Community: Essays in Honor of Karl W. Deutsch. Ed. R. Merritt and B. Russett . London: George Allen and Unwin. Pp. 404–22.

Singer, J. David , and Melvin Small . (1972). The Wages of War, 1816-1965. New York: John Wiley.

Siverson, Randolph M. (1980). “War and Change in the International System.” In Change in the International System. Ed. O. Holsti , R. Siverson , and A. George . Boulder: Westview Press. Pp. 211–32.

10.

Small, Melvin , and J. David Singer . (1982). Resort to Arms: International and Civil Wars, 1816-1980. Beverly Hills, Cal.: Sage.

11.

Stein, Arthur A. , and Bruce M. Russett . (1980). “Evaluating War: Outcomes and Consequences.” In Handbook of Political Conflict: Theory and Research. Ed. T. R. Gurr . New York: Free Press. Pp. 399–424.