Allison, G.1968. Conceptual models and the Cuban missile crisis. American Political Science Review63: 689–718.
2.
Brito, D.1972. A dynamic model of an armaments race. International Economic Review13: 359–75.
3.
Brito, D. and M. Intriligator. 1974. Uncertainty and the stability of the armaments race. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement3: 279–92.
4.
Enthoven, A. and K. Smith. 1972. How Much is Enough? Shaping the Defense Program, 1961 Through 1968.Harper and Row. Hearings before the committee on armed services, U.S. Senate, 93rd Congress on nomination of James R. Schlesinger to be secretary of defense. 1973. Government Printing Office.
5.
Kupperman, R., R. Behr, and T. Jones. 1974. The deterrence continuum. Orbis18: 728–49.
6.
Kupperman, R. and H. Smith. 1972. Strategies of mutual deterrence. Science176: 18–23.
7.
Kupperman, R. and H. Smith. 1974. Payoffs seen in strategic arms control analysis. SIAM News 7, No. 3. to appear. The role of population defense in mutual deterrence. SIAM Review. forthcoming. Deterrent stability and strategic warfare. Mathematical Systems in International Relations Research. Praeger.
8.
Newhouse, J.1973. Cold dawn: the story of SALT. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
9.
Saaty, T.1968. Mathematical models of arms control and disarmament. John Wiley and Sons.
10.
Sandburg, I.1974. On the mathematical theory of interactions in social groups. IEEE TransactionsSMC–4: 432–45.
11.
forthcoming. Some qualitative properties of nonlinear Richardson–type arms race models. Mathematical Systems in International Relations Research. Praeger.
12.
Senate Committee on appropriations and Senate Committee on armed services. Department of Defense appropriations.1965. Government Printing Office.