In the field of civil war studies, there is a consensus that the risk of war decreases as income increases. Nevertheless, such consensus has not been reached in the field of civil resistance and unarmed revolutions. This paper proposes a curvilinear framework positing two opposite trends in economic development. On the one hand, it increases the state resources for preventing illegal displacement and makes revolt costly for rebels. Conversely, it boosts resources needed for civil resistance. Utilizing independent sources on revolutions and employing parametric and non-parametric methods, we have identified robust support for the inverted “U-shape” relationship between income level and the risk of unarmed revolutions. This finding reconciles the discrepancies observed in previous studies and provides a different perspective on the “middle-income trap.”
AkhmedovV (2022) The Syrian revolution. In: GoldstoneJA, et al. (eds) Handbook of Revolutions in the 21st Century. Cham: Springer Nature, 707–723. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86468-2_27.
2.
AlbrechtHKoehlerK (2020) Revolutionary mass uprisings in authoritarian regimes.International Area Studies Review23(2): 135–159.
3.
AllinsonJ (2019) A fifth generation of revolution theory?Journal of Historical Sociology32(1): 142–151.
4.
AmannP (1962) Revolution: A redefinition.Political Science Quarterly77(1): 36–53.
5.
Arel-BundockVGreiferNHeissA (2024) How to interpret statistical models using marginaleffects for R and Python. Journal of Statistical Software111: 1–32.
6.
BarroRJLeeJ-W (2015) Education Matters: Global Schooling Gains from the 19th to the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199379231.001.0001.
7.
BeckCJBukovanskyMChenowethE, et al. (2022) On Revolutions: Unruly Politics in the Contemporary World. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
BeckCJRitterDP (2021) Thinking beyond generations: On the future of revolution theory.Journal of Historical Sociology34(1): 134–141.
9.
BeissingerM (2022) The Revolutionary City: Urbanization and the Global Transformation of Rebellion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
BesançonML (2005) Relative resources: Inequality in ethnic wars, revolutions, and genocides.Journal of Peace Research42(4): 393–415.
11.
BiglaiserGLeeHMcGauvranRJ (2024) Domestic political unrest and sovereign bond ratings in the developing world.Journal of Conflict Resolution68(7-8): 1580–1607.
BraithwaiteABraithwaiteJMKucikJ (2015) The conditioning effect of protest history on the emulation of nonviolent conflict.Journal of Peace Research52(6): 697–711.
14.
BraithwaiteAKucikJMavesJ (2014) The costs of domestic political unrest.International Studies Quarterly58(3): 489–500.
15.
BrooksRWhitePB (2023) The military before the march: Civil–military grand bargains and the emergence of nonviolent resistance in autocracies.Journal of Peace Research61(6): 1002–1018.
16.
ButcherCSvenssonI (2016) Manufacturing dissent: Modernization and the onset of major nonviolent resistance campaigns.Journal of Conflict Resolution60(2): 311–339.
17.
CebulMDGrewalS (2022) Military conscription and nonviolent resistance.Comparative Political Studies55(13): 2217–2249.
18.
CelestinoMRGleditschKS (2013) Fresh carnations or all thorn, No rose? Nonviolent campaigns and transitions in autocracies.Journal of Peace Research50(3): 385–400.
19.
ChenowethELewisOA (2013) Unpacking nonviolent campaigns: Introducing the NAVCO 2.0 dataset.Journal of Peace Research50(3): 415–423.
20.
ChenowethESchockK (2015) Do contemporaneous armed challenges affect the outcomes of mass nonviolent campaigns?.Mobilization: An International Quarterly20(4): 427–451.
21.
ChenowethEShayCW (2020a) List of Campaigns in NAVCO 1.3. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Dataverse.
ChenowethEStephanMJ (2011) Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
24.
ChenowethEUlfelderJ (2017) Can structural conditions explain the onset of nonviolent uprisings?Journal of Conflict Resolution61(2): 298–324.
25.
ClarkeK (2011) Saying “enough”: Authoritarianism and Egypt’s Kefaya Movement.Mobilization: An International Quarterly16(4): 397–416.
26.
CollierPHoefflerA (2004) Greed and grievance in civil war.Oxford Economic Papers56(4): 563–595.
27.
CookSJHaysJCFranzeseRJ (2020) Fixed effects in rare events data: A penalized maximum likelihood solution.Political Science Research and Methods8(1): 92–105.
CunninghamKG (2013) Understanding strategic choice.Journal of Peace Research50(3): 291–304.
30.
DahlMGatesSGleditschK, et al. (2021) Accounting for numbers: Group characteristics and the choice of violent and nonviolent tactics.The Economics of Peace and Security Journal16(1): 5–25.
31.
DahlumS (2019) Students in the streets: Education and nonviolent protest.Comparative Political Studies52(2): 277–309.
32.
DaviesJC (1962) Toward a theory of revolution.American Sociological Review27(1): 5–19.
33.
DjuveVLKnutsenCHWigT (2020) Patterns of regime breakdown since the French revolution.Comparative Political Studies53(6): 923–958.
34.
FearonJDLaitinDD (2003) Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war.American Political Science Review97(1): 75–90.
35.
FeenstraRCInklaarRTimmerMP (2015) The next generation of the Penn world table. American Economic Review105(10): 3150–3182. Available at: www.ggdc.net/pwt.
GerlachJ (2014) Color revolutions in Eurasia. Cham: Springer.
38.
GleditschKSRiveraM (2017) The diffusion of nonviolent campaigns.Journal of Conflict Resolution61(5): 1120–1145.
39.
GoldstoneJA (2001) Toward a fourth generation of revolutionary theory.Annual Review of Political Science4(1): 139–187.
40.
GoldstoneJAGrininLKorotayevA (2022) Introduction. Changing yet persistent: Revolutions and revolutionary events. In: GoldstoneJA, et al. (eds) Handbook of Revolutions in the 21st Century. Cham: Springer Nature, 1–34. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86468-2_1.
41.
GoldstoneJAGrininLUstyuzhaninV, et al. (2023) Revolutionary events of the 21st century: A preliminary quantitative analysis.Polis. Political Studies4: 54–71.
42.
GoodwinJ (2003) The renewal of socialism and the decline of revolution. In: The Future of Revolutions: Rethinking Radical Change in the Age of Globalization. London: Zed Books, 59–72.
43.
GrininLKorotayevA (2024) Is the fifth generation of revolution studies still coming?Critical Sociology50(6): 1039–1067.
44.
GrossmanHI (1991) A general equilibrium model of insurrections.The American Economic Review81(4): 912–921.
45.
GurievSMTreismanD (2022) Spin Dictators: The Changing Face of Tyranny in the 21st Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46.
HegreHSambanisN (2006) Sensitivity analysis of empirical results on civil war onset.Journal of Conflict Resolution50(4): 508–535.
47.
HonakerJKingGBlackwellM (2011) Amelia II: A program for missing data. Journal of Statistical Software45(7): 1–47. doi:10.18637/jss.v045.i07.
48.
HuntingtonSP (1968) Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT.: Yale Univ. Press.
49.
InglehartRWelzelC (2005) Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50.
IshchenkoV (2016) Far right participation in the Ukrainian Maidan protests: An attempt of systematic estimation.European Politics and Society17(4): 453–472.
51.
JakobsenTGde SoysaIJakobsenJ (2013) Why do poor countries suffer costly conflict? Unpacking per capita income and the onset of civil war. Conflict Management and Peace Science30(2): 140–160.
52.
JonesZMLupuY (2018) Is there more violence in the middle?American Journal of Political Science62(3): 652–667.
53.
KadivarMAKetchleyN (2018) Sticks, stones, and molotov cocktails: Unarmed collective violence and democratization.Socius4: 2378023118773614.
54.
KalinILounsberyMOPearsonF (2022) Major power politics and non-violent resistance movements.Conflict Management and Peace Science39(3): 241–265.
55.
KarakayaS (2018) Globalization and contentious politics: A comparative analysis of nonviolent and violent campaigns.Conflict Management and Peace Science35(4): 315–335.
56.
KellerF (2012) (Why) do revolutions spread? Paper presented at the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 30 August to 2 September, New Orleans, LA. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.1526.9284.
57.
KennedyR (2010) The contradiction of modernization: A conditional model of endogenous democratization.The Journal of Politics72(3): 785–798.
58.
KetchleyN (2017) Egypt in a Time of Revolution: Contentious Politics and the Arab Spring. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316882702.
59.
KimNKKroegerAM (2019) Conquering and coercing: Nonviolent anti-regime protests and the pathways to democracy.Journal of Peace Research56(5): 650–666.
60.
KingGZengL (2001) Logistic regression in rare events data.Political Analysis9(2): 137–163.
61.
KnutsenCH (2014) Income growth and revolutions.Social Science Quarterly95(4): 920–937.
62.
KorotayevAGrininLUstyuzhaninV (2024) Database of revolutionary events of the 21st century. Database registration certificate RU 2024622477, 05.06.2024. Application No. 2024622215 dated 31 May 2024. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=67982065.
63.
KorotayevAGrininLUstyuzhaninV, et al. (2025a) The fifth generation of revolution studies. Part I: When, why, and how did it emerge.Critical Sociology51(2): 257–282.
64.
KorotayevAIssaevLZinkinaJ (2015) Center-periphery dissonance as a possible factor of the revolutionary wave of 2013–2014: A cross-national analysis. Cross-Cultural Research49(5): 461–488.
65.
KorotayevAUstyuzhaninVGrininL, et al. (2025b) The fifth generation of revolution studies. Part II: A systematic review of substantive findings (revolution causes, forms, and waves). Critical Sociology51(3): 429–450.
66.
KorotayevAZhdanovAGrininL, et al. (2025c) Revolution and democracy in the twenty-first century.Cross-Cultural Research59(2): 180–215.
67.
KorotayevAZhdanovAZinkinaJ, et al. (2025d) Why do revolutions tend to become less violent? Some explanations of the global trend.Comparative Sociology24(6): 801–842.
68.
KosmidisIFirthD (2009) Bias reduction in exponential family nonlinear models.Biometrika96(4): 793–804.
69.
LallR (2016) How multiple imputation makes a difference.Political Analysis24(4): 414–433.
70.
LawsonG (2019) Anatomies of Revolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
71.
LedererE (1936) On revolutions.Social Research3(1): 1–18.
72.
LevitskySWayL (2022) Revolution and Dictatorship: The Violent Origins of Durable Authoritarianism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
73.
LindJTMehlumH (2010) With or without U? The appropriate test for a U-shaped relationship. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics72(1): 109–118.
74.
LipsetSM (1959) Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy.American Political Science Review53(1): 69–105.
75.
LynchM (2013) The Arab Uprising: The Unfinished Revolutions of the New Middle East. New York: Public Affairs.
76.
MabonS (2012) Kingdom in crisis? The arab spring and instability in Saudi Arabia.Contemporary Security Policy33(3): 530–553.
77.
MacCullochR (2004) The impact of income on the taste for revolt.American Journal of Political Science48(4): 830–848.
78.
MacCullochRPezziniS (2010) The roles of freedom, growth, and religion in the taste for revolution.The Journal of Law and Economics53(2): 329–358.
79.
MarxKEngelsF (2002 [1848]) The Communist Manifesto. London: Penguin.
80.
McAdamDTarrowSTillyC (2001) Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
81.
McCarthyJDZaldMN (1977) Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory.American Journal of Sociology82(6): 1212–1241.
PapavaV (2005) On the theory of post-communist economic transition to market.International Journal of Social Economics32(1/2): 77–97.
84.
PapavaV (2006) The political economy of Georgia's rose revolution.Orbis50(4): 657–667.
85.
PinckneyJ (2020) Curving the resource curse: Negative effects of oil and gas revenue on nonviolent resistance campaign onset. Research and Politics7(2): 6.
86.
PrzeworskiAAlvarezMECheibubJA, et al. (2000) Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804946.
87.
PrzeworskiALimongiF (1997) Modernization: Theories and facts.World Politics49(2): 155–183.
88.
RadnitzS (2006) What really happened in Kyrgyzstan?Journal of Democracy17(2): 132–146.
89.
RitterDP (2019) The (R)evolution is dead, long live the (r)evolution!. Contention7(2): 100–107.
90.
RørbækLL (2019) Ethnic exclusion and civil resistance campaigns: Opting for nonviolent or violent tactics?Terrorism and Political Violence31(3): 475–493.
Sala-i-MartinX (1997) I just ran two million regressions.The American Economic Review87(2): 178–183.
93.
SchaftenaarS (2017) How (wo)Men rebel: Exploring the effect of gender equality on nonviolent and armed conflict onset.Journal of Peace Research54(6): 762–776.
94.
SchockK (2013) The practice and study of civil resistance.Journal of Peace Research50(3): 277–290.
95.
SimonsohnU (2018) Two lines: A valid alternative to the invalid testing of U-shaped relationships with quadratic regressions.Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science1(4): 538–555.
96.
SkocpolT (1979) States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511815805.
97.
SlinkoEBilyugaSZinkinaJ, et al. (2017) Regime type and political destabilization in cross-national perspective: A re-analysis.Cross-Cultural Research51(1): 26–50.
UstyuzhaninVKorotayevA (2023) Education and revolutions: Why do revolutionary uprisings take violent or nonviolent forms?Cross-Cultural Research57(4): 352–390.
WelzelC (2013) Freedom Rising: Human Empowerment and the Quest for Emancipation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139540919.
106.
WheatonBKavanZ (2018) The Velvet Revolution: Czechoslovakia, 1988–1991. New York: Routledge.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
