This essay examines the roles of collaboration and challenging assumptions as key mechanisms for generating and developing research agendas in Peace Science. Successfully challenging assumptions requires that we identify meaningful differences from reality, show that retaining an assumption is problematic, and that the change has effects on outcomes we care about. Working with collaborators has important effects on our ability to question assumptions as we ask research questions, build theory, and create data.
AlesinaASpolaoreE (2005) The Size of Nations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
ArvesSCunninghamKGMcCullochC (2019) Rebel tactics and external public opinion. Research & Politics6(3): 205316801987703.
3.
BakkeKM (2015) Decentralization and Intrastate Struggles: Chechnya, Punjab, and Québec. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BakkeKMCunninghamKGSeymourLJM (2012) A plague of initials: Fragmentation, cohesion, and infighting in civil wars.Perspectives on Politics10(2): 265–283.
5.
BraithwaiteJMCunninghamKG (2020) When organizations rebel: Introducing the foundations of rebel group emergence (FORGE) dataset.International Studies Quarterly64(1): 183–193.
6.
BraithwaiteJMCunninghamKG (2023) Backgrounds with benefits? Rebel group origins and concessions during civil wars in Africa.Journal of Conflict Resolution68(9): 1691–1691.
ChenowethECunninghamKG (2013) Understanding nonviolent resistance: An Introduction.Journal of Peace Research50(3): 271–276.
9.
ChenowethECunninghamKG (2023) Guest Editors’ introduction: Nonviolent resistance and its discontents.Journal of Peace Research60(1): 3–8.
10.
CunninghamDEGleditschKSSalehyanI (2013) Non-State actors in civil wars: A new dataset. Conflict Management and Peace Science30(5): 516–531.
11.
CunninghamKG (2011) Divide and conquer or divide and concede: How do states respond to internally divided separatists?American Political Science Review105(2): 275–297.
12.
CunninghamKG (2013) Actor fragmentation and civil war bargaining: How internal divisions generate civil conflict.American Journal of Political Science57(3): 659–672.
13.
CunninghamKG (2014) Inside the Politics of Self-Determination. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
14.
CunninghamKG (2023) Choosing tactics: The efficacy of violence and nonviolence in self-determination disputes. Journal of Peace Research60(1): 124–140.
15.
CunninghamKGBakkeKMSeymourLJM (2012) Shirts today, skins tomorrow: Dual contests and the effects of fragmentation in self-determination disputes.Journal of Conflict Resolution56(1): 67–93.
16.
CunninghamKGDahlMFrugéA (2020) Introducing the strategies of resistance data project.Journal of Peace Research57(3): 482–491.
17.
DaviesSPetterssonTÖbergM (2023) Organized violence 1989–2022, and the return of conflict between states.Journal of Peace Research60(4): 691–708.
18.
DemourianAYenokianG (2023) Over Half of Nagorno–Karabakh’s Population Flees as the Separatist Government Says it Will Dissolve. Associated Press. September 28, 2023https://apnews.com/article/nagorno-karabakh-azerbaijan-armenia-separatist-government-689e9e437f60a92eaca2523d57bc3d42
19.
DietrichNEckK (2020) Known unknowns: Media bias in the reporting of political violence.International Interactions46(6): 1043–1060.
20.
DubashNK (2021) Varieties of climate governance: The emergence and functioning of climate institutions.Environmental Politics30(suppl.1): 1–25.
21.
FearonJD (1995) Rationalist explanations for war.International Organization49(3): 379–414.
GilmoreEARisiLHTennantE, et al. (2018) Bridging research and policy on climate change and conflict.Current Climate Change Reports4(4): 313–319.
24.
GleditschNP (2012) Whither the weather? Climate change and conflict.Journal of Peace Research49(1): 3–9.
25.
GourevitchPA (1979) The reemergence of “peripheral nationalisms”: Some comparative speculations on the spatial distribution of political leadership and economic growth.Comparative Studies in Society and History21(3): 303–322.
26.
HarveyS (2013) A different perspective: The multiple effects of deep level diversity on group creativity.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology49(5): 822–832.
MannixENealeMA (2005) What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations.Psychological Science in the Public Interest6(2): 31–55.
32.
MillikenFJBartelCAKurtzbergTR (2003) Diversity and creativity in work groups. In: Paulus PB and Nijstad BA (eds)Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 32–62.
33.
MooreWH (2015) Tilting at a windmill? The conceptual problem in contemporary peace science.Conflict Management and Peace Science32(4): 356–369.
34.
PearlmanW (2011) Violence, Nonviolence, and the Palestinian National Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
PowellR (2006) War as a commitment problem.International Organization60(1): 169–203.
36.
Reuters (2022) Scottish Voters Remain Split over Independence after Fresh Referendum Bid.Reuters.
37.
RoederPG (2018) National Secession: Persuasion and Violence in Independence Campaigns. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
38.
RudloffPFindleyMG (2016) The downstream effects of combatant fragmentation on civil war recurrence.Journal of Peace Research53(1): 19–32.
39.
SalehyanI (2008) From climate change to conflict? No consensus yet.Journal of Peace Research45(3): 315–326.
40.
SeymourLJ (2014) Why factions switch sides in civil wars: Rivalry, patronage, and realignment in Sudan.International Security39(2): 92–131.
41.
SeymourLJBakkeKMCunninghamKG (2016) E pluribus unum, ex uno plures: Competition, violence, and fragmentation in ethnopolitical movements.Journal of Peace Research53(1): 3–18.
42.
SlantchevBL (2003) The principle of convergence in wartime negotiations.American Political Science Review97(4): 621–632.
43.
TheisenOMGleditschNPBuhaugH (2013) Is climate change a driver of armed conflict?Climatic Change117(3): 613–625.
44.
ToftMD (2003) The Geography of Ethnic Violence: Identity, Interests, and the Indivisibility of Territory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
