Civil wars are difficult to resolve through negotiated settlements. Rebel institutions are thought to make negotiations more successful. I show, however, that this positive association does not hold. Rather, rebel service provision is negatively correlated with successful negotiated settlements. The well-established literature on commitment problems suggests that negotiated settlements are not reached because governments end negotiations amidst fears of rebel growth from civilian support derived from service provision. I offer an alternative explanation—strategic stalling—based on rebel incentives to realize the full long-term benefits of service provision. Qualitative evidence shows that observable implications of strategic stalling are observed in the cases surveyed.
ArenasJ (1990) Paz, Amigos y Enemigos. Colombia: La Abeja Negra.
4.
ArjonaA (2014) Wartime institutions: A research agenda. Journal of Conflict Resolution58(8): 1360–1389.
5.
ArjonaA (2016) Rebelocracy: Social Order in the Colombian Civil War. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BalcellsLKalyvasSN (2015) Revolutionary Rebels and the Marxist Paradox. Working paper. cpd.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Marxlns_4_15.pdf.
7.
BeittelJS (2015) Peace Talks in Colombia. Technical report, Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
8.
BoltJInklaarRde JongH, et al. (2018) Rebasing “Maddison”: New income comparisons and the shape of long-run economic development. GGDC Research Memorandum, 174: 1–41.
9.
BraithwaiteJMCunninghamKG (2019) When Organizations Rebel: Introducing the Foundations of Rebel Group Emergence Dataset. International Studies Quarterly 64(1): 183–193.
10.
BraunHT (2007) “Que haiga paz!” The cultural contexts of conflict in Colombia. In: WelnaCGallonG (eds) Peace, Democracy and Human Rights in Colombia. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame, pp.23–59.
11.
ClaytonG (2013) Relative rebel strength and the onset and outcome of civil war mediation. Journal of Peace Research50(5): 609–622.
12.
CogginsB (2015) Rebel diplomacy: Theorizing violent non-state actors’ strategic use of talk. In: ArjonaAKasfirNMampillyZ (eds) Rebel Governance in Civil War. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.98–118.
13.
CunninghamD (2011) Barriers to Peace in Civil Wars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
FearonJDLaitinDD (2008) Civil war termination. Working paper. web.stanford.edu/group/fearon-research/cgi-bin/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/civil-war-termination.pdf.
HennesseyT (2015) The First Northern Ireland Peace Process. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
25.
HuangR (2016) The Wartime Origins of Postwar Democratization: Civil War, Rebel Governance, and Political Regimes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26.
IsacsonARodriguezJR (2009) Origins, evolution, and lessons of the Colombian peace movement. In: BouvierVM (ed.) Colombia: Building Peace in a Time of War2. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace, pp.19–37.
27.
JungDF (2017) Determinants of rebel and terrorist organizational structure and the effects of counter-insurgency: Population dynamics and organizational ecology in rebellion. Working paper.
28.
KalyvasSN (2006) The Logic of Violence in Civil War. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29.
KalyvasSN (2015) Rebel governance during the Greek civil war, 1942–1949. In: ArjonaAKasfirNMampillyZ (eds) Rebel Governance in Civil War. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.119–137.
30.
KasfirN (2015) Rebel governance—constructing a field of inquiry: Definitions, scope, patterns, order, causes. In: ArjonaAKasfirNMampillyZC (eds) Rebel Governance in Civil War. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.21–46.
31.
KilcullenD (2011) The Accidental Guerrilla. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
KlineHF (2007) Chronicle of a Failure Foretold. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
33.
KreutzJ (2010) How and when armed conflicts end: Introducing the UCDP conflict termination dataset. Journal of Peace Research47(2): 243–250.
34.
LacinaBGleditschNP (2005) Monitoring trends in global combat: A new dataset of battle deaths. European Journal of Population21(2-3): 145–166.
35.
LaftaRCetorelliVBurnhamG (2018) Living in Mosul during the time of ISIS and the military liberation: Results from a 40-cluster household survey. Conflict and Health12(1): 4–11.
36.
LedwidgeF (2017) Rebel Law: Insurgents, Courts and Justice in Modern Conflict. London: Hurst.
37.
LickliderR (1995) The consequences of negotiated settlements in civil wars, 1945–1993. The American Political Science Review89(3): 681–690.
38.
MampillyZC (2011) Rebel Rulers: Insurgent Governance and Civilian Life During War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
39.
MampillyZ (2015) Performing the nation-state: Rebel governance and symbolic processes. In: ArjonaAKasfirNMampillyZ (eds) Rebel Governance in Civil War. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.74–97.
40.
MasonDTFettPJ (1996) How civil wars End: A rational choice approach. American Journal of Political Science40(4): 546–568.
41.
MattesMSavunB (2009) Fostering peace after civil war: Commitment problems and agreement design. International Studies Quarterly53(3): 737–759.
42.
NasiC (2009) Colombia’s peace processes, 1982–2002. In: BouvierVM (ed) Colombia: Building Peace in a Time of War. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace, pp. 39–64.
43.
PopkinSL (1979) The Rational Peasant. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
44.
PowellR (1999) In the Shadow of Power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45.
PowellR (2006) War as a commitment problem. International Organization60(1): 169–203.
46.
ReganPMMichael GreigJ (2008) When do they say yes? An analysis of the willingness to offer and accept mediation in civil wars. International Studies Quarterly52(4): 759–781.
47.
StewartM (2016) Civil war as state building: The determinants of insurgent public goods provision. Dissertation, Georgetown University.
48.
StewartM (2018) Civil war as state building: Strategic governance in civil war. International Organization72(1): 205–226.
49.
StewartMA (2020) Rebel governance: Military boon or military bust?Conflict Management and Peace Science37(1): 16–38.
50.
TNA (1974) CJ 4/1225 A Plan for a Cease Fire JB Bourh. London: The National Archives of the UK.
51.
TNA (1975a) FCO 87/460 Letter from Northern Ireland Office to G W Harding. London: The National Archives of the UK.
52.
TNA (1975b) FCO 87/460 Parliamentary Statement: 11 February 1975. London: The National Archives of the UK.
53.
TNA (1975c) FCO 87/460 Visit of Frank Cooper by Arthur Galsworthy. London: The National Archives of the UK.
54.
ToftM (2010) Securing the Peace: The Durable Settlement of Civil Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
55.
UzonyiGHananiaR (2017) Government-sponsored mass killing and civil war reoccurrence. International Studies Quarterly61(3): 677–689.
56.
WagstaffWAJungDF (2017) Competing for constituents: Trends in terrorist service provision. Terrorism and Political Violence6553: 1–32.
57.
WalterB (2002) Committing to Peace: The Successful Settlement of Civil Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
58.
WalterB (2004) Does conflict beget conflict? Explaining recurring civil war. Journal of Peace Research41(3): 371–388.
59.
WalterBF (2009) Bargaining failures and civil war. Annual Review of Political Science12(1): 243–261.
60.
WeberE (1976) Peasants into Frenchmen: The Modernization of Rural France, 1870–1914. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
61.
WeinsteinJM (2007) Inside Rebellion: The Politics of Insurgent Violence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
62.
WilkinCRC (1975) Provisional IRA Reorganisation during the Ceasefire. Technical report. Lisburn: British Forces Headquarters.
63.
ZartmanIW (1989) Ripe for Resolution: Conflict and Intervention in Africa. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
