Civil conflict increases incumbents’ vulnerability, expands their coercive capacity, enervates public good provision, and stifles public opposition. Consequently, we expect that elections held during civil conflict will feature more incumbent-perpetrated election violence. We test our argument with disaggregated data on election violence, generating two principal findings. First, elections held during civil conflict are more likely to feature violent coercion by incumbents. Second, this effect does not depend on the conflict's intensity or political salience, but is endemic to conflict-affected societies as a class. This raises questions about the nature of elections in conflict-affected societies and the relationship between forms of political violence.
BalcellsL (2012) The consequences of victimization on political identities: Evidence from Spain. Politics & Society40(3): 311–347.
2.
BeaulieuE (2014) Electoral protest and democracy in the developing world. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BeaulieuEHydeSD (2009) In the shadow of democracy promotion: Strategic manipulation, international observers, and election boycotts. Comparative Political Studies42(3): 392–415.
4.
BeberBRoesslerPScaccoA (2014) Intergroup violence and political attitudes: Evidence from a dividing Sudan. The Journal of Politics76(3): 649–665.
5.
BellAJonesK (2015) Explaining fixed effects: Random effects modeling of time-series cross-sectional and panel data. Political Science Research and Methods3(1): 133–153.
6.
BellCSudduthJK (2017) The causes and outcomes of coup during civil war. Journal of Conflict Resolution61(7): 1432–1455.
7.
BerrebiCKlorEF (2008) Are voters sensitive to terrorism? Direct evidence from the Israeli electorate. American Political Science Review102(3): 279–301.
8.
BirchSMuchlinskiD (2017) The dataset of countries at risk of electoral violence. Terrorism and Political Violence32(2): 217–236.
9.
BirchSMuchlinskiD (2018) Electoral violence prevention: What works?Democratization25(3): 385–403.
10.
BirchSDaxeckerUHöglundK (2020) Electoral violence: An introduction. Journal of Peace Research57(1): 3–14.
11.
BirnirJKGohdesA (2018) Voting in the shadow of violence: Electoral politics and conflict in Peru. Journal of Global Security Studies3(2): 181–197.
12.
BjarnegårdE (2018) Making gender visible in election violence: Strategies for data collection. Politics & Gender14(4): 690–695.
13.
BrancatiDSnyderJ (2013) Time to kill: The impact of election timing on postconflict stability. Journal of Conflict Resolution57(5): 822–853.
14.
BroschéJFjeldeHHöglundK (2020) Electoral violence and the legacy of authoritarian rule in Kenya and Zambia. Journal of Peace Research57(1): 111–125.
15.
CollierPCollierElliottVLHegreH, et al. (2003) Breaking the conflict trap: Civil war and development policy. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
16.
CondraLNLongJDShaverAC, et al. (2018) The logic of insurgent electoral violence. American Economic Review108(11): 3199–3231.
17.
CostalliSRuggeriA (2015) Forging political entrepreneurs: Civil war effects on post-conflict politics in Italy. Political Geography44(1): 40–49.
18.
CunninghamDEGleditschKSSalehyanI (2013) Non-state actors in civil wars: A new dataset. Conflict Management and Peace Science30(5): 516–531.
19.
DavenportC (2007) State repression and political order. Annual Review of Political Science10(1): 1–23.
20.
DaxeckerU (2012) The cost of exposing cheating: International election monitoring, fraud, and post-election violence in Africa. Journal of Peace Research49(4): 503–516.
21.
DaxeckerU (2014) All quiet on election day? International election observation and incentives for pre-election violence in African elections. Electoral Studies34: 232–243.
22.
DaxeckerU (2020) Unequal votes, unequal violence: Malapportionment and election violence in India. Journal of Peace Research57(1): 156–170.
23.
DaxeckerUJungA (2018) Mixing votes with violence: Election violence around the world. SAIS Review of International Affairs38(1): 53–64.
24.
DaxeckerUAmicarelliEJungA (2018) Electoral Contention and Violence (ECAV) Codebook. Available at:https://ecavdata.org/codebook/ (accessed 28 June 2020).
25.
DaxeckerUAmicarelliEJungA (2019) Electoral Contention and Violence (ECAV): A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research56(5): 714–723.
26.
DresdenJRFloresTENooruddinI (2019) Theories of democratic change, phase III: Transitions from conflict. Washington, DC.: United States Agency for International Development.
27.
DunningT (2011) Fighting and voting: Violent conflict and electoral politics. Journal of Conflict Resolution55(3): 327–339.
28.
FjeldeH (2020) Political party strength and electoral violence. Journal of Peace Research57(1): 140–155.
29.
FjeldeHHöglundK (2016) Electoral institutions and electoral violence in sub-Saharan Africa. British Journal of Political Science46(2): 297–320.
30.
FloresTENooruddinI (2012) The effect of elections on postconflict peace and reconstruction. The Journal of Politics74(2): 558–570.
31.
FloresTENooruddinI (2016) Elections in hard times: Building stronger democracies in the 21st century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
GhobarahHAHuthPRussettB (2004) The post-war public health effects of civil conflict. Social Science & Medicine59(4): 869–884.
Hafner-BurtonEMHydeSDJablonskiRS (2014) When do governments resort to election violence?British Journal of Political Science44(1): 149–179.
39.
Hafner-BurtonEMHydeSDJablonskiRS (2018) Surviving elections: Election violence, incumbent victory and post-election repercussions. British Journal of Political Science48(2): 459–488.
40.
HarishSPLittleAT (2017) The political violence cycle. American Political Science Review111(2): 237–255.
41.
HöglundK (2009) Electoral violence in conflict-ridden societies: Concepts, causes, and consequences. Terrorism and Political Violence21(3): 412–427.
42.
HöglundKJarstadAKKovacsMS (2009) The predicament of elections in war-torn societies. Democratization16(3): 530–557.
43.
HutchisonML (2014) Tolerating threat? The independent effects of civil conflict on domestic political tolerance. Journal of Conflict Resolution58(5): 796–824.
44.
HydeSDMarinovN (2012) Which elections can be lost?Political Analysis20(2): 191–210.
45.
JoshiM (2014) Post-accord political violence, elections, and peace processes: Evidence from Nepal. Civil Wars16(3): 276–299.
46.
KitscheltHWilkinsonSI (eds) (2007) Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of democratic accountability and political competition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
47.
KuhnP (2015) Do contentious elections trigger violence? In: NorrisPFrankRComaFMi (eds) Contentious elections: From ballots to barricades. New York: Taylor and Francis, pp.89–110.
48.
LupuNPeisakhinL (2017) The legacy of political violence across generations. American Journal of Political Science61(4): 836–851.
49.
MarshallMG (2017) Polity IV Project: Dataset users’ manual. Vienna, VA: Center for Systemic Peace.
50.
MatanockAM (2017) Electing peace: From civil conflict to political participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
MatanockAMStanilandP (2018) How and why armed groups participate in elections. Perspectives on Politics16(3): 710–727.
52.
NichterS (2018) Voters for survival: Relational clientelism in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
53.
PowellJ (2012) Determinants of the attempting and outcome of coups d’état. Journal of Conflict Resolution56(6): 1017–1040.
54.
Pyne-MercierLDJohn-StewartGCRichardsonBA, et al. (2011) The consequences of post-election violence on antiretroviral HIV therapy in Kenya. AIDS care23(5): 562–568.
55.
ReganPMHendersonEA (2002) Democracy, threats and political repression in developing countries: Are democracies internally less violent?Third World Quarterly23(1): 119–136.
56.
RitterEHConradCR (2016) Preventing and responding to dissent: The observational challenges of explaining strategic repression. American Political Science Review110(1): 85–99.
57.
Ruiz-RufinoRBirchS (2020) The effect of alternation in power on electoral intimidation in democratizing regimes. Journal of Peace Research57(1): 126–139.
SalehyanI (2007) Transnational rebels: Neighboring states as sanctuary for rebel groups. World Politics59(2): 217–242.
60.
SalehyanILinebargerC (2015) Elections and social conflict in Africa, 1990–2009. Studies in Comparative International Development50(1): 23–49.
61.
SalehyanIHendrixCSHamnerJ, et al. (2012) Social conflict in Africa: A new database. International Interactions38(4): 503–511.
62.
SimpserA (2013) Why governments and parties manipulate elections: Theory, practice, and implications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63.
SmidtH (2016) From a perpetrator’s perspective: International election observers and post-electoral violence. Journal of Peace Research53(2): 226–241.
64.
SmidtH (2020) Mitigating election violence locally: UN peacekeepers’ election-education campaigns in Côte d’Ivoire. Journal of Peace Research57(1): 199–216.
65.
SmidtH (2021) Keeping electoral peace? Activities of United Nations peackeeping operations and their effects on election-related violence. Conflict Management and Peace Science. OnlineFirst. doi: 10.1177%2F0738894220960041.
66.
SteeleA (2011) Electing displacement: Political cleansing in Apartadó, Colombia. Journal of Conflict Resolution55(3): 423–445.
67.
TaylorCFPevehouseJCStrausS (2017) Perils of pluralism: Electoral violence and incumbency in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Peace Research54(3): 397–411.
68.
ThemnérL (2018) UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset Codebook. Uppsala Conflict Data Program and the Centre for the Study of Civil Wars, International Peace Research Institute, Oslo.
69.
Von BorzyskowskiI (2019) The credibility challenge: How democracy assistance influences election violence. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
70.
Von BorzyskowskiIKuhnPM (2020) Dangerously informed: Voter information and pre-electoral violence in Africa. Journal of Peace Research57(1): 15–29.
71.
WahmanMGoldringE (2020) Pre-election violence and territorial control: Political dominance and subnational election violence in polarized African electoral systems. Journal of Peace Research57(1): 93–110.
72.
WoodEJ (2008) The social processes of civil war: The wartime transformation of social networks. Annual Review of Political Science11(1): 539–561.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
