How can ethnic reconciliation be achieved in conflict settings where populations are physically separated? We address this question by examining the role of “extended contact”—a form of indirect contact which entails learning about the contact experiences of others—in the context of Cyprus’s frozen conflict. We field a survey experiment in order to test two pathways through which extended contact works: (1) by helping build a common identity; and (2) by activating empathy. We find that our treatments are associated with greater trust in the outgroup and greater support for cross-ethnic interaction, but only among segments of the population that are initially less favorable toward reconciliation.
AdidaCLLoAPlatasMR (2018) Perspective taking can promote short-term inclusionary behavior toward Syrian refugees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115(38): 9521–9526.
2.
AllportG (1954) The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
3.
AltemeyerB (2009) Why do religious fundamentalists tend to be prejudiced?The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion13(1): 17–28.
4.
Bar-TalD (2000) From intractable conflict through conflict resolution to reconciliation: Psychological analysis. Political Psychology21(2): 351–365.
5.
BashirBGoldbergA (2014) Deliberating the Holocaust and the Nakba: Disruptive empathy and binationalism in Israel/Palestine. Journal of Genocide Research16(1): 77–99.
6.
BatsonCD (2013) Individual religion, tolerance, and universal compassion. In: Religion, Intolerance, and Conflict: A Scientific and Conceptual Investigation. Oxford University Press, pp. 88–106.
7.
BauerMBlattmanCChytilováJHenrichJMiguelEMittsT (2016) Can war foster cooperation?Journal of Economic Perspectives30(3): 249–74.
8.
Burch-BrownJBakerW (2016) Religion and reducing prejudice. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations19(6): 784–807.
9.
CameronLRutlandA (2006) Extended contact through story reading in school: Reducing children’s prejudice toward the disabled. Journal of Social Issues62(3): 469–488.
10.
CameronLRutlandAHossainRPetleyR (2011) When and why does extended contact work? The role of high quality direct contact and group norms in the development of positive ethnic intergroup attitudes amongst children. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations14(2): 193–206.
11.
CanettiDHallBJRapaportCWayneC (2013) Exposure to political violence and political extremism. European Psychologist18(4): 263–272.
12.
CanettiDKhatibIRubinAWayneC (2019) Framing and fighting: The impact of conflict frames on political attitudes. Journal of Peace Research56(6): 737–752.
13.
ClevenE (2020) Making connections? A study of interethnic dialogue in a divided community in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Ethnopolitics19(2): 125–149.
14.
CohenTRInskoCA (2008) War and peace: Possible approaches to reducing intergroup conflict. Perspectives on Psychological Science3(2): 87–93.
15.
CookSW (1985) Experimenting on social issues: The case of school desegregation. American Psychologist40(4): 452.
16.
De KadtDSandsML (2021) Racial isolation drives racial voting: Evidence from the new South Africa. Political Behavior43: 87–117.
17.
De LucaGVerpoortenM (2015) Civil war, social capital and resilience in Uganda. Oxford Economic Papers67(3): 661–686.
18.
DhontKVan HielA (2011) Direct contact and authoritarianism as moderators between extended contact and reduced prejudice: Lower threat and greater trust as mediators. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations14(2): 223–237.
19.
DikomitisL (2005) Three readings of a border: Greek Cypriots crossing the Green Line in Cyprus. Anthropology Today21(5): 7–12.
20.
DovidioJFGaertnerSLSaguyT (2009) Commonality and the complexity of we: Social attitudes and social change. Personality and Social Psychology Review13(1): 3–20.
21.
DovidioJFEllerAHewstoneM (2011) Improving intergroup relations through direct, extended and other forms of indirect contact. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations14(2): 147–160.
22.
DyrstadKBuhaugHRingdalKSimkusAListhaugO (2011) Microfoundations of civil conflict reconciliation: Ethnicity and context. International Interactions37(4): 363–387.
23.
EllerAAbramsDZimmermannA (2011) Two degrees of separation: A longitudinal study of actual and perceived extended international contact. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations14(2): 175–191.
24.
FestingerL (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations7(2): 117–140.
25.
FisherRJ (1994) Generic principles for resolving intergroup conflict. Journal of Social Issues50(1): 47–66.
26.
GaertnerSLMannJADovidioJFMurrellAJPomareM (1990) How does cooperation reduce intergroup bias?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology59(4): 692.
27.
GaertnerSLDovidioJFBachmanBA (1996) Revisiting the contact hypothesis: The induction of a common ingroup identity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations20(3-4): 271–290.
28.
GeorgiadesSD (2007) Public attitudes towards peace: The Greek-Cypriot position. Journal of Peace Research44(5): 573–586.
29.
GilliganMJPasqualeBJSamiiC (2014) Civil war and social cohesion: Lab-in-the-field evidence from Nepal. American Journal of Political Science58(3): 604–619.
30.
GómezATroppLRFernándezS (2011) When extended contact opens the door to future contact: Testing the effects of extended contact on attitudes and intergroup expectancies in majority and minority groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations14(2): 161–173.
31.
HadjipavlouM (2007) The Cyprus conflict: Root causes and implications for peace-building. Journal of Peace Research44(3): 349–365.
32.
HallDLMatzDCWoodW (2010) Why don’t we practice what we preach? A meta-analytic review of religious racism. Personality and Social Psychology Review14(1): 126–139.
33.
HewstoneMCairnsEVociAHambergerJNiensU (2006) Intergroup contact, forgiveness, and experience of The Troubles in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Issues62(1): 99–120.
34.
HodsonG (2011) Do ideologically intolerant people benefit from intergroup contact?Current Directions in Psychological Science20(3): 154–159.
35.
HodsonRSekulicDMasseyG (1994) National tolerance in the former Yugoslavia. American Journal of Sociology99(6): 1534–1558.
36.
HongJYKangWC (2017) Trauma and stigma: The long-term effects of wartime violence on political attitudes. Conflict Management and Peace Science34(3): 264–286.
37.
IngelaereBVerpoortenM (2020) Trust in the aftermath of genocide: Insights from Rwandan life histories. Journal of Peace Research, 0022343319899136.
38.
KanasAScheepersPSterkensC (2017) Positive and negative contact and attitudes towards the religious out-group: Testing the contact hypothesis in conflict and non-conflict regions of Indonesia and the Philippines. Social Science Research63: 95–110.
39.
KarimS (2020) Relational state building in areas of limited statehood: Experimental evidence on the attitudes of the police. American Political Science Review114(2): 536–551.
40.
KenworthyJBVociAAl RamiahATauschNHughesJHewstoneM (2016) Building trust in a postconflict society: An integrative model of cross-group friendship and intergroup emotions. Journal of Conflict Resolution60(6): 1041–1070.
41.
KijewskiSFreitagM (2018) Civil war and the formation of social trust in Kosovo: Posttraumatic growth or war-related distress?Journal of Conflict Resolution62(4): 717–742.
42.
KijewskiSRappC (2019) Moving forward? How war experiences, interethnic attitudes, and intergroup forgiveness affect the prospects for political tolerance in postwar Sri Lanka. Journal of Peace Research56(6): 845–859.
43.
LiebkindKMcAlisterAL (1999) Extended contact through peer modelling to promote tolerance in Finland. European Journal of Social Psychology29(5–6): 765–780.
44.
LupuNPeisakhinL (2017) The legacy of political violence across generations. American Journal of Political Science61(4): 836–851.
45.
MalhotraDLiyanageS (2005) Long-term effects of peace workshops in protracted conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution49(6): 908–924.
46.
MaozI (2011) Does contact work in protracted asymmetrical conflict? Appraising 20 years of reconciliation-aimed encounters between Israeli Jews and Palestinians. Journal of Peace Research48(1): 115–125.
47.
McKeownSPsaltisC (2017) Intergroup contact and the mediating role of intergroup trust on outgroup evaluation and future contact intentions in Cyprus and Northern Ireland. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology23(4): 392.
48.
MilesECrispRJ (2014) A meta-analytic test of the imagined contact hypothesis. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations17(1): 3–26.
49.
MironovaVWhittS (2014) Ethnicity and altruism after violence: The contact hypothesis in Kosovo. Journal of Experimental Political Science1(2): 170–180.
50.
MironovaVWhittS (2016) The evolution of prosociality and parochialism after violence. Journal of Peace Research53(5): 648–664.
51.
NadlerALiviatanI (2006) Intergroup reconciliation: Effects of adversary’s expressions of empathy, responsibility, and recipients’ trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin32(4): 459–470.
52.
NairGSambanisN (2019) Violence exposure and ethnic identification: Evidence from Kashmir. International Organization73(2): 329–363.
53.
PaluckELGreenDP (2009) Prejudice reduction: What works? A review and assessment of research and practice. Annual Review of Psychology60: 339–367.
54.
PettigrewTF (1971) Racially Separate or Together?New York: McGraw-Hill.
55.
PettigrewTF (1998) Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology49(1): 65–85.
56.
PettigrewTFTroppLR (2006) Ameta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology90(5): 751.
57.
PoratRHalperinEBar-TalD (2015) The effect of sociopsychological barriers on the processing of new information about peace opportunities. Journal of Conflict Resolution59(1): 93–119.
58.
PowellRClarkeS (2013) Religion, tolerance and intolerance: Views from across the disciplines. Religion, Intolerance and Conflict: A Scientific and Conceptual Investigation pp.1–35.
59.
PsaltisC (2012) Intergroup Trust and Contact in Transition: A Social Representations Perspective on the Cyprus Conflict. Abingdon: Routledge.
60.
PsaltisCLoizidesNLaPierreAStefanovicD (2019) Transitional justice and acceptance of cohabitation in Cyprus. Ethnic and Racial Studies42(11): 1850–1869.
61.
PsaltisCCakalHLoizidesNKuşçu BonnenfantI (2020) Internally displaced persons and the Cyprus peace process. International Political Science Review41(1): 138–154.
62.
RamiahAAHewstoneMLittleTDLangK (2014) The influence of status on the relationship between intergroup contact, threat, and prejudice in the context of a nation-building intervention in Malaysia. Journal of Conflict Resolution58(7): 1202–1229.
63.
RiekBMManiaEWGaertnerSL (2006) Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review10(4): 336–353.
64.
RoslerNCohen-ChenSHalperinE (2017) The distinctive effects of empathy and hope in intractable conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution61(1): 114–139.
65.
SambanisNShayoM (2013) Social identification and ethnic conflict. American Political Science Review pp. 294–325.
66.
SamiiC (2013) Perils or promise of ethnic integration? Evidence from a hard case in Burundi. American Political Science Review107(3): 558–573.
67.
ScaccoAWarrenSS (2018) Can social contact reduce prejudice and discrimination? Evidence from a field experiment in Nigeria. American Political Science Review112(3): 654–677.
68.
SharpMVociAHewstoneM (2011) Individual difference variables as moderators of the effect of extended cross-group friendship on prejudice: Testing the effects of public self-consciousness and social comparison. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations14(2): 207–221.
69.
ShechtmanZBasheero (2005) Normative beliefs supporting aggression of Arab children in an intergroup conflict. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression31(4): 324–335.
70.
SherifM (1966) In Common Predicament: Social Psychology of Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
71.
SimasENCliffordSKirklandJH (2020) How empathic concern fuels political polarization. American Political Science Review114(1): 258–269.
72.
SimonovitsGKezdiGKardosP (2018) Seeing the world through the other’s eye: An online intervention reducing ethnic prejudice. American Political Science Review112(1): 186–193.
StathiSCrispRJTurnerRNWestKBirtelMD (2012) Using mental imagery to promote positive intergroup relations. In: RussellDWRussellCA (Eds.), Psychology research progress. The psychology of prejudice: Interdisciplinary perspectives on contemporary issues (p. 235–250). Nova Science Publishers.
76.
StephanCWStephanWG (1992) Reducing intercultural anxiety through intercultural contact. International Journal of Intercultural Relations16(1): 89–106.
77.
StephanWGFinlayK (1999) The role of empathy in improving intergroup relations. Journal of Social issues55(4): 729–743.
78.
StephanWGStephanCW (2000) An integrated threat theory of prejudice. Reducing Prejudice and Discrimination In: OskampS (Ed.) “The Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology” Reducing prejudice and discrimination (p. 23–45). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
79.
TauschNHewstoneMSchmidKHughesJCairnsE (2011) Extended contact effects as a function of closeness of relationship with ingroup contacts. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations14(2): 239–254.
80.
ThomasP (1971) Racially separate or together?New York: McGraw Hill.
81.
TurnerRNHewstoneMVociAVonofakouC (2008) A test of the extended intergroup contact hypothesis: The mediating role of intergroup anxiety, perceived ingroup and outgroup norms, and inclusion of the outgroup in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology95(4): 843.
82.
UNDP (2010) Level of trust between the two communities in Cyprus. Action for Cooperation and Trust Initiative.
83.
WangDJohnstonAIWangB (2020) The effect of imagined social contact on Chinese students’ perceptions of Japanese people. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 0022002720942824.
84.
WeissCM (2019) Curing prejudice through representative bureaucracies: Evidence from a natural experiment in Israeli medical clinics. APSA Preprints. doi: 10.33774/apsa-2019-jzwtg.
85.
WhitleyBEJr (2009) Religiosity and attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A meta-analysis. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion19(1): 21–38.
86.
WrightSCAronAMcLaughlin-VolpeTRoppSA (1997) The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology73(1): 73.
87.
YogevABen-YehoshuaNSAlperY (1991) Determinants of readiness for contact with Jewish children among young Arab students in Israel. Journal of Conflict Resolution35(3): 547–562.
88.
YucelDPsaltisC (2020) Intergroup contact and willingness for renewed cohabitation in Cyprus: Exploring the mediating and moderating mechanisms. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations23(4): 578–597.
89.
ZhouSPage-GouldEAronAMoyerAHewstoneM (2019) The extended contact hypothesis: A meta-analysis on 20 years of research. Personality and Social Psychology Review23(2): 132–160.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
