The Terrorism in Armed Conflict project integrates the Uppsala Conflict Data Project sample of rebel organizations with START’s Global Terrorism Database, covering 409 organizations for 1970–2013. For many Global Terrorism Database incidents, perpetrator information is missing, or ambiguous. Because the accuracy of perpetrator information likely varies systematically, simply dropping these incidents from analyses may bias results. Terrorism in Armed Conflict provides possible attribution to specific rebel groups with coding for uncertainty, enabling researchers to (1) address “description bias” in media-based terrorism data, (2) model uncertainty regarding perpetrator attribution and (3) vary the way terrorism is counted. The Terrorism in Armed Conflict dataset further provides a measure of deliberately indiscriminate terrorism that allows for more nuanced testing of arguments about the strategic logic of terrorism.
AbrahmsMConradJ (2017) The strategic logic of credit claiming: A new theory for anonymous attacks. Security Studies26(2): 279–304.
2.
AcostaBRamosK (2016) Introducing the 1993 Terrorism and Political Violence Dataset. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism40(3): 232–247.
3.
ArblasterA (1977) Terrorism: Myths, meaning and morals. Political Studies5(3): 413–424.
4.
AsalVCousinKGleditschKS (2015) Making ends meet: Combining organizational data in contentious politics. Journal of Peace Research52(1): 134–138.
5.
AsalVPhillipsBJRethemeyerRKSimonelliCYoungJK (2019) Carrots, sticks, and insurgent targeting of civilians. Journal of Conflict Resolution63(7): 1710–1735.
6.
BelgioiosoM (2018) Going underground: Resort to terrorism in mass mobilization dissident campaigns. Journal of Peace Research55(5): 641–655.
7.
BrownJM (2020) Force of Words: The Logic of Terrorist Threats. New York: Columbia University Press.
8.
ChenowethEGofasA (2019) The study of terrorism. In: ChenowethEEnglishRGofasAKalyvasSN (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Terrorism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DrakosKGofasA (2006) The devil you know but are afraid to face: Underreporting bias and its distorting effects on the study of terrorism. Journal of Conflict Resolution50(5): 714–735.
17.
DrakosKGofasA (2007) Evidence for the existence of under-reporting bias in observed terrorist activity: The message in press freedom status transitions. Democracy and Security3(2): 139–155.
18.
DuganLDistlerM (2016) Measuring terrorism. In: LaFreeGFreilichJ (eds) The Handbook of the Criminology of Terrorism. New York: Wiley, pp. 189–205.
19.
EckKHultmanL (2007) One-sided violence against civilians in war: Insights from new fatality data. Journal of Peace Research44(2): 233–246.
20.
FindleyMGYoungJK (2012) Terrorism and civil war: A spatial and temporal approach to a conceptual problem. Perspectives on Politics10(2): 285–305.
21.
FindleyMGYoungJK (2015) Terrorism, spoiling, and the resolution of civil wars. The Journal of Politics77(4): 1115–1128.
22.
FortnaVP (2015) Do terrorists win? Rebels’ use of terrorism and civil war outcomes. International Organization69(3): 519–556.
23.
FortnaVPLotitoNJRubinMA (2018) Don’t bite the hand that feeds: Rebel funding sources and the use of terrorism in civil wars. International Studies Quarterly62(4): 782–794.
24.
GleditschNPWallensteenPErikssonMSollenbergMStrandH (2002) Armed conflict 1946–2001: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research39(5): 615–637.
25.
GoodwinJ (2006) A theory of categorical terrorism. Social Forces84(4): 2027–2046.
26.
Gutiérrez-SanínFWoodEJ (2017) What should we mean by “pattern of political violence”? Repertoire, targeting, frequency, and technique. Perspectives on Politics15(1): 20–41.
27.
HarbomLMelanderEWallensteenP (2008) Dyadic dimensions of armed conflict, 1946–2007. Journal of Peace Research45(5): 697–710.
28.
JonesT (1979) Monty Python’s Life of Brian. [Film]
29.
KalyvasSN (2006) The Logic of Violence in Civil War. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30.
KeelsEKinneyJ (2019) “Any press is good press?” Rebel political wings, media freedom, and terrorism in civil wars. International Interactions45(1): 144–169.
31.
KyddAHWalterBF (2006) The strategies of terrorism. International Security31(1): 49–80.
32.
LaFreeGDuganL (2007) Introducing the global terrorism database. Terrorism and Political Violence19(2): 181–204.
33.
MilesR (2014) What’s in a claim? The strategic logic of unclaimed terrorism. Unpublished Paper. Columbia University.
34.
NemethSCMausleinJA (2019) Geography and the certainty of terrorism event coding. Journal of Global Security Studies4(2): 227–240.
35.
PoloSMTGleditschKS (2016) Twisting arms and sending messages: Terrorist tactics in civil war. Journal of Peace Research53(6): 815–829.
36.
Sánchez-CuencaI (2014) Why do we know so little about terrorism?International Interactions40(4): 590–601.
37.
SaulB (2019) Defining terrorism: A conceptual minefield. In: ChenowethEEnglishRGofasAKalyvasSN (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Terrorism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
StantonJA (2013) Terrorism in the context of civil war. The Journal of Politics75(4): 1009–1022.
39.
StantonJA (2016) Violence and Restraint in Civil War: Civilian Targeting in the Shadow of International Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40.
START (2013) GTD: Global Terrorism Database: Codebook: Inclusion Criteria and Variables. National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism.
ThemnérLWallensteenP (2014) Armed conflicts, 1946–2013. Journal of Peace Research51(4): 541–554.
43.
ThomasJ (2014) Rewarding bad behavior: How governments respond to terrorism in civil war. American Journal of Political Science58(4): 804–818.
44.
WalzerM (1977) Just and Unjust Wars. New York: Basic Books.
45.
WalshJIPiazzaJA (2010) Why respecting physical integrity rights reduces terrorism. Comparative Political Studies43(5): 551–577.
46.
WeidmannNB (2016) A closer look at reporting bias in conflict event data. American Journal of Political Science60(1): 206–218.
47.
WeinbergLPedahzurAHirsch-HoeflerS (2004) The challenges of conceptualizing terrorism. Terrorism and Policical Violence16(4): 777–794.
48.
YoungJK (2019) Measuring terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence31(2): 323–345.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
