This article introduces the War Terrain Indices and Geospatial Representation Dataset (WARTIGER). This dataset addresses a dearth of quality terrain data in the study of interstate war outcomes. It introduces three primary sets of variables for all interstate wars between 1816 and 2003, including disaggregated versions of the First and Second World Wars. The first, spatial extent, approximates the total area of a given war. The second measures topographic heterogeneity using a terrain ruggedness index. The third estimates land cover heterogeneity and presents a trafficability index. These data allow for an accurate and temporal assessment of the role of terrain as they relate to the correlates of war outcomes.
BennettDSStamACIII (1998) The declining advantages of democracy: A combined model of war outcomes and duration . Journal of Conflict Resolution42: 344.
2.
BennettDSStamACIII (1996) The duration of interstate wars, 1816–1985. The American Political Science Review90: 239–257.
BouldingKE (1963) Conflict and Defense. New York: Harper & Brothers.
5.
BouldingKE (1965) The Meaning of the 20th Century: The Great Transition. London: George Allen & Unwin.
6.
BraithwaiteA (2010) Midloc: Introducing the Militarized Interstate Dispute Location Dataset. Journal of Peace Research47: 91–98.
7.
Bueno de MesquitaB (1981) The War Trap. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
8.
ClausewitzC von (2007) On War, transl. HowardMParetP.New York: Oxford University Press (originally published 1832).
9.
ClodfelterM (2017) Warfare and Armed Conflicts: A Statistical Reference to Casualty and Other Figures, 1618–2015, 4th edn.Jefferson, NC: MacFarland.
10.
CochranKMLongSB (2017) Measuring military effectiveness: Calculating casuality loss-exchange ratios for multilateral wars, 1816–1990. International Interactions43: 1019–1040.
11.
CollierPHoefflerA (2004) Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford Economic Papers56: 563–595.
12.
CollierPHoefflerARohnerD (2009) Beyond greed and grievance: Feasibility and civil war. Oxford Economic Papers61: 1–27.
13.
DanielsonJJGeschDB (2011) Global Multi-Resolution Terrain Elevation Data 2010 edition. Reston, VA: United States Geological Survey.
14.
DeschMC (2002) Democracy and victory: Why regime type hardly matters. International Security27: 5–47.
15.
DeschMC (2008) Power and Military Effectiveness: The Fallacy of Democratic Triumphalism. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
16.
DiehlPF (1985) Contiguity and military escalation in major power rivalries, 1816–1980. Journal of Politics47: 1203–1211.
17.
DupuyTN (1983) Analysis Factors that have Influenced Outcomes of Battles and Wars: A Database of Battles and Engagements, Final Report, 6 Vols. Dunn Loring, VA: Historical Evaluation and Research Organization.
18.
DupuyTN (1985) Predictions and War: The Use of History to Evaluate and Predict the Outcome of Armed Conflict. Fairfax, VA: HERO Books.
19.
DupuyREDupuyTN (1986) The Encylopedia of Military History from 3500 BC to the Present, 2nd edn.New York: Harper and Row.
20.
DupuyREDupuyTN (1993) The Harper Encylopedia of Military History from 3500 BC to the Present. New York: Harper and Row.
21.
FearonJDLaitinDD (2003) Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review97: 75–90.
22.
GleditschNPWallensteenPErikssonMSollenbergMStrandH (2002) Armed Conflict 1946–2001: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research39: 615–637.
23.
GoldewijkKKBeusenAvan DrechtGde VosM (2011) The Hyde 3.1 spatially explicit database of human-induced global land-use change over the past 12,000 years. Global Ecology and Biogeography20: 73–86.
24.
HendersonEABayerR (2013) Wallets, ballots, or bullets: Does wealth, democracy, or military capabilities determine war outcomes?International Studies Quarterly57: 303–317.
25.
KrasnoborskiEJMartiniFHrinkoR (2018) West Point Military Atlas. West Point, NY: United States Military Academy.
26.
MarshallMGGurrTRJaggerK (2013) Polity IV: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions 1800–2012. Vienna, VA: Center for Systemic Peace.
27.
MartinC (2016) UK as a Medium Maritime Power in the 21st Century: Logistics for Influence. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
MeiyappanPJainAK (2012) Three distinct estimates of historical land-cover and land-use conversions for over 200 years. Frontiers of Earth Science6: 122–139.
29.
MiguelESatyanathSSergentiE (2004) Economic shocks and civil conflict: An instrumental variables approach. Journal of Political Economy112: 725–753.
30.
New York Times (1983) New York Times Atlas of the World: In Collaboration with the Times of London. New York: New York Times.
31.
ReiterDStamACIII (1998) Democracy, war initiation, and victory. American Political Science Review92: 377–389.
32.
ReiterDStamACIII (2002) Democracies at War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
RileySJDeGloriaSDElliotR (1999) A terrain ruggedness index that quantifies topographic heterogeneity. Intermountain Journal of Sciences5: 23–27.
34.
SarkeesMRWaymanF (2010) Resort to War: 1816–2007. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
35.
ShaverACarterDBShawaTW (2016) Terrain ruggedness and land cover: Improved data for most research designs. Journal of Conflict Management and Peace Science36(2): 191–218.
36.
SingerJD (1987) Reconstructing the Correlates of War Dataset on material capabilities of states, 1816–1985. International Interactions14: 115–132.
37.
SmallMSingerJD (1976) War proneness of democratic states, 1816–1965. The Jerusalem Journal of International Relations1: 50–68.
38.
StamAC (1996) Win, Lose, or Draw: Domestic Politics and the Crucible of War. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
39.
TollefsenAFBuhaugH (2015) Insurgency and inaccessibility. International Studies Review17: 6–25.
40.
WebbK (2007) The continued importance of geographic distance and Boulding’s loss of strength gradient. Comparative Strategy26: 295–310.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
