Can highlighting the national contributions of a religiously marginalized group increase tolerance toward that group, even when its presence in the national identity is disputed? Research shows that prejudice can be overcome by emphasizing a superordinate identity to which members of different groups belong. Our paper investigates whether the provision of information about a religious minority group’s contribution to the nation—and in the process, reiterating to citizens the broader identity to which they all belong—can increase tolerance toward members of that group. We test the effect of randomly exposing survey respondents to factual information about Pakistan’s first Nobel Prize winner, a member of the widely ostracized Ahmadi minority sect, on support for pro-Ahmadi policies. We find that respondents overall are more willing to express tolerant views toward Ahmadis, but that this effect is attenuated (and in some cases, reversed) among respondents potentially alienated from the national identity.
AllportGW (1954) The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
BansakKHainmuellerJHangartnerD (2016) How economic, humanitarian, and religious concerns shape European attitudes toward asylum seekers. Science, 354(6309): 217.
3.
BooneJ (2016) Pakistan PM celebrates scientist from minority sect, risking hardliners’ fury. The Guardian, 5December.
4.
BrownRJ (1984) The role of similarity in intergroup relations. The Social Dimension: European Developments in Social Psychology2: 603–623.
5.
BrubakerR (2012) Religion and nationalism: Four approaches. Nations and Nationalism18(1): 2–20.
6.
BrubakerRLaitinDD (1998) Ethnic and nationalist violence. American Review of Sociology24: 423–452.
7.
ButtAKadercanB (2016) Fighting for God: Religious nationalism and conflict in international relations. Working Paper. George Mason University.
8.
ButtA (2016) Street power: Friday prayers, Islamist protests, and Islamization in Pakistan. Politics and Religion9(1): 1–28.
9.
Canada: Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, Pakistan (2008) The situation of Ahmadis, including legal status and political, education and employment rights; societal attitudes toward Ahmadis (2006 to November 2008), 4December.
10.
CaoC (2004) Chinese science and the “Nobel Prize Complex”. Minerva42(2): 151–172.
11.
CharnyshVLucasCSinghP (2014) The ties that bind: National identity salience and pro-social behavior toward the ethnic other. Comparative Political Studies48: 267–300.
12.
ChongD (1991) Collective Action and the Civil Rights Movement. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Dawn (2010) PML-N defends Nawaz’s remarks about Ahmadis, 10June. Available from: www.dawn.com
14.
DevjiF (2013) Muslim Zion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
DovidioJFGaertnerSLSaguyT (2009) Commonality and the complexity of “we”: Social attitudes and social change. Personality and Social Psychology Review13: 3–20.
16.
FiskeST (1988) Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In: GilbertDTFiskeSLindzeyG (eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th edn.New York: McGraw-Hill.
17.
GaertnerSLDovidioJF (2000) Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Common in-group Identity Model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
18.
GaertnerSLDovidioJFAnastasioPABachmanBARustMC (1993) The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of Social Psychology4(1): 1–26.
19.
GilliamFDIyengarS (2000) Prime suspects: The influence of local television news on the viewing public. American Journal of Political Science44(3): 560–573.
20.
GreenDPSeherRL (2003) What role does prejudice play in ethnic conflictAnnual Review of Political Science (6): 509–531.
21.
Grzymala-BusseA (2012) Why comparative politics should take religion more seriously. Annual Review of Political Science15: 421–442.
22.
HainmuellerJHopkinsDJ (2014) Public attitudes toward immigration. Annual Review of Political Science17: 225–249.
23.
HashimA (2014) Pakistan’s Ahmadiyya: An absence of justice. Al Jazeera English, 7August.
24.
HassnerRE (2016) Religion on the Battlefield. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
25.
HorowitzMC (2009) Long time going: Religion and the duration of crusading. International Security34(2): 162–193.
26.
IspahaniF (2015) Purifying the Land of the Pure: Pakistan’s Religious Minorities. New Delhi: Harper Collins India.
27.
JaffrelotC (2014) The Pakistan Paradox: Instability and Resistance. London: Hurst.
28.
KrysanM (2000) Prejudice, politics, and public opinion: Understanding the sources of racial policy attitudes. American Review of Sociology26: 135–168.
29.
MasoodS (2006) Pakistan’s Premier honors Nobel Laureate from persecuted minority. The New York Times, 5December.
30.
MiguelE (2004) Tribe or nation? Nation building and public goods in Kenya versus Tanzania. World Politics56(3): 327–362.
31.
NasrSVR (2006) The Shia Revival: How Conflicts Within Islam Will Shape the Future. New York: W.W. Norton.
32.
Pew Research Center (2013) In Pakistan, most say Ahmadis are not Muslim, 10September.
33.
Pew Research Center (2014) Religious hostilities reach six-year high, 14January.
34.
PiliavinJADovidioJGaertnerSClarkRDIII (1981) Emergency Intervention. New York: Academic Press.
35.
PosenB (1993) The security dilemma and ethnic conflict. Survival35: 27–47.
36.
RablenMDOswaldAJ (2008) Mortality and immortality: The Nobel Prize as an experiment into the effect of status upon longevity. Journal of Health Economics27(6): 1462–1471.
37.
RahmanT (2005) Passports to privilege: The English-medium schools in Pakistan. Peace and Democracy in South Asia1: 24–44.
38.
RaisRB (2007) Identity politics and minorities in Pakistan. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies30(1): 111–125.
39.
RieckA (2015) The Shias of Pakistan: An Assertive and Beleaguered Minority. New York: Oxford University Press.
40.
RiekBMManiaEWGaertnerSLMcDonaldSALamoreauxMJ (2010) Does a common ingroup identity reduce intergroup threat?Group Processes and Intergroup Relations13(4): 403–423.
41.
RobinsonAL (2016) Nationalism and ethnic-based trust: Evidence from an African border region. Comparative Political Studies49(14): 1819–1854.
42.
RoccasS (2003) The effects of status on identification with multiple groups. European Journal of Social Psychology33: 351–366.
43.
SachsNB (2009) Experimenting with identity: Islam, nationalism and ethnicity. Working Paper. Stanford University.
44.
SaeedS (2007) Pakistani Nationalism and the state marginalisation of the Ahmadiyya community in Pakistan. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 2007 ASEN Conference Special7(3): 132–152.
45.
SamadY (1996) Pakistan or Punjabistan: Crisis of national identity. In: SinghGTalbotI (eds), Punjabi Identity: Continuity and Change. Delhi: Manohar.
46.
ShayoM (2009) A model of social identity with an application to political economy: Nation, class, and redistribution. American Political Science Review103: 147–174.
47.
TajfelHTurnerJ (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: AustinWWorchelS (eds), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
48.
TajfelHTurnerJC (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: WorchelSAustinWG (eds), Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago,: Nelson-Hall.
49.
TalbotI (2002) The Punjabization of Pakistan: Myth or reality? In: JaffrelotC (ed.), Pakistan: Nationalism Without a Nation? New Delhi: Zed Books, pp. 51–62.
50.
TanveerR (2013) Second amendment anniversary: Speakers call for isolation, banishment of Ahmadis. Express Tribune, 8September.
51.
Theiss-MorseEh (2009) Who Counts as an American? The Boundaries of National Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
52.
ToftMD (2007) Getting religion? The puzzling case of Islam and civil war. International Security31(4): 97–131.
53.
TransueJE (2007) Identity salience, identity acceptance, and racial policy attitudes: American national identity as a uniting force. American Journal of Political Science51: 78–91.
54.
US Country Reports on Human Rights Practices (2008) Pakistan. International Religious Freedom Report2008, 19September.
55.
WenzelMMummendeyAWaldusS (2007) Superordinate identities and intergroup conflict: The in-group projection model. European Review of Social Psychology18: 331–372.
56.
WilkinsonS (2004) Votes and Violence: Electoral Competition and Ethnic Riots in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57.
WoodE (2003) Insurgent Collective Action and Civil War in El Salvador. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
