The Issue Correlates of War (ICOW) research project began nearly 20 years ago by collecting data on territorial claims in South America. Since then, the ICOW territorial claims dataset has expanded to cover the entire world, while ICOW has collected new data on river claims and maritime claims and is beginning a new project on identity claims. This article discusses the development and expansion of ICOW data, illustrating how the additional datasets offer important new information and open up new avenues for scholarship.
AlleeTLHuthPK (2006) Legitimizing dispute settlement: International legal rulings as domestic political cover. American Political Science Review100(2): 219–234.
2.
BellSR (2017) Power, territory, and interstate conflict. Conflict Management and Peace Science, this issue.
3.
BremerSA (1992) Dangerous dyads: Conditions affecting the likelihood of interstate war, 1816–1965. Journal of Conflict Resolution36(2): 309–341.
4.
BrochmannMHenselPR (2009) Peaceful management of international river claims. International Negotiation14(2): 391–416.
5.
BrochmannMHenselPR (2011) The effectiveness of negotiations over international river claims. International Studies Quarterly55(3): 859–882.
6.
CedermanL-EWimmerAMinB (2010) Why do ethnic groups rebel? New data and analysis. World Politics62(1): 87–119.
7.
CedermanL-EGleditschKSSalehyanIWucherpfennigJ (2013) Transborder ethnic kin and civil war. International Organization67(2): 389–410.
8.
CrescenziMJCKaderaKMMitchellSMThyneCL (2011) A supply side theory of mediation. International Studies Quarterly55(4): 1069–1094.
GiblerDM (2012) The Territorial Peace: Borders, State Development and International Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
GiblerDM (2017) What they fight for: Specific issues in militarized interstate disputes, 1816–2001. Conflict Management and Peace Science, this issue.
12.
HansenHMitchellSMNemethSC (2008) IO mediation of interstate conflicts: Moving beyond the global vs. regional dichotomy. Journal of Conflict Resolution52(2): 295–325.
13.
HenselPR (1996) Charting a course to conflict: Territorial issues and militarized interstate disputes, 1816–1992. Conflict Management and Peace Science15(1): 43–73.
14.
HenselPR (2001) Contentious issues and world politics: The management of territorial claims in the Americas, 1816–1992. International Studies Quarterly45(1): 81–109.
15.
HenselPR (2003) Militarized management of territorial claims in the Americas, 1816–2001. Presented at theJoint Meeting of the International Studies Association and CEEISA, Budapest, 27 June.
16.
HenselPRMacaulayC (2015) Ethnic/identity issues and interstate territorial conflict. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, New Orleans, LA, February 2015.
17.
HenselPRMitchellSM (2005) Issue indivisibility and territorial claims. GeoJournal64 (4): 275–285.
18.
HenselPRMitchellSMSowersTEII (2006) Conflict management of riparian disputes: A regional comparison of dispute resolution. Political Geography25(4): 383–411.
19.
HenselPRMitchellSMSowersTEIIThyneCL (2008) Bones of contention: Comparing territorial, maritime, and river issues. Journal of Conflict Resolution52(1): 117–143.
20.
HenselPRAllisonMKhananiA (2009) Territorial integrity treaties and armed conflict over territory. Conflict Management and Peace Science26(2): 120–143.
21.
HolstiKJ (1991) Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order, 1648–1989. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
HuthP (1996) Standing Your Ground: Territorial Disputes and International Conflict. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
23.
HuthPKAlleeT (2002) The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
JamesPParkJChoiSW (2006) Democracy and conflict management: Territorial claims in the Western Hemisphere revisited. International Studies Quarterly50(4): 803–818.
25.
KaderaKMMitchellSM. (2005) Heeding Ray’s advice: An exegesis on control variables in systemic democratic peace research. Conflict Management and Peace Science22, 4: 311–326.
26.
LektzianDPrinsBCSouvaM (2010) Territory, river, and maritime claims in the Western Hemisphere: Regime type, rivalry, and MIDs, 1901 to 2000. International Studies Quarterly54(4): 1073–1098.
27.
LuardE (1986) War in International Society. London: I. B. Tauris.
28.
MansbachRVasquezJA (1981) In Search of Theory: A New Paradigm for Global Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
29.
MitchellSM (2002) A Kantian system? Democracy and third party conflict resolution. American Journal of Political Science46(4): 749–759.
30.
MitchellSMHenselPR (2007) International institutions and compliance with agreements over contentious issues. American Journal of Political Science51(4): 721–737.
31.
MitchellSMHenselPR (2010) Issues and conflict. In: JakobsenTG (ed.), War: An Introduction to Theories and Research on Collective Violence. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science, pp. 275–295.
32.
MitchellSMPrinsBC (1999) Beyond territorial contiguity: Issues at stake in democratic militarized interstate disputes. International Studies Quarterly43(1): 169–183.
33.
MitchellSMZawahriNA (2015) The effectiveness of treaty design in addressing water disputes. Journal of Peace Research52(2): 187–200.
34.
MitchellSMKaderaKMCrescenziMJC (2008) Practicing democratic community norms: Third party conflict management and successful settlements. In: BercovitchJGartnerSS (eds), International Conflict Mediation: New Approaches and Findings. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 243–264.
35.
MitchellSMPowellEJ (2011) Domestic Law Goes Global: Legal Traditions and International Courts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
MooreWH (2002) Ethnic minorities and foreign policy. SAIS ReviewXXII(2): 77–90.
37.
NemethSCMitchellSMNymanEAHenselPR (2014) Ruling the sea: Managing maritime conflicts through UNCLOS and exclusive economic zones. International Interactions40(5): 711–736.
38.
OwsiakAP (2012) Signing up for peace: International boundary agreements, democracy, and militarized interstate conflict. International Studies Quarterly56(1): 51–66.
39.
OwsiakAPRiderTJ (2013) Clearing the hurdle: Border settlement and rivalry termination (with Toby J. Rider). Journal of Politics75(3): 757–772.
40.
OwsiakADiehlPFGoertzG (2017) Border settlement and the movement toward negative peace. Conflict Management and Peace Science, this issue.
41.
PalmerGD’OrazioVKenwickMLaneM (2015) The MID4 Data Set: Procedures, coding rules, and description. Conflict Management and Peace Science32(April): 222–242.
42.
RosenauJN (1966) Pre-theories and theories of foreign policy. In: FarrellRB (ed.), Approaches to Comparative and International Politics. New York: Free Press, pp. 27–93.
43.
ShannonM (2005) The democratic community and the expansion of international organizations. PhD dissertation, University of Iowa.
44.
ShannonM (2009) Preventing war and providing the peace? International organizations and the management of territorial disputes. Conflict Management and Peace Science26(2): 144–163.
VasquezJA (1993) The War Puzzle. New York: Cambridge University Press.
47.
VasquezJAHenehanMT (2001) Territorial issues and the probability of war, 1816–1992. Journal of Peace Research38(1): 123–138.
48.
VogtMBormannNCRüeggerSCedermanLEHunzikerPGirardinL (2015) Integrating data on ethnicity, geography, and conflict: The ethnic power relations dataset family. Journal of Conflict Resolution, in press.
49.
WolfAT (1998) Conflict and cooperation over international waterways. Water Policy1(2): 251–265.
50.
ZacherM (2001) The territorial integrity norm: International boundaries and the use of force. International Organization55(2): 215–250.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
