Efforts to resolve interstate disputes are often characterized by repeated engagement and evolving strategies. What explains a state’s decision to continue conflict resolution efforts but escalate their management strategy? Drawing from foreign policy literature, I argue that third parties escalate policies in response to past failures, shifting conflict dynamics and their relationship with the disputants. Analysis of management efforts from 1946 to 2001 reveals that the changing nature of the conflict, policy failures and relationships between the third party and disputants are integral to understanding the management decision process, but the effects of these factors depend on the management history.
AchenC (1986) The Statistical Analysis of Quasi-Experiments. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
2.
BarbieriK (1996) Trade and Conflict: Assessing the Impact of Interdependence on Militarized Conflict, 1870–1985. Binghampton, NY: Binghampton University
3.
BeardsleyK (2010) Pain, pressure, and political cover: Explaining mediation incidence. Journal of Peace Research47 (4): 1–12.
4.
BeardsleyK (2013) Using the right tool for the job: Mediator leverage and conflict resolution. Penn State Journal of Law and International Affairs2(1): 57–65.
5.
BeardsleyKLoN (2013) Third-party conflict management and the willingness to make concessions. Journal of Conflict Resolution; doi: 10.1177/0022002712467932
6.
BeardsleyKQuinnDMBiswasBWilkenfeldJ (2006) Mediation style and crisis outcomes. Journal of Conflict Resolution50(1): 58–86.
7.
BercovitchJ (2002) Introduction: Putting mediation in context. In: BercovitchJ (ed.) Studies in International Mediation: Essays in Honor of Jeffrey Z. Rubin. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
8.
BercovitchJDiehlPF (1997) Conict management of enduring rivalries: The frequency,timing, and short-term impact of mediation. International Interactions22: 299–320.
9.
BercovitchJGartnerSS (2006) Is there method in the madness of mediation: Some lessons for mediators from quantitative studies of mediation. International Interactions32: 329–354.
10.
BercovitchJJacksonR (2001) Negotiation or mediation? An exploration of factors affecting the choice of conict management in international conflict. Negotiation Journal17(1): 59–77.
11.
BercovitchJAnagnosonJTWilleDL (1991) Some conceptual issues and empirical trends in the study of successful mediation in international relations. Journal of Peace Research28(1): 7–17.
12.
BrandtPTSchneiderCJ (2007) So the reviewer told you to use a selection model? Selection models and the study of international relations. Paper read at Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
13.
ClarkDH (2001) Trading butter for guns: Domestic imperatives for foreign policy substitution. Journal of Conflict Resolution45(5): 636–660.
14.
ClarkDHNordstromTReedW (2008) Substitution is in the variance: Resources and foreign policy choice. American Journal of Political Science52(4): 763–773.
15.
ClarkDHReedW (2005) The strategic sources of foreign policy substitution. American Journal of Political Science49(3): 609–624.
16.
ClaytonGGleditschKS (2014) Will we see helping hands? Predicting civil war mediation and likely success. Conflict Management and Peace Science31: 265–284.
17.
CorbettaR (2010) Determinants of third parties’ intervention and alignment choices in ongoing conflicts, 1946–2001. Foreign Policy Analysis6(1): 61–85.
18.
CrescenziMJCKaderaKMMitchellSMThyneCL (2005) A supply side theory of third party conflict management. Paper read at Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, Honalulu, HI.
19.
CrescenziMJCKathmanJDKleinbergKBWoodRM (2012) Reliability, reputation, and alliance formation. International Studies Quarterly56(2): 259–274; doi: 10.1111/j.1468–2478.2011.00711.x
20.
DeutschM (1973) The Resolution of Conflict. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21.
DixonWJ (1996) Third-party techniques for preventing conflict escalation and promoting peaceful settlement. International Organization50(4): 653–681.
22.
FavrettoK (2005) Bargaining in the shadow of war: Bias and coercion in U.S. mediation, 1945–1990. Paper read at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
23.
FavrettoK (2009) Should peacemakers take sides? Major power mediation, coercion and bias. American Political Science Review103(2): 248–263.
24.
FearonJD (2002) Selection effects and deterrence. International Interactions28(1): 5–30.
25.
FrazierDDixonWJ (2006) Third-party intermediaries and negotiated settlements, 1946–2000. International Interactions32(4): 385–408.
26.
FreedmanDA (2006) On the so-called “Huber Sandwich Estimator” and “Robust Standard Errors”. The American Statistician60(4): 299–302
27.
GartnerSSBercovitchJ (2006) Overcoming obstacles to peace: The contributions of mediation to short-lived conflict settlements. International Studies Quarterly50(4): 319–328.
28.
GoldmannK (1988) Change and Stability in the International System. The Problems and Possibilities of Detente. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
GreigMJ (2001) Moments of opportunity: Recognizing conditions of ripeness for international mediation between enduring rivals. Journal of Conflict Resolution45(6): 691–718.
31.
GreigJM (2005) Stepping into the fray: When do mediators mediate?American Journal of Political Science49(2): 621–646; doi: 10.1111/j.0092–5853.2005.00121.x
32.
GreigJM (2013) Nipping them in the bud: The onset of mediation in low-intensity civil conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution; doi: 10.1177/0022002713503807
33.
GreigJMDiehlPF (2012) International Mediation. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
34.
GreigJMReganP (2008) When do they say yes? An analysis of the willingness to offer and accept mediation in civil wars. International Studies Quarterly52(4): 759–781.
35.
GustavssonJ (1998) The Politics of Foreign Policy Change: Explaining the Swedish Reorientation on EC Membership. Lund: Lund University Press.
36.
HeldtB (2009). Sequencing of peacemaking in emerging intrastate conflicts. In AggestamKBjoärkdahlA (eds). War and Peace in Transition. Lund: Nordic Academic Press.
37.
HermannCF (1990) Changing course: When governments choose to redirect foreign policy. International Studies Quarterly34: 3–21.
38.
HolstiKJ (1982) Why Nations Realign: Foreign Policy Restructuring in the Postwar World. London: George Allen and Unwin.
39.
HufbauerGCSchottJJ (1983) Economic Sanctions in support of Foreign Policy Goals. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
40.
HufbauerGCSchottJJElliottKAOeggB (2009) Economic Sanctions Reconsidered, 3rd edn. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
41.
KathmanJ (2010) Civil war contagion and neighboring interventions. International Studies Quarterly54(4): 989–1012.
42.
KathmanJ (2011) Civil war diffusion and regional motivations for intervention. Journal of Conflict Resolution55(6): 847–876.
43.
KleiboerM (1996) Understanding success and failure of international mediation. Journal of Conflict Resolution40(2): 360–389.
44.
KyddAH (2007) Trust and Mistrust in International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45.
LeedsBARitterJMMitchellSMLongAG (2002) Alliance treaty obligations and provisions, 1815–1944. International Interactions28: 237–260.
46.
LiC-P (1993) The effectiveness of sanctions linkages: Issues and actors. International Studies Quarterly37(3): 349–370.
47.
LibalM (1997) Limits of Persuasion: Germany and the Yugoslav Crisis, 1991–1992. Westport, CT: Praeger.
48.
MackRSnyderR (1957) An analysis of social conflict—Toward an overview and synthesis. Journal of Conflict Resolution1: 212–248.
49.
ManskiC (1995) Identification Problems in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50.
MaozZ (2004) Conflict management and conflict resolution—A conceptual and methodological introduction. In: MaozZMintzAMorganCTPalmerG (eds) Multiple Paths to Knowledge in International Politics: Methodology in the Study of Conflict Management and Conflict Resolution. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
MelinMM (2011) The impact of state relationship on if, when and how conflict management occurs. International Studies Quarterly55: 1–25.
53.
MelinMSvenssonI (2009) Incentives for talking: Accepting mediation in international and civil wars. International Interactions35(3): 249–271.
54.
MelinMMGartnerSSBercovitchJ (2013) Disaggregating decisions: Understanding disputant and third party choices in mediation. Conflict Management and Peace Science30(4): 354–368.
55.
NielsenCA (2014) Review of Michael Libal’s Limits of Persuasion: Germany and the Yugoslav Crisis, 1991–1992. Humanities and Social Sceinces Online 1999. Available from: http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=2795 (accessed 14 April 2014).
56.
OwsiakAP (2014) Conflict management trajectories in militarized interstate disputes: A conceptual framework and theoretical foundations. International Studies Review16(1): 50–78.
57.
PalmerG (1990) Alliance politics and issue areas: Determinants of defense spending. American Journal of Political Science34(1): 190–211.
58.
PowellR (1993) Guns, butter, and anarchy. The American Political Science Review87(1): 115–132.
59.
PruittDG (1981) Negotiator Behavior. New York: Academic Press.
60.
RauchhausR (2006) Asymmetric information, mediation, and conflict management. World Politics58(2): 207–241.
61.
ReedW (2000) A unified statistical model of conflict onset and escalation. American Journal of Political Science44(1): 84–93.
62.
ReganP (1996) Conditions of successful third-party intervention in intrastate conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution40(2): 336–359; doi: 10.1177/0022002796040002006
63.
ReganP (2000) Substituting policies during U.S. Interventions in internal conflicts: A little of this, a little of that. Journal of Conflict Resolution44(1): 90–106.
64.
ReganPStamAC (2000) In the nick of time: Conflict management, mediation timing, and the duration of interstate disputes. International Studies Quarterly44(2): 239–260.
65.
RichmondO (1998) Devious objectives and the disputants’ view of international mediation: A theoretical framework. Journal of Peace Research35(6): 707–722.
66.
RosenauJN (1980) The Study of Political Adaption. Dubuque, IA: Nichols.
67.
RubinJZ (1992) Conclusion: Internation mediation in context. In: RubinJZBercovitchJ (eds) Mediation in International Relations: Multiple Approaches to Conflict Management. New York: St Martin’s Press.
68.
SavunB (2005) Information, bias and mediation success. International Studies Quarterly52(1): 25–47.
69.
SingerJDBremerSStuckeyJ (1972) Capability distribution, uncertainty, and major power war, 1820–1965. In: RussettBM (ed.) Peace, War, and Numbers. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 19–48.
70.
SiversonRMStarrH (1991) The Diffusion of War: A Study of Opportunity and Willingness. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
71.
StarrH (2000) Substitutability in foreign policy: Theoretically central, empirically elusive. Journal of Conflict Resolution44(1): 128–138.
72.
StinnettDMTirJSchaferPDiehlPFGochmanC (2002) The Correlates of War project direct contiguity data, version 3. Conflict Management and Peace Science19(2): 58–66.
73.
SvenssonI (2006) Elusive Peacemakers: A Bargaining Perspective on Mediation in Internal Armed Conflicts. Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala.
74.
SvenssonI (2007a) Bargaining, bias and peace brokers: How rebels commit to peace. Journal of Peace Research44(2): 177–194.
75.
SvenssonI (2007b) Fighting with faith: Religion and conflict resolution in civil wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution51(6): 930–949.
76.
SvenssonI (2007c) Mediation with muscles or minds? Exploring power and pure mediators in civil wars. International Negotiation12(2): 229–248.
77.
TerrisLGMaozZ (2005) Rational mediation: A theory and a test. Journal of Peace Research42(5): 563–583.
78.
TouvalSZartmanIW (2001) International mediation in the post-Cold War era. In: CrockerCHampsonFOAallP (eds) Turbulent Peace: The Challenges of Managing International ConflictWashington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, pp. 427–443.
79.
WeissTG (1999) Sanctions as a foreign policy tool: Weighing humanitarian impulses. Journal of Peace Research36(5): 499–509.
80.
WohlforthWC (1999) The stability of a unipolar world. International Security24(1): 5–41; doi: 10.1162/016228899560031
81.
ZartmanIWRubinJZ (2000) The study of power and the practice of negotiation. In: ZartmanIWRubinJZ (eds) Power and Negotiation. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
