Explaining Interstate Conflict and War: What Should Be Controlled for?

Abstract

Most multivariate models designed by analysts of intemational conflict focus on one key explanatory factor and include several control variables. There are prominent norms or customs in the subfield of international politics regarding the construction of multivariate models and the selection of control variables. Several of these norms or customs may make the results of multivariate analyses confusing and difficult to interpret. Analysts typically do not, for example, distinguish between confounding and intervening variables even though the implications and impacts of such variables are substantially different. Most researchers also fail to distinguish between confounding variables and variables that have an impact on interstate conflict that is complementary to that of the key explanatory factor. Commonly, control variables are included in a model for no other reason than that they also have an impact on interstate conflict or some other outcome variable. In some recent analyses, "independent" variables are included that are related by definition to the key explanatory variable, or to each other. This practice introduces into multivariate models artifactual, misleading degrees of statistical association between variables related to each other by definition with tautological relationships masquerading as empirical causal connections that complicate the interpretation of results. Finally, the construction of pooled cross-sectional, time series analyses is consistently based on the assumption that the key explanatory factor, as well as the control variables, have essentially identical impacts on interstate conflict across space, and over time. Substantial evidence, some of which is provided in this paper, suggests that this assumption is unwarranted. This paper provides five guidelines for the construction of multivariate models that address these issues in a manner aimed at making the results of multivariate analyses more intelligible and credible.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achen, Christopher H. 2002. "Toward a New Political Methodology: Microfoundations and ART." Annual Review of Political Science 5: 423-450.

Althauser, Paul D. 1977. "Multicollinearity and Non-additive Regres sion Models ." in Hubert M. Blalock (ed.) Causal Models in the Social Sciences. Chicago : Aldine-Atherton.

Barbieri, Katherine. 2002. The Liberal Illusion: Does Trade Promote Peace? Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Beck, Nathaniel , Jonathan N. Katz , and Richard Tucker. 1998. "Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable." American Journal of Political Science 42: 1260-1288.

Bennett, D. Scott , and Allan C. Stam . 2000. "EUGene: A Conceptual Manual ." International Interactions 26: 179-204.

Berry, William. 1993. Understanding Regression Assumptions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

Blalock, Hubert M. 1964. Causal Inferences in Nonexperimental Research. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press .

Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce , and David Lalman. 1992. War and Reason. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Friedrich, Robert J. 1982. "In Defense of Multiplicative Terms in Multiple Regression Equations." American Journal of Political Science 26: 797-833.

10.

Green, Donald P. , Soo Yeon Kim , and David H. Yoon . 2001. "Dirty Pool' International Organization 55: 441-468.

11.

Henderson, Errol A. 2002. Democracy and War: The End of an Illusion? Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

12.

King, Gary. 2001. "Proper Nouns and Methodological Propriety: Pooling Dyads in International Relations Data." International Organization 55 : 497-507.

13.

King, Gary , Robert O. Keohane , and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

14.

Lemke, Douglas , and William Reed. 2001. "The Relevance of Politi cally Relevant Dyads." Journal of Conflict Resolution 45: 126-144.

15.

Lewis-Beck, Michael S. 1980. Applied Regression: An Introduction. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

16.

Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. "Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy." American Political Science Review 53: 69-105.

17.

Neuhaus, J.M. , and J.D. Kalbfleisch . 1998. "Between- and WithinCluster Covariate Effects in the Analysis of Clustered Data." Biometrics 54: 638-645.

18.

Oneal, John R. , and Bruce Russett. 1997. "The Classical Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict, 1950-1985." International Studies Quarterly 41: 267-294.

19.

Oneal, John R. , and Bruce Russett. 1999. "The Kantian Peace: The Pacific Benefits of Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885-1992 ." World Politics 52: 1-37.

20.

Oneal, John R. , and Bruce Russett. 2001. "Clear and Clean: The Fixed Effects of Liberal Peace."International Organization 55: 469-485.

21.

Ray, James Lee. 1995. Democracy and International Conflict. Colum bia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.

22.

Ray, James Lee. 2000. "On the Level(s): Does Democracy Correlate with Peace? " In John A. Vasquez (ed.) What Do We Know About War? Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

23.

Reiter, Dan , and Allan C. Stam . 2002. Democracies at War. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

24.

Rummel, R.J. 1979. Understanding Conflict and War: Volume 4, War, Power, and Peace. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications .

25.

Russett, Bruce. 1993. Grasping the Democratic Peace. Princeton : Princeton University Press.

26.

Russett, Bruce , and John R. Oneal . 2001. Triangulating Peace: Democ racy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York: Norton.

27.

Russett, Bruce , John R.Oneal , and David R. Davis . 1998. "The Third Leg of the Kantian Tripod for Peace: International Organizations and Militarized Disputes, 1950-1985 ." International Organization 52: 441-468.

28.

Senese, Paul D. 1997. "Dispute to War: The Conditional Importance of Territorial Issue Stakes and Geographic Proximity." Paper pre sented to the Intemational Studies Association, Toronto .

29.

Smith, Kent W. and M.S. Sasaki. 1979. "Decreasing Multicollinearity: A Method for Models with Multiplicative Functions." Sociological Methods and Research 8: 35-56.

30.

Stimson, James A. 1985. "Regression in Space and Time: A Statistical Essay :' American Journal of political Science 29 : 914-947.

31.

Tucker, Richard 1999. BTSCS: A Binary Time-Series-Cross-Section Data Analysis Utility. Version 4.0.4. http://www.vanderbilt.edu/∼rtucker/programs/btscs

32.

Vasquez, John A. 1993. The War Puzzle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

33.

Vasquez, John A. 1995. "Why do Neighbors Fight: Proximity, Interaction, or Territoriality? " Journal of Peace Research 32: 277-293.

34.

Zorn, Christopher. 2001. "Estimating Between- and Within-Cluster Covariate Effects, With an Application to Models of Intema tional Disputes." International Interactions 27: 433-445.