Berk, R.A. (1984). An evaluation of procedures for computing an ability-achievement discrepancy score. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 262-266.
2.
Braden, J.P. (1987). A comparison of regression and standard score discrepancy methods for learning disabilities identification: Effects on racial representation. Journal of School Psychology, 25, 23-29.
3.
Braden, J.P., & Weiss, L. (1988). Effects of simple difference versus regression discrepancy methods: An empirical study. Journal of School Psychology, 26, 133,142.
4.
Clarizio, H.F., & Phillips, S.E. (1989). Defining severe discrepancy in the diagnosis of learning disabilities: A comparison of methods. Journal of School Psychology, 27, 383-391.
5.
Cone, T., & Wilson, L. (1981). Quantifying a severe discrepancy: A critical analysis . Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 4, 359-371.
6.
Evans, L.D. (1992). Severe does not always imply significant: Bias of regression discrepancy model. Journal of Special Education , 26(1), 57-68.
7.
Fletcher, J., Espy, K., Francis, D., Davidson, K., Rourke, B., & Shaywitz, S. (1989). Comparisons of cutoff and regression-based definitions of reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 22, 334-338.
8.
Hallahan, D.P., & Kauffman, J.M. (1994). Exceptional children: Introduction to special education (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
9.
Heath, C.P., & Kush, J.C. (1991). Use of discrepancy formulas in the assessment of learning disabilities. In J. Obrzut & G. Hynd (Eds.), Neuropsychological foundations of learning disabilities: A handbook of issues, methods, and practice (pp. 287-306). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
10.
Heward, WL (1996). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.
11.
Kamphaus, R.W., Frick, P.J., & Lahey, B.B. (1991). Methodological issues and learning disabilities diagnosis in clinical populations. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 24, 613-618.
Mabry-Crawford, T. (1994). Differences between the standard score discrepancy model and the regression analysis model for determining discrepancy in learning disabled children (Doctoral dissertation, Mississippi State University, 1994) . Dissertation Abstracts International, 56-03A, 0890.
14.
McMann, G.M., Barnett, D.W., Lombard, T.J., Belton-Kocher, E., & Sharpe, M.N. (1989). On the actuarial classification of children: Fundamental studies of classification agreement. Journal of Special Education , 23, 127-149.
15.
McLeskey, J. (1989). The influence of level of discrepancy on the identification of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 435,438, 443.
16.
Payette, K.A., & Clarizio, H.F. (1994). Discrepant team decisions: The effects of race, gender, achievement, and IQ on LD eligibility. Psychology in the Schools, 31, 40-48.
17.
Reynolds, C.R. (1984). Critical issues in learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 18, 451-476.
18.
Reynolds, C.R. (1985). Toward objective diagnosis of learning disabilities . Special Services in the Schools, 2, 161-176.
19.
Reynolds, C.R., Berk, R.A., Boodoo, G.M., Cox, J., Gutkin, T.B., Mann, L., Page, E.B., & Willson, V.L. (1983). Critical issues in learning disabilities. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Special Education Work Group on Measurement Issues in the Assessment of Learning Disabilities .
20.
Shepard, L. (1980). An evaluation of the regression discrepancy method for identifying children with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 14, 79-91.
21.
Smith, D.D. (1998). Introduction to special education: Teaching in an age of challenge (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
U.S. Department of Education (1994). To assure the free appropriate public education of all children with disabilities: Sixteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Govemment Document Service.
24.
Wilson, L.R., & Cone, T. (1984). The regression equation method of determining academic discrepancy. Journal of School Psychology, 22, 95-110.
25.
Wood, D.M. (1991). Discrepancy formulas and classification and identification issues that affect diagnosis of learning disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 28, 219-225.