A multistate survey of 859 school psychologists who indicated prior experience conducting bilingual psycho-educational assessment found that over half had used interpreters. Seventy-seven percent of the school psychologists who reported using interpreters had received no or very little training to do so. Only 37% of the school psychologists reported that their interpreter had received formal training. In only 7% of the cases reported were both school psychologists and interpreters trained in the interpretation process. The data illustrate the need to increase training and recruitment of minority and/or non-minority graduate students proficient in two or more languages for the purpose of more accurately assessing limited-English proficient students. Additional areas for further research involving interpreters are suggested.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, T.K., Cancelli, A.A., & Kratochwill, T.R. (1984). Self-reported assessment practices of school psychologists: Implications for training and practice . Journal of School Psychology, 22, 17-29.
2.
Baca, L.M., & Cervantes, H.T. (1989). The bilingual special education interface (Second Ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Co.
3.
Barona, A., & Santos de Barona, M. (1987). A model for assessment of limited English proficiency students referred for special education services . In S.H. Fradd & W.J. Tikunoff (Eds.), Bilingual education and bilingual special education (pp. 183-209). San Diego, CA : College Hill Press.
4.
Bracken, B.A., & Barona, A. (1991). State of the art procedures for translating, validating and using psychoeducational tests in cross-cultural assessment. School Psychology International, 12, 119-132.
5.
Carrasquillo, A.L. (1991). Hispanic children and youth in the United States: A resource guide. New York: Garland Publishing Co.
6.
Caterino, L.C. (1990). Step-by-step procedure for the assessment of language minority children. In A. Barona & E.E. Garcia (Eds.), Children at risk: Poverty, minority status, and other issues in educational equity (pp. 269-282). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists .
7.
Chapa, J. (1990). Limited English proficient students demographics . In Proceedings of the first research symposium on limited English proficient students' issues (pp. 85-112). Washington DC : Office of Bilingual Education and Minority Languages Affair.
8.
Chamberlain, P., & Medeiros-Landurand, P. (1991). Practical considerations in the assessment of LEP students with special needs. In E.V. Hamayan & J.S. Damico (Eds.), Limiting bias in the assessment of bilingual students (pp. 111-156). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed .
9.
Chinn, P.C., & Hughes, S. (1987). Representation of minority students in special classes. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 41-46.
10.
Collier, V. (1987). Age and rate of acquisition of second language for academic purposes. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 617-641.
11.
Collier, V. (1989). How long? A synthesis of research on academic achievement in a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 509-531.
12.
Cummins, J. (1984). Bilingual special education issues in assessment and pedagogy. San Diego: College-Hill .
13.
Cummins, J. (1992). Bilingual education and English immersion: The Ramirez report in theoretical perspective. Bilingual Research Journal16, 91-104.
14.
Esquivel, G.B. (1988). Best practices in the assessment of limited English proficient and bilingual children. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (pp. 113-123). Washington, DC: The National Association of School Psychologists .
15.
Figueroa, R.A. (1989). Psychological testing of linguistic-minority students: Knowledge gaps and regulations. Exceptional Children, 56, 145-152.
16.
Figueroa, R.A. (1990). Best practices in the assessment of bilingual children. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology-II (pp. 93-106). Washington, DC: The National Association of School Psychologists.
17.
Figueroa, R.A., Fradd, S.H., & Correa, V.I. (1989). Bilingual special education and this issue. Exceptional Children, 56, 174-178.
18.
Figueroa, R.A., Sandoval, J., & Merino, B. (1984). School psychology and limited-English-proficient (LEP) children: New competencies. Journal of School Psychology , 22, 131-143.
19.
Fradd, S.H., & Wilen, D.K. (1990). Using interpreters and translators to meet the needs of handicapped language minority students and their families. (ERIC Reproduction No. ED 332540).
20.
Gersten, R., & Woodward, J. (1994). The language-minority student and special education: Issues, trends, and paradoxes. Exceptional Children, 60 (4), 310-322.
21.
Hamayan, E.V., & Damico, J.S. (Eds.). (1991). Limiting bias in the assessment of bilingual. students. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
22.
Harrison, P.L., Kaufman, A.S., Hickman, J.A., & Kaufman, N. (1988). A survey of tests used for adult assessment. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 6, 188-198.
23.
Holtzman, Jr., W.H., & Wilkinson, C.Y. (1991). Assessment of cognitive ability. In E.V. Hamayan & J.S. Damico (Eds.), Limiting bias in the assessment of bilingual students (pp. 247-280). Austin, TX : Pro-Ed.
24.
Kamphaus, R.W. (1993). Clinical assessment of children's intelligence: A handbook for professional practice. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
25.
Medina, V. (1982). Issues regarding the use of interpreters and translators in a school setting. (ERIC Reproduction No. ED 161191).
26.
Miller, N., & Abudarham, S. (1984). Management of communication problems in bilingual children. In N. Miller (Ed.), Bilingualism and language disability: Assessment and remediation (pp. 177-198). San Diego: College-Hill Press, Inc.
27.
Nuttall, E.V. (1987). Survey of current practices in the psychological assessment of limited-English-proficiency handicapped children. Journal of School Psychology, 25, 53-61.
28.
Ortiz, A. (1984). Texas: A state policy for Hispanic children with special needs. In P. Williams (Ed.), Special education in minority communities (pp. 33-53). Milton Keynes , England: Open University Press.
29.
Ortiz, A., & Polyzoi, E. (1986). Characteristics of limited English proficient Hispanic students in programs for the learning disabled: Implications for policy, practice and research. Part I. Report Summary. (ERIC Reproduction No. ED 267578).
30.
Ortiz, A., & Yates, J. (1983). Incidence of exceptionality among Hispanics: Implications for manpower planning. National Association of Bilingual Education Journal, 7, 41-54.
31.
Ramirez, J.D. (1992). Executive summary of volumes I and II of the final report: Longitudinal study of structured English immersion strategy, early-exit and late-exit transitional bilingual education programs for language-minority children. Bilingual Research Journal, 16, 1-62.
32.
Rogers, M.R., Ponterotto, J.G., Conoley, J.C., & Wiese, M.J. (1992). Multicultural training in school psychology: A national survey. School Psychology Review, 21, 603-616.
33.
Rueda, R., Cardoza, D., Mercer, J., & Carpenter, L. (1985). An examination of special education decision making with Hispanic first-time referral in large urban school district: Longitudinal Study I Report. (ERIC Reproduction No. ED 312 810).
34.
Scribner, A.P. (1993). The use of interpreters in the assessment of language minority students. The Bilingual Special Education Perspective , 12, 1, 2-6.
35.
Stinnett, T.A., Havey, J.M., & Oehler-Stinnett, J. (1994). Current test usage by practicing school psychologists: A national survey. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 12, 331-350.
36.
Trueba, H.T. (1989). Raising silent voices: Educating the linguistic minorities for the 21st century. New York, NY: Newbury House Publishers.
37.
Tucker, J.A. (1980). Ethnic proportions in classes for the learning disabled: Issues in nonbiased assessment. Journal of Special Education, 14, 93-105.
38.
Willig, A. (1986). Special education and the culturally and linguistically different child: An overview of issues and challenges. Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities, 2, 161-173.
39.
Wilen, D.K., & Sweeting, C.V.M. (1986). Assessment of limited English proficient Hispanic students. School Psychalogy Review, 15, 59-75.
