The purpose of this study was to describe learning disabilities teachers' perspectives regarding the use of assessment procedures. We focused specifically on teachers' reports of (a) procedures actually used, (b) procedures they found most useful, and (c) their perceived levels of competency as they related to initial placement, instructional planning, and student evaluation decisions. Respondents were 321 learning disabilities teachers in a large, urban school system. The results indicated that while teachers reported several assessment procedures to be useful, they relied primarily on standardized test results for informing educational decisions. Furthermore, most teachers indicated high levels of competency with all assessment procedures, except error analysis. The problematic nature of an over-reliance on standardized tests and the need for the use of more instructionally sensitive assessment procedures are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Campione, J.C. (1989). Assisted assessment: A taxonomy of approaches and an outline of strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 155-165.
2.
Coleman, M., & Dover, G.M. (1993). The RISK screening test: Using kindergarten teachers' ratings to predict future placement in resource classrooms. Exceptional Children, 59, 468-477.
3.
Dorr-Bremme, D., Burry, J., Catterall, J., Cabello, B., & Daniels, L. (1983). The costs of testing in American public schools (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 198). Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation.
4.
Dorr-Bremme, D., & Herman, J. (1983). Use of testing in schools: A national profile . In W. Hathaway (Ed.), Testing in the schools: New directions for testing and measurement (pp. 3-17), San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
5.
Evans, S.S., Evans, W.H., & Mercer, C.D. (1986). Assessment for instruction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
6.
Fish, J. (1988). Responses to mandated standardized testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
7.
Fowler, F.J. (1984). Survey research methods. London : Sage Publications.
8.
Fuchs, L.S., & Deno, S.L. (1992). Effects of curriculum within curriculum-based measurement. Exceptional Children58, 232-243.
9.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., & Ferguson, C. (1992). Effects of expert system consultation within curriculum-based measurement using a reading maze task. Exceptional Children , 58, 436-450.
10.
Gersten, R., & Woodward, J. (1994). The language minority student and special education: Issues, trends, and paradoxes. Exceptional Children, 60, 310-322.
11.
Herman, J.L., & Golan, S. (1991). Effects of standardized testing on teachers and learning-Another look. (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 334). Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
12.
Jenkins, J.R., & Jewell, M. (1993). Examining the validity of two measures for formative teaching: Reading aloud and maze. Exceptional Children, 59, 421-432.
13.
Lazor-Morrison, C., Polin, L., Moy, R., & Burry, J. (1980). A review of the literature on test use. (Center for the Study of Evaluation Report No. 144). Los Angeles : University of California Center for the Study of Evaluation.
14.
Luftig, R.L. (1989). Assessment of learners with special needs. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
15.
Madaus, G.F. (1988). The influence of testing on the curriculum. In L. Tanner (Ed.), The politics of reforming school administration. London: Farmer Press.
16.
Madaus, G.F. (1993). The growth of assessment. In Ascd (Ed.), Challenges and achievements of American education (pp. 53-79). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
17.
McLoughlin, J.A., & Lewis, R.B. (1990). Assessing special students (3rd ed.). Columbus: Merrill Publishing Company.
18.
Mehrens, W.A. (1984). National tests and local curriculum: Match or mismatch. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices. 3(3), 9-15.
19.
Patton, J.M. (1992). Assessment and identification of African-American learners with gifts and talents. Exceptional Children, 59, 150-159.
20.
Ruddell, R.B. (1985). Knowledge and attitude toward testing: Field educators and legislators. The Reading Teacher, 389, 538-543.
21.
Salmon-Cox, L. (1981). Teachers and standardized achievement tests: What's really happening? Phi Delta Kappan, 62, 730-736.
Shepard, L. (1991). Psychometricians' beliefs about learning. Educational Research, 20, 2-15.
24.
Smith, M.L., Edelsky, C., Draper, K., Rottenberg, C., & Cherland, M. (1989). The role of testing in elementary schools (Monograph) . Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University, Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (Grant No. OERI-G-86-003).
