Multidomain instruments for screening or diagnostic purposes can have advantages for those involved in early intervention programs for infants, toddlers, and preschoolers. Purposes of assessment and criteria for instrument utility are presented. Five multidomain screening tools and three multidomain diagnostic instruments are reviewed with respect to their validity, reliability, and utility.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alpern, G., Boll, T., & Shearer, M. (1980). Developmental Profile II manual. Aspen, CO: Psychological Development Publications.
2.
Clarke, A.D.B., & Clarke, A.M. (1971). Assessment and prediction in severely subnormal . Paper presented to Ciba Foundation and Institution for Research into Mental Retardation group No. 5, London , Eng. Cited in B. Stephens, Background papers (1972). In Screening and assessment of young children at developmental risk. Washington, DC: President's Committee on Retardation.
3.
Doll, E.A. (1965). Vineland Social Maturity Scale. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Dunn, L.M., & Dunn, L.M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service .
6.
Frankenburg, W., Camp, B., Van Natta, P., DeMersseman, J., & Voorhees, S., (1971). Reliability and stability of the Denver developmental screening test. Child Development, 42, 1315-1325.
7.
Frankenburg, W., & Dodds, J. (1967). The Denver Developmental Screening Test. The Journal of Pediatrics, 71, 181-191.
8.
Frankenburg, W., Dodds, J., Fandal, A., Kazuk, E., & Cohrs, M. (1975). Denver Development Screening Test reference manual . Denver: Ladoca Project and Publishing Foundation.
9.
Frankenburg, W., Fandal, A., Sciarillo, W., & Burgess, D. (1981). The newly abbreviated and revised Denver Developmental Screening Test. The Journal of Pediatrics, 99, 995-999.
10.
FranKenburg, W., Goldstein, A., & Camp, B. (1971). The revised Denver Developmental Screening Test: Its accuracy as a screening instrument. The Journal of Pediatrics , 79, 988-995.
11.
Frankenburg, W., Van Doorninck, W., Liddeli, T., & Dick, N. (1976). The Denver Prescreening Developmental Questionnaire (PDQ). Pediatrics, 57, 744-753.
12.
Goodwin, W. (1978). Minnesota Child Development Inventory In O. Buros (Ed.), Eighth Mental Measurements Yearbook (Vol. 1). Highland Park, NJ: Gryphon Press.
13.
Griffiths, R. (1970). The abilities of young children. Los Angeles: Western Psycholological Services.
14.
Grossman, H. (1973). Manual on terminology and classification in mental retardation. Washington, DC: American Assocation on Mental Deficiency.
15.
Haines, J., Ames, L.B., & Gillespie, C. (1980). The Gesell Preschool Test manual. Lumberville, PA: Modern Learning Press.
16.
Ireton, H., & Thwing, E. (1972). The Minnesota Child Development Inventory. Minneapolis, MN: Behavior Science Systems .
17.
Kaufman, N.L. (1985). Review of Gesell Preschool Test. In J.V. Mitchell (Ed.), The ninth mental measurement yearbook (Vol. 1) (pp. 607-608). Lincoln: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
18.
Knobloch, H., Stevens, F., & Malone, A. (1980). Manual of developmental diagnosis. Hagerstown, MD: Harper & Row.
19.
Mardell, C., & Goldenberg, D. (1975). DIAL (Developmental Indicators for the Assessment of Leaming) manual. Edison, NJ: Children and Education Corporation.
20.
Mardell-Czudnowski, C., & Goldenberg, D. (1983a). DIAL-R (Developmental Indicators for the Assessment of Learning) manual. Edison, NJ: Childcraft Education Corporation.
21.
Mardell-Czudnowski, C., & Goldenberg, D. (1983b). Revision and restandardization of a preschool screening test: DIAL becomes DIAL-R. Journal of the Division of Early Childhood, 8, 149-156.
22.
Naglieri, J.A. (1985). Review of Gesell Preschool Test. In J.V. Mitchell (Ed.), The ninth mental measurement yearbook (Vol. 1) (pp. 608-609). Lincoln: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Robinson, C., & Robinson, J. (1978). Sensorimotor functions and cognitive development . In M. Snell (Ed.), Systematic instruction of the moderately and severely handicapped. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
26.
Robinson, C., & Robinson, J. (1983). Sensorimotor functions and cognitive development . In M. Snell (Ed.), Systematic instruction of the moderately and severely handicapped (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
27.
Scott, K., & Hogan, A. (1982). Methods for the identification of high-risk and handicapped infants. In C. Ramey & P. Trohanis (Eds.), Finding and educating high-risk and handicapped infants. Baltimore : University Park Press.
28.
Sheehan, R. (1982). Infant assessment: A review and identification of emergent trends. In D. Bricker (Ed.), Intervention with at-risk and handicapped infants from research to application. Baltimore: University Park Press.
29.
Terman, L.M., & Merrill, M.A. (1980). A Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, Form L-M (3rd Rev.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin .
30.
Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation .
