Current spelling assessment practices, including formal and informal instruments plus promising procedures, were reviewed. First, six individually administered standardized tests that are presently available to special educators and diagnosticians were examined. Second, informal procedures were grouped into two categories: Inventories and criterion-referenced tests, and error analysis. Each informal procedure was analyzed in terms of specific advantages and disadvantages. Finally, two particularly promising procedures, miciodiagnostics and developmental spelling, were reviewed.
Barron, R.W.Visual and phonlogical strategies in reading and spelling. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive process in spelling . New York: Academic Press, 1980.
3.
Boder, E.Developmental dyslexia: A diagnotic screening procedure based on three characteristic patterns of reading and spelling. In B.D. Bateman (Ed.), Learning disorders (Vol. 4). Seattle: Special Child Publications, 1971.
4.
Boder, E.Developmental dyslexia: A diagnostic approach based on three atypical reading-spelling patterns. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1973, 14, 663-687.
5.
Brigance, A.H.Brigance Diagnotic Inventory of Basic Skills. North Billerica, Mass.: Curriculum Associates, 1977 .
6.
Brigance, A.H.Brigance Diagnostic Inventory of Essential Skills. North Billerica, Mass.: Curriculum Associates, 1981.
7.
Carpenter, D.Spelling error profiles of able and disabled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1983, 6, 102-104.
8.
Carpenter, D., & Carpenter, S.The concurrent validity of the Larsen-Hammill Test of Written Spelling in relation to the California Achievement Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1978, 38, 1201-1205.
Gentry, J.R.GNYS at WRK: An analysis of developmental spelling. Reading Teacher, 1982, 36, 192-200.
17.
Graham, S., & Miller, L.Spelling research and practice: A unified approach. Focus on Exceptional Children, 1979, 12, 1-16.
18.
Hammill, D.D., & Larsen, S.C.The Test of Written Language. Austin, Tex.: Pro-Ed, 1978.
19.
Hasselbring, T.S., & Crossland, C.L.Application of microcomputer technology to spelling assessment of learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1982, 5, 80-82.
20.
Heiss, W.Relating educational assessment to instructional planning. Focus on Exceptional Children, 1977, 9, 1-11.
21.
Henderson, E.H., & Beers, J.W. (Ed.). Developmental and cognitive aspects of learning to spell: A reflection of word knowledge. Newark, Del.: International Reading Association, 1980.
Jensen, A.R.Spelling errors and the serial-position effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1962, 53, 105-109.
24.
Kooi, B.Y., Schultz, R.E., & Baker, R.L.Spelling errors and the serial-position effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1965, 56, 334-336.
25.
Kottmeyer, W.Teacher's guide to remedial reading. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.
26.
Larsen, S.C., & Hammill, D.D.The Larsen-Hammill Test of Written Spelling. Austin, Tex. : Pro-Ed, 1976.
27.
Mardel-Czudinowski, C.D.The four W's of current testing practices: Who; what; why; and whom-An exploratory survey. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1980 , 3, 73-83.
28.
McLoughlin, J.A., & Lewis, R.B.Assessing special students: Strategies and procedures. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill, 1981.
29.
Moran, M.R.Assessment of the exceptional learner in the regular classroom. Denver: Love Publishing, 1978.
30.
Poplin, M.S., Gray, R., Larsen, S., Banikowski, A., & Mehring, T.A comparison of components of written expression abilities in learning and non-learning disabled students at three grade levels. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1980, 3, 46-53.
