Assessment of Exceptional Children: Guidelines for Practice

Abstract

Assessment is a process that provides information needed for a number of important decisions in the education of exceptional children. These decisions include eligibility, diagnostic classification, program planning and placement, and program effectiveness. Because assessment contributes so centrally to the educational process and because the consequences of inadequately performed assessment are severe, it is crucial that assessment practice be guided by a clear set of standards. This paper presents twelve guidelines for special education assessment. The guidelines are based on legal and professional codes and on ourrent knowledge of the constituents of good assessment practice. The guidelines are proposed as an initial set of standards from whish a formal series of comprehensive standares atually be developed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anastasi, A. Psychological testing. New York: MacMillan Publishing Co., 1976.

Bennett, R. Professional competence and the assessment of exceptional children . Journal of Special Education, in press.

Brown F. Guidelines for test use: A commentary on the Standards for Educational and Psychological Tests. Washington, D.C.: National Council on Measurement in Education, 1980.

Cotter, D. , & Berk, R. Item bias in the WISC-R using black, white, and Hispanic learning disabled children. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Los Angeles , April, 1981.

Dean, R. The use of the PIAT with emotionally disturbed children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1979, 12, 629-631.

Dean, R. The use of the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test with emotionally disturbed adolescents. Journal of School Psychology, 1980, 18, 172-175.

Eaves, R. , & McLaughlin, P. A systems approach for the assessment of the child and his environment: Getting back to basics. Journal of Special Education, 1977, 11, 99-111.

Prasse, D. , & Bracken B. Comparison of the PPVT-R and WISC-R with urban educable mentally retarded students. Psychology in the Schools, 1981, 18, 174-177.

Reschly, D. , & Reschly, J. Validity of WISC-R factor scores in predicting achievement and attention for four sociocultural groups. Journal of School Psychology , 1979, 17, 355-361.

10.

Salvia, J. , & Ysseldyke, J. Assessment in special and remedial education. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1981.

11.

Standards for educational and psychological tests. Washington, D.C. : American Psychological Association, 1974.

12.

Thorndike, R. Dilemmas in diagnosis. In W. MacGinitie (Ed.), Assessment problems in reading. Newark, Delaware : International Reading Association , 1973.

13.

Thorndike, R. , & Hagen, E. Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1977 .

14.

U.S. Office of Education. Education of handicapped children: Implementation of part B of the Education of the Handicapped Act . Federal Register, 1977, 42, 42474-42518. (a)

15.

U.S. Office of Education. Assistance to states for education of handicapped children: Procedures for evaluating specific learning disabilities. Federal Register, 1977 , 42, 65082-650851. (b)

16.

Yoshida, R. Out-of-ievel testing of special education students with a standardized achievement battery. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1976, 13, 215-221.