Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In this study we compared alternative measures of early writing performance to identify an indicator of writing proficiency that teachers could use to monitor student growth and evaluate instructional effectiveness. The participants were 15 second-grade students in a summer school program for students at risk. The performance sampled was word copying, sentence copying, word dictation, and sentence dictation. Two- to three-minute samples of performance were obtained and several different scores were examined. The criterion validity of the early writing measures was examined using both global judgments of competence and quantitative scoring of story writing as criteria. Writing from word and sentence dictation entered into very high correlations with both criteria, showing promise as indicators of early writing proficiency. The results are discussed in terms of desirable features of assessment procedures including technical adequacy, administrative efficiency, and consumer acceptability.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bradley-Johnson, S. , & Lesiak, J.L. ( 1989). Problems in written expression: Assessment and remediation. New York: Guilford .

Deno, S.L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative . Exceptional Children, 52(3), 219-232.

Deno, S.L. (1992). The nature and development of curriculum-based measurement. Preventing School Failure, 36(2), 5-10.

Deno, S.L. , Marston, D. , & Mirkin, P.L. (1982). Valid measurement procedures for continuous evaluation of written expression. Exceptional Children, 48, 368-371.

Deno, S.L. , Mirkin, P.K. , & Marston, D. (1980). Relationships among simple measures of written expression and performance on standardized achievement tests (Research Report No. 22). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.

Espin, C.A. , Scierka, B.J. , Skare, S. , & Halverson, N. (1999). Curriculum-based measures in writing for secondary students. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 15, 5-27.

Espin, C.A. , Shin, J. , Deno, S.L. , Skare, S. , Robinson, S. , & Benner, B. (2000). Identifying indicators of written expression proficiency for middle school students. The Journal of Special Education , 34, 140-153.

Harris, A.P. , & Jacobson, M.D. (1972). Basic elementary reading vocabularies. New York: Macmillan .

Isaacson, S. (1988). Assessing the writing product: Qualitative and quantitative measures. Exceptional Children, 54, 528-534.

10.

Marston, D. ( 1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why to do it. In M. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18-78). New York: Guilford .

11.

Marston, D. , & Deno, S.L. (1981). The reliability of simple, direct measures of written expression (Research Report No. 50). Minneapolis : University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.

12.

Parker, R. , Tindal, G. , & Hasbrouck, J. (1991). Countable indices of writing quality: Their suitability for screening-eligibility decisions. Exceptionality, 2, 1-17.

13.

Roit, M. , & McKenzie, R. ( 1985 ). Disorders of written communication: An instructional priority for LD students. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 19, 258-260.

14.

Tindal, G. , & Parker, R. (1989). Assessment of written expression for students in compensatory and special education programs. The Journal of Special Education, 23, 169-183.

15.

Tindal, G. , & Parker, R. (1991). Identifying measures for evaluating written expression . Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 6, 211-218.

16.

Videen, J. , Deno, S.L. , & Marston, D. (1982). Correct word sequences: A valid indicator of proficiency in written expression (Research Report No. 84). Minneapolis : University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.

17.

Watkinson, J.T. , & Lee, S.W. (1992). Curriculum-based measures of written expression for learning-disabled and nondisabled students. Psychology in the Schools, 29, 184-191.

Identifying an Indicator of Growth in Early Writing Proficiency for Elementary School Students

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References