Curriculum-based assessment for instructional design and curriculum-based measurement both involve measurements of reading fluency, which are often interpreted through comparisons to local norms. However, local norms are not always available and some scholars argue for a criterion-referenced approach when making instructional decisions. The current study examined the relationship between reading fluency and comprehension by having 49 third- and fourth-grade students orally read four passages from standardized reading assessment tools with an incremental increased percentage (0%, 10%, 20%, and 30%) of scrambled words. The number of words read correctly/minute and percentage of comprehension questions correctly answered were recorded. A suggested criterion of approximately 50 words/minute was found using the mean fluency rate of the highest passage in which students demonstrated adequate comprehension, but a wide range of normalcy was also noted. Suggestions for future research are included.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Blankenship, C. (1985). Using curriculum-based assessment data to make instructional decisions. Exceptional Children, 52, 233-238.
2.
Bums, M.K. (2001). Assessing sight-word acquisition and retention with curriculum-based assessment. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 19, 148-157.
3.
Bums, M.K., Tucker, J.A., Frame, J., Foley, S., & Hauser, A. (2000). Interscorer, alternate-form, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability of Gickling's model of Curriculum-based Assessment for reading. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 18, 353-360.
4.
Deno, S.L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative . Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
5.
Deno, S.L., & Mirkin, P.K. (1977). Data-based program modification: A manual. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children .
6.
Dowhower, S.L. (1987). Effects of repeated reading on second-grade transitional readers fluency and comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly , 22, 389-406.
7.
Ehri, L.C., Nunes, S.R., Willows, D.M., Schuster, B.V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z. & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly Special Issue, 36, 250-287.
8.
Fletcher, J.M., Francis, D.J., Shaywitz, S.E., Foorman, B.R., Stuebing, K.K., & Shaywitz, B.A. (1995, May). Diagnostic utility of intelligence testing and the discrepancy model for children with learning disabilities: Historical perspectives and current research. Paper presented at a workshop of the Board on Testing and Assessment , Houston, TX.
9.
Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J., Shaywitz, S.E., Shaywitz, B.A., & Fletcher, J.M. (1997). The case for early reading intervention. In B. A. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 243-264). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Fuchs, L.S. (1989). Evaluating solutions: Monitoring progress and revising intervention plans. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 153-181). New York: Guilford .
11.
Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation on student achievement: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children , 53, 199-208.
12.
Fuchs, L.S., & Deno, S.L. (1992). Effects of curriculum within curriculum-based measurement. Exceptional Children, 59, 232-242.
13.
Gickling, E., & Rosenfield, S. (1995). Best practices in curriculum-based assessment. In A. Thomas, & J. Grimes (Eds.) Best practices in school psychology (3rd ed., pp. 587-595 ). Washington DC: National Association of School Psychologists .
14.
Gickling, E.E., & Thompson, V. (1985). A personal view of curriculum-based assessment . Exceptional Children, 52, 205-218.
15.
Howell, K.W. (1986). Direct assessment of academic performance. School Psychology Review, 15, 324-335.
16.
Janssen, R., De Boeck, P., & Steene, G.V. ( 1996). Verbal fluency and verbal comprehension abilities in synonym tasks. Intelligence, 22, 291-310.
17.
Johnson, L., Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (1997). The effects of goal setting and self-instruction on learning a reading comprehension strategy: A study of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 80-91.
18.
Levy, B.A., Abello, B., & Lysynchuk, L. (1997). Transfer from word training to reading on context: Gains in reading fluency and comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 173-188.
19.
Linn, R.L., & Gronlund, N.E. (2000). Measurement and assessment in teaching (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20.
Lovitt, T., & Hansen, C. (1976). Round one—placing the child in the right reader. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 9, 347-353.
21.
Maddux, C.L. (1989). Review of the Standardized Reading Inventory. In J. C. Conoley & J. J. Kramer (Eds.), 10th Mental measurements yearbook (pp. 764-765). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute.
22.
Marston, D.B. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What is it is and why we do it. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18-78). New York: Guilford.
23.
Mastropieri, M.A., & Scruggs, T.E. (1997). Best practices in promoting reading comprehension in students with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 197-213.
24.
Mercer, C.D., Campbell, K.U., Miller, M.D., Mercer, K.D., & Lane, H.B. (2000). Effects of a reading fluency intervention for middle schoolers with specific learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 179-189.
25.
Meyer, M.S., Wood, F.B., Hart, L.A., & Felton, R.H. (1998). Selective predictive value of rapid automatized naming in peer readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 106-117.
26.
Newcomer, P. (1986). Standardized Reading Inventory. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
27.
Nicolson, R.I., Fawcett, A.J., Moss, H., Nicolson, M.K., & Reason, R. ( 1999). Early reading intervention can be effective and cost-effective. British Journal of Educational Psychology , 69, 47-62.
28.
Osaka, N., & Oda, K. ( 1994). Moving window generator for reading experiments . Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 26, 49-53.
29.
Rasinski, T.V. (1990). Investigating measures of reading fluency. Educational Research Quarterly, 14, 37-44.
30.
Reschly, D.J. (2000). The present and future status of school psychology in the United States. School Psychology Review, 29, 507-522.
31.
Reutzel, D.R., & Hollingsworth, P.M. ( 1993 ). Effects of fluency training on second graders reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 86, 325-331. ..
Shapiro, E.S., & Derr, T.F. ( 1990). Curriculum-based assessment. In C. R. Reynolds & T B. Gutkin (Eds.), The Handbook of School Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 365-387). New York: Wiley.
34.
Shinn, M.R. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford.
35.
Shinn, M.R., Rosenfield, S., & Knutson, N. (1989). Curriculum-based assessment: A comparison of models . School Psychology Review, 18, 299-316.
Starlin, C.M. (1982). On reading and writing. Iowa monograph. Iowa City, IA: State Department of Education . (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED220806)
38.
Wise, S.L. (1985). Review of the Diagnostic Reading Scales. In J. V Mitchell (Ed.), 9th mental measurements yearbook (pp. 480-481). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute.
