Allor, J.H., Fuchs, D., & Mathes, P.G. (in press). Do students with and without severe lexical retrieval weaknesses respond differently to instruction?American Educational Research Journal.
2.
Badian, N.A. (1996). Dyslexia, a validation of the concept at two age levels. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(1), 102-112.
3.
Badian, N.A. (1998). A validation of the role of preschool phonological and orthographic skills in the prediction of reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(5), 472-81.
4.
Blachman, B.A. (1994). What we have learned from longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading, and some unanswered questions: A response to Torgesen, Wagner, and Rashotte. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 27(5), 287-291.
5.
Blachman, B., Tangel, D.M., Ball, E.W., Black, B., & McGraw, C.K. (1999). Developing phonological awareness and word recognition: A two-year intervention with low-income, inner-city children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal , 11(3), 239-73
6.
Bowers, P.G., & Swanson, L.B. (1991). Naming speed deficits in reading disability: Multiple measures of a singular process. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 195-219.
7.
Bowers, P.G., & Wolf, M. (1993). Theoretical links between naming speed, precise timing mechanisms and orthographic skill in dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5(1), 69-85,
8.
Clark, D.B., & Uhry, J. (1995). Dyslexia: Theory and practice of remedial instruction . Baltimore: York Press.
9.
Fletcher, J., Foorman, B.R., Shaywitz, S., & Shaywitz, B. (1999). Conceptual and methodological issues in dyslexia research: A lesson for developmental disorders. In H. Tager-Flusberg (Ed.), Neurodevelopmental disorders (pp. 272-305). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
10.
Fletcher, J.M., & Lyon, R. (1998). Reading: A research based approach. In W.M. Evers (Ed.), What's gone wrong in America's classrooms (pp. 49-90). Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
11.
Foorman, B., Fletcher, J., & Francis, D.J. (1999). Preventing reading failure by ensuring effective reading instruction. In S. Patton & M. Holmes (Eds.), The keys to literacy (pp.29-49). Washington, DC: Council for Basic Education.
12.
Fuchs, D., Mathes, P.G., & Fuchs, L.S. (1997). Is learning disabilities nothing more than an oversophistication of low achievement? A review of the literature in reading. Technical Report submitted to theU.S. Office of Education , Washington, DC.
13.
Fuchs, D., Mathes, P.G., & Fuchs, L.S., & Lipsey, M.W. (in press). Reading differences in low achievers with and without learning disabilities. In R. Gersten & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Issues and research in special education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14.
Harm, M.W., & Seidenberg, M.S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 103(3), 491-528.
15.
Levy, B.A., Bourassa, D.C., & Horn, C. (1999). Fast and slow namers: benefits of segmentation and whole word training. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology , 73, 115-138.
16.
Lyon, G.R. & Krasnegor, N.A. (1996). Attention, Memory, and Executive Function. Maryland: Paul H Brookes Pub Co.
17.
Mathes, P.G., Howard, J.K., Allen, S.H., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Peer-assisted learning strategies for first-grade readers: Responding to the needs of diverse learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 62-94.
18.
Mathes, P.G., & Torgesen, J.K. (1998). All children can learn to read: Critical care for the prevention of reading failure. Peabody Journal of Education, 73(3&4), 317-340.
19.
Mauer, D., & Kamhi, A. (1996). Factors that influence phoneme-grapheme correspondence learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 259-270.
20.
National Research Council. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
21.
Schatschneider, C., Francis, D.J., Foorman, B.R., Fletcher, J.M., & Mehta, P. (1999). The dimensionality of phonological awareness: An application of item response theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 439-449.
22.
Share, D.L., & Stanovich, K.E. (1995). Cognitive processes in early reading development: Accommodating individual differences into a model of acquisition. Issues in Education, 1, 1-57.
23.
Shaywitz, S., Shaywitz, B., Pugh, K.R., Fulbright, R.K., Constable, R.T., Mencl, W.E., Shankweiler, D.P., Liberman, A.M., Skudlarski, P., Fletcher, J.M., Katz, L., Marchione, K.E., Lacadie, C., Gatenby, C. & Gore, J.C. (1998). Functional disruption in the organization of the brain for reading in dyslexia. Neurobiology, 95, 2636-2641.
24.
Snowling, M. (1995). Phonological processing and developmental dyslexia . Journal of Research in Reading, 18(2), 132-138.
25.
Torgesen J.K., & Bryant, B.R. (1994). Test of Phonological Awareness. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
26.
Torgesen, J.K., & Davis, C. (1997). Individual difference variables that predict response to training in phonological awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 1-21.
27.
Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1994). Longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 27, 276-286.
28.
Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Alexander, C.A., & Conway, T. (1997). Preventive and remedial interventions for children with severe disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 51-61.
29.
Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Burgess, S., & Hecht, S. (1996). Contributions of phonological awareness and rapid automatic naming ability to the growth of word-reading skills in second-to fifth-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 161-185.
30.
Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., Laughton, P., Simmons, K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1993). Development of young readers' phonological processing abilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 83-103.
31.
Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processes. Austin, TX: PRO-ED Inc.
32.
Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., Rashotte, C.A., Hecht, S.A., Barker, T.A., Burgess, S.R., Donahue, J., & Garon, T. (1997). Changing causal relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to fluent readings: A five-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 33(3), 468-479.
33.
Wolf, M., & Bowers, P.G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dylexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 415-438.
