This article presents an overview of several problems associated with assessing students with emotional or behavioral disorders (EBD) for eligibility. Major issues include underidentification of students in the category of EBD and the continuing overrepresentation of students of minority ethnicity. Movement away from the traditional norm-referenced approach to assessment toward a more functional approach seems to offer the most promise for addressing these concerns.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Algozzine, B.Christenson, S., & Ysseldyke, J. (1982). Probabilities associated with referral to placement process. Teacher Education and Special Education, 5, 19-23.
2.
Council for Children with Behavioral Disorders. ( 1989). Best assessment practices for students with behavioral disorders: Accommodation to cultural diversity and individual differences . Behavioral Disorders, 14, 263-278.
3.
Duncan, B.B., Forness, S.R., & Hartsough, C. (1995). Students identified as seriously emotionally disturbed in day treatment: Cognitive, psychiatric, and special education characteristics . Behavioral Disorders, 20, 238-232
4.
Gerber, M.M., & Semmel. M. I. (1984). Teacher as imperfect test: Reconceptualizing the referral process. Educational Psychologist, 19, 137-148.
5.
Hodgkinson, H.L. (1995). What should we call people? Race, class, and the census for 2000. Phi Delta Kappan,77, 173-179.
6.
Kauffman, J.M. (1999). How we prevent the prevention of emotional and behavioral disorders. Exceptional Children, 65, 448-468.
7.
Kauffman, J.M. (2001). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice-Hall
8.
Landrum, T.J., & Tankersley, M. (1999). Emotional and behavioral disorders in the new millennium: The future is now. Behavioral Disorders, 24, 319-330.
9.
Nelson, J.R., Roberts, M.L., Mathur, S.R., & Rutherford, R. B.Jr. (1999). Has public policy exceeded our knowledge base? A review of the functional behavioral assessment literature. Behavioral Disorders, 24, 169-179.
10.
O'Neill, R.E., Horner, R.H., Albin, R.W., Sprague, J.R., Storey, K., & Newton, J.S. (1997). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole .
11.
Oswald, D.P., & Coutinho, M.J. (in press). Trends in disproportionate representation in special education: Implications for multicultural education. In C. A. Utley & F. E. Obiakor (Eds.), Special education, multicultural education, and school reform: Components of a quality education for students with mild disabilities. Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas Publishing Co.
12.
Oswald, D.P., Coutinho, M.J., Best, A.M., & Singh, N.N. (1999). Ethnic representation in special education: The influence of school-related economic and demographic variables. Journal of Special Education, 32, 194-206.
13.
Rubin, R.A., & Balow, B. (1978). Prevalence of teacher identified behavior problems: A longitudinal study. Exceptional Children, 45, 102-111.
14.
Scott, T.M., & Nelson, C.M. (1999). Functional behavioral assessment: Implications for training and staff development. Behavioral Disorders, 24, 249-252.
15.
Sugai, G., & Maheady, L. (1988). Cultural diversity and individual assessment for behavior disorders. Teaching Exceptional Children, 21(1), 28-31.
16.
Trent, S.C., & Artiles, A.J. (1995). Serving culturally diverse students with emotional or behavioral disorders: Broadening current perspectives. In J. M. Kauffman, J. W. Lloyd, D. P. Hallahan, & T. A. Astuto (Eds.), Issues in education placement: Students with emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 215-249). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
U.S. Department of Education. (1999). Twenty-first annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
18.
U.S. Public Health Service. (2000). Report of the surgeon general's conference on children's mental health: A national action agenda. Washington, DC: Author.
19.
Walker, H.M. (1984). The social behavior survival program (SBS): A systematic approach to the integration of handicapped children into less restrictive settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 6, 421-441.
20.
Walker, H.M., & Fabre, T.R. (1987). Assessment of behavior disorders in the school setting: Issues, problems, and strategies revisited. In N. Haring (Ed.), Assessing and managing behavior disabilities (pp. 198243). Seattle: University of Washington Press .
21.
Walker, H.M., Homer, R.H., Sugai, G., Bullis, M., Sprague, J.R., Bricker, D., & Kaufman, M.J. (1996). Integrating approaches to preventing antisocial behavior patterns among school-aged children and youth. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4, 193-256.
22.
Walker, H.M., Kavanaugh, K., Stiller, B., Golly, A., Severson, H., & Feil, E.G. (1998). First step to success: An early intervention approach for preventing school antisocial behavior. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 6, 66-80.
23.
Yell, M.L. (1998). The law and special education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
