Students with attentional deficits are better able to maintain attention to tasks if novelty is added, especially during later trials. In this study, we assessed generality to a standardized reading test when noninformational color was added to one of two altemate forms, counterbalanced for order of condition and form. Participants were 25 third- to fifth-grade students with and without attentional deficits. Students with attentional deficits: (a) read as accurately as their classmates with color added (during a first test administration and across sessions), (b) read worse in the black-white condition, and (c) improved reading accuracy during the second test administration with color added (i.e., all other groups showed a decline in performance). Because the noninformational color did not change test difficulty (i.e., by altering the discriminability of task-relevant features), the implications of these findings may be more accurate assessment of the performance of students with attentional deficits.
American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed. revised). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed. revised). Washington, DC: Author.
4.
Anderson, V.L., & McLean, R.A. (1974). Design of experiments: A realistic approach. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
5.
Barkley, R.A. (1995). ADHD and IQ. The ADHD Report,3, 1-3.
6.
Belfiore, P.J., Grskovic, J.A., Murphy, A.M., & Zentall, S.S. (1996). The effects of antecedent color on reading for students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and learning disabilities . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 432-438.
7.
Butler, F.A., & Stevens, R. (1997, October). Accommodation strategies for English language learners on large-scale assessments: Student characteristics and other considerations. Los Angeles: University of California, Graduate School of Education & Information Studies, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
8.
Conners, C. (1973). Rating scales for use in drug studies with children . Psychopharmacology Bulletin (Special issue—Pharmacotherapy of children), 35-42.
9.
Douglas, V.I., Barr, R.G., O'Neill, M.E., & Britton, B.G. (1986). Short term effects of methylphenidate on the cognitive learning and academic performance of children with attention deficit disorder in the laboratory and the classroom. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 27, 191- 212.
10.
Douglas, V.I., & Peters, K.G. (1979). Toward a clearer definition of the attentional deficit of hyperactive children. New York: Plenum Press.
11.
Dunn, L.M., & Dunn, L.M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service .
12.
Fuchs, L., & Fuchs, D. (1988). Curriculum-based measurement: A methodology for evaluating and improving student programs. Diagnostique, 14, 3-13.
13.
Glass, G.V., & Hopkins, K.D. (1984). Statistical methods in education and psychology (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
14.
Helmstadter, G.C. (1964). Principles of psychology measurement. New York: Appleton Century- Crofts.
15.
Indiana Department of Education. (1998). ISTEP +: Indiana Statewide Testing for Educational Progress Plus Program Manual . Indianapolis, IN: Author .
16.
Lambert, N. (1999). Decision rules for approximations of the DSM-IV diagnosis of ADHD using the Children's Attention and Adjustment Survey- Home and School Forms. Berkeley, CA: Author.
17.
Lambert, N.M., & Hartsough, C.S. (1979). Pupil Behavior Rating Scale . In N.M. Lambert, C.S. Hartsough, & E.M. Bower (Eds.), A process for assessment of effective student functioning (pp. 120-129). Monterey, CA: CTB/ McGraw Hill.
18.
Lambert, N., Hartsough, C., & Sandoval, J. (1990). Children's Attention and Adjustment Survey. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service .
19.
Lyon, G.R. (1992). Research in leaming disabilities. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services .
20.
McDaniel, E. (1994). Understanding educational measurement. Madison, WI: WCB Brown & Benchmark .
21.
McDonnell L.J., McLaughlin, M.J., & Morison, P. (1997). Educating one and all: Students with disabilities and standards-based reform. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
22.
Nunnally, J.S. (1978). Psychometric theory (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
23.
Phillips, S.E. (1995, November). All students, same test, same standards: What the new Title I legislation will mean for the educational assessment of special education students. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
24.
Rosenthal, R., & Gaito, J. (1963). The interpretation of levels of significance by psychological researchers. Journal of Psychology, 55, 33-38.
Shroyer, C., & Zentall, S.S. (1986). Effects of rate, nonrelevant information, and repetition on the listening comprehension of hyperactive children. The Journal of Special Education, 20, 231-239.
27.
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins .
28.
Taylor, R.L. (1997). Assessment of exceptional students: Educational and psychological procedures (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
29.
Werry, J.S., Elkind, G.S., & Reeves, J.C. (1987). Attention deficit, conduct, oppositional, and anxiety disorders in children: III. Laboratory differences. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 15, 409-428.
Zentall, S.S. (1975). Optimal stimulation as theoretical basis of hyperactivity . American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 45, 549-563.
32.
Zentall, S.S. (1980). Behavioral comparisons of hyperactive and control children in natural settings. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology , 8, 93-109.
33.
Zentall, S.S. (1985). Stimulus-control factors in search performance of hyperactive children. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 18, 480-485.
34.
Zentall, S.S. (1986). Effects of color stimulation on performance and activity of hyperactive and nonhyperactive children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 8, 93- 109.
35.
Zentall, S.S. (1989). Attentional cueing in spelling tasks for hyperactive and comparison regular classroom children. The Journal of Special Education, 23, 83-93.
36.
Zentall, S.S., & Dwyer, A.M. (1988). Color effects on the impulsivity and errors of hyperactive children. Journal of School Psychology, 27, 164-174
37.
Zentall, S.S., Falkenberg, S.D., & Smith, L.B. (1985). Effects of color stimulation on the copying performance of attention-problem adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13, 501-511.
38.
Zentall, S.S., & Javorsky, J. (1995). Functional and clinical assessment of ADHD: Implications of DSM-IV in the schools. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, ADHD Special Monograph, 22-41.
39.
Zentall, S.S., & Zentall, T.R. (1976). Activity and task performance of hyperactive children as a function of environmental stimulation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 693-697.
40.
Zentall, S.S., & Zentall, T.R. (1983). Optimal stimulation: A model of disordered activity and performance in normal and deviant children. Psychological Bulletin,94, 446-471.
41.
Zentall, S.S., Zentall, T.R., & Booth, M.E. (1978). Within-task stimulation: Effects on activity and spelling performance in hyperactive and normal children. The Journal of Educational Research, 71, 223-230.
