The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of the online flipped classroom model on 8th-grade students’ achievement, retention of learning, and attitudes toward mathematics, specifically in the topic of triangles. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed. In the quantitative phase, a quasi-experimental pretest–posttest control group design was used with 63 students (33 control, 30 experimental). In the qualitative phase, students in the experimental group shared their opinions about the online flipped classroom model. Both groups received instruction through online distance education: the experimental group via the online flipped classroom model and the control group via the traditional online method. Findings indicated that achievement significantly increased from pretest to posttest in both groups but declined at retention. The experimental group achieved significantly higher posttest and retention scores than the control group. Regarding attitudes, no significant difference was observed in the control group, whereas the experimental group’s attitudes improved significantly. Posttest attitudes also favored the experimental group. Qualitative results revealed that students generally expressed positive views about the model. In conclusion, the online flipped classroom model enhanced achievement and attitudes and is recommended for integration into online education.
AikenL. R. (1980). Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(4), 955–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000419
AkdenizE. (2019). The impact of flipped classroom model on academic achievement, attitude and persistence [unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Necmettin Erbakan University.
Aksoyİ.AydınA. (2022). The effect of flipped classroom model on teaching of the reflection in mirrors and absorption of light unit in the 7th grade science lesson. Karaelmas Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(2), 203–223. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kebd/issue/74811/1079895
6.
Alsancak SırakayaD. (2015). The effect of flipped classroom model on academic achievement, self-directed learning readiness and motivation [unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Gazi University.
7.
AmstelveenR. (2019). Flipping a college mathematics classroom: An action research project. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1337–1350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9834-z
8.
BergmannJ.SamsA. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.
9.
BhagatK. K.ChangC. N.ChangC. Y. (2016). The impact of the flipped classroom on mathematics concept learning in high school. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 134–142. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1107169
10.
BishopJ. L.VerlegerM. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In: Proceedings of the 120th ASEE annual conference & exposition (pp. 1–18). American Society for Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--22585
11.
BolatlıZ. (2018). Determining the academic achievement of students who use flipped classroom method supported by Mobile application and their views on cooperative learning[Unpublished master’s thesis]. Selçuk University.
12.
BoyrazS. (2014). Evaluating flipped classroom/education method in English teaching [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Afyon Kocatepe University.
13.
BozkurtA. (2020). Assessments of education in the world during and after the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic: The new normal and the new education paradigm. Journal of Open Education Applications and Research, 6(3), 112–142. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/auad/issue/56247/773769
14.
BrooksA. W. (2014). Information literacy and the flipped classroom: Examining the impact of a one-shot flipped class on student learning and perceptions. Communications in Information Literacy, 8(2), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2014.8.2.168
15.
BüyüköztürkŞ. (2014). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Data analysis handbook for social sciences]. Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
16.
CabıE. (2018). The impact of the flipped classroom model on students' academic achievement. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 19(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i3.3482
17.
CanA. (2019). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi [Quantitative data analysis in the scientific research process using SPSS]. Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
18.
ClarkK. R. (2013). Examining the effects of the flipped model of instruction on student engagement and performance in the secondary mathematics classroom: An action research study[Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Capella University.
19.
CreswellJ. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches2nd ed. Sage.
20.
CreswellJ. W. (2021). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri: Beş yaklaşıma göre nitel araştırma ve araştırma deseni [Qualitative Inquiry And Research Design]. M. Bütün & S. B. Demir, Trans. (Ed). Siyasal Kitabevi.
GençerB. G. (2015). A case study towards the implementation of the flipped classroom model in the schools [unpublished master’s thesis]. Bahçeşehir University.
23.
GrahamK. L.CohenA.ReynoldsE. E.HuangG. C. (2019). Effect of a flipped classroom on knowledge acquisition and retention in an internal medicine residency program. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 11(1), 92–97. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-18-00536.1
24.
GüçF. (2017). The effect of the flipped classroom practice on the rational numbers and operations with rational numbers [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Amasya University.
25.
HairJ. F.Jr.HultG. T. M.RingleC. M.SarstedtM. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage. https://doi.org/10.54055/ejtr.v6i2.134
26.
HewK. F.JiaC.GondaD. E.BaiS. (2020). Transitioning to the “new normal” of learning in unpredictable times: Pedagogical practices and learning performance in fully online flipped classrooms. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00234-x
27.
HızalA. (1983). Uzaktan eğitim süreçleri ve yazılı gereçler [Distance learning processes and written materials]. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi.
28.
HolmP.BeckmanL. (2022). Flipped or traditional online teaching? Two different strategies to handle teaching in nursing education during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 19(1). 119. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2021-0119
29.
HolmbergB. (1989). Theory and practice of distance education. Routledge.
30.
JiaC.HewK. F.JiahuiD.LiuyufengL. (2023). Towards a fully online flipped classroom model to support student learning outcomes and engagement: A 2-year design-based study. The Internet and Higher Education, 56, 100878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100878
31.
KalafatH. Z. (2019). The examination of the effect of lecture designed with flipped classroom model on 7th grader students' academic achievement [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Marmara University.
32.
KayaD. (2018). The effect of flipped learning model on middle school students’ classroom engagement in teaching mathematics. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 8(4), 232–249. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.453729
33.
KayanM. F. (2020). The effect of flipped learning model on academic achievement, retention and classroom climate [unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Düzce University.
34.
KhodaeiS.HasanvandS.GholamiM.MokhayeriY.AminiM. (2022). The effect of the online flipped classroom on self-directed learning readiness and metacognitive awareness in nursing students during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Nursing, 21(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00804-6
35.
KimK. M.KimM. S.KheraO.GetmanJ. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: An exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education, 22(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.003
36.
KoceskaN.KoceskiS.PucovskiB.MitkovskaV.LazovskiA. (2020). Investigating the effects of online and flipped classroom approach during COVID-19 pandemic. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Technology and Development of Education – ITRO, 11(1), 42–47.
37.
KöseS.YüzüakA. V. (2020). Studies on flipped classroom in science and mathematics education: A thematic review. Bartın University Journal of Educational Research, 4(1), 15–33. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/bujer/issue/55738/719745
38.
LaiC.-L.HwangG.-J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 100(1), 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.006
39.
LinH. C.HwangG. J.ChangS. C.HsuY. D. (2021). Facilitating critical thinking in decision making-based professional training: An online interactive peer-review approach in a flipped learning context. Computers & Education, 173, 104266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104266
MoffettJ.MillA. C. (2014). Evaluation of the flipped classroom approach in a veterinary professional skills course. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 5(1), 415–425. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S70160
MusibM. K. (2014). Student perceptions of the impact of using the flipped classroom approach for an introductory-level multidisciplinary module. CDTL Brief, 17(2), 15–20.
45.
OjennusD. D. (2016). Assessment of learning gains in a flipped biochemistry classroom. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 44(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20926
46.
ÖzdemirA. (2016). Application of blended learning focused face-class modeling in secondary school mathematics teaching [unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Ankara University.
47.
ÖzdemirM. Ç. (2019). The use of flipped classroom in geometry teaching investigation of the effect of the mathematics teacher candidates on the attitudes of geometry[Unpublished master’s thesis]. Bayburt University.
48.
ÖzdoğanG.BulutM.KulaF. (2005). Matematik dersine yönelik tutumun ve başarının, cinsiyet ve öğrenim türü değişkenleri açısından incelenmesi [examining attitudes toward and success in mathematics classes in terms of gender and type of education]. XIV. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi Bildirileri, 2(1), 995–997. Pamukkale University.
49.
RipleyD. (2015). An examination of flipped instructional method on sixth graders’ mathematics learning: Utilizing propensity score matching [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Nevada.
50.
SaundersJ. M. (2014). The flipped classroom: Its effect on student academic achievement and critical thinking skills in high school mathematics[Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Liberty University.
51.
SpottsJ. D.Gutierrez de BlumeA. P. (2020). A pilot study on the effect of the flipped classroom model on pre-calculus performance. Sage Open, 10(4), 2158244020982604. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020982604
52.
StrayerJ. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4
53.
TekinO. (2018). Flipped classroom in high school mathematics: A mixed design study [unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University.
54.
ToqueroC. M. D. (2020). Emergency remote teaching amid COVID-19: The turning point. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 185–188. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3881748
55.
TuneJ. D.SturekM.BasileD. P. (2013). Flipped classroom model improves graduate student performance in cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal physiology. Advances in Physiology Education, 37(4), 316–320. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00091.2013
56.
TuranZ. (2015). The evaluation of flipped classroom method and examination of its effects on academic achievement, cognitive load and motivation[Unpublished doctoral dissertation].Atatürk University.
57.
TuranZ.GöktaşY. (2016). The flipped classroom: Instructional efficiency and impact of achievement and cognitive load levels. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 12(4), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1122
58.
WagnerM.UrhahneD. (2021). Disentangling the effects of flipped classroom instruction in EFL secondary education: When is it effective and for whom?Learning and Instruction, 75, 101490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101490
59.
WeiX.ChengI. L.ChenN. S.YangX.LiuY.DongY.ZhaiX.Kinshuk (2020). Effect of the flipped classroom on the mathematics performance of middle school students. Educational Technology Research & Development, 68(3), 1461–1484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09752-x
60.
WigintonB. L. (2013). Flipped instruction: An investigation into the effect of learning environment on student self-efficacy, learning style, and academic achievement in an algebra I classroom [unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of Alabama.
61.
WinterJ. B. (2013). The effect of the flipped classroom model on achievement in an introductory college physics course [unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Mississippi State University.
62.
YorgancıS. (2020). A flipped learning approach to improving students’ learning performance in mathematics courses. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(1), 348–371. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.657197
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
