This longitudinal mixed-methods study investigates the effectiveness of AI-driven flipped writing workshops in business education by enhancing analytical writing skills, professional communication abilities, and self-regulated learning (SRL) strategies over a 14-week intervention. Grounded in socio-cognitive learning theory, the research compares an experimental group (n = 113), which utilized AI-driven feedback scaffolds in flipped workshops, with a control group (n = 81) that received traditional lecture-based instruction. Triangulated data - comprising pre/post writing assessments, AI-generated feedback logs, and semi-structured interviews - indicated that the AI-flipped model: (a) improved analytical writing skills (MEx = 14.53, SDEx = .787 vs Mcont = 10.59, SDcont = .907; p < .01, Cohen’s d = 4.66), with notable gains in argumentation rigor and evidence-based synthesis; (b) enhanced professional communication, particularly in audience adaptation and clarity, with qualitative feedback highlighting AI’s role in replicating real-world business contexts; and (c) promoted self-regulated learning behaviors, evidenced by increased revision cycles (4.2 compared to 1.8 in the control group) and greater goal-setting precision, supported by AI-facilitated progress monitoring. Thematic analysis revealed AI’s dual function as both a personalized writing tutorby providing adaptive feedback, and a metacognitive motivator which encouraged reflective practice. These findings contribute to the field of business education research by: (1) demonstrating a scalable model of AI-enhanced writing instruction; (2) proposing a framework for integrating AI into self-regulated learning in professional training; and (3) addressing key gaps in longitudinal, technology-enhanced education. This study offers practical insights for curriculum designers seeking to harness AI’s transformative potential, while also emphasizing the ethical implications of human–AI collaboration in higher education.
AbbottM. R. B.AbbottW. W. (2024). Artificial intelligence or nursing student? Revisiting clues in the connectives. Nurse Educator, 49(6), 306–309. https://doi.org/10.1097/nne.0000000000001696
2.
AjmalB.AnsariM.AkhtarS. (2024). Flipped classroom: Promoting active learning on students’ engagement at a higher level. Journal of Policy Research, 10(2), 383–390. https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00245
3.
AkandaF.TalukderT. (2026). AI writing tools in English writing: Reviewing teachers’ and students’ views on benefits and concerns. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13(2026), Article 102437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102437
4.
AladiniA.IsmailS. M.KhasawnehM. A. S.ShakibaeiG. (2025). Self-directed writing development across computer/AI-based tasks: Unraveling the traces on L2 writing outcomes, growth mindfulness, and grammatical knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 17(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100566
5.
AlbariqiZ. (2024). A systematic review exploring the use of artificial intelligence in developing writing skills. Journal of Critical Studies in Language and Literature, 5(6), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.46809/jcsll.v5i6.308
6.
AlghamdiA. M.AbuSa’aleekA. O. (2025). Exploring postgraduates’ attitudes towards Grammarly as an automated writing evaluation tool in academic writing. Studies in English Language and Education, 12(2), 878–895. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v12i2.39995
7.
AlgobaeiF.AlzainE. (2026). Prompt engineering for non-native English learners: A generative AI approach to personalised language feedback. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13(June 2026), Article 102341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102341
8.
AlhazbiS.Al‐aliA.TabassumA.Al‐AliA.Al‐EmadiA.KhattabT.HasanM. A. (2024). Using learning analytics to measure self‐regulated learning: A systematic review of empirical studies in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(4), 1658–1674. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12982
9.
AljaraidehY. (2019). Students’ perception of flipped classroom: A case study for private universities in Jordan. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(3), 368–377. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.648
10.
AljuaidH. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence tools on academic writing instruction in higher education: A systematic review. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on ChatGPT, (April2024), 26-55. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/ph24v
11.
AlmumenH. A.JouharM. R. (2025). The impact of ChatGPT as a brainstorming tool on gifted students’ persuasive writing. Journal of Writing Research, 17(2), 181–207. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2025.17.02.01
12.
Al-RaimiM.MudhshB. A.Al-YafaeiY.Al-MaashaniS. (2024). Utilizing artificial intelligence tools for improving writing skills: Exploring Omani EFL learners’ perspectives. Forum for Linguistic Studies (Transferred), 6(2), 1177. https://doi.org/10.59400/fls.v6i2.1177
13.
AndersA. D.SpeltzE. D. (2025). Developing generative AI literacies through self-regulated learning: A human-centered approach. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9(2025), Article 100482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100482
AnnamalaiN.UthayakumaranA.BervellB.KumarR. (2025). Examining the use of ChatGPT in argumentative writing: A mixed methods study. Journal of Advanced Academics, 36(3), 521–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X251333859
16.
AnthonysamyL.WutT.-m. E.LimO. W. (2025). Metacognitive strategy interventions to improve analytical thinking skills: A quasi-experimental study. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12(2025), Article 102021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102021
17.
AslamA.SalemM. M.EbsharaM.KhudaiU.FatimaA. (2025). Assessing ChatGPT's influence on English academic writing: Educational prospects and limitations. The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies, 3(2), 2673–2691. https://doi.org/10.59075/vgprv112
18.
Asy’ariM.SharovS. (2024). Transforming education with ChatGPT: Advancing personalized learning, accessibility, and ethical AI integration. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 3(2), 119–157. https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v3i2.2424
19.
Baltà-SalvadorR.El-MadafriI.Brasó-VivesE.PeñaM. (2025). Empowering engineering students through Artificial Intelligence (AI): Blended human–AI creative ideation processes with ChatGPT. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 33(1), Article e22817. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22817
20.
BarrotJ. S. (2021). Using automated written corrective feedback in the writing classrooms: Effects on L2 writing accuracy. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1936071
21.
BishopJ.VerlegerM. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In 2013 ASEE annual conference & exposition (pp. 23–1200). American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--22585
BredowC. A.RoehlingP. V.KnorpA. J.SweetA. M. (2021). To flip or not to flip? A meta-analysis of the efficacy of flipped learning in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 91(6), 878–918. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211019122
BroadbentJ.PoonW. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
26.
CardonP.FleischmannC.AritzJ.LogemannM.HeidewaldJ. (2023). The challenges and opportunities of AI-assisted writing: Developing AI literacy for the AI age. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 86(3), 257–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906231176517
27.
CenX.ShakibaeiG. (2026). Enhancing creative writing through AI-powered co-creation with cognitive and emotional outcomes. Scientific Reports, 16(1), 4407. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34416-2
28.
ChakawodzaJ. M.NakediE. M.KizitoR. N. (2025). The effectiveness of flipped classroom pedagogy in promoting learning engagement in organic chemistry in Grade-12 students in the context of South Africa and COVID-19. International Journal of Science Education, 47(14), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2342574
29.
ChenZ.ZhuJ.McGraneJ.HopfenbeckT. N.WangY.JiY. (2026). More inspiration and attention: How generative AI tools impact graduate students' affective engagement in L2 source-based academic writing. Computers &Education, 242(March 2026), Article 105495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105495
30.
ChuX.WangM.SpectorJ. M.ChenN. S.ChaiC. S.HwangG. J.ZhaiX. (2025). Enhancing the flipped classroom model with generative AI and Metaverse technologies: Insights from lag sequential and epistemic network analysis. Educational Technology Research & Development, 73(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10457-2
31.
ConradD.NewberryR. (2012). Identification and instruction of important business communication skills for graduate business education. The Journal of Education for Business, 87(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2011.576280
32.
CreswellJ. W.ClarkV. L. P.GutmannM. L.HansonW. E. (2003). Advanced mixed. Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research, 209, 209–240.
33.
CuiH.WangB.KaurN. (2024). Writing anxiety and self-regulation strategies among medical English students. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 13(2), 342–354. https://doi.org/10.55493/5019.v13i2.5084
34.
DarwinRusdinD.MukminatienN.SuryatiN.LaksmiE. D.Marzuki (2023). Critical thinking in the AI era: An exploration of EFL students’ perceptions, benefits, and limitations. Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2290342. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2290342
35.
DeepP.ChenC. Y. (2025). The role of AI in academic writing: Impacts on writing skills, critical thinking, and integrity in higher education. Societies, 15(9), 247. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15090247
36.
DergaaI.ChamariK.ZmijewskiP.SaadH. B. (2023). From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: Examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biology of Sport, 40(2), 615–622. https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.125623
37.
DeVastoD.PalmerZ. (2024). Building critical AI literacy in the business communication classroom. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 87(4), 557–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906241253199
38.
DignathC.van EwijkR.PerelsF.FabrizS. (2023). Let learners monitor the learning content and their learning behavior! A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of tools to foster monitoring. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09718-4
EvangelistaE. D. L. (2025). Ensuring academic integrity in the age of ChatGPT: Rethinking exam design, assessment strategies, and ethical AI policies in higher education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(1), ep559. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15775
41.
FathiJ.RahimiM.LiuG. Z. (2023). A preliminary study on flipping an English as a foreign language collaborative writing course with video clips: Its impact on writing skills and writing motivation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(2), 659–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12772
42.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
43.
FieldA. (2024). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage Publications Limited.
44.
GkintoniE.AntonopoulouH.SortwellA.HalkiopoulosC. (2025). Challenging cognitive load theory: The role of educational neuroscience and artificial intelligence in redefining learning efficacy. Brain Sciences, 15(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15020203
45.
GoldenB. (2023). Enabling critical thinking development in higher education through the use of a structured planning tool. Irish Educational Studies, 42(4), 949–969. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2023.2258497
46.
GolonkaE. M.BowlesA. R.FrankV. M.RichardsonD. L.FreynikS. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.700315
47.
Guardia-PaniuraC. H.Cueva-LuzaT.Cruz-CarpioF. M.Ito-DíazR. R.Apaza-PacoD. V.Rosas-RojasN.Mamani-MamaniB.Terrero-PérezÁ.YaedúR. Y. F.Peralta-MamaniM. (2026). Human and AI-generated feedback in higher education: A systematic review of effectiveness and student perceptions. Contemporary Educational Technology, 18(1), ep623. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/17863
48.
HardiantiniL. R.RatminingsihN. M.UtamiI. G. A. L. P.SantosaM. H. (2025). The assistance of Quillbot in powering academic writing for higher students: A systematic literature review. Jurnal Dimensi Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 13(2), 266–279. https://doi.org/10.24269/dpp.v13i2.11074
49.
HeintaluK.SaksK.EdisherashviliN.DekkerI. (2025). The conceptualization of goal setting and goal orientation in higher education: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 48(August 2025), Article 100709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100709
50.
HematianF.RezaeiA. M.MohammadyfarM. A. (2017). On the effect of goal setting on self-directed learning, achievement motivation, and academic achievement among students. Modern Applied Science, 11(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v11n1p37
51.
HoW. W.LauY. H. (2025). Role of reflective practice and metacognitive awareness in the relationship between experiential learning and positive mirror effects: A serial mediation model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 157(9), Article 104947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.104947
52.
HuangJ. (2023). Engineering ChatGPT prompts for EFL writing classes. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 5(4), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.58304/ijts.20230405
53.
HuangW.HewK. F.FryerL. K. (2022). Chatbots for language learning—are they really useful? A systematic review of Chatbot‐Supported language learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12610
54.
HwangG. J.XieH.WahB. W.GaševićD. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1(2020), Article 100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001
55.
HylandK. (2015). Teaching and researching writing. Routledge.
56.
IvankovaN. V.CreswellJ. W.StickS. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x05282260
57.
JaleelS.AnuroofaO. M. (2017). A study on the relationship between self-directed learning and achievement in information technology of students at secondary level. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(10), 1849–1852. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.051024
58.
JannathH.AkterA. (2026). Artificial Intelligence (AI) for automated writing evaluation in TESOL: Effectiveness and challenges. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 14(1), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v14i1.18165
59.
JärveläS.MalmbergJ.KoivuniemiM. (2016). Recognizing socially shared regulation by using the temporal sequences of online chat and logs in CSCL. Learning and Instruction, 42(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.10.006
60.
JohnsonW. R.DurningS. J.AllardR. J.BarelskiA. M.ArtinoA. R.Jr (2023). A scoping review of self‐monitoring in graduate medical education. Medical Education, 57(9), 795–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15023
61.
KaliisaR.MisiejukK.López-PernasS.SaqrM. (2026). How does artificial intelligence compare to human feedback? A meta-analysis of performance, feedback perception, and learning dispositions. Educational Psychology, 46(1), 80–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2025.2553639
62.
KangwaD.MsafiriM. M.WanX.FuteA. (2024). Enhancing student engagement in online education: The role of self-regulation and teacher support in Zambia. Discover Education, 3(1), 156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00216-5
63.
KazanopoulosS.Tejada GaritanoE.BasogainX. (2022). The self-efficacy of special and general education teachers in implementing inclusive education in Greek secondary education. Education Sciences, 12(6), Article 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12060383
64.
KerimbayevN.UmirzakovaZ.ShadievR.JotsovV. (2023). A student-centered approach using modern technologies in distance learning: A systematic review of the literature. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00280-8
65.
KhadawardiK.MirdadD.NasiefH.HassanA.WaseemH.ButtA.AlboogA.SalahW.ZakariyahA. F. (2025). Evaluating medical student engagement in flipped classrooms: Insights on motivation and peer learning.Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 12, Article 23821205251320756. https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205251320756
66.
KhairuddinZ.DaudK. M.AnuarN.SatiminO.MohdF. H.YusofS. S. (2024). Relationship between perceived students’ critical thinking skills and academic writing skills. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(3s), 4709–4721. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.803343S
67.
KhasawnehM. A. S. (2024). Academic integrity and the use of ChatGPT by EFL pre-service teachers. Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development, 8(7), 4783. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i7.4783
68.
KimJ.YuS.DetrickR.LiN. (2025). Exploring students’ perspectives on generative AI-assisted academic writing. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 1265–1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12878-7
69.
KlimovaB. (2021). An insight into online foreign language learning and teaching in the era of COVID-19 pandemic. Procedia Computer Science, 192, 1787–1794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.08.183
70.
KoltovskaiaS. (2020). Student engagement with Automated Written Corrective Feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study. Assessing Writing, 44(3), Article 100450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450
71.
KongS. C.LeeJ. C. K.TsangO. (2024). A pedagogical design for self-regulated learning in academic writing using text-based generative artificial intelligence tools: 6-P pedagogy of plan, prompt, preview, produce, peer-review, portfolio-tracking. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 19, 030. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2024.19030
72.
LaiC. L.HwangG. J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 100(September 2016), 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.006
73.
LaiY.SaabN.AdmiraalW. (2022). University students’ use of mobile technology in self-directed language learning: Using the integrative model of behavior prediction. Computers & Education, 179, 104413.
74.
LakensD. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(November 2013), 863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
75.
LeveneH. (1960). Robust tests for equality of variances. In OlkinI. (Ed.), Contributions to probability and statistics (pp. 278–292). Stanford University Press.
76.
LinC. J.HwangG. J. (2018). A learning analytics approach to investigating factors affecting EFL students’ oral performance in a flipped classroom. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 205–219. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26388398.
77.
LiuG. Z.RahimiM.FathiJ. (2022). Flipping writing metacognitive strategies and writing skills in an English as a foreign language collaborative writing context: A mixed‐methods study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(6), 1730–1751. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12707
78.
LiuL. (2022). The contribution of the flipped learning environment to value perception and controllability of classroom activities as antecedents of learners’ anxiety: A control-value approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1000710. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1000710
79.
LiuX.SamahN. A.SallehS. M. (2022). Impact of using a Mobile app on improving students’ creative thinking in business English writing with self-regulated learning. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 16(15), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i15.31477
LuckinR.HolmesW. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson.
82.
LuoR. Z.ZhouY. L. (2024). The effectiveness of self‐regulated learning strategies in higher education blended learning: A five years systematic review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(6), 3005–3029. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13052
MasruddinHartinaS.ArifinM. A.LangajiA. (2024). Flipped learning: Facilitating student engagement through repeated instruction and direct feedback. Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2412500. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2412500
85.
MathumathiP.SelvarajV.BalamuruganS.SarkerM.OliL.PrakashA.RameshM. (2024). Assessment of factors that affect students’ business writing skills. World Journal of English Language, 14(5), 424. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n5p424
MengeshaA. K.AyeleH. S.MiskerM. F.BeynaA. T. (2024). Assessing the effectiveness of flipped classroom teaching–learning method among undergraduate medical students at Gondar University, college of medicine and health sciences: An interventional study. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1108. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06105-7
88.
MohebbiA. (2025). Enabling learner independence and self-regulation in language education using AI tools: A systematic review. Cogent Education, 12(1), Article 2433814. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2433814
89.
MoussaA.BelhiahH. (2024). Beyond syntax: Exploring Moroccan undergraduate EFL learners’ engagement with AI-Assisted writing. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on ChatGPT, April2024, 138-155. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/3fr45
90.
MudawyA. M. A. (2024). Investigating EFL faculty members’ perceptions of integrating artificial intelligence applications to improve the research writing process: A case study at Majmaah University. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issueon ChatGPT, April 2024, 169-183. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/k4ub8
91.
MurphyN.StrongC.JonesG. (2021). Flipped learning: A shift in graduate nursing education. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 34(1), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1097/JXX.0000000000000581
92.
NamaziandostE. (2025). Integrating flipped learning in AI-enhanced language learning: Mapping the effects on metacognitive awareness, writing development, and foreign language learning boredom. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9(December 2025), Article 100446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100446
93.
NguyenT. H. B.TranT. D. H. (2023). Exploring the efficacy of ChatGPT in language teaching. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 14(2), 156–167. https://doi.org/10.54855/acoj.2314210
94.
NouriJ. (2016). The flipped classroom: For active, effective and increased learning–especially for low achievers. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(33), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0032-z
95.
O’NeillE. J.FultonC.MatthewsJ.HenseyC. (2025). Metacognition design framework to aid metacognitive skill development in university students supported by the virtual learning environment. Educational Technology Research & Development. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10574-y
96.
Ortiz-BonninS.BlahopoulouJ. (2025). Chat or cheat? Academic dishonesty, risk perceptions, and ChatGPT usage in higher education students. Social Psychology of Education, 28(1), 113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-025-10080-2
97.
PaethrangsiN.TeekasapS.KhiewpanR.JandaboueW. (2024). Empowering students’ autonomous learning through self-regulation, metacognitive strategies, and collaborative learning environments. Journal of Liberal Arts RMUTT, 5(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.60101/jla.2024.5.1.4065
98.
PanJ. (2024). AI-driven English language learning program and academic writing integrity in the era of intelligent interface. English Language Teaching and Linguistics Studies, 6(4), 120. https://doi.org/10.22158/eltls.v6n4p120
99.
PanaderoE. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
100.
ParmarD.GuptaP. (2024). Sustainable data management and governance using AI. World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences, 13(2), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjaets.2024.13.2.0551
101.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (Vol. 3). Sage.
PerezA.HalimS. (2024). The impact of AI-powered software on second language (L2) writing: A systematic literature review. Research and Innovation in Applied Linguistics-Electronic Journal, 2(2), Article 138. https://doi.org/10.31963/rial.v2i2.4801
104.
PonomarenkoL.SusloparovaM.ChernovaN.KatakhovaN. (2024). Foreign language business writing skill formation among university students using the Microsoft Teams platform. Perspectives of Science and Education, 69(3), 391–405. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2024.3.23
105.
PopescuA.NikolovaM.NasrinS. (2024). The impact of self-efficacy training on goal setting and academic persistence. Journal of Adolescent and Youth Psychological Studies, 5(4), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.jayps.5.4.18
106.
RahimiM.FathiJ.ZouD. (2025). Exploring the impact of automated written corrective feedback on the academic writing skills of EFL learners: An activity theory perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 30(3), 2691–2735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12896-5
107.
RayS.SikdarD. P. (2024). AI-Driven flipped classroom: Revolutionizing education through digital pedagogy. British Journal of Education, Learning & Development Psychology, 7(2), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.52589/bjeldp-ltdjflih
108.
RiaziA. M.CandlinC. N. (2014). Mixed-methods research in language teaching and learning: Opportunities, issues and challenges. Language Teaching, 47(2), 135–173. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444813000505
109.
RileyT. J.SimonsK. A. (2016). The written communication skills that matter most for accountants. Accounting Education, 25(3), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2016.1164066
110.
RoaA. A. P.HalimS. (2024). The impact of AI-Powered software on second Language (L2) writing: A systematic literature review. Research and Innovation in Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 138–158. https://doi.org/10.31963/rial.v2i2.4801
111.
RosT. J.SamuelA. (2025). Artificial intelligence in academic writing: Tools and techniques for scholars to succeed in the publishing world. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.70014
112.
RoutonP. W.MarinanJ.BontragerM. (2021). The self-rated writing skills of business majors: Graduating perceptions and collegiate improvement. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 84(4), 339–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906211039528
SelahattinA. L. A. N.EyupY. U. R. T. (2024). Flipped learning: An innovative model for enhancing education through ChatGPT. International Journal of Modern Education Studies, 8(1), 124–148. https://doi.org/10.51383/ijonmes.2024.328
116.
SelimA. S. M. (2024). The transformative impact of AI-powered tools on academic writing: Perspectives of EFL university students. International Journal of English Linguistics, 14(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v14n1p14
117.
ShapiroS. S.WilkM. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3-4), 591–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591
118.
ShenW. Q.ChenH. L.HuY. (2014). The validity and reliability of the Self-Directed Learning Instrument (SDLI) in mainland Chinese nursing students. BMC Medical Education, 14, 108. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-108
119.
SiqiangL.KunH.QuanlanL.JieZ.ShuminW.LiH.EnzhongL.FujiaC.HongweiG.MingchengW.JunheL.XianliL. (2024). Innovative integration of the “W+ Flipped Classroom” and “B+ BOPPPS” teaching models for enhanced learning outcomes. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1050. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06034-5
120.
SoidFatihM.FauziN.NormanE. (2025). Effective communication in building healthy and productive relationships. MES Management Journal, 4(1), 662–671. https://doi.org/10.56709/mesman.v4i1.631
121.
SongC.SongY. (2023). Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: Assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1260843. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843
122.
StănescuD. F.FrunzaruV.ȘtefănițăO. (2024). Self-regulated learning, self-efficacy and life-long learning: The mediating role of future orientation. Kybernetes. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-03-2024-0585
123.
StasollaF.ZulloA.ManiglioR.PassaroA.Di GioiaM.CurcioE.MartiniE. (2025). Deep learning and reinforcement learning for assessing and enhancing academic performance in university students: A scoping review. Artificial Intelligence, 6(2), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai6020040
124.
TalapngoenS.ThurathamW. (2025). The effect of QuillBot utilization on the development of university students’ writing skills. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 16(2), 360–380. https://doi.org/10.37237/160206
125.
TanD.Diatta-HolgateH. A.Levesque-BristolC. (2021). Perceived autonomy supportive and culturally responsive environments contribute to international students’ participation and willingness to communicate. Current Psychology, 42(2), 7629–7648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02063-1
126.
TayeT.MengeshaM. (2024). Identifying and analyzing common English writing challenges among regular undergraduate students. Heliyon, 10(17), Article e36876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36876
127.
ThaksananP. (2023). EFL students’ business writing performance and writing anxiety. Hong Kong Journal of Social Sciences, 61(Spring/ Summer, 2023, 526–535. https://doi.org/10.55463/hkjss.issn.1021-3619.61.46
128.
ThakurR. A.GulS.HamidS. (2026). Artificial intelligence and human thought: A review of cognitive augmentation, challenges, and ethics. Scientific Culture, 12(2.1), 1566–1579. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.122.126126
129.
TranK. M. A. (2025). Research on using Grammarly to improve students’ English writing. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 16(1), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.54855/acoj.251614
130.
WeidlichJ.GotschF.SchudelK.Marusic-WürscherC.MazzarellaJ.BoltenH.BütlerD.LugerS.WohlfenderB.Maag MerkiK. (2025). Teacher, peer, or AI? Comparing effects of feedback sources in higher education. Computers and EducationOpen, 9(December 2025), Article 100300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100300
131.
WeigleS. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge University Press.
132.
WiboolyasarinW.WiboolyasarinK.SuwanwihokK.JinowatN.MuenjanchoeyR. (2024). Synergizing collaborative writing and AI feedback: An investigation into enhancing L2 writing proficiency in wiki-based environments. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6(2), Article 100228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100228
WiyantoM. T. (2025). Quillbot's role in enhancing paraphrasing skills of university students. [Undergraduate thesis]. Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang.
135.
WuL. (2024). AI-based writing tools: Empowering students to achieve writing success. Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology, 8(2), 40–44. https://doi.org/10.23977/aetp.2024.080206
YangR.WibowoS.MubarakS.RahamathullaM. (2021). Assessing the effects of perceived qualities on e-learning students’ attitude, learning engagement, and stickiness during COVID-19. In Pacific Asia conference on information systems 2021. Association for Information Systems (AIS). https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2021/204.
138.
YekolluR. K.Bhimraj GhugeT.Sunil BiradarS.HaldikarS. V.Farook Mohideen Abdul KaderO. (2024). AI-driven personalized learning paths: Enhancing education through adaptive systems. In International conference on smart data intelligence (pp. 507–517). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-3191-6_38
139.
ZainuddinZ.PereraC. J. (2019). Exploring students’ competence, autonomy and relatedness in the flipped classroom pedagogical model. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(1), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1356916
140.
ZhaoJ.LiY.FengW. (2023). Investigating the validity and reliability of a comprehensive essay evaluation model of integrating manual feedback and intelligent assistance. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(4), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i04.38241
141.
ZhenH.Wan YahayaW. A. J. (2024). Use of generative AI tools to facilitate personalized learning in the flipped classroom. In Transforming education with generative AI: Prompt engineering and synthetic content creation. IGI Global.
142.
ZhouS.ThompsonG. (2023). A longitudinal study on students’ self-regulated listening during transition to an English-medium transnational university in China. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 13(2), 427–450. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.38281
143.
ZhouY.ZhuY.WongW. K. (2023). Statistical tests for homogeneity of variance for clinical trials and recommendations. Contemporary clinical trials communications, 33, Article 101119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101119
144.
ZimmermanB. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In BoekaertsM.PintrichP. R.ZeidnerM. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7
145.
ZimmermanB. J.Martinez-PonsM. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.284
