Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
Enhancing Global Artificial Intelligence Literacy,Innovation and Entrepreneurship Through an Exploratory Cross-Cultural Study: Interactions With Pedagogical Agents in Immersive Virtual Reality Environments
As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to transform global education, the development of AI literacy has become a pressing priority. However, current initiatives often approach AI literacy from local or national perspectives, overlooking the importance of a broader, global context. In cross-cultural learning, immersive virtual reality (VR) environments based on 360-degree video technology offer authentic experiences; however, these are typically asynchronous, limiting learners’ opportunities for real-time interaction, feedback, and support. Such limitations may hinder the effective development of global AI literacy, innovation, and entrepreneurship. To address this challenge, the present study designed and implemented AI-powered interactive pedagogical agents (PAs) within immersive VR environments. These agents provided real-time, context-sensitive support during cross-cultural learning activities, aiming to enhance engagement and promote global AI literacy, innovation, and entrepreneurship. A total of 68 students from China, Northern Cyprus, and Kazakhstan participated in the study. With the assistance of PAs, students created cross-cultural scripts and recorded corresponding 360-degree videos, which were then exchanged among participants. Using VR headsets, students viewed immersive learning content on AI concepts and their applications across diverse cultural contexts, engaging in verbal interactions with PAs throughout the viewing experience. Following this, students reflected on their learning experiences under the guidance of PAs. A mixed-methods research, comprising pre- and post-test questionnaires, interviews, and reflection reports, demonstrated statistically significant gains in students’ global AI literacy, innovation, and entrepreneurship following the intervention. Participants also reported high levels of perceived credibility and immersion with the PAs in VR environments. Based on these findings, the study offers recommendations to inform future practices in global AI literacy education.
AhnY. H.OhE. Y. (2024). Effects of the international training program for enhancing intelligent capabilities through blended learning on computational thinking, artificial intelligence competencies, and core competencies for the future society in graduate students. Applied Sciences, 14(3), 991. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14030991
2.
AlnahhasN.YousefD. (2024, June 11-14). GAI as a catalyst in national technology sovereignty: Evaluating the influence of GAI on government policy[Conference paper]. 25th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. https://doi.org/10.1145/3657054.3657126
3.
BarariN.RezaeiZadehM.KhorasaniA.AlamiF. (2022). Designing and validating educational standards for E-teaching in virtual learning environments (VLEs), based on revised Bloom’s taxonomy. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(9), 1640–1652. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1739078
4.
BellR.BellH. (2023). Entrepreneurship education in the era of generative artificial intelligence. Entrepreneurship Education, 6(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41959-023-00099-x
5.
BensonA.JosephR.MooreJ. (2017). Culture learning and technology. Rutledge.
6.
CarayannisE. G.CampbellD. F. (2014). Developed democracies versus emerging autocracies: Arts, democracy, and innovation in Quadruple Helix innovation systems. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 3(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-014-0012-2
7.
CarayannisE. G.GrigoroudisE. (Eds.), (2023). Handbook of research on artificial intelligence, innovation and entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing.
8.
CarayannisE. G.SamaraE. T.BakourosY. L. (2015). Innovation and entrepreneurship. Theory, policy and practice, 218(10), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11242-8
9.
ChenQ. (2024). Enhancing cross‐cultural educational awareness: Experimental study on immersive experiences using virtual reality. British Educational Research Journal, 00(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4089
10.
ChenY. L. (2016). The effects of virtual reality learning environment on student cognitive and linguistic development. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(4), 637–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0293-2
11.
ChengL.VarshneyK. R.LiuH. (2021). Socially responsible ai algorithms: Issues, purposes, and challenges. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 71(2021), 1137–1181. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.12814
12.
ChienS. Y.HwangG. J. (2022). A question, observation, and organisation‐based SVVR approach to enhancing students’ presentation performance, classroom engagement, and technology acceptance in a cultural course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(2), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13159
13.
ChiuT. K.AhmadZ.IsmailovM.SanusiI. T. (2024). What are artificial intelligence literacy and competency? A comprehensive framework to support them. Computers and Education Open, 6, Article 100171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100171
14.
ChungK.KimS.JangY.ChoiS.KimH. (2024). Developing an AI literacy diagnostic tool for elementary school students. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 1013–1044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13097-w
CreswellJ. W.CreswellJ. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
17.
DahyaN.KingW. E.LeeK. J.LeeJ. H. (2021). Perceptions and experiences of virtual reality in public libraries. Journal of Documentation, 77(3), 617–637. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-04-2020-0051
18.
DeardorffD. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306287002
19.
DeciE. L.OlafsenA. H.RyanR. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108
20.
DerakhshanA.TeoT.KhazaieS. (2024). Is game-based language learning general or specific-oriented? Exploring the applicability of mobile virtual realities to medical English education in the Middle East. Computers & Education, 213, Article 105013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105013
21.
DongP.TuC. C. (2021). Research on the impact of university innovation and entrepreneurship education on university students’ entrepreneurship willingness based on virtual reality technology. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021(1), 9730705–9730708. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9730705
GaoL.WanB.LiuG.XieG.HuangJ.MengG. (2021). Investigating the effectiveness of virtual reality for culture learning. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 37(18), 1771–1781. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1913858
24.
GeorgievV.NikolovaA. (2021). Virtual reality simulations for presenting cultural-historic content in e-learning for kids. Digital Presentation and Preservation of Cultural and Scientific Heritage, 11(1), 267–272. https://doi.org/10.55630/dipp.2021.11.24
25.
GongL.NassC. (2007). When a talking-face computer agent is half-human and half-humanoid: Human identity and consistency preference. Human Communication Research, 33(2), 163–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00295.x
26.
GonsalvesC. (2024). Generative AI’s impact on critical thinking: Revisiting bloom’s taxonomy. Journal of Marketing Education, 1(1), Article 02734753241305980. https://doi.org/10.1177/02734753241305980
27.
GrewalD. S.GrewalP. D. S. (2014). A critical conceptual analysis of definitions of artificial intelligence as applicable to computer engineering. IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering, 16(2), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.9790/0661-16210913
28.
HaddadG.HaddadG.NagpalG. (2021). Can students’ perception of the diverse learning environment affect their intentions toward entrepreneurship?Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(3), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2021.04.002
29.
HameedA.PerkisA. (2024). Authenticity and presence: Defining perceived quality in VR experiences. Frontiers in Psychology, 15(4), Article 1291650. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1291650
HuangY. M.WangW. S.LeeH. Y.LinC. J.WuT. T. (2024). Empowering virtual reality with feedback and reflection in hands‐on learning: Effect of learning engagement and higher‐order thinking. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(4), 1413–1427. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12959
32.
HudsonS.Matson-BarkatS.PallaminN.JegouG. (2019). With or without you? Interaction and immersion in a virtual reality experience. Journal of Business Research, 100(7), 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.062
33.
HuiE. S. Y. E. (2025). Incorporating Bloom’s taxonomy into promoting cognitive thinking mechanism in artificial intelligence-supported learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(2), 1087–1100. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2364237
HwangW. Y.NguyenR. G.ShadievR. (2026). A study of AI-supported cross-cultural learning and its influence on cross-cultural understanding, learning behavior, and writing performance of learners in authentic contexts. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 42(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcal.70208
36.
Ilgun DibekM.Sahin KursadM.ErdoganT. (2025). Influence of artificial intelligence tools on higher order thinking skills: A meta-analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(3), 2216–2238. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2402028
37.
JackE. P.RaturiA. S. (2006). Lessons learned from methodological triangulation in management research. Management Research News, 29(6), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170610683833
38.
JeonJ.LeeS.ChoiS. (2024). A systematic review of research on speech-recognition chatbots for language learning: Implications for future directions in the era of large language models. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(8), 4613–4631. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2204343
KangiwaB. I.OludareO. E.NassarawaH. S.AbubakarN. S.EfeomaE. L.EnefolaH. A. (2024). Leveraging artificial intelligence for enhancing entrepreneurship and creativity in STEM education. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 4(6), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.70382/bejerp
41.
KhukalenkoI. S.Kaplan-RakowskiR.AnY.IushinaV. D. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of using virtual reality technology in classrooms: A large-scale survey. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 11591–11613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11061-0
42.
KorteS. M.CheungW. M. Y.MaasiltaM.KongS. C.KeskitaloP.WangL.GuM. M.LeeJ. C. K. (2024). Enhancing artificial intelligence literacy through cross-cultural online workshops. Computers and Education Open, 6, Article 100164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100164
43.
LanY. J.ChenN. S. (2024). Teachers’ agency in the era of LLM and generative AI. Educational Technology & Society, 27(1), I–XVIII. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48754837
44.
LansT.BiemansH.MulderM.VerstegenJ. (2010). Self‐awareness of mastery and improvability of entrepreneurial competence in small businesses in the agrifood sector. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 21(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20041
45.
LiC.ChenM.WangJ.SitaramS.XieX. (2024). Culturellm: Incorporating cultural differences into large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37(24), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.10946
46.
LiX.DengX.XuH. (2022). Interactive cultural communication effect in VR space of intelligent mobile communication network. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2022(1), Article 9689272. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9689272
47.
LimW. N.YapK. M.LeeY.WeeC.YenC. C. (2021). A systematic review of weight perception in virtual reality: Techniques, challenges, and road ahead. IEEE Access, 9(12), 163253–163283. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3131525
48.
LinT. J.LanY. J. (2015). Language learning in virtual reality environments: Past, present, and future. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 486–497. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.18.4.486
49.
LopesJ.OliveiraM.SilveiraP.FarinhaL.OliveiraJ. (2021). Business dynamism and innovation capacity, an entrepreneurship worldwide perspective. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010094
50.
LuK.ZhuJ.PangF.ShadievR. (2025). Understanding the relationship between colleges students’ artificial intelligence literacy and higher order thinking skills using the 3P model: The mediating roles of behavioral engagement and peer interaction. Educational Technology Research & Development, 73(2), 693–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10434-1
51.
LucetG. (2009). Virtual reality: A knowledge tool for cultural heritage. In Computer vision and computer graphics. Theory and applications: International conference, VISIGRAPP 2008, Funchal-Madeira, Portugal, January 22-25, 2008. Revised selected papers (pp. 1–10). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10226-4_1
52.
LuoY.LiuT.PangP. C. I.McKayD.ChenZ.BuchananG.ChangS. (2025). Enhanced bloom’s educational taxonomy for fostering information literacy in the era of large Language models. Computer Science, 25(5), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.19434
53.
MaQ.CrosthwaiteP.SunD.ZouD. (2024). Exploring ChatGPT literacy in language education: A global perspective and comprehensive approach. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 100278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100278
54.
MorandiniS.FraboniF.De AngelisM.PuzzoG.GiusinoD.PietrantoniL. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence on workers’ skills: Upskilling and reskilling in organisations. Informing Science, 26(11), 39–68. https://doi.org/10.28945/5078
55.
MuruganK.DevA.KumariK.DwaramwarP. A.SomasundaramR.BoopathiS. (2025). Exploring the cultural impacts of artificial intelligence on sustainable entrepreneurship development. In Essential information systems service management (pp. 221–250). IGI Global.
56.
NarayanR.RodriguezC.AraujoJ.ShaqlaihA.MossG. (2013). Constructivism—Constructivist learning theory. In The handbook of educational theories (pp. 169–183). IAP Information Age Publishing.
57.
NebelS.BeegeM.SchneiderS.ReyG. D. (2024). The learning adversary-An experimental investigation of adaptive pedagogical agents as opponents in educational videogames. Learning and Individual Differences, 110, Article 102425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102425
58.
NgD. T. K.LeeM.TanR. J. Y.HuX.DownieJ. S.ChuS. K. W. (2023). A review of AI teaching and learning from 2000 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies, 28(7), 8445–8501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11491-w
59.
NgD. T. K.LeungJ. K. L.SuJ.NgR. C. W.ChuS. K. W. (2023). Teachers’ AI digital competencies and twenty-first century skills in the post-pandemic world. Educational Technology Research & Development, 71(1), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10203-6
60.
OkoyeK.HosseiniS. (2024). T-test statistics in R: Independent samples, paired sample, and one sample T-tests. In R programming: Statistical data analysis in research (pp. 159–186): Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-3385-9_8
61.
PantanoE.TaverniseA. (2009). Learning cultural heritage through information and communication technologies: A case study. International Journal of Information Communication Technologies and Human Development, 1(3), 68–87. https://doi.org/10.4018/jicthd.2009070104
62.
PerchikJ. D.SmithA. D.ElkassemA. A.ParkJ. M.RothenbergS. A.TanwarM.SotoudehH.SturdivantA.TridandapaniS. (2023). Artificial intelligence literacy: Developing a multi-institutional infrastructure for AI education. Academic Radiology, 30(7), 1472–1480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2022.10.002
63.
PetersD.VoldK.RobinsonD.CalvoR. A. (2020). Responsible AI—Two frameworks for ethical design practice. IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society, 1(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1109/TTS.2020.2974991
64.
RahimI. H. A.MukhtarD. (2021). Perception of students on entrepreneurship education. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 12(1), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.30845/ijbss.v12n1p13
65.
RathD.SatpathyI.PatnaikB. C. M. (2019). Augmented reality (Ar) & virtual reality (Vr)-a channel for digital transformation in industrialization fostering innovation & entrepreneurship. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(10), 3228–3236. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.J1167.0881019
66.
Rezaei-ZadehM.O’ReillyJ.HoganM.ClearyB.MurphyE. (2013, June 12-14). Designing a specific tool for measuring students’ and tutors’ mutual expectations from each other in an e-learning platform [Conference session].ICELW 2013 conference proceeding: New York, NY, USA.https://learningideasconf.s3.amazonaws.com/Docs/Past/2013/papers/Rezaei-Zadeh_et_al.pdf
67.
SchroederN. L.CraigS. D. (2021). Learning with virtual humans: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1863114
68.
SchroederN. L.DavisR. O.YangE. (2025). Designing and learning with pedagogical agents: An umbrella review. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(8), 2127–2156. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241288476
69.
ShadievR.ChenX.SintawatiW.AltinayF.LiY.KerimbayevN.TliliA. (2025). Facilitating cross-cultural competence of students in an interactive VR learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 28(1), 78-108. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202501_28
70.
ShadievR.NguyenT. R. G.HwangW. Y. (2026). AI-enhanced cross-cultural learning with contextualization, personalization, and socialization in authentic contexts. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2612252
71.
ShadievR.WangX.ChenX.GayevskayaE.BorisovN. (2024). Research on the impact of the learning activity supported by 360-degree video and translation technologies on cross-cultural knowledge and attitudes development. Education and Information Technologies, 29(7), 7759–7791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12143-3
72.
ShadievR.WangX.HuangY. M. (2021). Cross-cultural learning in virtual reality environment: Facilitating cross-cultural understanding, trait emotional intelligence, and sense of presence. Educational Technology Research & Development, 69(5), 2917–2936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10044-1
73.
ShadievR.YiS.DangC.SintawatiW. (2022). Facilitating students’ creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship in a telecollaborative project. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.887620
74.
SharunovaA.ButtM.QureshiA. J. (2018). Transdisciplinary design education for engineering undergraduates: Mapping of bloom’s taxonomy cognitive domain across design stages. Procedia CIRP, 70(28), 313–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.02.042
75.
ShiG.LiY.ShadievR. (2025). A systematic review of online persistent learning: Methodologies, findings and issues. British Journal of Educational Technology, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.70036
76.
ShonfeldM.Cotnam-KappelM.JudgeM.NgC. Y.NtebutseJ. G.Williamson-LeadleyS.YildizM. N. (2021). Learning in digital environments: A model for cross-cultural alignment. Educational Technology Research & Development, 69(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09967-6
77.
SiS.HallJ.SuddabyR.AhlstromD.WeiJ. (2023). Technology, entrepreneurship, innovation and social change in digital economics. Technovation, 119, Article 102484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102484
78.
SiegleR. F.SchroederN. L.LaneH. C.CraigS. D. (2023). Twenty-five years of learning with pedagogical agents: History, barriers, and opportunities. TechTrends, 67(5), 851–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00869-3
79.
SikströmP.ValentiniC.SivunenA.KärkkäinenT. (2024). Pedagogical agents communicating and scaffolding students’ learning: High school teachers’ and students’ perspectives. Computers & Education, 222, Article 105140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105140
80.
SlaterM.WilburS. (1997). A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(6), 603–616. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.6.603
81.
TafazoliD. (2024a). Guest editorial: CALLing out culture: The interplay between language, technology and culture. Journal for Multicultural Education, 18(1/2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-06-2024-240
82.
TafazoliD. (2024b). From virtual reality to cultural reality: Integration of virtual reality into teaching culture in foreign language education. Journal for Multicultural Education, 18(1/2), 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-12-2023-0135
83.
TaheriS. M.HesamianG. (2013). A generalization of the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and its applications. Statistical Papers, 54(2), 457–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-012-0443-4
84.
TäksM.TynjäläP.TodingM.KukemelkH.VenesaarU. (2014). Engineering students’ experiences in studying entrepreneurship. Journal of engineering education, 103(4), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20056
85.
VelanderJ.TaiyeM. A.OteroN.MilradM. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in K-12 Education: Eliciting and reflecting on Swedish teachers’ understanding of AI and its implications for teaching & learning. Education and Information Technologies, 29(4), 4085–4105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11990-4
86.
WalterY. (2024). Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom: The relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3
87.
WangP.YinK.ZhangM.ZhengY.ZhangT.KangY.FengX. (2025). The effect of incorporating large language models into the teaching on critical thinking disposition: An “AI+ Constructivism Learning Theory” attempt. Education and Information Technologies, 30(9), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13244-3
ZhangJ.JingY. (2022). Application of artificial intelligence technology in cross-cultural communication of intangible cultural heritage. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6563114
90.
Zhang-ZhangY.RohlferS.VarmaA. (2022). Strategic people management in contemporary highly dynamic VUCA contexts: A knowledge worker perspective. Journal of Business Research, 144(5), 587–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.069
91.
ZygmontC. S. (2023). Managing the assumption of normality within the general linear model with small samples: Guidelines for researchers regarding if, when and how. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 19(4), 302–332. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.19.4.p302
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
