Preparing Teachers for Teaching Spatial Computational Thinking With Integrated Data Viewer Visualization of Weather Data: A Discipline-Based Perspective of Computational Thinking

Abstract

This study was grounded in the spatial computational thinking model developed by the 3D Weather project funded by the NSF STEM+C program. The model reflects a discipline-based perspective towards computational thinking and captures the spatial nature of computational thinking in meteorology and the reliance of computational thinking on spatial thinking for geospatial analysis. The research was conducted among nineteen teachers attending the summer workshop offered by the project in its third project year to prepare them for teaching spatial computational thinking with IDV (Integrated Data Viewer, downloadable at https://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/idv/) visualization of weather data. Quantitative survey data were collected measuring these teachers’ meteorology content knowledge, spatial computational thinking, self-efficacy for teaching spatial computational thinking, and epistemic cognition of teaching meteorology. The data were analyzed to examine the effects of the workshop in terms of these variables and the correlations among them were also explored.

Keywords

spatial computational thinking integrated data viewer weather data visualization meteorology self-efficacy epistemic cognition

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Angeli

Voogt

Fluck

Webb

Cox

Malyn-Smith

Zagami

(2016). A K-6 computational thinking curriculum framework: Implications for teacher knowledge. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 47–57.

Atit

Uttal

D. H.

Stieff

(2020). Situating space: Using a discipline-focused lens to examine spatial thinking skills. Cognitive research: Principles and Implications, 5(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00210-z

Atmatzidou

Demetriadis

(2016). Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: A study on age and gender relevant differences. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 661–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2015.10.008

Austin

J. T.

Hanisch

K. A.

(1990). Occupational attainment as a function of abilities and interests: A longitudinal analysis using project TALENT data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 77, 86. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.1.77

Bandura

(1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.

Barr

Stephenson

(2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is Involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? Acm Inroads, 2(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929887.1929905

Benton

Tranel

(1993) Visuoperceptual, visuospatial, and visuoconstructive disorders. In Heilman

K. M.

Valenstein

(Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology (pp. 165–213). Oxford University Press.

Brennan

Resnick

(2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. AREA.

Caprara

G. V.

Barbaranelli

Steca

Malone

P. S.

(2006). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students’ academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44(6), 473–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.09.001

10.

Carroll

J. B.

(1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge University Press.

11.

Cheng

Y. L.

Mix

K. S.

(2014). Spatial training improves children’s mathematics ability. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15(1), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2012.725186

12.

Città

Gentile

Allegra

Arrigo

Conti

Ottaviano

Reale

Sciortino

(2019). The effects of mental rotation on computational thinking. Computers & Education, 141, Article 103613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103613

13.

Ekstrom

R. B.

French

J. W.

Harman

H. H.

Dermen

(1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Educational Testing Service.

14.

Feucht

F. C.

(2011) The epistemic underpinnings of mrs. M’s reading lesson on drawing conclusions: A classroom-based research study. In Lunn Brownlee

Schraw

Berthelsen

(Eds.), Personal epistemology and teacher education (pp. 3–21). Routledge.

15.

Gagnier

K. M.

Atit

Ormand

C. J.

Shipley

T. F.

(2017). Comprehending 3D diagrams: Sketching to support spatial reasoning. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(4), 883–901. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12233

16.

Gouws

L. A.

Bradshaw

Wentworth

(2013). Computational thinking in educational activities: An evaluation of the educational game light-bot. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 10–15). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2462476.2466518

17.

Greene

J. A.

Sandoval

W. A.

Braten

(2016). Handbook of epistemic cognition. Routledge.

18.

Grover

Pea

(2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x12463051

19.

Grover

Pea

(2018). Computational thinking: A competency whose time has come. In Sentance

Barendsen

Schulte

(Eds.), Computer science education: Perspectives on teaching and learning in school. (pp. 19–38). Bloomsbury Academic.

20.

Ham

D. A.

(2022). Spatial thinking as a path towards computational thinking. In Khosrow-Pouor

Clarks

Jennes

M. E.

Anttiroiko

(Eds.), Research anthology on computational thinking, programming, and robotics in the classroom. (pp. 279–289). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3200-2.ch006

21.

Hegarty

(1992). Mental animation: Inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems. Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 18(5), 1084–1102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.1084

22.

Hegarty

(2010). Components of spatial intelligence. In Ross

B. H.

(Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory. (pp. 265–297). Elsevier Academic Press.

23.

Hegarty

Sims

V. K.

(1994). Individual differences in mental animation during mechanical reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 22(4), 411–430. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03200867

24.

Hsi

Linn

M. C.

Bell

J. E.

(1997). The role of spatial reasoning in engineering and the design of spatial instruction. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(2), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1997.tb00278.x

25.

KaleliOğlu

Gubahar

Kukul

(2016). A framework for computational thinking based on a systematic research review. Baltic J. Modern Computing, 4(3), 583–596.

26.

Kali

Orion

(1996). Spatial abilities of high-school students in the perception of geologic structures. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(4), 369–391. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199604)33:4<369::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-Q

27.

Kastens

K. A.

Ishikawa

(2006). Spatial thinking in the geosciences and cognitive sciences: A cross-disciplinary look at the intersection of the two fields. Earth and Mind: How Geologists Think and Learn about the Earth, 413(413), 53–76. https://doi.org/10.1130/2006.2413(05)

28.

Lazarides

Warner

L. M.

(2020). Teacher self-efficacy. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education.

29.

Linn

Petersen

(1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56(6), 1479–1498. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130467

30.

Linstone

H. A.

Turoff

(Eds.), (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.

31.

Lodi

Martini

(2021). Computational thinking, between Papert and wing. Science & Education, 30(4), 883–908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00202-5

32.

Lohman

D. F.

(1979). Spatial ability: A review and re-analysis of the correlational literature. School of Education, Stanford University.

33.

Lohman

D. F.

(1993). Spatial ability and G. Paper presented at the first spearman seminar. University of Plymouth, July 21, 1993.

34.

Lohman

D. F.

(1996) Spatial ability and g. In Dennis

Tapsfield

(Eds.), (pp. 97–116). Human abilities: Their nature and measurement. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

35.

Lowrie

Logan

Ramful

(2017). Visuospatial training improves elementary students’ mathematics performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 170–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12142

36.

Lunn Brownlee

Schraw

Berthelsen

(2011). Personal epistemology and teacher education: An emerging field of research. In Brownlee

Schraw

Berthelsen

(Eds.), Personal epistemology and teacher education (pp. 3–21). Routledge.

37.

Lunn Brownlee

Schraw

Walker

Ryan

(2016). Changes in preservice teachers’ personal epistemologies. In Greene

J. A.

Sandoval

W. A.

Braten

(Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 300–317). Routledge.

38.

McNeal

P. M.

(2017). Identifying and characterizing cognitive factors significant to practicing and learning meteorology (Publication No. 3192). Doctoral dissertation. Western Michigan University. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/3192

39.

McNeal

P. M.

Petcovic

H. L.

LaDue

N. D.

Ellis

T. D.

(2019). Identifying significant cognitive factors for practicing and learning meteorology. Journal of Operational Meteorology, 7(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.15191/nwajom.2019.0701

40.

Moreno-León

Robles

Román-González

(2015). Dr Scratch: Automatic analysis of scratch projects to assess and foster computational thinking (Vol. 46). RED. https://www.um.es/ead/red/46/

41.

Moschella

Basso

(2020). Computational Thinking, spatial and logical skills. An investigation at primary school. Journal of Theories and Research in Education, 15(2), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.6092/ISSN.1970-2221/11583

42.

National Research Council . (2006). Learning to think spatially: GIS as a support system in the K–12 curriculum. National Academic Press.

43.

National Research Council . (2010). Report of a workshop on the scope and nature of computational thinking. National Academies Press.

44.

Palts

Pedaste

(2020). A model for developing computational thinking skills. Informatics in Education, 19(1), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2020.06

45.

Reynolds

S. J.

(2012). Some important aspects of spatial cognition in field geology. Special Papers - Geological Society of America, 486(12), 75–77. https://doi.org/10.1130/2012.2486

46.

Rochford

(1985). Spatial learning disabilities and underachievement among university anatomy students. Medical Education, 19(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1985.tb01134.x

47.

Rogers

E. M.

(2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

48.

Selby

Woollard

(2013). Computational thinking: The developing definition. University of Southampton Institutional Repository. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/356481/.

49.

Shea

D. L.

Lubinski

Benbow

C. P.

(2001). Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 604–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.604

50.

Shute

V. J.

Sun

Asbell-Clarke

(2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003

51.

Small

Morton

(1983). Research in college science teaching: Spatial visualization training improves performance in organic chemistry. Journal of College Science Teaching, 13(1), 41–43.

52.

Sorby

Casey

Veurink

Dulaney

(2013). The role of spatial training in improving spatial and calculus performance in engineering students. Learning and Individual Differences, 26(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.03.010

53.

Strobel

Wang

Weber

N. R.

Dyehouse

(2013). The role of authenticity in design-based learning environments: The case of engineering education. Computers & Education, 64(4), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.026

54.

Sun

Rogers

Winship

(2019). An authentic and sustainable STEM pre-service teacher professional development model: Authentic learning experience and preparing for tomorrow’s STEM professionals. In Polly

Martin

Dikilitaş

(Eds.), Handbook of research on educator preparation and professional learning (pp. 321–339). MePA: IGI Global.

55.

Super

D. E.

Bachrach

P. B.

(1957). Scientific careers and vocational development theory: A review, a critique and some recommendations. Columbia University.

56.

Uttal

D. H.

Meadow

N. G.

Tipton

Hand

L. L.

Alden

A. R.

Warren

(2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 352–402. https://doi/10.1037/a0028446.

57.

Voogt

Fisser

Good

Mishra

Yadav

(2015). Computational thinking in compulsory education:Towards an agenda for research and practice. Education and Information Technologies, 20(4), 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9412-6

58.

Voyer

Postma

Brake

Imperato-McGinley

(2007). Gender differences in object location memory: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194024

59.

Wai

Lubinski

Benbow

C. P.

(2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 817–835. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016127

60.

Webb

R. M.

Lubinski

Benbow

C. P.

(2007). Spatial ability: A neglected dimension in talent searches for intellectually precocious youth. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 397–420. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.397

61.

Weintrop

Beheshti

Horn

Orton

Jona

Trouille

Wilensky

(2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5

62.

Wing

J. M.

(2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215

63.

Yadav

Mayfield

Zhou

Hambrusch

Korb

J. T.

(2014). Computational thinking in elementary and secondary teacher education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/2576872

64.

Yang

Baek

Ching

Y.-H.

Swanson

Chittoori

Wang

(2021). Infusing computational thinking in an integrated STEM curriculum: User reactions and lessons learned. European Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 04. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/9560