The current study aims to determine the effect of teaching a mechanic neuro-computerized course through virtual learning environments (VLE) to develop computational thinking among mathematics pre-service teachers. The neuro-computerized virtual learning environments (NCVLE) model was designed to be used to teach the mechanics course to third-year students of the mathematics department. To achieve the targeted learning outcomes, the study recruited (102) third-year students of the Faculty of Education and classified them into a control group of (50) students and an experimental group of (52) students. The experiment lasted for 14 weeks during one semester of the 2021-2022 academic year. The results agreed with most of what has been found from relevant literature and studies. Also, the results indicated that the NCVLE model played a vital role in the purposeful teaching, learning, and assessment processes and enhanced the learning of computational thinking.
AbidoyeL. K.Bani-HaniE.El Haj AssadM.AlShabiM.SoudanB.OriajeA. T. (2020). Effects of environmental and turbine parameters on energy gains from wind farm system: Artificial neural network simulations. Wind Engineering, 44(2), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524X19849834
2.
AdamsA.FengY.LiuJ. C.StaufferE. (2021). Potentials of teaching, learning, and design with virtual reality: An interdisciplinary thematic analysis. In: Intersections across disciplines (pp. 173–186). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53875-0_14
3.
AlamriH.LowellV.WatsonW.WatsonS. L. (2020). Using personalized learning as an instructional approach to motivate learners in online higher education: Learner self-determination and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 322–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1728449
4.
AlbusP.VogtA.SeufertT. (2021). Signaling in virtual reality influences learning outcome and cognitive load. Computers and Education, 166, 104154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104154
5.
Araiza-AlbaP.KeaneT.ChenW. S.KaufmanJ. (2021). Immersive virtual reality as a tool to learn problem-solving skills. Computers and Education. p. 104121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104121
6.
AttiasV.VigneriL.DimitrovV. (2022). Rethinking modular multi-exponentiation in real-world applications. Journal of Cryptographic Engineering, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13389-022-00287-w
7.
BaalaajiA.BeviR. (2021). Design of a novel chaotic neural network based encryption system for security applications. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 44(5), 424–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/02533839.2021.1919558
BoosK.ChuD.CuervoE. (2016, June). Flashback: Immersive virtual reality on mobile devices via rendering memoization. In: Proceedings of the 14th annual international conference on mobile systems, applications, and services (p. 291–304). https://doi.10.1145/2906388.2906418
10.
BoultonC. A.KentC.WilliamsH. T. (2018). Virtual learning environment engagement and learning outcomes at a ‘bricks-and-mortar’university. Computers and Education, 126, 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.031
11.
BustamanteJ. C.NavarroJ. J. (2022). Technological tools for the intervention and computerized dynamic assessment of executive functions handbook of research on neurocognitive development of executive functions and implications for intervention. IGI Global, p. 310–339. https://doi.10.4018/978-1-7998-9075-1.ch014
12.
CalvertJ.AbadiaR. (2020). Impact of immersing university and high school students in educational linear narratives using virtual reality technology. Computers and Education, 159, 104005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104005
13.
CanzianiA.CulurcielloE.PaszkeA. (2017, May). Evaluation of neural network architectures for embedded systems. In: 2017 IEEE international symposium on Circuits and systems (ISCAS) (pp. 1–4). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAS.2017.8050276
14.
CeallaighT. Ó. (2022). Designing, navigating and nurturing virtual learning spaces: Teacher educators’ professional development priorities and potential pathways. Teaching and Teacher Education, 115, 103697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103697
15.
ChangS. C.HsuT. C.JongM. S. Y. (2020). Integration of the peer assessment approach with a virtual reality design system for learning earth science. Computers and Education, 146, 103758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103758
16.
ChaoP. Y. (2016). Exploring students’ computational practice, design and performance of problem-solving through a visual programming environment. Computers and Education, 95, 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.010
17.
ChengA.KolbeM.GrantV.EllerS.HalesR.SymonB.GriswoldS.EppichW. (2020). A practical guide to virtual debriefings: Communities of inquiry perspective. Advances in Simulation, 5(1), 18–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-020-00141-1
18.
ChengK. H.TsaiC. C. (2019). A case study of immersive virtual field trips in an elementary classroom: Students’ learning experience and teacher-student interaction behaviors. Computers and Education, 140, 103600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103600
19.
ChristofiM.KyrlitsiasC.Michael-GrigoriouD.AnastasiadouZ.MichaelidouM.PapamichaelI.PieriK. (2018). A tour in the archaeological site of choirokoitia using virtual reality: A learning performance and interest generation assessment. In: Advances in digital cultural heritage (pp. 208–217). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75789-6_15
20.
Di NataleA. F.RepettoC.RivaG.VillaniD. (2020). Immersive virtual reality in K-12 and higher education: A 10-year systematic review of empirical research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2006–2033. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13030
21.
DurakH. Y.SaritepeciM. (2018). Analysis of the relation between computational thinking skills and various variables with the structural equation model. Computers and Education, 116, 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.004
22.
Espejo-GarciaB.MylonasN.AthanasakosL.FountasS. (2020). Improving weeds identification with a repository of agricultural pre-trained deep neural networks.Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 175, 105593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105593
23.
Feyzi BehnaghR.YasrebiS. (2020). An examination of constructivist educational technologies: Key affor-dances and conditions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 1907–1919. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13036
24.
FussellS. G.TruongD. (2022). Using virtual reality for dynamic learning: An extended technology acceptance model. Virtual Reality, 26(1), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-021-00554-x
25.
GhanaatiA.SjöblomJ.FaghaniE. (2020). Design of a virtual test cell based on GMDH-type neural network for a heavy-duty diesel engine. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 235(2–3), 436–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954407020960614
Guerrero AlonsoP. D.Merino CeballosM.Moreno LlorcaR.Ros CandeiraA.ZamoraR. (2022). Data model, E-infrastructure services, and the virtual research environment (VRE) In: The landscape of the sierra Nevada (pp. 369–384). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94219-9_22
28.
HamiltonD.McKechnieJ.EdgertonE.WilsonC. (2021). Immersive virtual reality as a pedagogical tool in education: A systematic literature review of quantitative learning outcomes and experimental design. Journal of Computers in Education, 8(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00169-2
29.
HamutogluN. B.GemikonakliO.DumanI.KirksekizA.KiyiciM. (2020). Evaluating students experiences using a virtual learning environment: Satisfaction and preferences. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 437–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09705-z
ItoT.HearneL.MillR.CocuzzaC.ColeM. W. (2020). Discovering the computational relevance of brain network organization. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.005
32.
JociusR.O’ByrneW. I.AlbertJ.JoshiD.BlantonM.RobinsonR.AndrewsA.BarnesT.CateteV. (2022). Building a virtual community of practice: Teacher learning for computational thinking infusion. TechTrends: For Leaders in Education and Training, 66(3), 547–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00729-6
33.
KamilarisA.Prenafeta-BoldúF. X. (2018). A review of the use of convolutional neural networks in agriculture. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 156(3), 312–322. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859618000436
34.
KhlaisangJ.SongkramN. (2019). Designing a virtual learning environment system for teaching twenty-first century skills to higher education students in ASEAN. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24(1), 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9310-7
35.
KuznetcovaI.GlassmanM.LinT. J. (2019). Multi-user virtual environments as a pathway to distributed social networks in the classroom. Computers and Education, 130, 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.004
36.
LeiteW. L.XingW.FishG.LiC. (2022). Teacher strategies to use virtual learning environments to facilitate algebra learning during school closures. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2110335
37.
LiangY.XuS.HongK.WangG.ZengT. (2019). Neural network modeling and single-neuron proportional–integral–derivative control for hysteresis in piezoelectric actuators. Measurement and Control, 52(9–10), 1362–1370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020294019866846
38.
LinK. Y.YuK. C.HsiaoH. S.ChangY. S.ChienY. H. (2020). Effects of web-based versus classroom-based STEM learning environments on the development of collaborative problem-solving skills in junior high school students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9488-6
39.
LiuT. C.LinY. C.WangT. N.YehS. C.KalyugaS. (2021). Studying the effect of redundancy in a virtual reality classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 1183–1200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09991-6
40.
LiuW.WangZ.LiuX.ZengN.LiuY.AlsaadiF. E. (2017). A survey of deep neural network architectures and their applications. Neurocomputing, 234, 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2016.12.038
41.
LockwoodJ.MooneyA. (2018). Computational thinking in secondary education: Where does it fit? A systematic literary review. International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, 2(1), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.21585/ijcses.v2i1.26
42.
LuoY.HanX.ZhangC. (2022). Prediction of learning outcomes with a machine learning algorithm based on online learning behavior data in blended courses. Asia Pacific Education Review, p. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09749-6
43.
MáñezI.Vidal-AbarcaE.KendeouP.MartínezT. (2019). How do students process complex formative feedback in question-answering tasks? A think-aloud study. Metacognition and Learning, 14(1), 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-019-09192-w
44.
MartinF.DennenV. P.BonkC. J. (2020). A synthesis of systematic review research on emerging learning environments and technologies. Educational Technology Research and Development: ETR and D, 68(4), 1613–1633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09812-2
45.
MillerG. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158
46.
MoonJ.DoJ.LeeD.ChoiG. W. (2020). A conceptual framework for teaching computational thinking in personalized OERs. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0108-z
47.
MukashevaM.KornilovI.BeisembayevG.SorokoN.SarsimbayevaS.OmirzakovaA. (2023). Contextual structure as an approach to the study of virtual reality learning environment. Cogent Education, 10, 1. https://10.1080/2331186X.2023.2165788
48.
Muñoz-CristóbalJ. A.Gallego-LemaV.Arribas-CuberoH. F.Martínez-MonésA.Asensio-PérezJ. I. (2017). Using virtual learning environments in bricolage mode for orchestrating learning situations across physical and virtual spaces. Computers and Education, 109, 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.004
49.
NegreteJ. C. (2018). Artificial neural networks in mexican agriculture, A overview. International Journal of Research in Agriculture and Forestry, 5(7), 1–4.
50.
NgD. T. K.ChuS. K. W. (2021). Motivating students to learn STEM via engaging flight simulation activities. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(5), 608–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09907-2
51.
NikiforosS.TzanavarisS.KermanidisK. L. (2020). Virtual learning communities (VLCs) rethinking: Influence on behavior modification—bullying detection through machine learning and natural language processing. Journal of Computers in Education, 7(4), 531–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00166-5
52.
NordbyS. K.BjerkeA. H.MifsudL. (2022). Computational thinking in the primary mathematics classroom: A systematic review. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 8, 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-022-00102-5
53.
PaltsT.PedasteM. (2020). A model for developing computational thinking skills. Informatics in Education, 19(1), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2020.06
54.
PanjabureeP.KomalawardhanaN.IngkavaraT. (2022). Acceptance of personalized e-learning systems: A case study of concept-effect relationship approach on science, technology, and mathematics courses. Journal of Computers in Education, 9(4), 681–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00216-6
55.
PappaG.IoannouN.ChristofiM.LanitisA. (2018). Preparing student mobility through a VR application for cultural education In: Advances in digital cultural heritage (pp. 218–227). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75789-6_16
56.
PeteranetzM. S.MorrowP. M.SohL. K. (2020, February). Development and validation of the computational thinking concepts and skills test In: Proceedings of the 51st ACM technical Symposium on computer science education (p. 926–932). https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366813
57.
Pinargote-OrtegaM.Bowen-MendozaL.MezaJ.VenturaS. (2021). Peer assessment using soft computing techniques. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 33(3), 684–726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-021-09296-w
58.
QadirA.GazderU.ChoudharyK. U. N. (2020). Artificial neural network models for performance design of asphalt pavements reinforced with geosynthetics. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2674(8), 319–326.
59.
RadiantiJ.MajchrzakT. A.FrommJ.WohlgenanntI. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers and Education, 147, 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
60.
RadovićS.HummelH. G. K.VermeulenM. (2022). Design-based research with mARC ID model: Designing experiential learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 25(3), 803–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09394-7
61.
RajN. S.VGR. (2022). Early prediction of student engagement in virtual learning environments using machine learning techniques. E-Learning and Digital Media. p. 20427530221108027. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530221108027
62.
Román-GonzálezM.Pérez-GonzálezJ. C.Jiménez-FernándezC. (2017). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the computational thinking test. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 678–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.047
63.
RyanE.PooleC. (2019). Impact of virtual learning environment on students’ satisfaction, engagement, recall, and retention. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 50(3), 408–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2019.04.005
64.
SanfilippoF.BlazauskasT.SalviettiG.RamosI.VertS.RadiantiJ.MajchrzakT. A.OliveiraD. (2022). A perspective review on integrating VR/AR with haptics into STEM education for multi-sensory learning. Robotics, 11(2), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics11020041
65.
SaritepeciM. (2020). Developing computational thinking skills of high school students: Design-based learning activities and programming tasks. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00480-2
66.
ShinN.BowersJ.RoderickS.McIntyreC.StephensA. L.EidinE.KrajcikJ.DamelinD. (2022). A framework for supporting systems thinking and computational thinking through constructing models. Instructional Science, 50(6), 933–960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09590-9
67.
StrawhackerA.LeeM.BersM. U. (2017). Teaching tools, teachers’ rules: Exploring the impact of teaching styles on young children’s programming knowledge in Scratch Jr. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(2), 347–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9400-9
68.
SunG.WangS. (2019). A review of the artificial neural network surrogate modeling in aerodynamic design. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 233(16), 5863–5872. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410019864485
69.
TrenadoC.Pedroarena-LealN.RugeD. (2021). Considering the role of neurodidactics in medical education as inspired by learning studies and music education. Medical Science Educator, 31(1), 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-020-01176-9
70.
VarelaC.RebollarC.GarcíaO.BravoE.BilbaoJ. (2019). Skills in computational thinking of engineering students of the first school year. Heliyon, 5(11), Article e02820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02820
71.
VertesiA.DoganH.StefanidisA. (2020). Usability evaluation of virtual learning environments: A university case study. In Online teaching and learning in higher education (pp. 161–183). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48190-2_9
72.
WangT. (2020). Intelligent employment rate prediction model based on a neural computing framework and human–computer interaction platform. Neural Computing and Applications, 32(21), 16413–16426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04019-w
73.
WangX.WuP.LiuG.HuangQ.HuX.XuH. (2019). Learning performance prediction via convolutional GRU and explainable neural networks in e-learning environments. Computing, 101(6), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-018-00699-9
WuB.PengX.HuY. (2021). How to foster pre-service teachers’ stem learning design expertise through virtual internship: A design-based research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(6), 3307–3329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10063-y
77.
XueK.Huggins-ManleyA. C.LeiteW. (2022). Semisupervised learning method to adjust biased item difficulty estimates caused by nonignorable missingness in a virtual learning environment. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 82(3), 539–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644211020494
78.
YenM. H.WangC. Y.ChangW. H.ChenS.HsuY. S.LiuT. C. (2018). Assessing metacognitive components in self-regulated reading of science texts in e-based environments. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(5), 797–816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9818-2
79.
ZhangT. H.YouX. Y. (2017). The use of genetic algorithm and self-updating artificial neural network for the inverse design of cabin environment. Indoor and Built Environment, 26(3), 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X15609772
