Engagement in educational games was conceptualized as four dimensions but few studies have examined the four dimensions together. Additionally, game features vary greatly in different game genres that demand different engagement dimensions. However, engaging game features were studied in general and did not inquire specific game genres in extant literature. This study aimed at filling in this gap by examining students’ engagement patterns as well as what and how game features provided engagement opportunities in a personalized computerized role-playing game environment through the lens of the four-dimension engagement framework. Results showed the instability of engagement and certain engagement dimensions would predominate in different gameplay stages. Students exhibited cognitive engagement both during and after gameplay. Behavioral engagement dominated during gameplay while affective engagement dominated after gameplay. This study also found that gender, age, employment status, and gameplay experience affected engagement during gameplay. All features of personalized computerized role-playing game could engage students but manipulating a fictional world and portraying game characters could best engage students. Implications and future research were also discussed in the study.
AlamriH.LowellV.WatsonW.WatsonS. L. (2020). Using personalized learning as an instructional approach to motivate learners in online higher education: Learner self-determination and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 322–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1728449
2.
AnnettaL. A. (2010). The “I's” have it: A framework for serious educational game design. Review of general psychology, 14(2), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018985
3.
BoeijeH. (2010). Analysis in qualitative research. Sage.
4.
BresslerD. M.BodzinA. M. (2013). A mixed methods assessment of students' flow experiences during a mobile augmented reality science game. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 505–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12008
5.
ChenC. H.LawV.HuangK. (2019). The roles of engagement and competition on learner’s performance and motivation in game-based science learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(4), 1003–1024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09670-7
6.
ClarkD. B.VirkS. S.BarnesJ.AdamsD. M. (2016). Self-explanation and digital games: Adaptively increasing abstraction. Computers & Education, 103, 28–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.09.010
7.
ColemanT. E.MoneyA. G. (2020). Student-centred digital game–based learning: A conceptual framework and survey of the state of the art. Higher Education, 79(3), 415–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00417-0
8.
ConatiC.JaquesN.MuirM. (2013). Understanding attention to adaptive hints in educational games: An eye-tracking study. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 23(1), 136–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-013-0002-8
9.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage publications.
10.
CreswellJ. W.CreswellJ. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage publications.
11.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage publications.
12.
DomagkS.SchwartzR. N.PlassJ. L. (2010). Interactivity in multimedia learning: An integrated model. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1024–1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.003
FettersM. D.CurryL. A.CreswellJ. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(62), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
15.
FredricksJ. A.BlumenfeldP. C.ParisA. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
16.
GeX.IfenthalerD. (2018). Designing engaging educational games and assessing engagement in game-based learning. In Gamification in education: Breakthroughs in research and practice (pp. 1–19). IGI Global.
17.
GreenM. C.BrockT. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.701
18.
HammerJ.HellerK. (2012). Playing history: How Ars Magica players develop historical literacy. Meaningful play. Michigan State University.
19.
HammerJ.ToA.SchrierK.BowmanS. L.KaufmanG. (2018). Learning and role-playing games. In ZagalJ. P.DeterdingS. (Eds.), Role-playing game studies: Transmedia foundations (pp. 283–299). Routledge.
20.
HardingT. (2007). Immersion revisited: Role-playing as interpretation and narrative. In Knudepunkt 07 (pp. 25–33). Dansk Ungdoms Fællesråd.
HarunaH.ZainuddinZ.OkoyeK.MelleckerR. R.HuX.ChuS. K. W.HosseiniS. (2021). Improving instruction and sexual health literacy with serious games and gamification interventions: An outlook to students’ learning outcomes and gender differences. Interactive Learning Environments: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1888754
23.
HeintzS.LawE. L. C. (2015). The game genre map: A revised game classificatio. In Proceedings of the 2015 annual Symposium on computer-human Interaction in play (pp. 175–184). https://doi.org/10.1145/2793107.2793123
24.
HomerB. D.KinzerC. K.PlassJ. L.LetourneauS. M.HoffmanD.BromleyM.KornakY. (2014). Moved to learn: The effects of interactivity in a Kinect-based literacy game for beginning readers. Computers & Education, 74, 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.007
25.
HsiehY. H.LinY. C.HouH. T. (2015). Exploring elementary-school students' engagement patterns in a game-based learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 336–348. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.18.2.336
26.
JensonJ.De CastellS. (2010). Gender, simulation, and gaming: Research review and redirections. Simulation & Gaming, 41(1), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878109353473
27.
KeF.XieK.XieY. (2016). Game‐based learning engagement: A theory-and data-driven exploration. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1183–1201. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12314
28.
KhanA.AhmadF. H.MalikM. M. (2017). Use of digital game-based learning and gamification in secondary school science: The effect on student engagement, learning and gender difference. Education and Information Technologies, 22(6), 2767–2804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9622-1
29.
KrouskaA.TroussasC.SgouropoulouC. (2020). A personalized brain-based quiz game for improving students’ cognitive functions. In FrassonC.BamidisP.VlamosP. (Eds.), Brain function assessment in learning (pp. 102-106). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60735-7_11
30.
KuO.HouC.-C.ChenS. Y. (2016). Incorporating customization and personalization into game-based learning: A cognitive style perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.040
31.
LessiterJ.FreemanJ.KeoghE.DavidoffJ. (2001). A cross-media presence questionnaire: The ITC-sense of presence inventory. Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 10(3), 282–297. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474601300343612
32.
LindbergR. S.LaineT. H. (2018). Formative evaluation of an adaptive game for engaging learners of programming concepts in K-12. International Journal of Serious Games, 5(2), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v5i2.220
33.
LodererK.PekrunR.PlassJ. (2020). Emotional foundations of game-based learning. In PlassJ. L.MayerR. E.HomerB. D. (Eds.), Handbook of game-based learning (pp. 111–151). MIT Press.
34.
MartinovicD.BurgessG. H.PomerleauC. M.MarinC. (2016). Computer games that exercise cognitive skills: What makes them engaging for children?Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.063
35.
MayerR. E. (2014). Computer games for learning: An evidence-based approach. MIT Press.
36.
MoonJ.KeF. (2020). Exploring the relationships among middle school students’ peer interactions, task efficiency, and learning engagement in game-based learning. Simulation & Gaming, 51(3), 310–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878120907940
37.
ÖzhanŞ. Ç.KocadereS. A. (2020). The effects of flow, emotional engagement, and motivation on success in a gamified online learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(8), 2006–2031. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118823159
38.
PlassJ. L.HeidigS.HaywardE. O.HomerB. D.UmE. (2014). Emotional design in multimedia learning: Effects of shape and color on affect and learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 128–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.02.006
39.
PlassJ. L.HomerB.D.SchwartzR. N.MilneC.E.JordanT.YavnerS. (2013, April). What you see is what you get: Using visual scaffolds in multimedia simulations [Conference session]. Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, United States.
40.
PlassJ. L.HomerB. D.KinzerC. K. (2015). Foundations of game-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 50(4), 258–283. http://10.1080/00461520.2015.1122533
41.
PlassJ. L.HomerB. D.MayerR.KinzerC. K. (2020). Theoretical foundations of game-based and playful learning. In PlassJ. L.MayerR. E.HomerB. D. (Eds.), Handbook of game-based learning (pp. 53–80). MIT Press.
42.
PlassJ. L.HomerB. D.PawarS.BrennerC.MacNamaraA. P. (2019). The effect of adaptive difficulty adjustment on the effectiveness of a game to develop executive function skills for learners of different ages. Cognitive Development, 49, 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.11.006
43.
ProcciK.JamesN.BowersC. (2013). The effects of gender, age, and experience on game engagement. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting (57, pp. 2132–2136). Sage CASAGE Publications.
44.
PrzybylskiA. K.MishkinA. F. (2016). How the quantity and quality of electronic gaming relates to adolescents’ academic engagement and psychosocial adjustment. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000070
45.
RahmanA. A.AngraeniA. (2020). Empowering learners with role-playing game for vocabulary mastery. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(1), 60–73. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.1.4
46.
ReamG. L.ElliottL. C.DunlapE. (2013). A genre-specific investigation of video game engagement and problem play in the early life course. Journal of Addiction Research & Therapy, 6, 8. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6105.S6-008
47.
Ruipérez-ValienteJ. A.KimY. J. (2020). Effects of solo vs. collaborative play in a digital learning game on geometry: Results from a K12 experiment. Computers & Education, 159, 104008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104008
48.
SalviniG.Van PaassenA.LigtenbergA.CarreroG. C.BregtA. K. (2016). A role-playing game as a tool to facilitate social learning and collective action towards Climate Smart Agriculture: Lessons learned from Apuí, Brazil. Environmental Science & Policy, 63, 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.05.016
49.
SchwartzR. N.PlassJ. L. (2014). Click versus drag: User-performed tasks and the enactment effect in an interactive multimedia environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 242–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.012
50.
SchwartzR. N.PlassJ. L. (2020). Types of engagement in learning with games. In PlassJ. L.MayerR. E.HomerB. D. (Eds.), Handbook of game-based learning (pp. 53–80). MIT Press.
51.
SchwarzA. F.Huertas-DelgadoF. J.CardonG.DeSmetA. (2020). Design features associated with user engagement in digital games for healthy lifestyle promotion in youth: A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies. Games for Health Journal, 9(3), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2019.0058
52.
SharekD.WiebeE. (2014). Measuring video game engagement through the cognitive and affective dimensions. Simulation & Gaming, 45(4-5), 569–592. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878114554176
53.
SillaotsM.JesminT.FiadotauM.KhulbeM. (2020). Gamifying classroom presentations: Evaluating the effects on engagement across demographic factors. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on game based learning ECGBL 2020: International conference on game based learning ECGBL 2020, Brighton, UK (pp. 537–546). Academic Conferences International Limited. https://doi.org/10.34190/GBL.20.105
54.
SteinkuehlerC.TsaasanA. M. (2020). Sociocultural foundations of game-based learning. In PlassJ. L.MayerR. E.HomerB. D. (Eds.), Handbook of game-based learning (pp. 177–208). MIT Press.
55.
StoyanovI.EvstatievB.IlievT.MihaylovG. (2019). Adaptive learning for virtual investigation of capacitors’ electrical and physical properties. In 2019 IEEE 25th international symposium for design and Technology in electronic packaging (SIITME) (pp. 58–61). IEEE.
56.
ThaiK. P.BangH. J.LiL. (2022). Accelerating early math learning with research-based personalized learning games: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 15(1), 28–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2021.1969710
57.
TroussasC.KrouskaA.SgouropoulouC. (2020). Collaboration and fuzzy-modeled personalization for mobile game-based learning in higher education. Computers & Education, 144, 103698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103698
58.
Van OostendorpH.Van der SpekE. D.LinssenJ. (2014). Adapting the complexity level of a serious game to the proficiency of players. EAI Endorsed Trans. Serious Games, 1(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4108/sg.1.2.e5
59.
YinR. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage publications.
60.
ZagalJ. P.DeterdingS. (2018). Role-playing game studies: Transmedia foundations. Routledge.
61.
ZainuddinZ.ShujahatM.HarunaH.ChuS. K. W. (2020). The role of gamified e-quizzes on student learning and engagement: An interactive gamification solution for a formative assessment system. Computers & Education, 145, 103729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103729
62.
ZhongL. (2022a). A mixed methods study of student’s engagement in a game-based learning environment. In LangranE. (Ed.), Proceedings of society for information Technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 1003-1005). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/220841/
63.
ZhongL. (2022b). A systematic review of personalized learning in higher education: Learning content structure, learning materials sequence, and learning readiness. Interactive Learning Environments: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2061006
64.
ZhongL.XuX. (2019). Developing real life problem-solving skills through situational design: A pilot study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(6), 1529–1545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09691-2
65.
ZualkernanI.PasquierM.JibreelM. M.ZakariaR. S.TayemR. M. (2010). An adaptive learning RPG game-engine based on knowledge spaces. In 2010 2nd International Conference on Education Technology and Computer, 2, V2-V223-V2-227. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETC.2010.5529397
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
