Creativity Development With Problem-Based Digital Making and Block-Based Programming for Science,Technology,Engineering,Arts,and Mathematics Learning in Middle School Contexts

Abstract

Creativity, one of the cornerstones of students’ 21st-century skills, is regarded as an important learning outcome of science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) education. Meanwhile, problem-based digital making (DM), which combines the child-friendly programming activities of DM with problem-solving elements, is an emerging instructional design to facilitate STEAM learning. This qualitative case study examines the implementation of a problem-based DM instructional program that used the block-based programming tool Scratch to cultivate the participants’ creativity. Fifty-four middle school students (aged 10–14 years) in Hong Kong participated in the program, which totaled 10 contact hours over five consecutive weeks. Through triangulating students’ DM artifacts, video recordings, field notes, and interviews, the researchers characterized the students’ creative expression, examined the role of problem-based DM in encouraging creative work, and investigated the use of Scratch for mediating student creativity. The results showed that problem-based DM activities fostered students’ creative expressions in the dimensions of novelty, utility, aesthetics, and authenticity. While Scratch mediated the way the students presented their solutions, it had limitations that hindered the students’ digital artifact construction. The findings provide theoretical insights for framing creativity and offer practical implications for the implementation of problem-based DM in K–12 contexts.

Keywords

creativity problem-based learning programming digital making Scratch science,technology,engineering,arts,and mathematics education middle school

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bautista

(2021). STEAM education: Contributing evidence of validity and effectiveness, Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 44(4), 755–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2021.1926678

Brennan

Resnick

(2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In Annual American Educational Research Association meeting, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 13–17 April 2012.

Çakıroğlu

Ü.

Mumcu

(2020). Focus-Fight-Finalize (3F): Problem-solving steps extracted from behavioral patterns in block based programming. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(7), 1279–1310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120930673

Chan

M. M.

Blikstein

(2018). Exploring problem-based learning for middle school design and engineering education in digital fabrication laboratories. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 12(2), 7. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1746

Cui

(2021). The interplay between mathematical and computational thinking in primary school students’ mathematical problem-solving within a programming environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(5), 988–1012. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120979930

Dios

M. Á. Q.

López-Iñesta

Ojeda

M. D.

Manzanares

M. C. S.

Dorrío

J. B. V.

(2021). Implementation of a STEAM project in compulsory secondary education that creates connections with the environment. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 44(4), 871–908. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2021.1925475

Fidai

Capraro

M. M.

Capraro

R. M.

(2020). “Scratch”-ing computational thinking with Arduino: A meta-analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100726

Fields

D. A.

Kafai

Y. B.

Morales-Navarro

Walker

J. T.

(2021). Debugging by design: A constructionist approach to high school students’ crafting and coding of electronic textiles as failure artefacts. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(3), 1078–1092. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13079

Honey

Pearson

Schweingruber

H. A.

(Eds.). (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18612

10.

Jurado

Fonseca

Coderch

Canaleta

(2020). Social STEAM learning at an early age with robotic platforms: A case study in four schools in Spain. Sensors, 20(13), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20133698

11.

Kharkhurin

A. V.

(2014). Creativity.4in1: Four-criterion construct of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26 (3), 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.929424

12.

Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity [KOFAC] . (2017). Concept and definition of STEAM. https://steam.kofac.re.kr/?page_id=11269

13.

Laakso

N. L.

Korhonen

T. S.

Hakkarainen

K. P.

(2021). Developing students’ digital competences through collaborative game design. Computers and Education, 174, 104308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104308

14.

Lou

S. J.

Chou

Y. C.

Shih

R. C.

Chung

C. C.

(2017). A study of creativity in CaC2 steamship-derived STEM project-based learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2387–2404. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01231a

15.

Chan

(2019). Learning as Making: Using 3D computer-aided design to enhance the learning of shape and space in STEM-integrated ways. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12643

16.

Cui

(2021). Examining primary students’ mathematical problem-solving in a programming context: Toward a computationally enhanced mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 53(4), 847–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01200-7

17.

Liu

Cui

(2021). Students’ in-moment challenges and developing maker perspectives during problem-based digital making. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 114(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1967817

18.

Ozkan

Topsakal

U. U.

(2019). Exploring the effectiveness of STEAM design processes on middle school students’ creativity. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09547-z

19.

Papert

S. A.

(1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books.

20.

Perignat

Katz-Buonincontro

(2019). STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.10.002

21.

Piaget

(1973). To understand is to invent. Grossman Publishers.

22.

Rodríguez-Martínez

J. A.

González-Calero

J. A.

Sáez-López

J. M.

(2020). Computational thinking and mathematics using Scratch: An experiment with sixth-grade students. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(3), 316–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1612448

23.

Sáez-López

J. M.

Sevillano-García

M. L.

Vazquez-Cano

(2019). The effect of programming on primary school students’ mathematical and scientific understanding: Educational use of mBot. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(6), 1405–1425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09648-5

24.

Saorín

J. L.

Melian-Diaz

Bonnet

Carrera

C. C.

Meier

De La Torre-Cantero

(2017). Makerspace teaching-learning environment to enhance creative competence in engineering students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.01.004

25.

Smyrnaiou

Georgakopoulou

Sotiriou

(2020). Promoting a mixed-design model of scientific creativity through digital storytelling—the CCQ model for creativity. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00223-6

26.

Strauss

Corbin

(1998). Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.) Sage.

27.

Tang

Vezzani

Eriksson

(2020). Developing critical thinking, collective creativity skills and problem solving through playful design jams. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100696

28.

Thomas

(2011). A typology for the case study in social science following a review of definition, discourse, and structure. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(6), 511–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800411409884

29.

Tobin

G. A.

Begley

C. M.

(2004). Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48(4), 388–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03207.x

30.

Topalli

Cagiltay

N. E.

(2018). Improving programming skills in engineering education through problem-based game projects with Scratch. Computers and Education, 120, 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.011

31.

Tracy

S. J.

(2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” Criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121

32.

Tucker-Raymond

Puttick

Cassidy

Harteveld

Troiano

G. M.

(2019). “I broke your game!”: Critique among middle schoolers designing computer games about climate change. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0194-z

33.

Van de Walle

J. A.

Karp

K. S.

Bay-Williams

J. M.

(2016). Elementary and middle school mathematics. Pearson Education UK.

34.

Wagner

(1997). The unavoidable intervention of educational research: A framework for reconsidering researcher-practitioner cooperation. Educational Researcher, 26(7), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x026007013

35.

Waterman

K. P.

Goldsmith

Pasquale

(2020). Integrating computational thinking into elementary science curriculum: An examination of activities that support students’ computational thinking in the service of disciplinary learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09801-y

36.

Weng

Chiu

T. K.

Jong

M. S.

(2022). Applying relatedness to explain learning outcomes of STEM maker activities. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 800569-800569. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.800569

37.

Weng

Cui

O. L.

Jong

M. S.

Chiu

T. K.

(2022). Characterizing students’ 4C skills development during problem-based digital making. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(3), 372–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09961-4