The purpose of this study is to investigate genetic and environmental influences on computer self-efficacy. A total of 165 Turkish twin-pairs participated in the study. Participants’ mean age was 12.45 (SD = 1.82). The results of paired t-test comparisons showed no significant differences in monozygotic, and both same-sex and opposite-sex dizygotic twin-pairs’ levels of computer self-efficacy. Correlations were calculated to test intrapair similarity for computer self-efficacy. The monozygotic correlation for computer self-efficacy was .443 and the same-sex dizygotic correlation was .472, suggesting no genetic contribution to computer self-efficacy but providing support for environmental influences. Interpretations of results and potential directions for future research are presented.
AesaertK.van BraakJ. (2014) Exploring factors related to primary school pupils’ ICT self-efficacy: A multilevel approach. Computers in Human Behavior41: 327–341. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.006.
2.
AhnH. S.UsherE. L.ButzA.BongM. (2016) Cultural differences in the understanding of modelling and feedback as sources of self-efficacy information. British Journal of Educational Psychology86: 112–136. doi:10.1111/bjep.12093.
3.
BanduraA. (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4.
BanduraA. (1993) Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist28(2): 117–148. doi:0.1207/s15326985ep2802_3.
5.
BanduraA. (1997) Self-efficacy: The exercise of control, New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
6.
BanduraA. (2001) Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology3(3): 265–299. doi:10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03.
7.
BanduraA. (2012) On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management38(1): 9–44. doi:10.1177/0149206311410606.
8.
BeattyM. J.MarshallL. A.RuddJ. E. (2001) A twins study of communicative adaptability: Heritability of individual differences. Quarterly Journal of Speech87(4): 366–377. doi:10.1080/00335630109384346.
9.
BaoY.XiongT.HuZ.KibellohM. (2013) Exploring gender differences on general and specific computer self-efficacy in mobile learning adoption. Journal of Educational Computing Research49(1): 111–132. doi:10.2190/EC.49.1.e.
BritnerS. L.PajaresF. (2006) Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching43: 485–499. doi:10.1002/tea.20131.
12.
BuschT. (1995) Gender differences in self-efficacy and attitudes toward computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research12: 147–158. doi:10.2190/H7E1-XMM7-GU9B-3HWR.
13.
ButzA. R.UsherE. L. (2015) Salient sources of early adolescents’ self-efficacy in two domains. Contemporary Educational Psychology42: 49–61. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.04.001.
14.
CampbellD. T.FiskeD. W. (1959) Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin56(2): 81–105. doi:10.1037/h0046016.
15.
CassidyS.EachusP. (2002) Developing the computer user self-efficacy (CUSE) scale: Investigating the relationship between computer self-efficacy, gender and experience with computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research26(2): 133–153. doi:10.2190/JGJR-0KVL-HRF7-GCNV.
16.
ChaseM. A. (1998) Sources of self-efficacy in physical education and sport. Journal of Teaching Physical Education18: 76–89.
17.
ChouH. W. (2001) Effects of training method and computer anxiety on learning performance and self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior17: 51–69. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00035-2.
18.
Compeau, D. R., Gravill, J., Haggerty, N., & Kelley, H. (2006). Computer self-efficacy: A review. In P. Zhang & D. Galletta (Eds.), Human-computer interaction and management information systems: Foundations (pp. 225–261). Advances in Management Information Systems Volume 5. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
19.
CompeauD. R.HigginsC. A. (1995a) Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly19(2): 189–211.
20.
CompeauD. R.HigginsC. A. (1995b) Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Information Systems Research6(2): 118–143. doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.118.
21.
CompeauD. R.HigginsC. A.HuffS. (1999) Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly23(2): 145–158.
22.
de JongH. L. (2000) Genetic determinism: How not to interpret behavioral genetics. Theory & Psychology10(5): 615–637. doi:10.1177/0959354300105003.
23.
DeryakuluD.ÇalışkanE. (2012) A twin study of computer anxiety in Turkish adolescents. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking15(4): 212–218. doi:10.1089/cyber.2011.0499.
24.
DeryakuluD.UrsavaşÖ. F. (2014) Genetic and environmental influences on problematic Internet use: A twin study. Computers in Human Behavior39: 331–338. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.038.
25.
Di GiuntaL.AlessandriG.GerbinoM.KanacriP. L.ZuffianoA.CapraraG. V. (2013) The determinants of scholastic achievement: The contribution of personality traits, self-esteem, and academic self-efficacy. Learning and Individual Differences27: 102–108. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2013.07.006.
26.
Duffy, D. L. (1994). Asthma and allergic diseases in Australian twins and their families (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Department of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
27.
EarleyP. C. (1994) Self or group? Cultural effects of training on self-efficacy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly39: 89–117.
28.
ErtmerP. A.EvenbeckE.CennamoK. S.LehmanJ. D. (1994) Enhancing self-efficacy for computer technologies through the use of positive classroom experiences. Educational Technology Research and Development42(3): 45–62. doi:10.1007/BF02298094.
29.
GistM. E.SchwoererC.RosenB. (1989) Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training. Journal of Applied Psychology74(6): 884–891. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.6.884.
30.
GohD.OganC.AhujaM.HerringS. C.RobinsonJ. C. (2007) Being the same isn’t enough: Impact of male and female mentors on computer self-efficacy of college students in IT-related fields. Journal of Educational Computing Research37(1): 19–40. doi:10.2190/3705-4405-1G74-24T1.
31.
GrevenC. U.HarlaarN.KovasY.Chamorro-PremuzicT.PlominR. (2009) More than just IQ: School achievement is predicted by self-perceived abilities—But for genetic rather than environmental reasons. Psychological Sciences20(6): 753–762. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02366.x.
32.
HarrisonA. W.RainerR. K.Jr.HochwarterW. A.ThompsonK. R. (1997) Testing the self-efficacy-performance linkage of social-cognitive theory. The Journal of Social Psychology137(1): 79–87. doi:10.1080/00224549709595415.
33.
HodgesC. B.MurphyP. F. (2009) Sources of self-efficacy beliefs of students in a technology-intensive asynchronous college algebra course. The Internet and Higher Education12(2): 93–97. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.06.005.
34.
HouleP. A. (1996) Toward understanding student differences in a computer skills course. Journal of Educational Computing Research14(1): 25–48. doi:10.2190/C06X-G9UQ-6BUB-YPTY.
35.
HsuW. K. K.HuangS. H. S. (2006) Determinants of computer self-efficacy—An examination of learning motivations and learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research35(3): 245–265. doi:10.2190/K441-P725-8174-55X2.
36.
IşıksalM.AşkarP. (2003) İlköğretim öğrencileri için matematik ve bilgisayar öz-yeterlik algısı ölçekleri [The scales of perceived mathematics and computer self-efficacy for elementary students]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi25: 109–118.
37.
JacksonL. A.ErvinK. S.GardnerP. D.SchmittN. (2001) Gender and the internet: Women communicating and men searching. Sex Roles44(5/6): 363–379. doi:10.1023/A:1010937901821.
38.
JohnsonR. D. (2005) An empirical investigation of sources of application-specific computer-self-efficacy and mediators of the efficacy-performance relationship. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies62: 737–758. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.02.008.
39.
KirzingerA. E.WeberC.JohnsonM. (2012) Genetic and environmental influences on media use and communication behaviors. Human Communication Research38(2): 144–171. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01424.x.
40.
KomarrajuM.NadlerD. (2013) Self-efficacy and academic achievement: Why do implicit beliefs, goals and effort regulation matter?Learning and Individual Differences25: 67–72. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.005.
41.
KovasY.Garon-CarrierG.BoivinM.PetrillS. A.PlominR.MalykhS. B.BrendgenM. (2015) Why children differ in motivation to learn: Insights from over 13,000 twins from 6 countries. Personality and Individual Differences80: 51–63. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.006.
42.
LaBudaM. C.SvikisD. S.PickensR. W. (1997) Twin closeness and co-twin risk for substance use disorders: Assessing the impact of the equal environment assumption. Psychiatry Research70: 155–164. doi:10.1016/S0165-1781(97)03045-X.
43.
LeeC. -L.HuangM. -K. (2014) The influence of computer literacy and computer anxiety on computer self-efficacy: The moderating effect of gender. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking17(3): 172–180. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0029.
44.
LiM.ChenJ.LiN.LiX. (2014) A twin study of problematic Internet use: Its heritability and genetic association with effortful control. Twin Research and Human Genetics17(04): 279–287. doi:10.1017/thg.2014.32.
45.
LinG. -Y. (2016) Self-efficacy beliefs and their sources in undergraduate computing disciplines: An examination of gender and persistence. Journal of Educational Computing Research53(4): 540–561. doi:10.1177/0735633115608440.
46.
LittvayL.WeithP. T.DawesC. T. (2011) Sense of control and voting: A genetically-driven relationship. Social Science Quarterly92(5): 1236–1252. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00816.x.
47.
LongE. C.VerhulstB.NealeM. C.LindP. A.HickieI. B.MartinN. G.GillespieN. A. (2015) The genetic and environmental contributions to Internet use and associations with psychopathology: A twin study. Twin Research and Human Genetics19(1): 1–9. doi:10.1017/thg.2015.91.
48.
LopezF. G.LentR. W. (1992) Sources of mathematics self-efficacy in high school students. The Career Development Quarterly41: 3–12. doi:10.1002/j.2161-0045.1992.tb00350.x.
49.
MarakasG. M.YiM. Y.JohnsonR. D. (1998) The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Information System Research9(2): 126–163. doi:10.1287/isre.9.2.126.
50.
McGueM.BouchardT. J.Jr. (1998) Genetic and environmental influences on human behavioral differences. Annual Review of Neuroscience21(1): 1–24. doi:10.1002/neu.10160.
51.
McilroyD.PooleK.UrsavaşÖ. F.MoriartyA. (2015) Distal and proximal associates of academic performance at secondary level: A mediation model of personality and self-efficacy. Learning and Individual Differences38: 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.01.004.
52.
McilroyD.SadlerC.BoojawonN. (2007) Computer phobia and computer self-efficacy: Their association with undergraduates’ use of university computer facilities. Computers in Human Behavior23: 1285–1299. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.12.004.
53.
MillerG.ZhuG.WrightM. J.HansellN. K.MartinN. G. (2012) The heritability and genetic correlates of mobile phone use: A twin study of consumer behavior. Twin Research and Human Genetics15(01): 97–106. doi:10.1375/twin.15.1.97.
54.
MiuraI. T. (1987) The relationship between self-efficacy expectations to computer interest and course enrolment in college. Sex Roles16(5/6): 303–311. doi:10.1007/BF00289956.
55.
MoosD. C.AzevedoR. (2009) Learning with computer-based learning environments: A literature review of computer self-efficacy. Review of Educational Research79(2): 576–600. doi:10.3102/0034654308326083.
56.
Ortiz de GuineaA.WebsterJ. (2011) Are we talking about the task or the computer? An examination of the associated domains of task-specific and computer self-efficacies. Computers in Human Behavior27(2): 978–987. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.002.
57.
Ortiz de GuineaA.WebsterJ. (2015) The missing links: Cultural, software, task and personal influences on computer self-efficacy. The International Journal of Human Resource Management26(7): 905–931. doi:10.1080/09585192.2012.655758.
58.
PapastergiouM.GerodimosV.AntoniouP. (2011) Multimedia blogging in physical education: Effects on student knowledge and ICT self-efficacy. Computers & Education57(3): 1998–2010. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.006.
59.
ParaskevaF.BoutaH.PapagianniA. (2008) Individual characteristics and computer self-efficacy in secondary education teachers to integrate technology in educational practice. Computers & Education50(3): 1084–1091. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.10.006.
60.
PetersonT. O.ArnnR. B. (2005) Self-efficacy: The foundation of human performance. Performance Improvement Quarterly18(2): 5–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1937-8327.2005.tb00330.x.
61.
PlominR. (1989) Environment and genes: Determinants of behavior. American Psychologist44(2): 105–111. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.2.105.
62.
PlominR.DanielsD. (2011) Why are children in the same family so different from one another?International Journal of Epidemiology40(3): 563–582doi:10.1093/ije/dyq148.
63.
PlominR.DeFriesJ. C.McClearnG. E.RutterM. (2001) Behavioral genetics, New York, NY: Worth.
64.
PotoskyD. (2002) A field study of computer efficacy beliefs as an outcome of training: The role of computer playfulness, computer knowledge, and performance during training. Computers in Human Behavior18(3): 241–255. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(01)00050-4.
65.
RichardsonK.NorgateS. (2005) The equal environments assumption of classical twin studies may not hold. British Journal of Educational Psychology75(3): 339–350. doi:10.1348/000709904X24690.
66.
SaleemH.BeaudryA.CroteauA. M. (2011) Antecedents of computer self-efficacy: A study of the role of personality traits and gender. Computers in Human Behavior27(5): 1922–1936. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.017.
67.
SaudinoK. J.GagneJ. R.GrantJ.IbatoulinaA.MarytuinaT.Ravich-ScherboI.WhitfieldK. (1999) Genetic and environmental influences on personality in adult Russian twins. International Journal of Behavioral Development23(2): 375–389. doi:10.1080/016502599383874.
68.
SchererR.SiddiqF. (2015) Revisiting teachers’ computer self-efficacy: A differentiated view on gender differences. Computers in Human Behavior53: 48–57. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.038.
69.
SegalN. L. (1990) The importance of twin studies for individual differences research. Journal of Counseling & Development68(6): 612–622.
70.
ShermanS. L.DeFriesJ. C.GottesmanI. I.LoehlinJ. C.MeyerJ. M.PeliasM. Z.WaldmanI. (1997) Behavioral Genetics ’97: ASHG statement recent developments in human behavioral genetics: Past accomplishments and future directions. American Journal of Human Genetics60: 1265–1275. doi:10.1086/515473.
71.
ShuQ.TuQ.WangK. (2011) The impact of computer self-efficacy and technology dependence on computer-related technostress: A social cognitive theory perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction27(10): 923–939. doi:10.1080/10447318.2011.555313.
72.
SmithS. M. (2002) Using the social cognitive model to explain vocational interest in information technology. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal20(1): 1–9. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/219816562?accountid=8319.
73.
Smith-Weber, S. M. (1999). Latent sources of computer self-efficacy. In: Delta Pi Epsilon national conference, Book of readings (p. 87; ED 451 405). Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED451405.pdf#page=87.
74.
Smith-WeberS. M. (2000) Computer self-efficacy: An examination of the sources and the impact of computer technology education. NABTE Review27: 53–58.
75.
SpinathF. M.SpinathB.PlominR. (2008) The nature and nurture of intelligence and motivation in the origins of sex differences in elementary school achievement. European Journal of Personality22(3): 211–229. doi:0.1002/per.677.
76.
TorkzadehG.Van DykeT. (2002) Effects of training on Internet self-efficacy and computer user attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior18(5): 479–494. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00010-9.
77.
ThatcherJ. B.PerrewéP. L. (2002) An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. MIS Quarterly26(4): 381–396. doi:10.2307/4132314.
78.
UsherE. L.PajaresF. (2006) Sources of academic and self-regulatory efficacy beliefs of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology31: 125–141. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.03.002.
79.
UsherE. L.PajaresF. (2009) Sources of self-efficacy in mathematics: A validation study. Contemporary Educational Psychology34: 89–101. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.09.002.
80.
WaaktaarT.TorgersenS. (2013) Self-efficacy is mainly genetic, not learned: A multiple-rater twin study on the causal structure of general self-efficacy in young people. Twin Research and Human Genetics16(3): 651–660. doi:10.1017/thg.2013.25.
81.
WalkerS. O.PlominR. (2006) Nature, nurture, and perceptions of the classroom environment as they relate to teacher-assessed academic achievement: A twin study of nine-year-olds. Educational Psychology26(4): 541–561. doi:10.1080/01443410500342500.
82.
WoodR. E.BanduraA. (1989) Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision making. Journal of Personality Social Psychology56(5): 805–814. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.805.
83.
van DintherM.DochyF.SegersM. (2011) Factors affecting students’ self-efficacy in higher education. Educational Research Review6(2): 95–108. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.10.003.
84.
VekiriI. (2010) Boys’ and girls’ ICT beliefs: Do teachers matter?Computers & Education55(1): 16–23. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.013.
85.
VidingE.SpinathF. M.PriceT. S.BishopD. V.DaleP. S.PlominR. (2004) Genetic and environmental influence on language impairment in 4-year-old same-sex and opposite-sex twins. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry45(2): 315–325. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00223.x.
86.
VinkJ. M.BeijsterveldtT. C.HuppertzC.BartelsM.BoomsmaD. I. (2015) Heritability of compulsive Internet use in adolescents. Addiction Biology21: 460–468. doi:10.1111/adb.12218.
87.
YeoG. B.NealA. (2006) An examination of the dynamic relationship between self-efficacy and performance across levels of analysis and levels of specificity. Journal of Applied Psychology91(5): 1088–1101. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1088.
88.
ZeldinA. L.PajaresF. (2000) Against the odds: Self-efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical, scientific, and technological careers. American Educational Research Journal37(1): 215–246. doi:10.3102/00028312037001215.
89.
ZhangY.EspinozaS. (1998) Relationships among computer self-efficacy, attitudes toward computers, and desirability of learning computing skills. Journal of Research in Computing Education30(4): 420–438. doi:10.1080/08886504.1998.10782236.
