Researchers investigated perceptions of Japanese college students toward the use of digital games in English-language learning. The study was conducted at one large private university in Japan. Undergraduate students who were enrolled in 14 English-language courses were invited to complete a paper-based survey during class time. The survey included the following constructs: ease of use, learning opportunities, experience, preferences, and actual use. Participants were also invited to share potential advantages and disadvantages for digital game use in the classroom. Two hundred and twenty-two students completed the survey. Results indicate that most students viewed the potential integration and utilization of digital games as positive. However, some students expressed concern that the use of games may not be an effective or efficient method of learning.
AdamsD. A.NelsonR. R.ToddP. A. (1992) Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly16(2): 227–247.
BanduraA. (1997) Self-efficacy: The exercise of control, New York, NY: Freeman.
4.
BonannoP.KommersP. A. M. (2008) Exploring the influence of gender and gaming competence on attitudes towards using instructional games. British Journal of Educational Technology39(1): 97–109. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00732.x.
5.
BogdanR. C.BiklenS. K. (1998) Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods, 3rd ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
6.
BourgonjonJ.ValckeM.SoetaertR.SchellensT. (2010) Students’ perceptions about the use of video games in the classroom. Computers & Education54: 1145–1156. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.022.
7.
CarlessD. (2012) Task-based language teaching in Confucian-heritage settings: Prospects and challenges. OnTask2(1): 4–8. Retrieved from http://www.tblsig.org/ontask.
8.
CarrD.PelletierC. (2008) Gamers, gender and representation. In: FerdigR. (ed.) Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education, Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, pp. 911–921. doi:10.4018/978-1-59904-808-6.ch052.
9.
ChaE. S.KimK. H.ErlenJ. A. (2007) Translation of scales in cross-cultural research: Issues and techniques. Journal of Advanced Nursing58(4): 386–395. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04242.x.
10.
ChenH. H.YangC. (2011) Investigating the effects of an adventure video game on foreign language learning. In: ChangM.HwangW. Y.ChenM. P.MuellerW. (eds) Edutainment technologies. Educational games and virtual reality/augmented reality applications, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag, pp. 168–175.
11.
CreswellJ. W. (2014) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, & mixed method approaches, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
12.
DaviesR.IkenoO. (2002) The Japanese mind: Understanding contemporary culture, Tokyo, Japan: Tuttle Publishing.
13.
DavisF. D. (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 13(3): 319–340.
14.
DavisF. D.BagozziR. P.WarshawP. R. (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science35(8): 982–1003. doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982.
15.
deHaanJ.ReedW. M.KuwadaK. (2010) The effect of interactivity with a music video game on second language vocabulary recall. Language Learning & Technology14(2): 74–79. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol14num2/default.html.
16.
De JeanJ.UpitisR.KochC.YoungJ. (1999) The story of Phoenix Quest: How girls respond to a prototype language and mathematics computer game. Gender and Education11(2): 207–223. doi:10.1080/09540259920708.
17.
DeVellisR. F. (2003) Scale development: Theory and applications, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (1975) Belief, attitude, intension and behavior: An introduction to theory and research, Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
20.
FlickU. (2006) An introduction to qualitative research, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
GeeJ. P. (2003) What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
22.
GefenD.StraubD. W. (2000) The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: A study of e-commerce adoption. Journal of the Association for Information Systems1(1): 1–30. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol1/iss1/8.
23.
GravetterF. J.ForzanoL. B. (2009) Research methods for the behavioral sciences, 3rd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
24.
HaI.YoonY.ChoiM. (2007) Determinants of adoption of mobile games under mobile broadband wireless access environment. Information & Management44(3): 276–286. doi:10.1016/j.im.2007.01.001.
HsuC. L.LuH. P. (2004) Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Information & Management41(7): 853–868. doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.08.014.
27.
HsuC. L.LuH. P. (2007) Consumer behavior in online game communities: A motivational factor perspective. Computers in Human Behavior23(3): 1642–1659. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2005.09.001.
28.
KeF. (2008) A case study of computer gaming for math: Engaged learning from gameplay?Computers & Education51(4): 1609–1620. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.03.003.
29.
KingW. R.HeJ. (2006) A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management43(6): 740–755. doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003.
30.
LatchemC.JungI.AokiK.OzkulA. E. (2008) The tortoise and the hare enigma in e-transformation in Japanese and Korean higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology39(4): 610–630. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00771.x.
31.
LauS. H.WoodsP. C. (2008) An investigation of user perceptions and attitudes towards learning objects. British Journal of Educational Technology39(4): 685–699. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00770.x.
32.
LegrisP.InghamJ.ColleretteP. (2003) Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the Technology Acceptance Model. Information & Management40(3): 191–204. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4.
OliverM.CarrD. (2009) Learning in virtual worlds: Using communities of practice to explain how people learn from play. British Journal of Educational Technology40(3): 444–457. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00948.x.
37.
PapastergiouM. (2009) Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers & Education52(1): 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.004.
38.
ParkS. Y.NamM. W.ChaS. B. (2012) University students’ behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. British Journal of Educational Technology43(4): 592–605. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01229.x.
39.
PetersonM. (2001) MOOs and second language acquisition: Towards a rationale for MOO-based learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning14(5): 443–459. doi:10.1076/call.14.5.443.5773.
40.
PetersonM. (2010) Learner participation patterns and strategy use in Second Life: An exploratory case study. ReCALL22(3): 273–292. doi:10.1017/S0958344010000169.
RanalliJ. (2008) Learning English with the Sims: Exploiting authentic computer simulation games for L2 learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning21(5): 441–455. doi:10.1080/09588220802447859.
43.
Rankin, Y., Gold, R., & Gooch, B. (2006). 3D role-playing games as language learning tools. In E. Gröller & L. Szirmay-Kalos (Eds.), Proceedings of EuroGraphics (Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 211–225). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
44.
RankinY. A.MorrisonD.McNealM.GoochB.ShuteM. W. (2009) Time will tell: In-game social interactions that facilitate second language acquisition. In: YoungR. M. (ed.) Proceedings of the International Conference on the Foundations of Digital GamesVol. 4, New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 161–168. doi:10.1145/1536513.1536546.
45.
RieberL. P. (1996) Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games. Educational Technology Research & Development44(2): 43–58. doi:10.1007/BF02300540.
46.
SánchezR. A.HuerosA. D. (2010) Motivational factors that influence the acceptance of Moodle using TAM. Computers in Human Behavior26(6): 1632–1640. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.011.
47.
SheppardB. H.HartwickJ.WarshawP. R. (1988) The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research15(3): 325–343.
48.
ShieldL. (2003) MOO as a language learning tool. In: FelixU. (ed.) Language learning online: Towards best practice, Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger, pp. 97–122.
TaoY. H.ChengC. J.SunS. Y. (2009) What influences college students to continue using business simulation games? The Taiwan experience. Computers & Education53(3): 929–939. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.009.
51.
Teo, T. (Ed.). (2011). Technology acceptance in education: Research and issues. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
52.
ThorneS. L. (2008) Transcultural communication in open Internet environments and massively multiplayer online games. In: MagnanS. S. (ed.) Mediating discourse online, Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing, pp. 305–327.
53.
TomlinsonB.MasuharaH. (2009) Playing to learn: A review of physical games in second language acquisition. Simulation & Gaming40(5): 645–668. doi:10.1177/1046878109339969.
54.
VenkateshV.DavisF. D. (2000) A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science46(2): 186–204. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
55.
VenkateshV.MorrisM. G.DavisG. B.DavisF. D. (2003) User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly23(3): 425–478.
56.
WangF.BurtonJ. K. (2013) Second Life in education: A review of publications from its launch to 2011. British Journal of Educational Technology44(3): 357–371. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01334.x.
WarnerC. N. (2004) It’s just a game, right? Types of play in foreign language CMC. Language Learning and Technology8(2): 69–87. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num2/default.html.
60.
WarshawP. R.DavisF. D. (1985) Disentangling behavioral intention and behavioral expectation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology21(3): 213–228. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(85)90017-4.
61.
WatersJ. K. (2007) On a quest for English. Technological Horizons in Education34(10): 26–32.
62.
WhiteJ.MillsD. J. (2014) Examining attitudes towards and usage of smartphone technology among Japanese university students studying EFL. Computer-Assisted Language Learning-Electronic Journal15(2): 1–15. Retrieved from http://callej.org/journal/15-2.html.
YoungM. F.SlotaS.CutterA. B.JaletteG.MullinG.LaiB.YukhymenkoM. (2012) Our princess is in another castle: A review of trends in serious gaming for education. Review of Education Research82(1): 61–89. doi:10.3102/0034654312436980.
