This article is an adaptation of the sixteenth Lewis A. Coser lecture, given virtually in 2021 for the American Sociological Association Meetings. In this article, I pay tribute to Lewis and Rose Laub Coser by engaging with their past work, which inspired a theoretical provocation about what it means to theorize from the margins. I specifically address the questions of who gets to be a theorist and what kinds of theoretical work get marginalized. I outline the process of epistemic oppression involved in trying to publish marginal ideas in mainstream journals. I argue that the relationship between mainstream sociology and what I refer to as “marginal” requires a relational perspective that (1) situates both marginalized scholars and their scholarship in the broader discipline of sociology and (2) examines the epistemic oppression of their theories regardless of their sometimes-powerful institutional positioning in highly ranked departments or as leaders within various professional associations.
AbendGabriel. 2019. “Thick Concepts and Sociological Research.” Sociological Theory37(3):209–33.
2.
AdamsJuliaBruecknerHannahNaslundCambria. 2019. “Who Counts as a Notable Sociologist on Wikipedia? Gender, Race, and the ‘Professor Test.’”Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World5(1). doi:10.1177/2378023118823946
3.
BandeljNina. 2019. “Academic Familism, Spillover Prestige, and Gender Segregation in Sociology Subfields: The Trajectory of Economic Sociology.” The American Sociologist50:488–508. doi:10.1007/s12108-019-09421-4.
4.
BenjaminRuha. 2019. Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Boston, MA: Polity.
5.
BhabhaHomi. 1994. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.
6.
Bonilla-SilvaEduardo. 2012. “The Invisible Weight of Whiteness: The Racial Grammar of Everyday Life in America.” Ethnic and Racial Studies35(2):173–94.
7.
Bonilla-SilvaEduardo. 2022. Racism without Racists: Color-Blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in America. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
8.
BorisEileenParreñasRhacel. 2010. Intimate Labors: Cultures, Technologies, and the Politics of Care. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
9.
BrownKarida. 2018. Gone Home: Race and Roots through Appalachia. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
10.
BruchElizabeth E.MareRobert D.. 2006. “Neighborhood Choice and Neighborhood Change.” American Journal of Sociology112(3):667–709.
11.
CappellCharles L.GuterbockThomas M.. 1992. “Visible Colleges: The Social and Conceptual Structure of Sociology Specialties.” American Sociological Review57(2):266–73.
12.
ChafetzJanet Saltzman. 1997. “Feminist Theory and Sociology: Underutilized Contributions for Mainstream Theory.” Annual Review of Sociology23:97–120.
13.
ClemensElisabethPowellWalter W.McIlwaineKrisOkamotoDina. 1995. “Careers in Print: Books, Journals, and Scholarly Reputations.” American Journal of Sociology101(2):433–94.
14.
ColeJonathan. 1987. Fair Science: Women in the Scientific Community. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
15.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 1989. “The Social Construction of Black Feminist Thought.” Signs14:745–73.
16.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 1999. “Learning from the Outsider within: The Sociological Significance of Black Feminist Thought.” Social Problems33(6):S14–32.
17.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 2000. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York, NY: Routledge.
18.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 2022. “Black Feminist Sociology: An Interview with Patricia Hill Collins.” Pp. 19–31 in Black Feminist Sociology: Perspectives and Praxis, edited by LunaZ.Laster PirtleW. N.. New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
CookJudithFonowMary Margaret. 1985. “Knowledge and Women’s Interests: Issues of Epistemology and Methodology in Feminist Sociological Research.” Sociological Inquiry56:2–27.
20.
CoserLewis A.1964. The Functions of Social Conflict. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
21.
CoserLewis A.1965. Men of Ideas: A Sociologist’s View. New York, NY: Free Press Paperbacks.
22.
CoserLewis A.1974. Greedy Institutions: Patterns of Undivided Commitment. New York, NY: The Free Press.
23.
CoserLewis A.1988a. A Handful of Thistles: Collected Papers in Moral Conviction. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
24.
CoserLewis A.1988b. “Introduction.” Pp. xi–xx in A Handful of Thistles: Collected Papers in Moral Conviction. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
25.
CoserLewis A.1993. “A Sociologist’s Atypical Life.” Annual Review of Sociology19:1–15.
26.
CoserRose Laub. 1961. “Insulation from Observability and Types of Social Conformity.” American Sociological Review26(1):28–39.
27.
CoserRose Laub. 1966. “Role Distance, Sociological Ambivalence, and Transitional Status Systems.” American Journal of Sociology72(2):173–87.
28.
CoserRose Laub. 1971. “On Nepotism and Marginality.” American Sociologist6:259–60.
29.
CoserRose Laub. 1975. “Stay Home, Little Sheba: On Placement, Displacement, and Social Change.” Social Problems22(4):470–80.
30.
De CampoMarianne Egger. 2013. “Contemporary Greedy Institutions: An Essay on Lewis Coser’s Concept in the Era of the ‘Hive Mind.’”Sociologický Časopis / Czech Sociological Review49(6):969–87.
31.
EmersonRobertFretzRachelShawLinda. 1995. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
32.
FanonFrantz. [1963] 2021. The Wretched of the Earth. Translated by PhilcoxRichard. New York, NY: Grove Press.
33.
FleckChristian. 2013. “Lewis A. Coser— A Stranger within More Than One Gate.” Sociologický Časopis / Czech Sociological Review49(6):951–68.
34.
FourcadeMarion. 2016. “Ordinalization: Lewis A. Coser Memorial Award for Theoretical Agenda Setting 2014.” Sociological Theory34(3):175–95.
35.
GarridoMarco. 2019. The Patchwork City: Class, Space, and Politics in Metro Manila. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
GlennEvelyn Nakano. 1985. “Racial Ethnic Women’s Labor: The Intersections of Race, Gender, and Class Oppression.” Review of Radical Political Economy17(3):89–90, 95–96.
38.
GoJulian. 2016. Postcolonial Thought and Social History. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
39.
GoJulian. 2020. “Race, Empire, and Epistemic Exclusion: or the Structures of Sociological Thought.” Sociological Theory38(2):79–100.
40.
GraizbordDianaRodríguez-MuñizMichaelBaiocchiGianpaolo. 2017. “Expert for a Day: Theory and the Tailored Craft of Ethnography.” Ethnography18(3):322–44.
41.
GrantLindaWardKathryn B.. 1991. “Gender and Publishing in Sociology.” Gender & Society5(2):207–23.
42.
GrantLindaWardKathryn BRongXue Lan. 1987. “Is There an Association between Gender and Methods in Sociological Research?”American Sociological Review52(6):856–62.
43.
HallStuart. 2017. The Fateful Triangle: Race, Ethnicity, Nation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
HallidayTerenceJanowitzMorris. 1992. Sociology and Its Publics: The Forms and Fates of Disciplinary Organization. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
45.
HardingSandra, ed. 2004. The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies. New York, NY: Routledge.
46.
HartsockNancy. 1983. “The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism.” Pp. 283–310 in Discovering Reality, edited by HardingS.HinitikkaM.. Boston, MA: D. Reidel.
47.
HoangKimberly Kay. 2014. “Flirting with Capital: Negotiating Perceptions of Pan-Asian Ascendency and Western Decline in Global Sex Work.” Social Problems61(4):507–29.
48.
HoangKimberly Kay. 2015. Dealing in Desire: Asian Ascendancy, Western Decline, and the Hidden Currencies of Global Sex Work. Oakland: University of California Press.
HoangKimberly Kay. 2018. “Risky Investments: How Local and Foreign Investors Finesse Corruption-Rife Emerging Markets.” American Sociological Review83(4):657–85.
51.
HoangKimberly Kay. 2020. “Engendering Global Capital: How Homoerotic Triangles Facilitate Foreign Investments into Risky Markets.” Gender & Society34(4):547–72.
52.
ItzigsohnJoséBrownKarida L.. 2020. The Sociology of W.E.B. Du Bois: Racialized Modernity and the Global Color Line. New York: New York University Press.
53.
KaridesMarinaMisraJoyaKennellyIvyMollerStephanie. 2001. “Representing the Discipline: Social Problems compared to ASR and AJS.” Social Problems48(1):111–28.
Lainer-VosDan. 2013. “The Practical Organization of Moral Transactions: Gift Giving, Market Exchange, Credit, and the Making of Diaspora Bonds.” Sociological Theory31(2):145–67.
56.
LeiYa-Wen. 2017. The Contentious Public Sphere: Law, Media, & Authoritarian Rule in China. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57.
MojolaSanyu A.2014. Love, Money, and HIV: Becoming a Modern African Woman in the Age of AIDS. Oakland: University of California Press.
58.
MooreMignon. 2012. Invisible Families: Gay Identities, Relationships and Motherhood among Black Women. Berkeley: University of California Press.
59.
MorrisAldon. 2015. The Scholar Denied: W.E.B. Du Bois and the Birth of Modern Sociology. Oakland: University of California Press.
60.
ParreñasRhacel Salazar. 2001. Servants of Globalization: Women, Migration, and Domestic Work. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
61.
ParreñasRhacel Salazar. 2011. Illicit Flirtations: Labor, Migration, and Sex Trafficking in Tokyo. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
62.
ParreñasRhacel Salazar. 2021. Unfree: Migrant Domestic Work in Arab States. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
63.
PaschelTiana. 2016. Becoming Black Political Subjects: Movements and Ethno-Racial Rights in Columbia and Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
64.
RayRaka. 1999. Fields of Protest: Women’s Movements in India. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
65.
RayRakaQayumSeemin. 2009. Cultures of Servitude: Modernity, Domesticity, and Class in India. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
66.
ReyesVictoria. 2019. Global Borderlands: Fantasy, Violence, and Empire in Subic Bay, Philippines. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
67.
ReyesVictoria. 2022. “For a Du Boisian Economic Sociology.” Sociology Compass16(5). doi:10.1111/soc4.12975.
68.
Rodríguez-MuñizMichael2016. “Bridgework: STS, Sociology and the ‘Dark Matters’ of Race.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society2:214–26. doi:10.17351/ests2016.74.
69.
RomeroMary. 2019. “Sociology Engaged in Social Justice.” American Sociological Review85(1):1–30.
70.
RossmanGabriel. 2014. “Obfuscatory Relational Work and Disreputable Exchange.” Sociological Theory32(1):43–63.
71.
SampsonRobert. 2012. Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
72.
SmallMario. 2009. “‘How Many Cases Do I Need?’ On Science and the Logic of Case Selection in Field-Based Research.” Ethnography10(1):5–38.
73.
SmithDorothy. 1990. The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology and Political Controversies. Lebanon, NH: Northeastern University Press.
74.
SmithDorothy. 1987. “Women’s Perspective as a Radical Critique of Sociology.” Pp. 84–96 in Feminism and Methodology, edited by HardingS.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
75.
StaceyJudithThorneBarrie. 1985. “The Missing Feminist Revolution in Sociology.” Social Problems32(4):301–16.
76.
StiglitzJoseph. 2001. “Foreword.” Pp. vii–xvii in The Great Transformation, edited by PolanyiK.. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
77.
TavoryIddoTimmermansStefan. 2014. Abductive Analysis: Theorizing Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
78.
TimmermansStefanTavoryIddo. 2022. Data Analysis in Qualitative Research: Theorizing with Abductive Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
79.
Watkins-HayesCeleste. 2019. Remaking a Life: How Women Living with HIV/AIDS Confront Inequality. Oakland: University of California Press.
80.
WinantHoward. 2007. “The Dark Side of the Force: One Hundred Years of the Sociology of Race.” Pp. 535–71 in Sociology in America: A History, edited by CalhounC.. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
