How does material culture matter for institutions? Material objects are increasingly prominent in sociological research, but current studies offer limited insight for how material objects matter to institutional processes. We build on sociological insights to theorize aesthetic style, a shared pattern of material object presence and usage among a cluster of organizations in an institutional field. We use formal relational methods and a survey of material objects from religious congregations to uncover the aesthetic styles that are part of the “logics of god” in the United States’ Christian religious field. We argue aesthetic styles help structure an institutional field by spanning objects’ meanings across space and time, stabilizing objects’ authority, and demarcating symbolic boundaries. Our research provides a conceptual tool for understanding how objects bridge the material and symbolic dimensions of institutions and a methodological example for examining the meaning of objects across numerous organizations in an institutional field.
AdlerGaryOffuttSteven. 2017. “The Gift Economy of Direct Transnational Civic Action: How Reciprocity and Inequality Are Managed in Religious ‘Partnerships.’” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion56(3):600–19.
2.
AmmermanNancy T.2020. “Rethinking Religion: Toward a Practice Approach.” American Journal of Sociology126(1):6–51.
BailChristopher A.2012. “The Fringe Effect Civil Society Organizations and the Evolution of Media Discourse about Islam Since the September 11th Attacks.” American Sociological Review77(6):855–79.
5.
BeckerHoward S.1982. Art Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
BeckerPenny Edgell. 1999. Congregations in Conflict: Cultural Models of Local Religious Life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BenzecryClaudioCollinsRandall. 2014. “The High of Cultural Experience: Toward a Microsociology of Cultural Consumption.” Sociological Theory32(4):307–26.
8.
BenzecryClaudio E.RubioFernando D.. 2018. “The Cultural Life of Objects.” Pp. 322–29 in Routledge Handbook of Cultural Sociology, edited by GrindstaffL.LoM.HallJ. R.. New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
BerezinMabel. 1994. “Cultural Form and Political Meaning: State-Subsidized Theater, Ideology, and the Language of Style in Fascist Italy.” American Journal of Sociology99(5):1237–86.
10.
BoutylineAndreiVaiseyStephen. 2017. “Belief Network Analysis: A Relational Approach to Understanding the Structure of Attitudes.” American Journal of Sociology122(5):1371–447.
11.
BreigerRonald L.1974. “The Duality of Persons and Groups.” Social Forces53(2):181–90.
12.
BreigerRonald L.MohrJohn W.. 2004. “Institutional Logics from the Aggregation of Organizational Networks: Operational Procedures for the Analysis of Counted Data.” Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory10(1):17–43.
13.
CeruloKaren A.1993. “Symbols and the World System: National Anthems and Flags.” Sociological Forum8(2):243–71.
14.
CeruloKaren A.1995. Identity Designs: The Sights and Sounds of a Nation. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
15.
CeruloKaren A.2018. “Scents and Sensibility: Olfaction, Sense-Making, and Meaning Attribution.” American Sociological Review83(2):361–89.
16.
ChavesMark2004. Congregations in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
ChildressClayton C.FriedkinNoah. 2012. “Cultural Reception and Production: The Social Construction of Meaning in Book Clubs.” American Sociological Review77(1):45–68.
18.
CollinsonPatrick. [1986] 1997. “From Iconoclasm to Iconophobia: The Cultural Impact of the Second English Reformation.” Pp. 278–300 in The Impact of the English Reformation, 1500-1640, edited by MarshallP.. London: Hodder Education Publishers.
19.
CsardiGaborNepuszTamas. 2006. “The Igraph Software Package for Complex Network Research.” InterJournal, Complex Systems1695(5):1–9.
20.
DacinM. TinaDacinPeter A.. 2008. “Traditions as Institutionalized Practice: Implications for Deinstitutionalization.” Pp. 327–51 in The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by GreenwoodR.OliverC.SuddabyR.SahlinK.. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
21.
de la FuenteEduardo. 2008. “The Art of Social Forms and the Social Forms of Art: the Sociology-Aesthetics Nexus in Georg Simmel's Thought.” Sociological Theory26(4):344–62.
22.
DellaPostaDaniel. 2020. “Pluralistic Collapse: The ‘Oil Spill’ Model of Mass Opinion Polarization.” American Sociological Review85(3):507–36.
23.
DeNoraTia. 2005. “Music and Social Experience.” Pp. 147–59 in The Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Culture, edited by JacobsM. D.HanrahanN. W.. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
24.
DiMaggioPaul. 1987. “Classification in Art.” American Sociological Review52(4):440–55.
25.
DiMaggioPaul. 1998. “The Relevance of Organization Theory to the Study of Religion.” Pp. 7–23 in Sacred Companies: Organizational Aspects of Religion and Religious Aspects of Organizations, edited by DemerathN. J.IIIHallP. D.SchmittT.WilliamsR. H.. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
26.
DiMaggioPaul. 2011. “Cultural Networks.” Pp. 286–310 in The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis, edited by ScottJ.CarringtonP. J.. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
27.
DouglasMary. 1996. Thought Styles. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
28.
DouglasMary. [1966] 2002. Purity and Danger. New York, NY: Routledge.
29.
DromiShai M.2016. “Soldiers of the Cross: Calvinism, Humanitarianism, and the Genesis of Social Fields.” Sociological Theory34(3):196–219.
30.
DuffyEamon. 2005. The Stripping of the Altars: Traditional Religion in England, 1400-1580. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
31.
DurkheimÉmile. [1912] 1995. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Translated by FieldsK.. New York, NY: The Free Press.
32.
DuvalJulien. 2016. “Multiple Correspondence Analysis.” Pp. 255–71 in The SAGE Handbook of Cultural Sociology, edited by InglisD.AlmilaA.. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
33.
EireCarlos M.1989. War against the Idols: The Reformation of Worship from Erasmus to Calvin. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
34.
EliasophNinaLichtermanPaul. 2003. “Culture in Interaction.” American Journal of Sociology108(4):735–94.
35.
FinkeRoger. 2004. “Innovative Returns to Tradition: Using Core Teachings as the Foundation for Innovative Accommodation.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion43(1):19–34.
36.
FriedlandRoger. 2013. “God, Love and Other Good Reasons for Practice: Thinking through Institutional Logics.” Pp. 25–50 in Institutional Logics in Action: Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Part A, edited by LounsburyM.BoxenbaumE.. Somerville, MA: Emerald Publishing.
37.
FriedlandRogerAlfordRobert. 1991. “Bringing Society Back in: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions.” Pp. 232–63 in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by PowellW. W.DiMaggioP.. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
38.
FriedlandRogerArjalièsDiane-Laure. 2020. “Putting Things in Place: Institutional Objects and Institutional Logics.” Pp. 232–63 in Research in the Sociology of Organizations, edited by LounsburyM.SmetsM.. Somerville, MA: Emerald Insight.
39.
FriedlandRogerMohrJohn W.RooseHenkGardinaliPaolo. 2014. “The Institutional Logics of Love: Measuring Intimate Life.” Theory and Society43(3–4):333–70.
40.
FruchtermanThomas M. J.ReingoldEdward M.. 1991. “Graph Drawing by Force-Directed Placement.” Software: Practice and Experience21(11):1129–64.
41.
GallagherSally K.2005. “Building Traditions: Comparing Space, Ritual, and Community in Three Congregations.” Review of Religious Research47(1):70–85.
42.
GhazianiAminBaldassarriDelia. 2011. “Cultural Anchors and the Organization of Differences: a Multi-method Analysis of LGBT Marches on Washington.” American Sociological Review76(2):179–206.
43.
GlynnMary A.AbzugRikki. 2002. “Institutionalizing Identity: Symbolic Isomorphism and Organizational Names.” Academy of Management Journal45(1):267–80.
44.
GorskiPhilip S.2003. The Disciplinary Revolution: Calvinism and the Rise of the State in Early Modern Europe. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
45.
GreeleyAndrew. 1989. “Protestant and Catholic: Is the Analogical Imagination Extinct?”American Sociological Review54(4):485–502.
46.
GreeleyAndrew. 2000. The Catholic Imagination. Berkeley: University of California Press.
47.
GreenacreMichael. 2006. “From Simple to Multiple Correspondence Analysis.” Pp. 41–76 in Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Related Methods, edited by GreenacreM.BlasiusJ.. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
48.
GreenacreMichaelBlasiusJorg. 2006. Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Related Methods. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
49.
GriswoldWendy. 1986. Renaissance Revivals: City Comedy and Revenge Tragedy in the London Theater, 1576-1980. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
50.
GriswoldWendy. 1987a. “The Fabrication of Meaning: Literary Interpretation in the United States, Great Britain, and the West Indies.” American Journal of Sociology92(5):1077–117.
51.
GriswoldWendy. 1987b. “A Methodological Framework for the Sociology of Culture.” Sociological Methodology17:1–35.
52.
GriswoldWendyMangioneGemmaMcDonnellTerrence E.. 2013. “Objects, Words, and Bodies in Space: Bringing Materiality into Cultural Analysis.” Qualitative Sociology36(4):343–64.
53.
HebidgeDick. [1979] 2004. The Meaning of Style. New York, NY: Routledge.
54.
JohnsonVictoria. 2007. “What Is Organizational Imprinting? Cultural Entrepreneurship in the Founding of the Paris Opera.” American Journal of Sociology113(1):97–127.
55.
JonesCandaceBoxenbaumEvaAnthonyCallen. 2013. “The Immateriality of Material Practices in Institutional Logics.” Pp. 51–75 in Institutional Logics in Action, Part A edited by LounsburyM.BoxenbaumE.. Somerville, MA: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
56.
JonesCandaceMassaFelipe G.. 2013. “From Novel Practice to Consecrated Exemplar: Unity Temple as a Case of Institutional Evangelizing.” Organization Studies34(8):1099–136.
57.
JonesCandaceMeyerRenate E.JancsaryDennisHöllererMarkus. 2017. “The Material and Visual Basis of Institutions.” Pp. 651–78 in The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by GreenwoodR.OliverC.LawrenceT. B.MeyerR. E.. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
58.
KildeJeanne H.2008. Sacred Power, Sacred Space. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
59.
KoniecznyMary Ellen. 2009. “Sacred Places, Domestic Spaces: Material Culture, Church, and Home at Our Lady of the Assumption and St. Brigitta.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion48(3):419–42.
60.
LamontMichèleMolnárVirág. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology28:167–95.
61.
LatourBruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
62.
Le RouxBrigitteRouanetHenry. 2004. Geometric Data Analysis: From Correspondence Analysis to Structured Data Analysis. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
63.
Le RouxBrigitteRouanetHenry. 2010. Multiple Correspondence Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.
64.
LeschzinerVanina J.2015. At the Chef's Table: Culinary Creativity in Elite Restaurants. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
65.
LizardoOmar. 2016. “Cultural Symbols and Cultural Power.” Qualitative Sociology39(2):199–204.
66.
McDonnellTerrence. E.2010. “Cultural Objects as Objects: Materiality, Urban Space, and the Interpretation of AIDS Campaigns in Accra, Ghana.” American Journal of Sociology115(6):1800–52.
67.
MeyerJohn W.RowanBrian. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology83(2):340–63.
68.
MeyerRenate E.HöllererMarkus A.JancsaryDennisLeeuwenTheo van. 2013. “The Visual Dimension in Organizing, Organization, and Organization Research: Core Ideas, Current Developments, and Promising Avenues.” The Academy of Management Annals7(1):489–555.
69.
MohrJohn. 1998. “Measuring Meaning Structures.” Annual Review of Sociology24:345–70.
70.
MohrJohn W.BailChristopher A.FryeMargaretLenaJennifer C.LizardoOmarMcDonnellTerence E.MischeAnnTavoryIddoWherryFrederick F.. 2020. Measuring Culture. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
71.
MohrJohn W.Vincent DuquenneV.1997. “The Duality of Culture and Practice: Poverty Relief in New York City, 1888-1917.” Theory and Society26(2/3):305–56.
72.
MohrJohn W.FriedlandRoger. 2008. “Theorizing the Institution: Foundations, Duality, and Data.” Theory and Society37(5):421–25.
73.
MohrJohn W.RawlingsCraig. 2012. “Four Ways to Measure Culture: Social Science, Hermeneutics, and the Cultural Turn.” Pp. 70–113 in Oxford Handbook of Cultural Sociology, edited by AlexanderJ. C.JacobsR. N.SmithP.. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
74.
MohrJohn W.RawlingsCraig. 2015. “Formal Methods of Cultural Analysis.” Pp. 357–67 in International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, edited by WrightJ. D.. Amsterdam: Elevesier Inc.
75.
MohrJohn W.WhiteHarrison C.. 2008. “How to Model an Institution.” Theory and Society37(5):485–512.
76.
MolotchHarvey. 2004. Where Stuff Comes from: How Toasters, Toilets, Cars, Computers and Many Other Things Come To Be as They Are. New York, NY: Routledge.
77.
MolotchHarveyFreudenburgWilliamPaulsenKrista E.. 2000. “History Repeats Itself, but How? City Character, Urban Tradition, and the Accomplishment of Place.” American Sociological Review65(6):791–823.
78.
MorganDavid. 2005. The Sacred Gaze: Religious Visual Culture in Theory and Practice. Berkeley: University of California Press.
79.
PachuckiMark A.BreigerRonald L.. 2010. “Cultural Holes: Beyond Relationality in Social Networks and Culture.” Annual Review of Sociology36(1):205–24.
80.
PachuckiMark A.PendergrassSabrinaLamontMichele. 2007. “Boundary Processes: Recent Theoretical Developments and New Contributions.” Poetics35(6):331–51.
81.
PattersonOrlando. 2014. “Making Sense of Culture.” Annual Review of Sociology40:1–30.
82.
Pew Forum. 2014. Religious Landscape Study. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
83.
RawlingsCraig M.ChildressClayton. 2019. “Emergent Meanings: Reconciling Dispositional and Situational Accounts of Meaning-Making from Cultural Objects.” American Journal of Sociology124(6):1763–809.
84.
RindovaViolina P.PetkovaAntoaneta P.. 2007. “When Is a New Thing a Good Thing? Technological Change, Product Form Design, and Perceptions of Value for Product Innovations.” Organization Science18(2):217–32.
85.
RooseHenk. 2016. “Getting beyond the Surface: Using Geometric Data Analysis in Cultural Sociology.” Pp. 174–90 in Routledge International Handbook of the Sociology of Art and Culture, edited by HanquinetL.SavageM.. New York, NY: Routledge.
86.
SchwadelPhilipDoughertyKevin D.. 2010. “Assessing Key Informant Methodology in Congregational Research.” Review of Religious Research51(4):366–79.
87.
SchwartzBarry. 1981. Vertical Classification: A Study in Structuralism and the Sociology of Knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
88.
SewellWilliam H.1999. “The Concept(s) of Culture.” Pp. 35–61 in Beyond the Cultural Turn: New Directions in the Study of Society and Culture, edited by BonnellV. E.HuntL.. Berkeley: University of California Press.
89.
SheltonJason E.2018. “Is RELTRAD Still the Gold Standard?”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion57(4):817–26.
90.
SteenslandBrianParkJerry Z.RegnerusMark D.RobinsonLynn D.WilcoxBradford W.WoodberryRobert D.. 2000. “The Measure of American Religion: Toward Improving the State of the Art.” Social Forces79(1):291–318.
91.
SteinbergMarc W.1999. “The Talk and Back Talk of Collective Action: A Dialogic Analysis of Repertoires of Discourse among Nineteenth-century English Cotton Spinners.” American Journal of Sociology105(3):736–80.
92.
SwidlerAnn. 1986. “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.” American Sociological Review51(2):273–86.
93.
SwidlerAnn. 2001. Talk of Love: How Culture Matters. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
94.
TaylorMarshall A.StoltzDustin, S.McDonnellTerrence E.. 2019. “Binding Significance to Form: Cultural Objects, Neural Binding, and Cultural Change.” Poetics73(4):1–16.
95.
ThorntonPatricia H.OcasioWilliamLounsburyMichael. 2012. The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
96.
TurnerVictorTurnerEdith. 1978. Image and Pilgrimage in Christian Culture: Anthropological Perspectives. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
97.
van der LaanEliseKuipersGiselinde. 2016. “How Aesthetic Logics Shape a Cultural Field: Differentiation and Consolidation in the Transnational Field of Fashion Images, 1982–2011.” Poetics56:64–84.
98.
Wagner-PacificiRobinSchwartzBarry. 1991. “The Vietnam Veterans Memorial: Commemorating a Difficult Past.” American Journal of Sociology97(2):376–420.
99.
WatkissLeeGlynnMary Ann. 2016. “Materiality and Identity: How Organizational Products, Artifacts, and Practices Instantiate Organizational Identity.” Pp. 317–44 in The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Identity, edited by PrattM. G.SchultzM.AshforthB. E.RavasiD.. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
100.
WeberKlausDacinM. Tina. 2011. “The Cultural Construction of Organizational Life: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Organization Science22(2):287–98.
101.
WeberMax. [1930] 2001. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York, NY: Routledge Classics.
102.
WellmanJames K.2008. Evangelical vs. Liberal: The Clash of Christian Cultures in the Pacific Northwest. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
103.
WinchesterDaniel. 2016. “A Hunger for God: Embodied Metaphor as Cultural Cognition in Action.” Social Forces95(2):585–606.
104.
WinchesterDaniel. 2017. “‘A Part of Who I Am’: Material Objects as ‘Plot Devices’ in the Formation of Religious Selves.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion56(1):83–103.
105.
WohlHannah. 2015. “Community Sense: The Cohesive Power of Aesthetic Judgment.” Sociological Theory33(4):299–326.
106.
WoodberryRobert D.ParkJerry Z.KellstedtLyman A.RegnerusMark D.SteenslandBrian. 2012. “The Measure of American Religious Traditions: Theoretical and Measurement Considerations.” Social Forces91(1):65–73.
107.
WuthnowRobert. 1988. The Restructuring of American Religion: Society and Faith Since World War II. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
108.
ZubrzyckiGeneviève. 2013. “Aesthetic Revolt and the Remaking of National Identity in Québec, 1960–1969.” Theory and Society42(5):423–75.
109.
ZubrzyckiGeneviève. 2017a. “Matter and Meaning: A Cultural Sociology of Nationalism.” Pp. 1–17 in National Matters: Materiality, Culture, and Nationalism, edited by ZubrzyckiG.. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
110.
ZubrzyckiGeneviève. 2017b. National Matters: Materiality, Culture, and Nationalism. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
