This article builds the argument that Bourdieu’s dispositional theory of practice can help integrate the sociological tradition with three prominent strands of behavioral economics: bounded rationality, prospect theory, and time inconsistency. I make the case that the habitus provides an alternative framework to show how social and mental structure constitute one another, where cognitive tendencies toward irrationality can be either curtailed or amplified based on one’s position in the economic field and a person’s corresponding set of dispositions, ranging from more rational doxic dispositions to irrational allodoxic tendencies. Bridging economic sociology and behavioral economics, this work also bears on issues of persistent financial inequality reproduced through self-defeating patterns of economic behavior inculcated into individuals who occupy dominated positions in the social structure. Bourdieu’s thought, and in particular his conception of field+habitus, can usefully be applied to the empirical findings of behavioral economics to understand deviations from rational action as not only cognitive but also socially structured.
AinslieGeorge. 1991. “Derivation of ‘Rational’ Economic Behavior from Hyperbolic Discount Curves.” American Economic Review81(2):334–40.
2.
AkerlofRobert. 2017. “Value Formation: The Role of Esteem.” Games and Economic Behavior102:1–19.
3.
AkerlofGeorgeKrantonRachel E.2000. “Economics and Identity.” Quarterly Journal of Economics115(3):715–53.
4.
BeckertJens. 2016. Imagined Futures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
BeckertJensLutterMark. 2013. “Why the Poor Play the Lottery: Sociological Approaches to Explaining Class-Based Lottery Play.” Sociology47(6):1152–70.
6.
BenabouRolandTiroleJean. 2006. “Belief in a Just World and Redistributive Politics.” Quarterly Journal of Economics121(2):699–746.
7.
BenabouRolandTiroleJean. 2011. “Identity, Morals, and Taboos: Beliefs as Assets.” Quarterly Journal of Economics126(2):805–55.
8.
BergNathanGigerenzerGerd. 2010. “As-if Behavioral Economics: Neoclassical Economics in Disguise?” History of Economic Ideas18(1):133–65.
9.
BergeronHenriCastelPatrickDubuisson-QuellierSophie. 2018. Le Biais Comportementaliste. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
10.
BernheimB. DouglasRayDebrajYeltekinŞevin. 2015. “Poverty and Self Control.” Econometrica83(5):1877–1911.
11.
BisinAlbertoVerdierThierry. 2000. “Beyond the melting pot”: cultural transmission, marriage, and the evolution of ethnic and religious traits.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics115(3):955–988.
12.
BourdieuPierre. 1964. “The Attitude of the Algerian Peasant toward Time.” Pp. 55–72 in Mediterranean Countrymen: Essays in the Social Anthropology of the Mediterranean, edited by Pitt-RiversJ. A.Abū ZaidA. M.Westport, CT: Greenwood.
13.
BourdieuPierre. 1969. “Intellectual Field and Creative Project.” Information8(2):89–119.
14.
BourdieuPierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Vol. 16. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
BourdieuPierre.1979. Algeria 1960: The Kabyle House or the World Reversed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
BourdieuPierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
BourdieuPierre. 1988. Homo Academicus. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
18.
BourdieuPierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
19.
BourdieuPierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
BourdieuPierre. 1998. Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
21.
BourdieuPierre. 2000a. “Making the Economic Habitus: Algerian Workers Revisited.” Ethnography1(1):17–41.
22.
BourdieuPierre. 2000b. Pascalian Meditations. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
23.
BourdieuPierre. 2005. The Social Structures of the Economy. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
24.
BourdieuPierreWacquantLoïc J.1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
CamererColinLoewensteinGeorgePrelecDrazen. 2005. “Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience Can Inform Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature43(1):9–64.
26.
CarvalhoJean-Paul. 2012. Veiling. Quarterly Journal of Economics128(1):337–70.
27.
ChristoforouAsiminaLainéMichael. 2014. Re-thinking Economics: Exploring the Work of Pierre Bourdieu. Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Routledge.
28.
ColletFrancois. 2009. “Does Habitus Matter? A Comparative Review of Bourdieu’s Habitus and Simon’s Bounded Rationality with Some Implications for Economic Sociology.” Sociological Theory27(4):419–34.
29.
CrossleyNick. 2001. The Social Body: Habit, Identity and Desire. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
DecetyJeanJacksonPhilip L.SommervilleJessica A.ChaminadeThierryMeltzoffAndrew N.2004. “The Neural Bases of Cooperation and Competition: An fMRI Investigation.” NeuroImage23(2):744–51.
31.
DeerCécile. 2014. “Doxa.” Pp. 119–30 in Pierre Bourdieu: Key Concepts, edited by GrenfellM. J.Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Routledge.
32.
DellaVignaStefano. 2009. “Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field.” Journal of Economic Literature47(2):315–72.
33.
De MartinoBenedettoCamererColin F.AdolphsRalph. 2010. “Amygdala Damage Eliminates Monetary Loss Aversion.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences107(8):3788–92.
34.
DietzThomasSternPaul C.1995. “Toward a Theory of Choice: Socially Embedded Preference Construction.” Journal of Socio-economics24(2):261–79.
35.
DiMaggioPaul. 1979. “On Pierre Bourdieu.” American Journal of Sociology84(6):1460–74.
36.
DiMaggioPaulLouchHugh. 1998. “Socially Embedded Consumer Transactions: For What Kinds of Purchases Do People Most Often Use Networks?” American Sociological Review63(5):619–37.
37.
DuncanSimon. 2011. “Personal Life, Pragmatism and Bricolage.” Sociological Research Online16(4):1–13.
GächterSimonJohnsonEric J.HerrmannAndreas. 2007. “Individual-Level Loss Aversion in Riskless and Risky Choices.” Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) Discussion Paper 2961.
GranovetterMark. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology91(3):481–510.
46.
HaighMichael S.ListJohn A.2005. “Do Professional Traders Exhibit Myopic Loss Aversion? An Experimental Analysis.” Journal of Finance60(1):523–34.
47.
HayesAdam. 2019. “The Social Meaning of Financial Wealth: Relational Accounting in the Context of 401(k) Retirement Accounts.” Finance and Society5(1):61–83.
48.
HenrichJosephHeineSteven J.NorenzayanAra. 2010. “Most People Are Not WEIRD.” Nature466(7302):29.
49.
HeukelomFloris. 2014. Behavioral Economics: A History. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50.
HjorthKatrineFosgerauMogens. 2011. “Loss Aversion and Individual Characteristics.” Environmental and Resource Economics49(4):573–96.
51.
HoffKarlaPandeyPriyanka. 2006. “Discrimination, Social Identity, and Durable Inequalities.” American Economic Review96(2):206–11.
52.
HoffKarlaStiglitzJoseph E.2016. “Striving for Balance in Economics: Towards a Theory of the Social Determination of Behavior.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization126:25–57.
53.
HosseiniHamid. 2003. “The Arrival of Behavioral Economics: From Michigan, or the Carnegie School in the 1950s and the early 1960s?” Journal of Socio-Economics32(4):391–409.
54.
InghamGeoffrey. 1996. “Money Is a Social Relation.” Review of Social Economy54(4):507–29.
55.
JonesDan. 2010. “A WEIRD View of Human Nature Skews Psychologists’ Studies.” Science328(5986):1627.
56.
KahnemanDaniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Macmillan.
57.
KahnemanDanielTverskyAmos. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica47(2):263–92.
58.
KnetschJack L.1989. “The Endowment Effect and Evidence of Nonreversible Indifference Curves.” American Economic Review79(5):1277–84.
59.
KrippnerGreta R.2002. “The Elusive Market: Embeddedness and the Paradigm of Economic Sociology.” Theory and Society30(6):775–810.
60.
LaibsonDavid. 1997. “Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting.” Quarterly Journal of Economics112(2):443–78.
61.
LamontMichèleAdlerLauraParkBo YunXiangXin. 2017. “Bridging Cultural Sociology and Cognitive Psychology in Three Contemporary Research Programmes.” Nature Human Behaviour1(12):866–72.
62.
LebaronFrédéric. 2003. “Pierre Bourdieu: Economic Models Against Economism.” Theory and Society32(5–6):551–65.
63.
LizardoOmar. 2004. “The Cognitive Origins of Bourdieu’s Habitus.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour34(4):375–401.
64.
LockePeter R.MannSteven C.2005. “Professional Trader Discipline and Trade Disposition.” Journal of Financial Economics76(2):401–44.
65.
LoewensteinGeorgePrelecDrazen. 1992. “Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice: Evidence and an Interpretation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics107(2):573–97.
66.
ManskiCharles F.1993. “Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem.” Review of Economic Studies60(3):531–42.
67.
MullainathanSendhilThalerRichard. 2001. “Behavioral Economics.” Pp. 1094–1100 in International Encyclopedia of Social Sciences, vol. 11, edited by SmelserN. J.BaltesP. B.Amsterdam: Elsevier.
68.
ÖzbilginMustafaTatliAhu. 2005. “Book Review Essay: Understanding Bourdieu’s Contribution to Organization and Management Studies.” Academy of Management Review30(4):855–77.
69.
PioreMichael. 2010. “From Bounded Rationality to Behavioural Economics.” In Discussion Forum II: Behavioural Economics. Socio-Economic Review8(2):383–87.
70.
RickScott. 2011. “Losses, Gains, and Brains: Neuroeconomics Can Help to Answer Open Questions about Loss Aversion.” Journal of Consumer Psychology21(4):453–63.
71.
RillingJames K.GutmanDavid A.ZehThorsten R.PagnoniGiuseppeBernsGregory S.KiltsClinton D.2002. “A Neural Basis for Social Cooperation.” Neuron35(2):395–405.
72.
ShefrinHersh M.ThalerRichard. 1978. “An Economic Theory of Self.” Center for Economic Analysis of Human Behavior and Social Institutions Working Paper 208.
73.
SimonHerbert. A.1947. Administrative Behavior. New York: Macmillan.
74.
SimonHerbert. A.1955. “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice.” Quarterly Journal of Economics69(1):99–118.
75.
StreeckWolfgang. 2010. “Does ‘Behavioural Economics’ Offer an Alternative to the Neoclassical Paradigm?” In Discussion Forum II: Behavioural Economics. Socio-Economic Review8(2):387–97.
76.
SunsteinCass R.2002. “What’s Available—Social Influences and Behavioral Economics.” Northwestern University Law Review97:1295–1314.
77.
SwedbergRichard. 2009. Principles of Economic Sociology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
78.
SwedbergRichard. 2011. “The Economic Sociologies of Pierre Bourdieu.” Cultural Sociology5(1):67–82.
79.
ThalerRichard H.1981. “Some Empirical Evidence on Dynamic Inconsistency.” Economics Letters8(3):201–7.
80.
ThalerRichard H.1985. “Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice.” Marketing Science4(3):199–214.
81.
ThalerRichard H.GanserL. J.2015. Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioral Economics. New York: Norton.
82.
ThalerRichard H.ShefrinHersh M.1981. “An Economic Theory of Self-Control.” Journal of Political Economy89(2):392–406.
83.
TomerJohn F.2007. “What Is Behavioral Economics?” Journal of Socio-Economics36(3):463–79.
84.
UzziBrian. 1997. “Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness.” Administrative Science Quarterly42(1):35–67.
85.
Von GaudeckerHans-MartinVan SoestArthurWengstromErik. 2011. “Heterogeneity in Risky Choice Behavior in a Broad Population.” American Economic Review101(2):664–94.
86.
WacquantLoïc. 2005. “Habitus.” Pp. 317–21 in International Encyclopedia of Economic Sociology, edited by BeckertJ.ZafirovskiM.London: Routledge.
87.
WaltherMatthias. 2014. Repatriation to France and Germany: A Comparative Study Based on Bourdieu’s Theory of Practice. New York: Springer.
88.
WangMeiRiegerMarc OliverHensThorsten. 2017. “The Impact of Culture on Loss Aversion.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making30(2):270–81.
89.
WeberMax. [1922] 1978. Economy and society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Vol. 1. Berkeley: University of California Press.
90.
WherryFrederick F.2016. “Relational Accounting: A Cultural Approach.” American Journal of Cultural Sociology4(2):131–56.
91.
ZelizerViviana A.2012. “How I Became a Relational Economic Sociologist and What Does That Mean?” Politics & Society40(2):145–74.
