For years, sociologists who study society and the environment have focused on resolving the debate regarding the relationship between economic development and environmental degradation. Studies from a family of critical perspectives tend to find that economic development is antithetical to environmental protection, whereas a suite of more optimistic perspectives has uncovered more hopeful findings. We attempt to resolve these differences by situating this debate within the larger framework of the anthro-shift. The anthro-shift explains how the society-environment relationship changes over time. The theory assumes this relationship is the product of interrelations among the state, market, and civil society sectors. We focus on two distinctive qualities of the anthro-shift: the role risk plays as a pivot for reorienting how society interacts with the natural environment and the multidirectionality of the theory, highlighting how it combines elements of many of the dominant critical and optimistic perspectives into a broader framework.
AduaLazarusYorkRichardSchuelke-LeechB. A.. 2016. “The Human Dimensions of Climate Change: A Micro-Level Assessment of Views from the Ecological Modernization, Political Economy and Human Ecology Perspectives.” Social Science Research56:26–43.
2.
AngeloHillary. 2017. “From the City Lens toward Urbanisation as a Way of Seeing: Country/City Binaries on an Urbanising Planet.” Urban Studies54(1):158–78.
3.
BeckUlrich. 1994. “The Reinvention of Politics.” Pp. 1–55 in Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Stanford University Press.
4.
BeckUlrich. 1995. Ecological Politics in an Age of Risk. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
5.
BeckUlrich. 1997. “Subpolitics: Ecology and the Disintegration of Institutional Power.” Organization & Environment10(1):52–65.
6.
BeckUlrich. 1999. World Risk Society. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
7.
BeckUlrich. 2009. World at Risk. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
8.
BeckUlrich. 2013. “Why ‘Class’ Is Too Soft a Category to Capture the Explosiveness of Social Inequality at the Beginning of the Twenty-First Century.” The British Journal of Sociology64(1):63–74.
9.
BeckUlrich. 2014. “Foreword: Risk Society as Political Category.” Pp. xiii–xxiv in The Risk Society Revisited, edited by E. ARosaRennO.McCrightA. M.. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
10.
BeckUlrichBonssWolfgangLauChristoph. 2003. “The Theory of Reflexive Modernization.” Theory, Culture & Society20(2):1–33.
11.
BeckUlrichGiddensAnthonyLashScott. 1994. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
BlockFredSomersMargaret R.. 2014. The Power of Market Fundamentalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
BoliJohnThomasGeorge, eds. 1999. Constructing World Culture: International Non-Governmental Organizations Since 1875. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14.
BondsEricDowneyLiam. 2012. “Green Technology and Ecologically Unequal Exchange: The Environmental and Social Consequences of Ecological Modernization in the World-System.” Journal of World-Systems Research18(2):167–86.
15.
BoströmMagnusLidskogRolfUgglaYlva. 2017. “A Reflexive Look at Reflexivity in Environmental Sociology.” Environmental Sociology3(1):6–16.
16.
BrennerNeilMaddenDavid J.WachsmuthDavid. 2011. “Assemblage Urbanism and the Challenges of Critical Urban Theory.” City15(2):225–40.
17.
BulkeleyHarriet. 2005. “Reconfiguring Environmental Governance: Towards a Politics of Scales and Networks.” Political Geography24(8):875–902.
18.
BunkerStephen G.1990. Underdeveloping the Amazon: Extraction, Unequal Exchange, and the Failure of the Modern State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
BurnsThomasDavisByronKickEdward. 1997. “Position in the World-System and National Emissions of Greenhouse Gases.” Journal of World-Systems Research3(3):432–66.
20.
ButtelFrederick H.2000a. “Classical Theory and Contemporary Environmental Sociology.” Pp. 17–40 in Environment and Global Modernity, edited by SpaargarenGMolA. P. J.ButtelF. H.. London: Sage Studies in International Sociology.
21.
ButtelFredrick H.2000b. “World Society, the Nation-State, and Environmental Protection.” American Sociological Review65(1):117–21.
22.
CableSherryShriverThomas E.MixTamara L.. 2008. “Risk Society and Contested Illness: The Case of Nuclear Weapons Workers.” American Sociological Review73(3):380–401.
23.
CalhounCraig, ed. 1992. Habermas in the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24.
CattonWilliam R.1982. Overshoot: The Ecological Basis of Revolutionary Change. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
25.
Chase-DunnChristopher. 1998. Global Formation: Structures of the World Economy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
26.
ChristoffPeter. 2010. “Ecological Modernisation, Ecological Modernities.” Pp. 101–22 in The Ecological Modernization Reader, edited by MolA. P. JSonnenfeldD. A.SpaargarenG.. New York: Routledge.
27.
ClarkBrettFosterJohn Bellamy. 2001. “William Stanley Jevons and the Coal Question: An Introduction to Jevons’s ‘Of the Economy of Fuel.’” Organization & Environment14(1):93–98.
28.
ClarkBrettFosterJohn Bellamy. 2009. “Ecological Imperialism and the Global Metabolic Rift.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology50(3–4):311–34.
29.
ClarkBrettJorgensonAndrew K.AuerbachDaniel. 2012. “Up in Smoke: The Human Ecology and Political Economy of Coal Consumption.” Organization & Environment25(4):452–69.
30.
ClarkBrettYorkRichard. 2005. “Carbon Metabolism: Global Capitalism, Climate Change, and the Biospheric Rift.” Theory and Society34(4):391–428.
31.
ClausenRebeccaClarkBrett. 2005. “The Metabolic Rift and Marine Ecology: An Analysis of the Ocean Crisis within Capitalist Production.” Organization & Environment18(4):422–44.
32.
ClemensElisabethGuthrieDoug, eds. 2011. Politics and Partnerships: The Role of Voluntary Associations in America’s Political Past and Present. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
CohenJean L.AratoAndrew. 1994. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.
CohenMaurie J.2004. “George W. Bush and the Environmental Protection Agency: A Midterm Appraisal.” Society & Natural Resources17(1):69–88.
35.
CohnSamuel. 2016. “The State and Development.” Pp. 393–413 in The Sociology of Development Handbook, edited by HooksGAlmeidaP.BrownD.CohnS.CurranS.EmighR.HungH.JorgensonA.LachmannR.LobaoL.MoghadamV.. Oakland: University of California Press.
DeweyJohn. 1927. The Public and Its Problems. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
40.
DietzThomas. 2015. “Prolegomenon to a Structural Human Ecology of Human Well-Being.” Sociology of Development1(1):123–48.
41.
DietzThomasJorgensonAndrew K., eds. 2013. Structural Human Ecology: New Essays in Risk, Energy, and Sustainability. Pullman: Washington State University Press.
42.
DietzThomasRosaEugene A.. 1997. “Effects of Population and Affluence on CO2 Emissions.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA94(1):175–79.
43.
DietzThomasRosaEugene A.YorkRichard. 2007. “Driving the Human Ecological Footprint.” Frontiers in Ecology and The Environment5(1):13–18.
44.
DietzThomasRosaEugene A.YorkRichard. 2012. “Environmentally Efficient Well-Being: Is there a Kuznets Curve?” Applied Geography32(1):21–28.
45.
DillonLindseySellersChristopherUnderhillVivianShapiroNicholasOhayonJennifer LissSullivanMarianneBrownPhilHarrisonJillWylieSara. 2018. “The Environmental Protection Agency in the Early Trump Administration: Prelude to Regulatory Capture.” American Journal of Public Health108(S2):S89–94.
46.
DunlapRiley E.CattonWilliam R.. 1994. “Struggling with Human Exemptionalism: The Rise, Decline and Revitalization of Environmental Sociology.” The American Sociologist25(1):5–30.
47.
DunlapRiley E.Van LiereKent D.. 1978. “The ‘New Environmental Paradigm.’” The Journal of Environmental Education9(4):10–19.
48.
DunlapRiley E.Van LiereKent D.. 1984. “Commitment to the Dominant Social Paradigm and Concern for Environmental Quality.” Social Science Quarterly65(4):1013–28.
EkbergMerryn. 2007. “The Parameters of the Risk Society: A Review and Exploration.” Current Sociology55(3):343–66.
52.
EliasophNina. 2009. “Top-Down Civic Projects Are Not Grassroots Associations: How the Differences Matter in Everyday Life.” Voluntas20(3):291–308.
53.
ElliottJames R.FrickelScott. 2013. “The Historical Nature of Cities: A Study of Urbanization and Hazardous Waste Accumulation.” American Sociological Review78(4):521–43.
54.
ElliottJames R.FrickelScott. 2015. “Urbanization as Socioenvironmental Succession: The Case of Hazardous Industrial Site Accumulation.” American Journal of Sociology120(6):1736–77.
55.
EmirbayerMustafaShellerMimi. 1999. “Publics in History.” Theory and Society28(1):143–97.
56.
EvansPeter. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States & Industrial Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57.
EvansPeter B.RueschemeyerDietrichSkocpolTheda eds. 1985. Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge Cambridgeshire; New York: Cambridge University Press.
58.
FineGary Alan. 1998. Morel Tales: The Culture of Mushrooming. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
59.
FisherDana R.2002. “From Treadmill of Production to Ecological Modernization? Applying a Habermasian Framework to Understanding Environment-Society Relationships.” Research in Social Problems and Public Policy10:53–64.
60.
FisherDana R. 2004. National Governance and the Global Climate Change Regime. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
61.
FisherDana R.FreudenburgWilliam R.. 2001. “Ecological Modernization and Its Critics: Assessing the Past and Looking toward the Future.” Society and Natural Resources14(8):701–709.
62.
FisherDana R.FreudenburgWilliam R.. 2004. “Post Industrialization and Environmental Quality: An Empirical Analysis of the Environmental State.” Social Forces83(1):157–88.
63.
FisherDana R.FritschOliverAndersenMikael S.. 2009. “Transformations in Environmental Governance and Participation” Pp. 141–55 in Ecological Modernisation Reader, edited by MolA. P. JSpaargarenG.SonnenfeldD.. London: Routledge Press.
64.
FisherDana R.Galli RobertsonAnya M.WaggleJoseph McCartneyDeweyAmanda M.DubinAnn H.YagatichWilliam. 2018. “Polarizing Climate Politics in America.” Pp. 1–23 in Environment, Politics, and Society (Research in Political Sociology). Vol. 25, edited by RAlaganAladuwakaS.. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.
65.
FisherDana R.SvendsenErika S.. 2013. “Hybrid Arrangements within the Environmental State.” Pp. 179–89 in Routledge International Handbook of Social and Environmental Change, edited by SLockieSonnenfeldD. A.FisherD. R.. London: Routledge Press.
66.
FosterJohn Bellamy. 1992. “The Absolute General Law of Environmental Degradation under Capitalism.” Capitalism Nature Socialism3(3):77–81.
67.
FosterJohn Bellamy. 1999. “Marx’s Theory of Metabolic Rift.” American Journal of Sociology105(2):366–405.
68.
FosterJohn BellamyClarkBrett. 2012. “The Planetary Emergency.” Monthly Review64(7):1–25.
69.
FosterJohn BellamyClarkBrettYorkRichard. 2010. The Ecological Rift. New York: Monthly Review Press.
70.
FrankDavid JohnHironakaAnnSchoferEvan. 2000. “The Nation-State and the Natural Environment over the Twentieth Century.” American Sociological Review65(1):96–116.
71.
FreudenburgWilliam R.2005. “Privileged Access, Privileged Accounts: Toward a Socially Structured Theory of Resources and Discourses.” Social Forces84(1):89–114.
72.
FukuyamaFrancis. 2014. Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy. New York: Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux.
73.
FukuyamaFrancis. 2016. “Governance: What Do We Know, and How Do We Know It?” Annual Review of Political Science19:89–105.
74.
GalliAnya M.FisherDana R.. 2016. “Hybrid Arrangements as a Form of Ecological Modernization: The Case of the US Energy Efficiency Conservation Block Grants.” Sustainability8(88):1–19.
75.
GareauBrian. 2017. “Sociology in Global Environmental Governance? Neoliberalism, Protectionism, and the Methyl Bromide Controversy in the Montreal Protocol.” Environments4(4):173.
76.
GareauBrianLucierCristina. 2018. “Neoliberal Restructuring of the World Polity: The Weakening of the Montreal Protocol and Basel Convention in Historical Perspective.” Environmental Sociology4(3):325–42.
77.
GiddensAnthony. 1998. The Third Way. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
78.
GivensJennifer. 2016. “Urbanization, Slums, and the Carbon Intensity of Well-Being: Implications for Sustainable Development.” Human Ecology Review22(1):107–28.
79.
GivensJenniferClarkBrettJorgensonAndrew K.. 2016. “Strengthening the Ties between Environmental Sociology and the Sociology of Development.” Pp. 69–94 in The Sociology of Development Handbook, edited by HooksGAlmeidaP.BrownD.CohnS.CurranS.EmighR.HungH.JorgensonA.LachmannR.LobaoL.MoghadamV.. Oakland: University of California Press.
80.
GivensJenniferJorgensonAndrew K.. 2013. “Individual Environmental Concern in the World Polity.” Social Science Research42(2):418–31.
81.
GoldmanM.2001. “Constructing an Environmental State: Eco-Governmentality and Other Transnational Practices of a ‘Green’ World Bank.” Social Problems48(4):499–523.
82.
GothamKevin FoxGreenbergMiriam. 2014. Crisis Cities: Disaster and Redevelopment in New York and New Orleans. New York: Oxford University Press.
83.
GouldKenneth A.LewisTammy L.RobertsJ. Timmons. 2004. “Blue-Green Coalitions: Constraints and Possibilities in the Post 9-11 Political Environment.” Journal of World-Systems Research10(1):91–116.
84.
GouldKenneth A.PellowDavidSchnaibergAllan. 2004. “Interrogating the Treadmill of Production: Everything You Wanted to Know about the Treadmill but Were Afraid to Ask.” Organization & Environment17(3):296–316.
85.
GouldKenneth A.PellowDavidSchnaibergAllan. 2008. The Treadmill of Production: Injustice and Unsustainability in the Global Economy. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
86.
GramsciAntonio. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. New York: International Publishers.
87.
GrantDonJorgensonAndrew K.LonghoferWesley. 2018. “Pathways to Carbon Pollution: The Interactive Effects of Global, Political, and Organizational Factors on Power Plants’ CO2 Emissions.” Sociological Science5(4):58–92.
88.
GrantDonVasiIon Bogdan. 2017. “Civil Society in an Age of Environmental Accountability: How Local Environmental Nongovernmental Organizations Reduce U.S. Power Plants’ Carbon Dioxide Emissions.” Sociological Forum32(1):94–115.
89.
GruskyDavid B.WesternBruceWimerChristopher. 2011. The Great Recession. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
HabermasJürgen. 1970. Towards a Rational Society. Boston, MA: Beacon.
92.
HabermasJürgen. 1975. The Legitimation Crisis. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
93.
HabermasJürgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
94.
HabermasJürgen. 1992. “Further Reflections on the Public Sphere.” Pp. 421–61 in Habermas in the Public Sphere, edited by CalhounC.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
95.
HabermasJürgen. 1998. Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
96.
HannChrisDunnElizabeth. 1996. Civil Society: Challenging Western Models. London: Routledge.
97.
HarveyDavid. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
98.
HironakaAnn. 2014. Greening the Globe: World Society and Environmental Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
99.
HolzerBorisSørensenMads P.. 2003. “Rethinking Subpolitics: Beyond the Iron Cage of Modern Politics?” Theory, Culture & Society20(2):79–102.
100.
HuangXiaorui. 2018. “Ecologically Unequal Exchange, Recessions, and Climate Change: A Longitudinal Study.” Social Science Research73:1–12.
101.
HuberJoseph. 2010. “Upstreaming Environmental Action.” Pp. 334–55 in The Ecological Modernisation Reader, edited by MolA. P. JSpaargarenG.SonnenfeldD.. London: Routledge.
JevonsWilliam Stanley. 2001. “Of the Economy of Fuel.” Organization & Environment14(1):99–104.
105.
JorgensonAndrew K.2006. “Global Warming and the Neglected Greenhouse Gas: A Cross-National Study of the Social Causes of Methane Emissions Intensity, 1995.” Social Forces84(3):1779–98.
106.
JorgensonAndrew K.2014. “Economic Development and the Carbon Intensity of Human Well-Being.” Nature Climate Change4(3):186–89.
107.
JorgensonAndrew K.ClarkBrett. 2009. “The Economy, Military, and Ecologically Unequal Relationships in Comparative Perspective: A Panel Study of the Ecological Footprints of Nations, 1975–2000.” Social Problems56(4):621–46.
108.
JorgensonAndrew K.ClarkBrett. 2011. “Societies Consuming Nature: A Panel Study of the Ecological Footprints of Nations, 1960–2003.” Social Science Research40(1):226–44.
109.
JorgensonAndrew K.ClarkBrett. 2012. “Are the Economy and the Environment Decoupling? A Comparative International Study, 1960–2005.” American Journal of Sociology118(1):1–44.
110.
JorgensonAndrew K.DickChristopherMahutgaMatthew. 2007. “Foreign Investment Dependence and the Environment: An Ecostructural Approach.” Social Problems54(3):371–94.
111.
JorgensonAndrew K.FiskeShirleyHubacekKlausLiJiaMcGovernTomRickTorbenSchorJuliet B.SoleckiWilliamYorkRichardZychermanAriela. 2019. “Social Science Perspectives on Drivers of and Responses to Global Climate Change.” WIREs Climate Change10:e554.
112.
KleinNaomi. 2007. The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. Toronto, ON: Random House of Canada.
113.
KnightKyleSchorJuliet B.. 2014. “Economic Growth and Climate Change: A Cross-National Analysis of Territorial and Consumption-Based Carbon Emissions in High-Income Countries.” Sustainability6(6):3722–31.
114.
KoontzTomas M.SteelmanToddi A.CarminJoAnnKorfmacherKatrina SmithMoseleyCassandraThomasCraig W.. 2004. Collaborative Environmental Management: What Roles for Government?Washington, DC: RFF Press.
115.
LatourBruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
116.
LichtermanPaulEliasophNina. 2014. “Civic Action.” American Journal of Sociology. 120(3):798–863.
117.
LonghoferWesleyJorgensonAndrew K.. 2017. “Decoupling Reconsidered: Does World Society Integration Influence the Relationship between the Environment and Economic Development?” Social Science Research65:17–29.
118.
LonghoferWesleySchoferEvan. 2010. “National and Global Origins of Environmental Association.” American Sociological Review71(4):505–33.
119.
LongoStefanoClarkBrett. 2016. “An Ocean of Troubles: Advancing Marine Sociology.” Social Problems63(4):463–79.
120.
Marquart-PyattSandraJorgensonAndrew K.HamiltonLawrence. 2015. “Methodological Approaches for Sociological Research on Climate Change.” Pp. 369–411 in Climate Change and Society: Sociological Perspectives, edited by RDunlapBrulleR.. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
121.
McAdamDougTarrowSidneyTillyCharles.2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
122.
McCarthyThomas. 1978. The Social Theory of Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
123.
MarxKarl. [1867] 1976. Capital. Vol.1. New York: Vintage.
124.
MeyerJohn W.FrankDavid JohnHironakaAnnSchoferEvanTumaNancy Brandon. 1997. “The Structuring of the World Environmental Regime, 1870–1990.” International Organization51(4):623–51.
125.
MolArthur P J.2000. “The Environmental Movement in an Era of Ecological Modernisation.” Geoforum31(1):45–56.
126.
MolArthur. 2001. Globalization and Environmental Reform. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
127.
Mol, ArthurP. J.ButtelFredrick H.. 2002. “The Environmental State under Pressure: An Introduction.” Pp. 1–11 in The Environmental State Under Pressure. Vol. 10, Research in Social Problems and Public Policy, edited by ArthurP. J. M.FrederickH. B.. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
128.
MolArthurJänickeMartin. 2010. “The Origins and Theoretical Foundations of Ecological Modernisation Theory.” Pp. 17–27 in The Ecological Modernization Reader, edited by A. P. JMolSonnenfeldD.SpaargarenG.. New York: Routledge.
129.
MolArthurSpaargarenGertSonnenfeldDavid. 2009. “Ecological Modernisation: Three Decades of Policy, Practice and Theoretical Reflection.” Pp. 3–14 in The Ecological Modernisation Reader, edited by MolA. P. JSpaargarenG.SonnenfeldD.. London: Routledge.
130.
MolArthurSpaargarenGertSonnenfeldDavid. 2014. “Ecological Modernization Theory: Taking Stock, Moving forward.” Pp. 15–30 in The Routledge International Handbook of Social and Environmental Change, edited by SLockieSonnenfeldD.FisherD. R.. Routledge Press.
131.
MutzDiana C.2018. “Status Threat, Not Economic Hardship, Explains the 2016 Presidential Vote.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115(19):E4330–39.
132.
O’ConnorJames. 1991. “On the Two Contradictions of Capitalism.” Capitalism Nature Socialism2(3):107–9.
133.
ObachBrian. 2015. Organic Struggle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
134.
PellowDavid. 2007. Resisting Global Toxics: Transnational Movements for Environmental Justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
135.
PellowDavidBrehmHollie. 2013. “An Environmental Sociology for the Twenty-First Century.” Annual Review of Sociology39:229–50.
136.
PinchTrevor J.BijkerWiebe E.. 1984. “The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other.” Social Studies of Science14(3):399–441.
137.
PolanyiKarl. 2001. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
138.
RosaEugene A.DietzThomas. 2012. “Human Drivers of National Greenhouse-Gas Emissions.” Nature Climate Change2:581–86.
139.
RosaEugene A.RennOrtwinMcCrightAaron M.. 2014. The Risk Society Revisited. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
140.
RosaEugene A.YorkRichardDietzThomas. 2004. “Tracking the Anthropogenic Drivers of Ecological Impacts.” Ambio33(8):509–12.
141.
RudelThomas K.RobertsJ. TimmonsCarminJoAnn. 2011. “Political Economy of the Environment.” Annual Review of Sociology37:221–38.
142.
SchnaibergAllan. 1980. The Environment: From Surplus to Scarcity. New York: Oxford University Press.
143.
SchnaibergAllanGouldKenneth. 1994. Environment and Society: The Enduring Conflict. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
144.
SchoferEvanHironakaAnn. 2005. “The Effects of World Society on Environmental Protection Outcomes.” Social Forces84(1):25–47.
145.
SchoferEvanLonghoferWesley. 2011. “The Structural Sources of Association.” American Journal of Sociology117(2):539–85.
146.
SchorJuliet B.JorgensonAndrew K.. 2019. “Is It Too Late for Growth?” Review of Radical Political Economics51(2):320–29.
147.
ShandraJohn. 2007a. “International Nongovernmental Organizations and Deforestation: Good, Bad, or Irrelevant?” Social Science Quarterly88(3):665–89.
148.
ShandraJohn. 2007b. “The World Polity and Deforestation: A Quantitative, Cross-National Analysis.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology48(1):5–27.
149.
ShandraJohnLeckbandChristopherMcKinneyLaura A.LondonBruce. 2009. “Ecologically Unequal Exchange, World Polity, and Biodiversity Loss: A Cross-National Analysis of Threatened Mammals.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology50(3–4):285–310.
150.
ShandraJohnLondonBruceWooleyOwenWilliamsonJohn. 2004. “International Nongovernmental Organizations and Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the Developing World: A Quantitative, Cross-National Analysis.” Sociological Inquiry74(4):520–44.
151.
ShoretteKristen. 2012. “Outcomes of Global Environmentalism: Longitudinal and Cross-National Trends in Chemical Fertilizer and Pesticide Use.” Social Forces91(1):299–325.
152.
ShoretteKristenHendersonKentSommerJamieLonghoferWesley. 2017. “World Society and the Natural Environment.” Sociology Compass11(10):e12511.
153.
ShwomRachael. 2009. “Strengthening Sociological Perspectives on Organizations and the Environment.” Organization & Environment22(3):271–92.
154.
ShwomRachael. 2011. “A Middle Range Theorization of Energy Politics: The Struggle for Energy Efficient Appliances.” Environmental Politics20(5):705–26.
155.
SlovicPaulFinucaneMelissa L.PetersEllenMacGregorDonald G.. 2004. “Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality.” Risk Analysis24(2):311–22.
156.
SonnenfeldDavid. 2002. “Social Movements and Ecological Modernization: The Transformation of Pulp and Paper Manufacturing.” Development and Change33(1):1–27.
157.
SpaargarenGertMolArthur P. J.. 1992. “Sociology, Environment, and Modernity: Ecological Modernization as a Theory of Social Change.” Society & Natural Resources5(4):323–44.
158.
SpaargarenGertMolArthur P. J.ButtelFrederick H.. 2006. Governing Environmental Flows: Global Challenges to Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
159.
StallingsRobert A.1990. “Media Discourse and the Social Construction of Risk.” Social Problems37(1):80–95.
160.
ThombsRyan. 2018. “The Transnational Tilt of the Treadmill and the Role of Trade Openness on Carbon Emissions: A Comparative International Study, 1965–2010.” Sociological Forum33(2):422–42.
161.
TillyCharles. 2007. Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
162.
TsingAnna Lowenhaupt. 2015. The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
163.
WachsmuthDavid. 2012. “Three Ecologies: Urban Metabolism and the Society-Nature Opposition.” The Sociological Quarterly53(4):506–23.
164.
WhiteDamianRudyAlanGareauBrian. 2016. Environments, Natures, and Social Theory. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.
165.
WrightRachel A.BoudetHilary Schaffer. 2012. “To Act or Not to Act: Context, Capability, and Community Response to Environmental Risk.” American Journal of Sociology118(3):728–77.
166.
WuthnowRobert. 1991. Between States and Markets: The Voluntary Sector in Comparative Perspective. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
YorkRichard. 2008. “De-Carbonization in Former Soviet Republics, 1992–2000: The Ecological Consequences of De-Modernization.” Social Problems55(3):370–90.
169.
YorkRichardMcGeeJulius. 2016. “Understanding the Jevons Paradox.” Environmental Sociology2(1):77–87.
170.
YorkRichardRosaEugene. 2012. “Choking on Modernity: A Human Ecology of Air Pollution.” Social Problems59(2):282–300.
171.
YorkRichardRosaEugene A.DietzThomas. 2003a. “Footprints on the Earth: The Environmental Consequences of Modernity.” American Sociological Review68(2):279–300.
172.
YorkRichardRosaEugene A.DietzThomas. 2003b. “A Rift in Modernity? Assessing the Anthropogenic Sources of Global Climate Change with the STIRPAT Model.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy23(10):31–51.
173.
ZinnJens Oliver. 2016. “Living in the Anthropocene: Towards a Risk-Taking Society.” Environmental Sociology2(4):385–94.
