This article argues that empirical social scientists can be freed from having to account for “micro-to-macro transitions.” The article shows, in opposition to the (still) dominant perspective based on Coleman’s macro-micro-macro model, that no micro-macro transitions or mechanisms connect the individual level to the macro level in empirical social science. Rather, when considering that social macro entities and properties are micro manifest rather than macro manifest, it becomes clear that the micro-macro move in empirical social science is purely conceptual or analytical.
AbellPeterFelinTeppoFossNicolai. 2010. “Causal and Constitutive Relations, and the Squaring of Coleman’s Diagram: Reply to Vromen.” Erkenntnis73(3):385–91.
2.
ArcherMargaret S.2003. Structure, Agency, and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BeachDerekBrun PedersenRasmus. 2013. Process-tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
4.
BechtelWilliamCallebautWernerGriesemerJames R.SchankJeffrey C.2006. “Bill Wimsatt on Multiple Ways of Getting at the Complexity of Nature.” Biological Theory1(2):213–19.
5.
BhaskarRoy. 1978. A Realist Theory of Science. Hassocks, England: Harvester.
6.
BhaskarRoy. 2000. The Possibility of Naturalism. Routledge, London, 3rd edition
7.
BouvierAlban. 2011. “Individualism, Collective Agency and the Micro-macro Relation.” Pp. 199–216 in The Sage Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences, edited by JarvieI. C.Zamora-BonillaJ.London: Sage.
8.
BradyHenry E.2008. “Causation and Explanation in Social Science.” Pp. 217–67 in The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, edited by Box-SteffensmeierJ.BradyH. E.CollierD.Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
9.
BungeMario. 1996. Finding Philosophy in Social Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10.
CheckelJeffrey T.2006. “Tracing Causal Mechanisms.” International Studies Review8(2):362–70.
11.
ColemanJames. 1987. “Microfoundations and Macrosocial Behavior.” Pp. 153–73 in The Micro-macro Link, edited by AlexanderJ. C.GiesenB.MunchR.SmelserN. J.Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
ColemanJames S.1986. “Social Theory, Social Research, and a Theory of Action.” American Journal of Sociology91(6):1309–35.
13.
ColemanJames S.1994. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
DaviesJames C.1962. “Toward a Theory of Revolution.” American Sociological Review27(1):5–19.
16.
DemeulenaerePierre. 2011. “Introduction.” Pp. 1–30 in Analytical Sociology and Social Mechanisms, edited by DemeulenaereP.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
17.
DownsA.1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
18.
Elder-VassDave. 2010. The Causal Power of Social Structures: Emergence, Structure and Agency. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
19.
ElsterJon. 1983. Explaining Technical Change: A Case Study in the Philosophy of Science. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
FelinTeppoFossNicolai. 2006. “Individuals and Organizations: Thoughts on a Micro-foundations Project for Strategic Management and Organizational Analysis.” Pp. 253–88 in Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, edited by KetchenD. J.BerghD. D.Bingley, England: Emerald Group.
22.
GeorgeAlexander L.BennettAndrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.
GerringJohn. 2010. “Causal Mechanisms: Yes, But …” Comparative Political Studies43(11):1499–1526.
24.
GlennanStuart S.1996. “Mechanisms and the Nature of Causation.” Erkenntnis44(1):49–71.
25.
GoodwinJeff. 2001. No Other Way Out: States and Revolutionary Movements, 1945–1991. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
26.
HardinGarrett. 1968. “The Tragedy of the Commons.” Science162(3859):1243–48.
27.
HayekFriedrich A.1955. The Counter-revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
28.
HedströmPeter. 2005. Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
29.
HedströmPeter. 2008. “Studying Mechanisms to Strengthen Causal Inferences in Quantitative Research.” Pp. 319–36 in The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, edited by BoxJ. M.BradyH. E.CollierD.Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
30.
HedströmPeterBearmanPeter. 2009. “What Is Analytical Sociology All About? An Introductory Essay.” Pp. 3–25 in The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, edited by HedströmP.BearmanP.Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
31.
HedströmPeterSwedbergRichard. 1998. “Social Mechanisms: An Introductory Essay.” Pp. 1–31 in Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, edited by HedströmP.SwedbergR.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
32.
HedströmPeterYlikoskiPetri. 2010. “Causal Mechanisms in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology36:49–67.
33.
HedströmPeterYlikoskiPetri. 2011. “Analytical Sociology.” Pp. 386–98 in The Sage Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences, edited by JarvieI. C.Zamora BonillaJ. P.Los Angeles: Sage.
34.
HudikMarek. 2011. “Why Economics Is Not a Science of Behavior.” Journal of Economic Methodology18(2):147–62.
35.
JeppersonRonaldMeyerJohn W.2011. “Multiple Levels of Analysis and the Limitations of Methodological Individualisms.” Sociological Theory29(1):54–73.
36.
KimJaegwon. 1999. “Making Sense of Emergence.” Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition95(1):3–36.
37.
KincaidHarold. 1986. “Reduction, Explanation, and Individualism.” Philosophy of Science53(4):492–513.
38.
KincaidHarold. 1996. Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences: Analyzing Controversies in Social Research. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
39.
León-MedinaFrancisco J.2017. “Analytical Sociology and Its ‘Syntax’ for Explanation.” Social Science Information56(4):502–25.
40.
ListChristianSpiekermannKai. 2013. “Methodological Individualism and Holism in Political Science: A Reconciliation.” American Political Science Review107(4):629–43.
41.
LittleDaniel. 2012. “Explanatory Autonomy and Coleman’s Boat.” Theoria27(2):137–51.
42.
MachamerPeterDardenLindleyCraverCarl F.2000. “Thinking about Mechanisms.” Philosophy of Science67(1):1–25.
ManzoG.2007. “The Progress and ‘Urgency’ of Modeling in Sociology. The Concept of ‘Generative Model’ and Its Implementation.” L’Année sociologique57(1):13–61.
45.
MayntzRenate. 2004. “Mechanisms in the Analysis of Social Macro-phenomena.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences34(2):237–59.
46.
MitrovicBranko. 2017. “Is Multiple Realizability a Valid Argument against Methodological Individualism?” Philosophy of the Social Sciences47(1):28–43.
47.
OlsonM.1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
48.
OppK. D.2011. “Modeling Micro-macro Relationships: Problems and Solutions.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology35(1/3):209–34.
49.
PutnamRobert D.2000. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
50.
RamströmGustav. 2014. “Actor-theoretical Storytelling in Political Science—A Critique.” Presented at the Higher Research Seminar, Department of Political Science, Stockholm University, February 3, Stockholm, Sweden.
51.
RamströmGustav. 2018. “The Analytical Micro-macro Relationship in Social Science and Its Implications for the Individualism-holism Debate.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences48(5):474–500.
52.
SawyerR. Keith. 2001. “Emergence in Sociology: Contemporary Philosophy of Mind and Some Implications for Sociological Theory.” American Journal of Sociology107(3):551–85.
53.
SawyerR. Keith. 2002. “Nonreductive Individualism.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences32(4):537–59.
54.
SawyerR. Keith. 2003. “Nonreductive Individualism Part II—Social Causation.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences33(2):203–24.
55.
SawyerR. Keith. 2005. Social Emergence: Societies as Complex Systems. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
56.
SayerAndrew. 2000. Realism and Social Science. London: Sage.
57.
SchellingT. C.1978. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: W. W. Norton.
58.
StinchcombeArthur L.2005. The Logic of Social Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59.
UdehnLars. 2001. Methodological Individualism: Background, History and Meaning. New York: Routledge.
60.
VromenJack. 2010. “MICRO-foundations in Strategic Management: Squaring Coleman’s Diagram.” Erkenntnis73(3):365–83.
61.
WahlbergTobias H.2014. “Elder-Vass on the Causal Power of Social Structures.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences44(6):774–91.
62.
WatkinsJ. W. N.1953. “Ideal Types and Historical Explanation.” Pp. 723–43 in Readings in the Philosophy of Science, edited by FeiglH.BrodbeckM.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
63.
WimsattWilliam C.2000. “Emergence as Non-aggregativity and the Biases of Reductionisms.” Foundations of Science5(3):269–97.
64.
YlikoskiPetri. 2012. “Micro, Macro and Mechanisms.” Pp. 21–45 in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Social Science, edited by KincaidH.Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
65.
YlikoskiPetri. 2014. “Rethinking Micro-macro Relations.” Pp. 117–35 in Rethinking the Individualism-holism Debate: Essays in the Philosophy of Social Science, edited by ZahleJ.CollinF.Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
66.
ZahleJulie. 2003. “The Individualism-holism Debate on Intertheoretic Reduction and the Argument from Multiple Realization.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences33(1):77–99.
67.
ZahleJulie. 2007. “Holism and Supervenience.” Pp. 311–41 in Philosophy of Anthropology and Sociology, edited by TurnerS. P.RisjordM. W.Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland.
68.
ZahleJulieCollinFinn. 2014. “Introduction.” Pp. 1–14 in Rethinking the Individualism-holism Debate: Essays in the Philosophy of Social Science, edited by ZahleJ.CollinF.Cham, Switzerland: Springer.